This study’s main objective is to assess the relative importance of fiscal and monetary policies on the Asia-Pacific Economies. We have empirically investigated both the original St. Louis equation and its expanded version to study the comparative relevance of one over the other. Our empirical results indicate that both monetary and fiscal policies are essential in promoting economic growth. In both models, monetary policy is more effective than fiscal policy. In the expanded St. Louis model, exports, exchange rate and inflation variables substantially impact gross domestic product than the conventional monetary and fiscal measures.
AhmedE., & JohannesJ. M. (1984). St. Louis equation restrictions and criticisms revisited: Note. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 16(4), 514–520.
2.
AndersenL. C., & JordanJ. L. (1968). Monetary and fiscal actions: A test of their relative importance in economic stabilization. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 50, 11–24.
3.
ArestisP., & SawyerM. (2004). On the effectiveness of monetary policy and fiscal policy. Review of Social Economy, 62(4), 441–463.
4.
Asia Development Bank. (2020). Asia Development Bank statistical database. Data and statistics.
5.
Azam KhanM., & KhanS. (2018). Inflation and economic growth: Evidence from five Asian countries. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, 28(2), 235–252.
6.
BattenD., & HaferR. (1983, January). The relative impact of monetary and fiscal actions on economic activity: A cross-country comparison. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 65, 5–12.
7.
BattenD. S., & ThorntonD. L. (1986, October). The monetary- fiscal policy debate and the Andersen-Jordan equation. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 9–17. https://files.stlouisfed.org/files/htdocs/publications/review/86/10/Monetary_Oct1986.pdf
8.
BlinderA. S., & SolowR. M. (1974). Economics of public finance. The Brookings Institution.
BrooksD. H. (1998). Challenges for Asia’s trade and environment (Economic Staff Paper No. 57). Economics and Development Resource Center.
11.
ChoiI. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272.
12.
ChowdhuryA. R. (1986a). Monetary and fiscal impacts on economic activities in Bangladesh: A ‘Note’. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 14(1), 101–106.
13.
ChowdhuryA. R. (1986b). Monetary policy, fiscal policy, and aggregate economic activity in Korea. Asian Economies, 58, 47–57.
14.
EvansO., & KelikumeI. (2018). The effects of foreign direct investment, trade, aid, remittances and tourism on welfare under terrorism and militancy. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 7(3), 206–232.
15.
FatimaA., & IqbalA. (2003). The relative effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policies: An econometric study. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 41(1/2), 93–116.
16.
HaD. T.-T., & HoangN. T. (2020). Exchange rate regime and economic growth in Asia: Convergence or divergence. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(1), 1–15.
17.
HarrisR. D. F., & TzavalisE. (1999). Inference for unit roots in dynamic panel where the time dimension is fixed. Journal of Econometrics, 90, 1–44.
18.
HurS.-K., JhaS., ParkD., & QuisingP. (2010). Did fiscal stimulus lift developing Asia out of the global crisis? A preliminary empirical investigation. Asian Development Bank.
19.
HussainM. (1992). Causality tests and relative effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policies in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 31(4), 759–769.
20.
KehoY. (2017). The impact of trade openness on economic growth: The case of Cote d’Ivoire. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(1), 1–14.
21.
KhanM. S., & SenhadjiA. S. (2001). Threshold effects in the relationship between inflation and growth (Working Paper 48). IMF.
22.
LevinA., LinC., & ChuC. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.
23.
MallikG., & ChowdhuryA. (2001). Inflation and economic growth: Evidence from four South Asian countries. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 8(1), 123–135.
24.
MatthewsK. G. P., & OrmerodP. A. (1978). St. Louis models of the UK economy. National Institute Economic Review, 84, 65–69.
25.
ModiglianiF., & AndoA. (1976). The impact of fiscal action on aggregate income and the monetarist controversy: Theory and evidence. In SteinJ. W. (Ed.), Monetarism (pp. 17–42). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
26.
MorganP. J. (2013). Monetary policy frameworks in Asia: Experience, lessons, and issues. Asian Development Bank Institute.
27.
MoayediV. (2013). Reassessing the effect of fiscal and monetary policies in Iran: The St. Louis equation revisited. Journal of Economic Development, 38(4), 123–141.
28.
NwaogwugwuI., & EvansO. (2016). A sectoral analysis of fiscal and monetary actions in Nigeria. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(4), 211–230.
29.
RangarajanC. (2020, January). The new monetary policy framework: What it means. In Prof. Sukhamoy Chakravarty Memorial Lecture, delivered at Annual Conference of the Indian Econometric Society. Madurai Kamaraj University.
30.
SchnablG. (2009). Exchange rate volatility and growth in emerging Europe and East Asia. Open Economies Review, 20(4), 565–587.
31.
SenbetD. (2011). The relative impact of fiscal versus monetary actions on output: A vector autoregressive (VAR) approach. Business and Economics Journal, 25, 1–11.
32.
TadesseT., & MelakuT. (2019). Analysis of the relative impact of monetary and fiscal policies on economic growth in Ethiopia, using ARDL approach to co-integration: Which policy Is more potent?Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 8(2), 89.
33.
TangH. C., LiuP., & CheungE. C. (2010). Changing impact of fiscal policy on selected ASEAN countries (Working Papers No. 70 on Regional Economic Integration). Asian Development Bank.
34.
ThanhS. D. (2014). Threshold effects of inflation on growth in the ASEAN-5 countries: A panel smooth transition regression approach. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 20(38), 41–48.
35.
TrejosS., & BarbozaG. A. (2015). Dynamic estimation of the relationship between trade openness and output growth in Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 36, 110–125.
36.
VanegasM. (2018). Tourism, macroeconomics, growth, and the St. Louis equation. Tourism Review International, 22(1), 3–21.
37.
Zarra-NejadM., HosseinpourF., & ArmanS. A. (2014). Trade-growth nexus in developing and developed countries: An application of extreme bounds analysis. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 4(7), 915–929.
