Developing countries have an urge to boost economic development and they provide a supportive platform for production units with less stringent environment norms. Hence substantial numbers of manufacturing units are moving from developed economies to developing economies. Such a shift is leading to an upsurge in foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows in the developing economies. The study is an attempt to find relationship between FDI (inflows) and environmental degradation using a sample size of 14 developing Asian economies over the period of 1971–2019 using panel autoregressive distributed lag specifications. Study adopts Environmental Kuznet Curve (EKC) technique to validate the existence of pollution havens in the region. Two panel regression equations were formed: first equation covers the link between economic growth (income per capita) and environment by incorporating square of GDP per capita as one of the explanatory variable. The second equation examines the relation between investment and environmental degradation by accommodating square of FDI as one of the dependent variable. The long-run results for first equation validated the presence of EKC, supporting the presence of pollution havens in the region. Long-run results for non-linear FDI depicted positive and significant outcome (using pooled mean group) indicating negligence towards environment. The results indicated that developing countries are not working towards inviting investment flows which are more environment friendly.
AbdouliM., & HammamiS. (2015). The impact of FDI inflows and environmental quality on economic growth: An empirical study for MENA countries. Journal Knowledge of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0323-y.
2.
AbdouliM., & HammamiS. (2017). Economic growth, FDI inflows and their impact on the environment: An empirical study for the MENA countries. Quality & Quantity, 51, 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0298-6
3.
AhmedK., & LongW. (2012). Environmental Kuznets Curve and Pakistan: An empirical analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 1(1), 4–13.
4.
AlamJ. (2014). On the relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions: The Bangladesh experience. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF), 5(6), 36–41.
5.
AmeenR. F. M., & MourshedM. (2017). Urban environmental challenges in developing countries—A stakeholder perspective. Habitat International, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.002
6.
Aminu AliyuM. (2005, June9–11). Foreign direct investment and the environment: Pollution haven hypothesis revisited. Paper prepared for the Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, Germany.
7.
BalaguerJ., & CantavellaM. (2016). Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for Spain by considering fuel oil prices (1874–2011). Ecological Indicators, 60, 853–859.
8.
BeakJ., & KooW. W. (2009). A dynamic approach to FDI-Environment nexus: The case of China and India. Journal of International Economic Studies, 13(2), 1598–2769.
9.
BelloumiM. (2014). The relationship between trade, FDI and economic growth in Tunisia: An application of the autoregressive distributed lag model. Economic Systems, 38(2), 269–287
10.
BlackburneE. F., & FrankM. W. (2007). Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. The Stata Journal, 7(2), 197–208.
11.
BolukG., & MertM. (2015). The renewable energy, growth and Environmental Kuznets Curve in Turkey: An ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52(C), 587–595.
12.
BowonderB. (1985). The Bhopal accident. Environmentalist, 5, 89–103.
13.
CaiX., CheX., ZhuB., ZhaoJ., & XieR. (2018). Will developing countries become pollution havens for developed countries? An empirical investigation in the Belt and Road. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198(5), 624–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.291
14.
ChoiE., HeshmatiA., & ChoY. (2010). An empirical study of the relationships between CO2 emissions, economic growth and openness (IZA Discussion Paper No. 5304). http://ftp.iza.org/dp5304.pdf
15.
DasguptaS., LaplanteB., WangH. & WheelerD. (2002). Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 147–168.
16.
GrossmanG. M., & KruegerA. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NBER Working Papers Series No. 3914). NBER.
17.
GrossmanG. M., & KruegerA. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353–377.
18.
GunartoT. (2020). Effect of economic growth and Foreign direct investment on carbon emission in the Asian States. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10, 563–569. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/10218
19.
GuptaV., & YadavU. (2014). Understanding CO2 emissions in India: EKC and beyond. Presented at Fifth World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists.
20.
HailemariamA., DzhumashevR., & ShahbazM. (2019). Carbon emissions, income inequality and economic development. Empirical Economics, 59, 1139–1159.
21.
HillR. J., & MagnaniE. (2002). An exploration of the conceptual and empirical basis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Australian Economic Papers, 41(2), 239–254.
22.
HitamM., & BorhanH. (2012). FDI, growth and the environment: Impact on quality of life in Malaysia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.038
23.
ImK. S., PesaranM. H., & ShinY. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.
24.
JayanthakumaranK., VermaR., & LiuY. (2012). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: A comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42, 450–460.
25.
KahouliB., OmriA., & ChaibiA. (2014). Environmental regulations, trade, and foreign direct investment: Evidence from Gravity Equations (IPAG Working Paper No. 2014-189). Department of Research, IPAG Business School.
26.
KhanM. A., KhanM. Z., ZamanK., & ArifM. (2014). Global estimates of energy-growth nexus: Application of seemingly unrelated regressions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 29, 63–71.
27.
KhederS. B. (2010). French FDI and pollution emissions: An empirical investigation. University of Paris. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=5BB5F009EC31E8C646843C41B6A6BC7F?doi=10.1.1.193.8893&rep=rep1&type=pdf
28.
KuznetsS. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. TheAmerican Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
29.
LiT., WangY., & ZhaoD. (2016). Environmental Kuznets curve in China: New evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy, 91, 138–147.
30.
LiangF. H. (2006). Does foreign direct investment harm the host country’s environment? Evidence from China. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1479864
31.
LinhD. H., & LinS. M. (2012). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI in Vietnam. Managing Global Transitions, 12(3), 219–232.
32.
MaddalaG. S., & WuS. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–652.
33.
NeaguO. (2019). The link between economic complexity and carbon emissions in the European Union Countries: A model based on the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) approach. Sustainability, 11(17), 1–27.
34.
NgC. F., ChoongC. K., & LauL. S. (2020). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: Asymmetry analysis and robust estimation under cross-section dependence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 18685–18698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08351-w
35.
NunnenkampP. (2001). Foreign direct investment in developing countries: What policymakers should not do and what economists don’t know (Kiel Discussion Papers 380). Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IFW).
36.
OmriA., NguyenD. K., & RaultC. (2014). Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: Evidence from dynamic simultaneous equation models. Economic Modelling, 42, 382–389.
37.
PanayotouT. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (Working Paper WP238). Technology and Employment Programme, International Labour Office.
38.
PedroniP. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 653–670.
39.
PedroniP. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93–130.
40.
PedroniP. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20, 597–625.
41.
PesaranM. H., & SmithR. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79–113.
42.
PesaranM. H., & ShinY. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In StromS. (ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: The ragnar frisch centennial symposium. Cambridge University Press.
43.
PesaranM. H., ShinY. & SmithR. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634.
44.
RahmanA., Woahid MuradS. M., AhmadF., & WangX. (2020). Evaluating the EKC hypothesis for the BCIM-EC member countries under the belt and road initiative. Sustainability, 12(4), 1–20.
45.
RothmanD. S. (1998). Environmental Kuznets curve: Real progress or passing the buck? A case for consumption-base approaches. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 177–194.
46.
SamargandiN., & FidrmucJ., & GhoshS. (2015). Is the relationship between financial development and economic growth monotonic? Evidence from a sample of middle-income countries. World Development, 68(C), 66–81.
47.
SekerF., ErtugrulH. M., & CetinM. (2015). The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52(C), 347–356
48.
SeldenT. M., & SongD. Q. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emission. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147–162.
49.
ShahbazM., Balsalobre-LorenteD., & SinhaA. (2019). Foreign direct investment–CO2 emissions Nexus in Middle East and North African countries: Importance of biomass energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 603–614, ISSN 0959-6526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.282
50.
ShahbazM., NasreenS., AbbasF., & AnisO. (2015). Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality? New evidence from high, middle and low income countries. Energy Economics, 51, 275–287.
51.
ShahbazM., NasreenS., & AfzaT. (2011). Environmental consequences of economic growth and foreign direct investment: Evidence from panel data analysis. Bulletin of Energy Economics, 2(2), 14–27
52.
SharmaR., KautishP., & UddinG. S. (2020). Do the international economic endeavors affect CO2 emissions in open economies of South Asia? An empirical examination under nonlinearity. Management of Environmental Quality, 31(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-05-2019-0099
53.
StavropoulosS., WallR. & XuY. (2018). Environmental regulations and industrial competitiveness: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 50, 1378–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1363858.
54.
TamazianA., & BhaskaraR. B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137–145.
55.
TiwariA. K., ShahbazM., & HyeQ. M. (2013). The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: Cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18(C), 519–527.
56.
ToA. H., HaD. T., NguyenH. M., & VoD. H. (2019). The impact of foreign direct investment on environment degradation: Evidence from emerging markets in Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091636
57.
TutulmazO. (2015). Environmental Kuznets curve time series application for Turkey: Why controversial results exist for similar models?Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50(C), 73–81.
58.
U. T. S. C., & MitraA. (2020). Development and degradation: The Nexus between GDP, FDI, and pollution in India. Emerging Economy Studies, 6(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394901520907712
59.
UllahS., & AwanM. (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve and income inequality: Pooled mean group estimation for Asian developing countries. Forman Journal of Economic Studies, 15, 157–179. 10.32368/FJES.20191507
60.
UNCTAD. (2014, January). Global investment trends monitor.
61.
WangS. X., FuY. B., & ZhangZ. G. (2015). Population growth and the environmental Kuznets curve. China Economic Review, 36(C), 146–165.
62.
ZakaryaG. Y., MostefaB., & AbbesS. M. (2015). Factors affecting CO2 emissions in the BRIC countries: A panel data analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 114–125.
