Despite the widespread use of financial reporting quality (FRQ) metrics, the literature provides little evidence regarding the prominence and causal relationships among them. The article provides empirical evidence on prioritizing FRQ metrics and examining the causal relationships among them. Through extensive literature review and expert inputs, 12 FRQ metrics were finalized and analysed using the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method. India, a developing country, was selected for empirical study. Empirical results indicate that opinion in auditors’ report is the most prominent metric to examine FRQ, followed by value relevance in the context of fair value accounting. A formal scientific categorization of the metrics into cause and effect groups has also been attempted. The causal relationships among FRQ metrics and their relative prominence would help in interpreting empirical studies, which employ these metrics. The study suggests that the stakeholders can focus on prominent FRQ metrics to examine FRQ of the reporting entity before taking their decisions.
AbdullatifM. (2016). Auditing fair value estimates in developing countries: The case of Jordan. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 9(2), 101–140.
AltuntasS., & DereliT. (2015). A novel approach based on DEMATEL method and patent citation analysis for prioritizing a portfolio of investment projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(3), 1003–1012.
4.
BacudioL. R., BenjaminM. F. D., EusebioR. C. P., HolaysanS. A. K., PromentillaM. A. B., YuK. D. S., & AvisoK. B. (2016). Analyzing barriers to implementing industrial symbiosis networks using DEMATEL. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 7, 57–65.
5.
BallR., KothariS. P., & RobinA. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1–51.
6.
BallR., RobinA., & WuJ. S. (2003). Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1–3), 235–270.
7.
BallR., & ShivakumarL. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83–128.
8.
BallR., RobinA., & SadkaG. (2008). Is financial reporting shaped by equity markets or by debt markets? An international study of timeliness and conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies, 13(2–3), 168–205.
9.
BarkerR., & ImamS. (2008). Analysts’ perceptions of ‘earnings quality. Accounting and Business Research, 38(4), 313–329.
10.
BarthM. E., BeaverW. H., & LandsmanW. R. (2001). The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 77–104.
11.
BarthM. E., LandsmanW. R., & LangM. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498.
12.
BarthM. E., LandsmanW. R., LangM., & WilliamsC. (2012). Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable?Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(1), 68–93.
13.
BasuS. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3–37.
14.
BhattacharyaU., DaoukH., & WelkerM. (2003). The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 641–678.
15.
BurgstahlerD., & DichevI. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 99–126.
16.
CahanS. F., EmanuelD., & SunJ. (2009). The effect of earnings quality and country-level institutions on the value relevance of earnings. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 33(4), 371–391.
17.
CapkunV., CollinsD., & JeanjeanT. (2016). The effect of IAS/IFRS adoption on earnings management (smoothing): A closer look at competing explanations. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(4), 352–394.
18.
CerqueiraA., & PereiraC. (2017). Accruals quality, managers’ incentives and stock market reaction: Evidence from Europe. Applied Economics, 49(16), 1606–1626.
19.
ChenH., TangQ., JiangY., & LinZ. (2010). The role of international financial reporting standards in accounting quality: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 21(3), 220–278.
20.
CormierD., & MagnanM. L. (2016). The advent of IFRS in Canada: Incidence on value relevance. Journal of International Accounting Research, 15(3), 113–130.
21.
DayanandanA., DonkerH., IvanofM., & KarahanG. (2016). IFRS and accounting quality: Legal origin, regional, and disclosure impacts. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 24(3), 296–316.
22.
DebR., & DasJ. (2018). IFRSs convergence and expectation gap: Vindication from practitioners. Metamorphosis, 17(2), 86–99.
23.
DechowP. M., SloanR. G., & SweeneyA. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225.
24.
DechowP. M., & DichevI. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77, 35–59.
25.
DechowP., GeW., & SchrandC. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 344–401.
26.
DegeorgeF., PatelJ., & ZeckhauserR. (1999). Earnings management to exceed thresholds. The Journal of Business, 72(1), 1–33.
27.
DoliyaP., & SinghJ. P. (2016). An interpretive structural modeling approach to analyze the interaction between factors of the fair value measurement audit process. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 13(2), 37–48.
28.
EckerF., FrancisJ., OlssonP., & SchipperK. (2013). Estimation sample selection for discretionary accruals models. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2–3), 190–211.
29.
FerentinouA. C., & AnagnostopoulouS. C. (2016). Accrual-based and real earnings management before and after IFRS adoption: The case of Greece. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 17(1), 2–23.
30.
FrancisJ., & SchipperK. (1999). Have financial statements lost their relevance?Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 319–352.
31.
FrancisJ., LaFondR., OlssonP. M., & SchipperK. (2004). Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 967–1010.
32.
FrancisJ., LaFondR., OlssonP., & SchipperK. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295–327.
33.
GabusA., & FontelaE. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Geneva, Switzerland: Battelle Geneva Research Center.
34.
GaioC. (2010). The relative importance of firm and country characteristics for earnings quality around the world. European Accounting Review, 19(4), 693–738.
35.
GandhiS., ManglaS. K., KumarP., & KumarD. (2015). Evaluating factors in implementation of successful green supply chain management using DEMATEL: A case study. International Strategic Management Review, 3, 96–109.
36.
GarcíaM. D. P. R., AlejandroK. A. C., SáenzA. B. M., & SánchezH. H. G. (2017). Does an IFRS adoption increase value relevance and earnings timeliness in Latin America?Emerging Markets Review, 30, 155–168.
37.
GassenJ., & SellhornT. (2006). Applying IFRS in Germany: Determinants and consequences. Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, 58(4), 1–38. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.906802.
38.
GuptaH., & BaruaM. K. (2018). Modelling cause and effect relationship among enablers of innovation in SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(5), 1597–1622.
39.
HsuC. W., KuoT. C., ChenS. H., & HuA. H. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164–172.
40.
International Accounting Standards Board (2008). Exposure draft on an improved conceptual framework for financial reporting, Chap. 2: Qualitative characteristics and constraints of decision-useful financial reporting information. London, UK: International Accounting Standards Board.
41.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (2008). Auditing accounting estimates, including fair value accounting estimates, and related disclosures (International Standard on Auditing 540). New York, NY: International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.
42.
JeanjeanT., & StolowyH. (2008). Do accounting standards matter? An exploratory analysis of earnings management before and after IFRS adoption. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(6), 480–494.
43.
JonesJ. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228.
44.
KaurJ., SidhuR., AwasthiA., ChauhanS., & GoyalS. (2018). A DEMATEL based approach for investigating barriers in green supply chain management in Canadian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 312–332.
45.
KeungE., & ShihM. S. (2014). Measuring discretionary accruals: Are ROA-matched models better than the original Jones-type models?Review of Accounting Studies, 19(2), 736–768.
46.
KhursidM., & SwainR. K. (2018). Earnings management and IFRS adoption—A study on selected UK and Indian pharmaceuticals companies. International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 8(1), 40–42.
47.
KothariS. P., LeoneA. J., & WasleyC. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197.
48.
KumarA., & DixitG. (2018a). An analysis of barriers affecting the implementation of e-waste management practices in India: A novel ISM-DEMATEL approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 14, 36–52.
49.
KumarA., & DixitG. (2018b). Evaluating critical barriers to implementation of WEEE management using DEMATEL approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 131, 101–121.
50.
KumarasiriJ., & FisherR. (2011). Auditors’ perceptions of fair-value accounting: Developing country evidence. International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), 66–87.
51.
LanS., & ZhongR. Y. (2016). An evaluation model for financial reporting supply chain using DEMATEL-ANP. Procedia CIRP, 56, 516–519.
52.
LangM., RaedyJ. S., & YetmanM. H. (2003). How representative are firms that are cross-listed in the United States? An analysis of accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(2), 363–386.
53.
LangM., RaedyJ. S., & WilsonW. (2006). Earnings management and cross listing: Are reconciled earnings comparable to US earnings?Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1), 255–283.
54.
LeuzC., NandaD., & WysockiP. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527.
55.
LevB. (1983). Some economic determinants of time-series properties of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 31–48.
56.
LiY., HuY., ZhangX., DengY., & MahadevanS. (2014). An evidential DEMATEL method to identify critical success factors in emergency management. Applied Soft Computing, 22, 504–510.
57.
LinR. J. (2013). Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 32–39.
58.
LipeR. (1990). The relationship between stock returns and accounting earnings given alternative information. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 49–71.
59.
LiuJ., & ThomasJ. (2000). Stock returns and accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(1), 71–101.
60.
LiuJ. Y., & LeeM. S. (2014). MCDM Approach for the adoption of IFRS for SMEs: Using Taiwan as an example. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 43(4), 964–976.
61.
LiuG., & SunJ. (2015). Did the mandatory adoption of IFRS affect the earnings quality of Canadian firms?Accounting Perspectives, 14(3), 250–275.
62.
LysT., & SooL. G. (1995). Analysts’ forecast precision as a response to competition. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 10(4), 751–765.
63.
MatsumotoD. A. (2002). Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 483–514.
64.
MiaoR., XuF., ZhangK., & JiangZ. (2014). Development of a multi-scale model for customer perceived value of electric vehicles. International Journal of Production Research, 52(16), 4820–4834.
65.
MyersJ. N., MyersL. A., & SkinnerD. J. (2007). Earnings momentum and earnings management. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22(2), 249–284.
66.
OhlsonJ. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687.
67.
PaananenM., & LinH. (2009). The development of accounting quality of IAS and IFRS over time: The case of Germany. Journal of International Accounting Research, 8(1), 31–55.
68.
Parte-EstebanL., & GarcíaC. F. (2014). The influence of firm characteristics on earnings quality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 42, 50–60.
69.
PenmanS. H., & ZhangX. J. (2002). Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 237–264.
70.
RaghuvanshiJ., AgrawalR., & GhoshP. K. (2017). Analysis of barriers to women entrepreneurship: The DEMATEL approach. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 26(2), 220–238.
71.
RudraT., & BhattacharjeeD. (2012). Does IFRS influence earnings management? Evidence from India. Journal of Management Research, 4(1), 1–13.
SeleemS. N., AttiaE. A., & El-AssalA. (2016). Managing performance improvement initiatives using DEMATEL method with application case study. Production Planning & Control, 27(7–8), 637–649.
75.
SharmaS., JoshiM., & KansalM. (2017). IFRS adoption challenges in developing economies: An Indian perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(4/5), 406–426.
76.
SiekkinenJ. (2016). Value relevance of fair values in different investor protection environments. Accounting Forum, 40, 1–15.
77.
SinghJ. P. & DoliyaP. (2015). On the audit of fair value measurements. Ekonomski Horizonti, 17(1), 61–71.
78.
TruemanB., & TitmanS. (1988). An explanation for accounting income smoothing. Journal of Accounting Research, 26, 127–139.
79.
TsengM. L. (2017). Using social media and qualitative and quantitative information scales to benchmark corporate sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 727–738.
80.
TzengG. H., ChiangC. H., & LiC. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028–1044.
81.
UgrinJ. C., MasonT. W., & EmleyA. (2017). Culture’s consequence: The relationship between income-increasing earnings management and IAS/IFRS adoption across cultures. Advances in Accounting, 37, 140–151.
82.
VardiaD., KalraD., & SoralG. (2016). An impact of IFRS on the value relevance of financial statements: A study of selected Indian listed company. Indian Journal of Accounting, 18(2), 7–17.
83.
WuH. H., ChenH. K., & ShiehJ. I. (2010). Evaluating performance criteria of employment service outreach program personnel by DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 5219–5223.
84.
WuH. H., & TsaiY. N. (2011). A DEMATEL method to evaluate the causal relations among the criteria in auto spare parts industry. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(5), 2334–2342.
85.
ZhangL., SunX., & XueH. (2019). Identifying critical risks in Sponge City PPP projects using DEMATEL method: A case study of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 949–958.
86.
ZhouX., ShiY., DengX., & DengY. (2017). D-DEMATEL: A new method to identify critical success factors in emergency management. Safety Science, 91, 93–104.
