Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this study, the authors investigate the association between auditor-provided nonaudit tax services (NATS) and financial reporting quality for public companies in a post-Sarbanes-Oxley environment. They measure the quality of financial reporting by means of appropriately screened financial statement restatements. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) restricts the scope of auditor-provided tax services and simultaneously bans other major nonaudit services by the auditor. The authors argue that the restriction limits the potential financial reporting quality benefits of NATS, while the ban simultaneously makes those services a relatively more important source of revenue to the auditor, exacerbating the potential for impairment of independence. Consequently, pre-Sarbanes-Oxley results may not hold in a post-Sarbanes-Oxley environment. On examination, they find no significant association between auditor-provided NATS and general financial statement restatements. However, they find a significant negative association between such services and tax-related financial statement restatements. Thus, in a post-Sarbanes-Oxley environment, the benefits of auditor-provided NATS seem to manifest themselves in higher quality tax-related financial statement management assertions.

Keywords

auditor-provided tax services financial statement restatements Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 financial reporting quality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agrawal

Chadha

(2005). Corporate governance and accounting scandals. Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 371-406.

Ainsworth

R. T.

(2004). Sarbanes-Oxley and tax services. Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Journal. Retrieved from http://www.s-ox.com/dsp_getFeaturesDetails.cfm?CID=197

Ashbaugh

Lafond

Mayhew

(2003). Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. Accounting Review, 78, 611-639.

Choi

Kim

Liu

Simunic

(2009). Cross-listing audit fee premiums: Theory and evidence. Accounting Review, 84, 1429-1463.

Chung

Kallapur

(2003). Client importance, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals. Accounting Review, 78, 931-955.

Cook

Huston

Omer

(2008). Earnings management through effective tax rates: The effects of tax planning investment and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, 447-471.

Cripe

McAllister

(2009). Determinants of audit/tax separation decisions. American Journal of Business, 24, 47-56.

DeFond

Jiambalvo

(1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 145-176.

DeZoort

F. T.

Stanley

(2007). Audit firm tenure and financial restatements: An analysis of industry specialization and fee effects. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, 131-159.

10.

Durst

M. C.

Gibson

T. H.

(2003). Audit vs. non-audit tax services under Sarbanes-Oxley. Tax Executive, 55, 474-477.

11.

Elder

Harris

Zhou

(2008). Tax consulting and reported weaknesses in internal control (Working paper). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.

12.

Frankel

Johnson

Nelson

(2002). The relation between auditors’ fees for non-audit services and earnings management. Accounting Review, 77, 71-105.

13.

Frankel

Roychowdhury

(2008). Are all special items equally special? The predictive role of conservatism (Working paper, Washington University). St. Louis. MO: MIT Press.

14.

Gleason

Mills

(2007). Do auditor-provided tax services improve the estimate of tax expense? (McCombs Research Paper Series No. ACC-01–07). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=977973

15.

Government Accountability Office. (2002). Financial statement restatements: Trends, market impacts, regulatory responses and remaining challenges (GAO 03-138). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-03-138

16.

Government Accountability Office. (2006). Financial statement restatements: Update of public company trends, market impacts, and regulatory enforcement activities (GAO-06-678). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-678

17.

Huang

Mishra

Raghunandan

(2007). Types of nonaudit fees and financial reporting quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 26, 133-145.

18.

Khan

Watts

(2009). Estimation and validation of a firm-year measure of conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48, 132-150.

19.

Kinney

W. J.

Jr. Palmrose

Z.-V.

Scholz

(2004). Auditor independence, non-audit services, and restatements: Was the U.S. government right? Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 561-588.

20.

Klein

(2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 375-400.

21.

Krishnan

Visvanathan

(2008, August 3-6). The association between auditor provided tax services and the use of deferred tax expense to avoid reporting losses (Working Paper, American Accounting Association Annual Meeting). Anaheim, CA. Retrieved form http://aaahq.org/AM2008/abstract.cfm?submissionID=834

22.

Larcker

Richardson

(2004). Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 625-658.

23.

Lassila

D. R.

Omer

Shelley

Smith

(2009). Do complexity, independence, and governance influence whether firms retain their auditors for tax services? (Working paper). College Station: Texas A&M University.

24.

Maydew

Shackelford

(2006). The changing role of auditors in corporate tax planning (Working paper). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

25.

Omer

Bedard

Falsetta

(2006). Tax fees paid to auditors: The effects of a changing regulatory environment. Accounting Review, 81, 1095-1117.

26.

Purcell

T. J.

Lifson

(2003). Tax services after Sarbanes-Oxley: How to cope with an uncertain present. Journal of Accountancy, 196, 32-37.

27.

Reynolds

Deis

Francis

(2004). Professional service fees and auditor objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23, 29-52.

28.

Romanus

Maher

Fleming

(2008). Auditor industry specialization, auditor changes, and accounting restatements. Accounting Horizons, 22, 389-413.

29.

Scholz

(2008). The changing nature and consequences of public company financial restatements: 1997-2006 (The U.S. Department of the Treasury). Retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/documents/financialrestatements_1997_2006.pdf

30.

Sweeny

(1994). Debt covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 281-308.

Tax-Related Financial Statement Restatements and Auditor-Provided Tax Services

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References