The primary focus of this study is to examine how shocks and volatility are transmitted across sector indices in the Indian stock market. This study employs a dynamic conditional correlation generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (DCC-GARCH) model, utilizing daily data from five prominent sectoral indices of the National Stock Exchange (NSE) in India, from 1 January 2016 to 31 May 2024. The study shows that sectoral volatility responds very differently across pre-COVID, COVID, post-COVID and geopolitical-crisis periods, with pro-cyclic sectors displaying sharper shock sensitivity during the pandemic and defensive sectors showing stronger stability under geopolitical stress. Consumer durables and financial services consistently provide the strongest hedging benefits during COVID and post-COVID periods, while IT-linked pairs exhibit weak hedging relationships throughout. The geopolitical shock generates volatility but does not compress sector movements as strongly as the pandemic, resulting in shallower and less persistent spillovers. Dynamic hedge ratios and portfolio weights reveal that IT becomes more relevant only in the post-COVID phase, but it does not function as a strong hedge during crisis-driven volatility. Crisis conditions tend to compress diversification opportunities by increasing correlations and connectedness, requiring more careful portfolio rebalancing. These findings offer new insights into how sector-specific behaviours and hedging performance evolve under varying macro-financial conditions, contributing to adaptive risk-management and portfolio-optimization strategies.
AhmadW., HernandezJ. A., SainiS., & MishraR. K. (2021). The US equity sectors, implied volatilities, and COVID-19: What does the spillover analysis reveal?Resources Policy, 72, 102102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102102
2.
AhmadW., MishraA. V., & DalyK. (2018). Heterogeneous dependence and dynamic hedging between sectors of BRIC and global markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 59, 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.07.005
3.
AkhtaruzzamanM., BoubakerS., LuceyB. M., & SensoyA. (2021). Is gold a hedge or a safe-haven asset in the COVID-19 crisis?Economic Modelling, 102, 105588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105588
4.
AlessandriP., & MumtazH. (2019). Financial regimes and uncertainty shocks. Journal of Monetary Economics, 101, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.05.001
5.
AshriD., SahooB. P., GulatiA., & HaqI. U. L. (2021). Repercussions of COVID-19 on the Indian stock market: A sectoral analysis. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1495–1509.
6.
BakerS. R., BloomN., DavisS. J., KostK., SammonM., & ViratyosinT. (2020). The unprecedented stock market reaction to COVID-19. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 10(4), 742–758.
7.
Ben AmeurH., JamaaniF., & Abu AlfoulM. N. (2025). The dynamic connectedness among infectious diseases, geopolitical risks, cryptocurrency, and commodity markets: Evidence from a partial and multiple wavelet analysis. PLoS One, 20(7July), e0324599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324599
8.
BhattacharjeeA., GaurD., & GuptaK. (2024). Russia–Ukraine war and the impact on Indian economy. Journal of Economic Studies, 51(4), 841–858. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-03-2023-0136
9.
BouriE., JainA., BiswalP. C., & RoubaudD. (2017). Cointegration and nonlinear causality amongst gold, oil, and the Indian stock market: Evidence from implied volatility indices. Resources Policy, 52(November2016), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.03.003
10.
ChoiS.-Y. (2023). The dynamic network of industries in US stock market: Evidence of GFC, COVID-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine war. Heliyon, 9(9), e19726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19726
11.
Cifuentes-FauraJ. (2022). Circular economy and sustainability as a basis for economic recovery post-COVID-19. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00065-6
12.
Civcirİ., & AkkoçU. (2021). Dynamic volatility linkages and hedging between commodities and sectoral stock returns in Turkey: Evidence from SVAR-cDCC-GARCH model. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(2), 1978–1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1889
13.
CostaA., MatosP., & da SilvaC. (2022). Sectoral connectedness: New evidence from US stock market during COVID-19 pandemics. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102124
14.
CurtoJ. D., & SerrasqueiroP. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on S&P500 sector indices and FATANG stocks volatility: An expanded APARCH model. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102247
15.
DasR., & DebnathA. (2022). Analysing the COVID-19 pandemic volatility spillover influence on the collaboration of foreign and Indian stock markets. Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, 14(2), 411–452. https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v14.n2.2022.5
16.
DhingraB., SainiM., FakhfekhM., & YadavM. (2024). An empirical investigation of return spillover and volatility dynamics of Indian sectoral indices. Investment Analysts Journal, 53, 462–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2024.2344939
17.
DieboldF. X., & YilmazK. (2023). On the past, present, and future of the Diebold–Yilmaz approach to dynamic network connectedness. Journal of Econometrics, 234, 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.01.021
18.
DongZ., LiY., ZhuangX., & WangJ. (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 on global stock sectors: Evidence from time-varying connectedness and asymmetric nexus analysis. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 62, 101753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101753
19.
El KhouryR., MensiW., AlshaterM. M., & KangS. (2025). Extreme risk spillovers and hedging strategies between Indonesia sectorial stocks and commodity markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 20(1), 428–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-11-2022-1721
20.
HaL. T. (2023). An application of Bayesian vector heterogeneous autoregressions to study network interlinkages of the crude oil and gold, stock, and cryptocurrency markets during the COVID-19 outbreak. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(26), 68609–68624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27069-z
21.
HachichaN., GhorbelA., FekiM. C., TahiS., & DammakF. A. (2022). Hedging Dow Jones Islamic and conventional emerging market indices with CDS, oil, gold and the VSTOXX: A comparison between DCC, ADCC and GO-GARCH models. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.04.002
22.
HammaW., GhorbelA., & JarbouiA. (2021). Hedging Islamic and conventional stock markets with other financial assets: Comparison between competing DCC models on hedging effectiveness. Journal of Asset Management, 22(3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-021-00208-2
23.
JosephB. (2023). Impact of COVID 19 on oil prices, gold prices and Indian stock market. International conference on economics, business and sustainability (265–272). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3366-2_31
24.
KaranasosM., YfantiS., & HunterJ. (2022). Emerging stock market volatility and economic fundamentals: The importance of US uncertainty spillovers, financial and health crises. Annals of Operations Research, 313(2), 1077–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04042-y
25.
KumarR., BhatiaP., & GuptaD. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the Indian stock market—A sectoral analysis. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(3), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(3).2021.28
26.
KushwaahP., & SymssJ. (2024). Asymmetric return connectedness among Indian equity sectors: Insights from recent global disruptions. Global Business Review, 09721509241257111. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509241257111
27.
KyriazisΝ. A. (2021). Investigating the nexus between European major and sectoral stock indices, gold and oil during the COVID-19 pandemic. SN Business & Economics, 1(4), 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00060-x
28.
KyriazisN. A., PapadamouS., & TzeremesP. (2023). Are benchmark stock indices, precious metals or cryptocurrencies efficient hedges against crises?Economic Modelling, 128, 106502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106502
29.
LiuN., & SuY. (2024). Russia-Ukraine war’s effects on the world economy. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 24, 1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.54097/td35qy81
30.
MaharanaN., PanigrahiA. K., & ChaudhuryS. K. (2024). Volatility persistence and spillover effects of Indian market in the global economy: A pre- and post-pandemic analysis using VAR-BEKK-GARCH model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(7), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17070294
31.
MajumderS. B., & NagR. N. (2018). Shock and volatility spillovers among equity sectors of the National Stock Exchange in India. Global Business Review, 19(1), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917713290
32.
MatosP., CostaA., & da SilvaC. (2021). COVID-19, stock market and sectoral contagion in US: A time-frequency analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 57, 101400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101400
33.
MauryaP. K., BansalR., & MishraA. K. (2025). Sectoral connectedness, volatility spillover and hedging opportunities: Evidence from Indian stock market. Eurasian Economic Review, 15(1), 1099–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-025-00324-z
34.
MelkiA., & GhorbelA. (2023). Which commodity sectors effectively hedge emerging Eastern European stock markets? Evidence from MGARCH models. Commodities, 2(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.3390/commodities2030016
35.
MensiW., AlomariM., VoX. V., & KangS. H. (2023). Extreme quantile spillovers and connectedness between oil and Chinese sector markets: A portfolio hedging analysis. Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 28(1), e00327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00327
36.
MensiW., HammoudehS., SensoyA., & YoonS. M. (2017). Analysing dynamic linkages and hedging strategies between Islamic and conventional sector equity indexes. Applied Economics, 49(25), 2456–2479. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1240349
37.
MezghaniT., Ben HamadouF., & Boujelbène AbbesM. (2021). The dynamic network connectedness and hedging strategies across stock markets and commodities: COVID-19 pandemic effect. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 13(4), 520–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-01-2021-0036
38.
MezghaniT., Ben HamadouF., & Boujelbène-AbbesM. (2025). Network connectedness and portfolio hedging of green bonds, stock markets and commodities. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 20(5), 2154–2181. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-02-2023-0160
39.
MezghaniT., RabbaniM. R., TrichilliY., & AbbesB. (2024). Revisiting the dynamic connectedness, spillover and hedging opportunities among cryptocurrency, commodities, and Islamic stock markets. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 10(1), 35–92. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v10i1.1813
40.
MishraA. K., AgrawalS., & PatwaJ. A. (2022). Return and volatility spillover between India and leading Asian and global equity markets: An empirical analysis. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 27(54), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-06-2021-0082
41.
MishraA. K., Anand K.K., & Venkatasai KappagantulaA. (2025). Unveiling asymmetric return spillovers with portfolio implications among Indian stock sectors during COVID-19 pandemic. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 75, 102297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102297
42.
MishraA., Kumar DashA., PandeyS. N., & AgarwalA. (2023). Dynamic spillover among the sectoral indices: Evidence from first and second waves of COVID-19. International Journal of Financial Engineering, 10(03), 2350020. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424786323500202
43.
MishraS., & MishraS. (2021). Are Indian sectoral indices oil shock prone? An empirical evaluation. Resources Policy, 70(1), 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101889
44.
MishraA. K., PandaP., PradhanS. K., PandaA. K., & SmarkC. (2024). Uncertainties and dynamic connectedness among sectors: A case of the USA, India, France, Germany and Russia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 18(3), 168–201. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v18i3.10
45.
MoradlouH., SkipworthH., BalsL., AktasE., & RoscoeS. (2025). Geopolitical disruptions and supply chain structural ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 45(4), 836–862. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2023-0915
46.
MukherjeeP., & BardhanS. (2022). Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on interactions among stock, gold and oil prices in India. In Revisiting the Indian financial sector: Recent issues and perspectives (pp. 281–300). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7668-0_14
47.
OlasiukH., KumarS., SharmaP., & GanushchakT. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 on the efficiency of Indian IT companies. Vision, 09722629231202082. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629231202082
48.
PolatO. (2024). Interlinkages across US sectoral returns: Time-varying interconnectedness and hedging effectiveness. Financial Innovation, 10(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00581-4
49.
PriyaP., & SharmaC. (2023). COVID-19 related stringencies and financial market volatility: Sectoral evidence from India. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 15(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-05-2022-0136
50.
RijantoA. (2023). Co-movements between an Asian technology stock index and cryptocurrencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: A bi-wavelet approach. Economies, 11(9), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11090232
51.
RiyazahmedK. (2022). Volatility spillover and pandemic—Analysis of selected sectoral indices in India. Economic Thought Journal, 67(6), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.56497/etj2267602
52.
RubbaniyG., KhalidA. A., SyriopoulosK., & PolyzosE. (2024). Dynamic returns connectedness: Portfolio hedging implications during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine War. Journal of Futures Markets, 44(10), 1613–1639. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22539
53.
RubbaniyG., MaghyerehA., CheffiW., & KhalidA. A. (2024). Dynamic connectedness, portfolio performance, and hedging effectiveness of the hydrogen economy, renewable energy, equity, and commodity markets: Insights from the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. Journal of Cleaner Production, 452, 142217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142217
54.
SahooS., & KumarS. (2024). Volatility spillover among the sectors of emerging and developed markets: A hedging perspective. Cogent Economics and Finance, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2316048
55.
ShahzadS. J. H., NaeemM. A., PengZ., & BouriE. (2021). Asymmetric volatility spillover among Chinese sectors during COVID-19. International Review of Financial Analysis, 75, 101754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101754
56.
ShakthivelS., AjithA., KumarS. P., & DomnicN. A. (2025). Pre & post Covid-financial performance of select IT companies in India. Journal of Humanities, Education and Cultural Reforms, 1(1), 9–18.
57.
ShankarR., & DubeyP. (2021). Indian stock market during the COVID-19 pandemic: Vulnerable or resilient? Sectoral analysis. Organisations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 12(1), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.15388/OMEE.2021.12.51
58.
Taheri HosseinkhaniN. (2025). Geopolitical turmoil, supply-chain realignment, and inflation: Commodity shocks, trade fragmentation, and policy responses. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12775.51369
59.
ThangamuthuM., MaheshwariS., & NaikD. R. (2022). Volatility spillover effects during pre-and-post COVID-19 outbreak on Indian market from the USA, China, Japan, Germany, and Australia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(9), 378. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15090378
60.
YadavN., SinghA. B., & TandonP. (2023). Volatility spillover effects between Indian stock market and global stock markets: A DCC-GARCH model. FIIB Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145221141186
61.
YayaO. S., AkinlanaD. M., & OgbonnaA. E. (2017). Investigating structural break-GARCH-based unit root test in US exchange rates. Journal of Science Research, 16(1), 80–95.
62.
YousfiM., FarhaniR., & BouzgarrouH. (2024). From the pandemic to the Russia–Ukraine crisis: Dynamic behavior of connectedness between financial markets and implications for portfolio management. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.02.001
63.
ZhangY., & HamoriS. (2022). A connectedness analysis among BRICS’s geopolitical risks and the US macroeconomy. Economic Analysis and Policy, 76, 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.08.004
64.
ZhangY., Sánchez ArnauE., & Sánchez PérezE. A. (2025). Impact of geopolitical and international trade dynamics on corporate vulnerability and insolvency risk: A graph-based approach. Information (Switzerland), 16(7), 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16070525
