This article explores the relationship between board gender diversity and research and development investments in the technology industry. The study employs a multi-theoretical framework based on the constructs of upper echelon theory, resource-dependency theory and on the literature on women’s attitude towards risk assessment. We adopt a panel data set of 390 technology firms over the study period 2009–2019. Our empirical research unveils an inverted curvilinear (U-shaped) relationship between board gender diversity and research and development investments, with national gender inequality negatively moderating this relationship. This study introduces an innovative framework that integrates considerations at both the micro level (the relationship between board gender diversity and research and development intensity) and the macro level (the moderating role of national gender inequality), offering a more comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted factors influencing firms’ investments in research and development initiatives. Our findings provide critical insights for enhancing gender diversity in corporate settings, serving both academic research and practical managerial and policymaking endeavours.
AbukhaitR. M., Bani-MelhemS., & ZeffaneR. (2019). Empowerment, knowledge sharing and innovative behaviours: Exploring gender differences. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(01), 1950006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500063
2.
AguileraR. V., & JacksonG. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196772
3.
AikenL. S., WestS. G., & RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.
4.
AlmorT., Bazel-ShohamO., & LeeS. M. (2022). The dual effect of board gender diversity on R&D investments. Long Range Planning, 55(2), 101884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.05.004
5.
AmabileT. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. Springer.
6.
AmabileT. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
7.
ArunT., & RojersJ. P. (2021). Gender and firm innovation—A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(2), 301–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-08-2019-0480
8.
Attah-BoakyeR., AdamsK., KimaniD., & UllahS. (2020). The impact of board gender diversity and national culture on corporate innovation: A multi-country analysis of multinational corporations operating in emerging economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120247
9.
AzzamA. A. (2022). Board gender diversity and innovation activities: Evidence from R&D investments in the UK. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2154056. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2154056
10.
BanerjeeR., & GuptaK. (2021). Do country or firm-specific factors matter more to R&D spending in firms?International Review of Economics & Finance, 76, 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.05.008
11.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
12.
BaysingerB., & HoskissonR. E. (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308231
13.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Free Press.
14.
BoschM. J., Las HerasM., RussoM., RofcaninY., & GrauM. G. (2018). How context matters: The relationship between family supportive supervisor behaviours and motivation to work moderated by gender inequality. Journal of Business Research, 82, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.026
15.
BravoF., & Reguera-AlvaradoN. (2017). The effect of board of directors on R&D intensity: Board tenure and multiple directorships. R&D Management, 47(5), 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12260
16.
ByronK., & PostC. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12165
17.
CampbellK., & Mínguez-VeraA. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y
18.
CharnessG., & GneezyU. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007
19.
ChenS., NiX., & TongJ. Y. (2016). Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: A case of R&D investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 136, 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2528-6
20.
ChenR., TongJ. Y., ZhangF. F., & ZhouG. S. (2021). Do female directors enhance R&D performance?International Review of Economics & Finance, 74, 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.03.003
21.
ChengJ. Y. J., & GroysbergB. (2020). Gender diversity at the board level can mean innovation success. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61(2), 1–8.
22.
ChuS., & OldfordE. (2023). Female directors, R&D activities and firms’ investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 30(4), 890–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2021.2023025
23.
CoxT. H., LobelS. A., & McLeodP. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827–847. https://doi.org/10.5465/256391
24.
CrosonR., & GneezyU. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448
25.
Díaz-GarcíaC., González-MorenoA., & Jose Sáez-MartínezF. (2013). Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation, 15(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.149
26.
EaglyA. H., Johannesen-SchmidtM. C., & Van EngenM. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
27.
EliasA. A., CavanaR. Y., & JacksonL. S. (2002). Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Management, 32(4), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00262
28.
FarooqS., GanC., & NadeemM. (2023). Boardroom gender diversity and investment inefficiency: New evidence from the United Kingdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12443
29.
FerreiraD. (2010). Board diversity. In Corporate governance: A synthesis of theory, research, and practice. Wiley.
30.
FrancoeurC., LabelleR., & Sinclair-DesgagnéB. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9482-5
31.
HaansR. F., PietersC., & HeZ. L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U-and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399
32.
HallidayC. S., Paustian-UnderdahlS. C., & FainshmidtS. (2021). Women on boards of directors: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of organizational leadership and national context for gender equality. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09679-y
33.
HambrickD. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
34.
HambrickD. C., & MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
35.
HillmanA. J., WithersM. C., & CollinsB. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
36.
HoY. K., TjahjapranataM., & YapC. M. (2006). Size, leverage, concentration, and R&D investment in generating growth opportunities. The Journal of Business, 79(2), 851–876. https://doi.org/10.1086/499140
37.
HuangJ., ZhaoJ., & CaoJ. (2021). Environmental regulation and corporate R&D investment—Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. International Review of Economics & Finance, 72, 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.11.018
38.
JoshiA., & RohH. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41331491
39.
KallunkiJ. P., PyykköE., & LaamanenT. (2009). Stock market valuation, profitability and R&D spending of the firm: The effect of technology mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(7–8), 838–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02161.x
40.
KarayiannisA. D., & HatzisA. N. (2012). Morality, social norms and the rule of law as transaction cost-saving devices: The case of ancient Athens. European Journal of Law and Economics, 33, 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-010-9150-6
41.
KhatibS. F., AbdullahD. F., ElamerA. A., & AbueidR. (2021). Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2665
42.
KorY. Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081–1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.554
43.
KourouklisD., & GandjourA. (2022). Pharmaceutical spending and early-stage innovation in EU countries. Industry and Innovation, 29(10), 1141–1170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.2021864
44.
KumarP., & ZattoniA. (2013). How much do country-level or firm-level variables matter in corporate governance studies?Corporate Governance, 21(3), 199–200.
45.
KuschelK., & LepeleyM. T. (2016). Women start-ups in technology: Literature review and research agenda to improve participation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 27(2–3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2016.073995
46.
KyawK., TreepongkarunaS., & JirapornP. (2022). Board gender diversity and environmental emissions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 2871–2881.
47.
LewellynK. B., & Muller-KahleM. I. (2020). The corporate board glass ceiling: The role of empowerment and culture in shaping board gender diversity. Journal of Business Ethics, 165, 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3052
48.
LiJ., ZhaoF., ChenS., JiangW., LiuT., & ShiS. (2017). Gender diversity on boards and firms’ environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1918
49.
LinH. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755272
50.
LindJ. T., & MehlumH. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118.
51.
MatherP., RanasingheD., & UndaL. A. (2021). Are gender diverse boards more cautious? The impact of board gender diversity on sentiment in earnings press releases. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 17(3), 100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2021.100278
52.
Meier-PestiK., & PenzE. (2008). Sex or gender? Expanding the sex-based view by introducing masculinity and femininity as predictors of financial risk taking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.002
53.
MiroshnychenkoI., & De MassisA. (2020). Three decades of research on corporate governance and R&D investments: A systematic review and research agenda. R&D Management, 50(5), 648–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12432
54.
MoehrleM. G., & WalterL. (2008). Risk and uncertainty in R&D management. R&D Management, 38(5), 449–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00536.x
55.
MöhringK., & TeneyC. (2020). Equality prescribed? Contextual determinants of citizens’ support for gender boardroom quotas across Europe. Comparative European Politics, 18, 560–589. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00199-w
56.
NaghaviN., Pahlevan SharifS., & Iqbal HussainH. B. (2021). The role of national culture in the impact of board gender diversity on firm performance: Evidence from a multi-country study. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 40(5), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-04-2020-0092
57.
NielsenM. W., BlochC. W., & SchiebingerL. (2018). Making gender diversity work for scientific discovery and innovation. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(10), 726–734.
58.
NorthD. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.
59.
NuberC., VelteP., & HörischJ. (2020). The curvilinear and time-lagging impact of sustainability performance on financial performance: Evidence from Germany. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1795
60.
O’ReillyC. A., WilliamsK. Y., & BarsadeS. (1997). Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help? In GruenfeldD. H. (Ed.), Composition (pp. 183–207). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
61.
ØstergaardC. R., TimmermansB., & KristinssonK. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004
62.
PadgettR. C., & GalanJ. I. (2010). The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0230-x
63.
PfefferJ., & SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
64.
PindadoJ., de QueirozV., & De la TorreC. (2015). How do country-level governance characteristics impact the relationship between R & D and firm value?R&D Management, 45(5), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12115
65.
RatnerB. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they?Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2009.5
66.
ReddyS., & JadhavA. M. (2019). Gender diversity in boardrooms—A literature review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 7(1), 1644703. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1644703
67.
ReuversM., Van EngenM. L., VinkenburgC. J., & Wilson-EveredE. (2008). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: Exploring the relevance of gender differences. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00487.x
68.
RidgewayC. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender & Society, 23(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208330313
69.
SaadG., & GillT. (2000). Applications of evolutionary psychology in marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 17(12), 1005–1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(200012)
70.
SaeedA., RiazH., LiedongT. A., & RajwaniT. (2022). The impact of TMT gender diversity on corporate environmental strategy in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 141, 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.057
71.
SaenzJ., AramburuN., & RiveraO. (2009). Knowledge sharing and innovation performance: A comparison between high-tech and low-tech companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930910922879
72.
SaggeseS., SartoF., & ViganòR. (2021). Do women directors contribute to R&D? The role of critical mass and expert power. Journal of Management and Governance, 25, 593–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09513-1
73.
ShakilM. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144
74.
ShiC. (2003). On the trade-off between the future benefits and riskiness of R&D: A bondholders’ perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(2), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(03)00020-X
75.
SimionescuL. N., GherghinaŞ. C., TawilH., & SheikhaZ. (2021). Does board gender diversity affect firm performance? Empirical evidence from Standard & Poor’s 500 Information Technology Sector. Financial Innovation, 7, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00265-x
76.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43(3), 1066–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10382877
77.
SureshG. (2023). Financial inclusion and its impact on fertility: An empirical investigation. Indian Journal of Human Development, 17(2), 344–358.
78.
SzymanowiczA., & FurnhamA. (2013). Gender and gender role differences in self-and other-estimates of multiple intelligences. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(4), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.754397
79.
TaylorC., IvcevicZ., MoellerJ., & BrackettM. (2020). Gender and support for creativity at work. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12397
80.
TerjesenS., CoutoE. B., & FranciscoP. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 20, 447–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8
81.
TeruelM., & Segarra-BlascoA. (2022). Gender, occupational diversity of R&D teams and patents generation: An application to Spanish firms. R&D Management, 52(3), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12496
82.
TraversiM., BannòM., & FilippiE. (2024). The role of the cultural context in moderating the effect between the presence of women directors and firm environmental innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 3685–3702. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2765
83.
TsaiF. S. (2018). Knowledge heterogeneity, social capital, and organizational innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 304–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-03-2017-0047
84.
United Nations. (2021). The sustainable development goal report. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2021.pdf
85.
WienclawR. A. (2011). Gender roles. In Sociology reference guide: Gender roles and equality (pp. 33–40).
86.
WilsonM., & DalyM. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(85)90041-X
87.
World Economic Forum. (2021). Global Gender Gap Report.
88.
WuQ., DboukW., HasanI., KobeissiN., & ZhengL. (2021). Does gender affect innovation? Evidence from female chief technology officers. Research Policy, 50(9), 104327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104327
89.
XieL., ZhouJ., ZongQ., & LuQ. (2020). Gender diversity in R&D teams and innovation efficiency: Role of the innovation context. Research Policy, 49(1), 103885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103885
90.
YooH. S., JungY. L., & JunS. P. (2023). The effects of SMEs’ R&D team diversity on project-level performances: Evidence from South Korea’s R&D subsidy program. R&D Management, 53(3), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12575
