Start-ups are pivotal to the contemporary economy, yet securing essential growth capital remains a considerable challenge due to financial constraints arising from asymmetric information, regulatory frameworks and market conditions. Extant research has rigorously examined both traditional and non-traditional funding sources, addressing the myriad obstacles that entrepreneurs encounter when seeking finance. Despite substantial scholarly attention to the role of innovation intermediaries in supporting start-ups, there remains a paucity of understanding regarding their facilitation of access to both conventional and alternative finance. This study, through a comprehensive analysis of 157 Italian digital start-ups, elucidates that innovation intermediaries significantly enhance funding opportunities across diverse sources, including equity crowdfunding, venture capital and traditional bank loans. The findings contribute to the academic literature highlighting the crucial role of innovation intermediaries in shaping the financial ecosystem for digital start-ups, providing nuanced insights crucial for fostering sustainable growth and innovation.
AgrestiA., & MinY. (2002). Unconditional small-sample confidence intervals for the odds ratio. Biostatistics, 3(3), 379–386.
2.
AllisonP. D. (2012). Logistic regression using SAS: Theory and application. SAS Institute.
3.
Al-MubarakiH. M., & BuslerM. (2010). Business incubators: Findings from a worldwide survey, and guidance for the GCC states. Global Business Review, 11(1), 1–20.
4.
ArendR. J., PatelP. C., & ParkH. D. (2014). Explaining post-IPO venture performance through a knowledge-based view typology. Strategic Management Journal, 35(3), 376–397.
5.
AtanasovV., IvanovV., & LitvakK. (2012). Does reputation limit opportunistic behavior in the VC industry? Evidence from litigation against VCs. The Journal of Finance, 67(6), 2215–2246.
6.
BakerM., & WurglerJ. (2007). Behavioral corporate finance: A survey. In: Handbook of the economics of finance (Vol. 1, pp. 385–430). Elsevier.
7.
BattagliaF., OssorioM., FiorilloP., & SalernoD. (2023). Family ownership after going public: Exploring nonlinear effect on innovation inputs and the role of institutional investors. Global Business Review,0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231195673
8.
BeckT., Demirgüç-KuntA., LaevenL., & MaksimovicV. (2006). The determinants of financing obstacles. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(6), 932–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2006.07.005
9.
BellavitisC., FilatotchevI., KamuriwoD. S., & VanackerT. (2017). Entrepreneurial finance: New frontiers of research and practice: Editorial for the special issue embracing entrepreneurial funding innovations. Venture Capital, 19(1–2), 1–16.
10.
BergerA. N., & UdellG. F. (2006). A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(11), 2945–2966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.008
11.
BessièreV., StéphanyE., & WirtzP. (2020). Crowdfunding, business angels, and venture capital: An exploratory study of the concept of the funding trajectory. Venture Capital, 22(2), 135–160.
12.
BoniniS., CapizziV., VallettaM., & ZocchiP. (2018). Angel network affiliation and business angels’ investment practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 592–608.
13.
BrownR., MawsonS., LeeN., & PetersonL. (2019). Start-up factories, transnational entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Unpacking the lure of start-up accelerator programmes. European Planning Studies, 27(5), 885–904.
14.
ButticèV., CroceA., & UghettoE. (2021). Network dynamics in business angel group investment decisions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101812.
15.
CaloffiA., ColovicA., RizzoliV., & RossiF. (2023). Innovation intermediaries’ types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122351.
16.
CavalloA., GhezziA., Dell’EraC., & PellizzoniE. (2019). Fostering digital entrepreneurship from start-up to scaleup: The role of venture capital funds and angel groups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 24–35.
17.
ChahineS., & FilatotchevI. (2008). The effects of venture capitalist affiliation to underwriters on short-and long-term performance in French IPOs. Global Finance Journal, 18(3), 351–372.
18.
CiuchtaM. P., LetwinC., StevensonR., McMahonS., & HuvajM. N. (2018). Betting on the coachable entrepreneur: Signaling and social exchange in entrepreneurial pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(6), 860–885.
19.
CollewaertV., & ManigartS. (2016). Valuation of angel-backed companies: The role of investor human capital. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 356–372.
20.
ColomboM. G., & GrilliL. (2007). Funding gaps? Access to bank loans by high-tech start-ups. Small Business Economics, 29, 25–46.
21.
CrupiA., Del SartoN., Di MininA., GregoriG. L., LeporeD., MarinelliL., & SpigarelliF. (2020). The digital transformation of SMEs—a new knowledge broker called the digital innovation hub. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(6), 1263–1288.
22.
CummingD., & JohanS. (2017). The problems with and promise of entrepreneurial finance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(3), 357–370.
23.
DarensbourgM., & FanY. (2017). The effects of crowdfunding on start-up performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 333–349.
24.
DavilaA., FosterG., & GuptaM. (2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of start-up firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 689–708.
25.
Del SartoN., CazaresC. C., & Di MininA. (2022). Start-up accelerators as an open environment: The impact on start-ups’ innovative performance. Technovation, 113, 102425.
26.
Del SartoN., FerrignoG., ParidaV., & Di MininA. (2023). Do start-ups benefit from coworking spaces? An empirical analysis of accelerators’ programs. Review of Managerial Science, 17(7), 2471–2502.
27.
DuanR., & JinL. (2021). The role of public innovation intermediaries plays in regional innovation: A comparative study of two regions in Japan. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34, 1–16.
28.
EnkelE., GassmannO., & ChesbroughH. (2010). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 40(3), 307–316.
29.
FasanoF., & CappaF. (2022). How do banking fintech services affect SME debt?Journal of Economics and Business, 121, 106070.
30.
FerriG., MurroP., & PiniM. (2020). Credit rationing and the relationship between family businesses and banks in Italy. Global Finance Journal, 43, 100427.
31.
FeserD. (2023). Innovation intermediaries revised: A systematic literature review on innovation intermediaries’ role for knowledge sharing. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1827–1862.
32.
FrancoM., HaaseH., & RodiniA. (2023). The role of incubators in the internationalization process of incubated SMEs: A perspective of international cooperation. Global Business Review, 24(3), 488–509.
33.
GalbreathJ., LucianettiL., ThomasB., & TischD. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in Italian firms: The moderating role of competitive strategy. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(4), 629–646.
34.
GhobakhlooM., IranmaneshM., MoralesM. E., NilashiM., & AmranA. (2023). Actions and approaches for enabling Industry 5.0-driven sustainable industrial transformation: A strategy roadmap. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1473–1494.
35.
GornallW., & LockettA. (2017). The role of venture capital in UK start-up financing: Evidence from the 2013 BVCA survey. Venture Capital, 19(2), 137–157.
36.
GranzC., HennM., & LutzE. (2020). Research on venture capitalists’ and business angels’ investment criteria: A systematic literature review. In Contemporary developments in entrepreneurial finance: An academic and policy lens on the status-quo, challenges and trends (pp. 105–136). Springer.
37.
GredelD., KramerM., & BendB. (2012). Patent-based investment funds as innovation intermediaries for SMEs: In-depth analysis of reciprocal interactions, motives and fallacies. Technovation, 32(9–10), 536–549.
38.
HausbergJ. P., & KorreckS. (2021). Business incubators and accelerators: A co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review. In Handbook of research on business and technology incubation and acceleration (pp. 39–63). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
39.
Hernández-CánovasG., & Martínez-SolanoP. (2010). Relationship lending and SME financing in the continental European bank-based system. Small Business Economics, 34, 465–482.
40.
HornufL., KlusM. F., LohwasserT. S., & SchwienbacherA. (2021). How do banks interact with fintech start-ups? Small Business Economics, 57(3), 1505–1526.
IbrahimA. A., & IsicheiE. E. (2023). Entrepreneurial finance and sustainability of nascent firms. Global Business Review, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231168538
43.
IslamM., FremethA., & MarcusA. (2018). Signaling by early stage start-ups: US government research grants and venture capital funding. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 35–51.
44.
Jiménez-PartearroyoM., Medina-LópezA., & Juárez-VarónD. (2023). Towards industry 5.0: Evolving the product-process matrix in the new paradigm. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 49, 1–36.
45.
JunW., & RanX. Q. (2024). Dynamics in digital finance and its impact on SME financing. Heliyon, 10(9), e30586.
46.
KimJ., & ParkS. (2019). Does crowdfunding reduce the agency problems in start-up financing?Journal of Business Venturing, 34(6), 807–820.
47.
KleinM., NeitzertF., Hartmann-WendelsT., & KrausS. (2019). Start-up financing in the digital age: A systematic review and comparison of new forms of financing. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 21(2), 46–98.
48.
KlerkxL., & LeeuwisC. (2008). Balancing multiple interests: Embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure. Technovation, 28(6), 364–378.
49.
KubaraM., & KopczewskaK. (2023). Akaike information criterion in choosing the optimal k-nearest neighbours of the spatial weight matrix. Spatial Economic Analysis, 19, 1–19.
50.
LaursenK., & SalterA. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
51.
LiE., MaoM. Q., ZhangH. F., & ZhengH. (2023). Banks’ investments in fintech ventures. Journal of Banking & Finance, 149, 106754.
52.
LiH., PengM., & YangB. (2019). Technology transfer offices and venture capital financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 1–20.
53.
LichtenthalerU., & ErnstH. (2009). The role of innovation intermediaries in open innovation: A review of literature. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(3), 417–437.
54.
LorentzR., Pensé-LhéritierA. M., & AoussatA. (2016). Innovation intermediation at the new product development level: A case study in the bio-industrial sectors. International Journal of Product Development, 21(2–3), 97–116.
55.
LoveJ. H., RoperS., & BrysonJ. R. (2011). Openness, knowledge, innovation and growth in UK business services. Research Policy, 40(10), 1438–1452.
56.
LowikS., KraaijenbrinkJ., & GroenA. J. (2017). Antecedents and effects of individual absorptive capacity: A micro-foundational perspective on open innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1319–1341.
57.
LukasonO., & KäsperK. (2017). Failure prediction of government funded start-up firms. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(2), 296–306.
58.
MarićJ., Opazo-BasáezM., VlačićB., & DabićM. (2023). Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122605.
MianS., LamineW., & FayolleA. (2016). Technology business incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, 50, 1–12.
61.
MollickE. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.
62.
NgongoniC. N., GrobbelaarS. S., & SchutteC. S. L. (2017). The role of open innovation intermediaries in entrepreneurial ecosystems design. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 28(3), 56–65.
63.
OlssonA. K., ErikssonK. M., & CarlssonL. (2024). Management toward Industry 5.0: A co-workership approach on digital transformation for future innovative manufacturing. European Journal of Innovation Management, Ahead-of-Print.
64.
OyonD. (2006). Bank debt and the life cycle of the firm. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 465–498.
65.
PoharM., BlasM., & TurkS. (2004). Comparison of logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis: A simulation study. Metodoloski zvezki, 1(1), 143.
66.
PriegerJ. E. (2023). Local banking markets and barriers to entrepreneurship in minority and other areas. Journal of Economics and Business, 124, 106108.
67.
RazaliN. M., & WahY. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.
68.
RidingA., MadillJ., & HainesnG.Jr. (2007). Incrementality of SME loan guarantees. Small Business Economics, 29(1–2), 47–61.
69.
RussoM., CaloffiA., RossiF., & RighiR. (2019). Innovation intermediaries and performance-based incentives: A case study of regional innovation poles. Science and Public Policy, 46(1), 1–12.
70.
RussoP. F., NigroV., & PastorelliS. (2024). Bank lending to small firms: Metamorphosis of a financing model. International Review of Economics & Finance, 90, 13–31.
71.
SahutJ. M., DanaL. P., & TeulonF. (2021). Corporate governance and financing of young technological firms: A review & introduction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120425.
72.
SchepisD. (2020). How innovation intermediaries support start-up internationalization: A relational proximity perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36, 2062–2073.
73.
SchoarA. (2005). Debt versus equity financing: The trade-off. Review of Financial Studies, 18(2), 765–784.
74.
ShaneS. (2012). The importance of angel investing in financing the growth of entrepreneurial ventures. The Quarterly Journal of Finance, 2(02), 1250009.
75.
SinghS., & Mungila HillemaneB. S. (2023). Sources of finance for tech start-ups over its lifecycle: What determines their approach of sources and its success?International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(8), 1766–1787.
76.
StefanelliV., BosciaV., & TomaP. (2020). Does knowledge translation drive spin-offs away from the “valley of death”? A nonparametric analysis to support a banking perspective. Management Decision, 58(9), 1985–2009.
77.
StulzR. M. (2010). Optimal debt structure and the number of creditors. Journal of Financial Economics, 97(1), 52–75.
78.
VanackerT., SorensonO., & LandryR. (2017). The geography of venture capital and innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(3), 211–228.
79.
VillaniE., RasmussenE., & GrimaldiR. (2017). How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 86–102.
80.
WangJ., LiuG., XuX., & XingX. (2024). Credit risk prediction for small and medium enterprises utilizing adjacent enterprise data and a relational graph attention network. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 9, 177–192.
81.
WellalageN. H., & FernandezV. (2019). Innovation and SME finance: Evidence from developing countries. International Review of Financial Analysis, 66, 101370.
82.
WhiteB. A., & DumayJ. (2020). The angel investment decision: Insights from Australian business angels. Accounting and Finance, 60(3), 3133–3162.
83.
WiltbankR., BoekerW., & MooreE. S. (2006). Business angel investment: A comparison of syndicated and non-syndicated investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(3), 359–376.
84.
WrightF. (2017). How do entrepreneurs obtain financing? An evaluation of available options and how they fit into the current entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 22(3–4), 190–200.
85.
WrightM., SiegelD. S., & MustarP. (2017). An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 909–922.
86.
ZahraS. A., & NambisanS. (2012). Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business Horizons, 55(3), 219–229.
