This article explores both the drivers of the digitalisation of start-ups, and its impact on their economic, innovative and social performance. Integrating the framework of the digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE) and the institutional perspective of ecosystems, structural equation modelling is used to test hypotheses on data collected from 206 Brazilian start-ups. Findings reveal that the dimensions of the DEE, its resources, institutions and infrastructures, contribute to strengthening the digitalisation of start-ups. However, this might not be equally relevant for diverse contexts. The results also extend entrepreneurial orientation (EO) theory by investigating its role as mediator: innovation, proactivity and risk-taking enhance DEE factors in the use of digital technologies for developing products and services, processes and customer interactions. As digital tools are implemented, and EO is internalised, benefits can also be observed in the social domain. Managerial and policy implications are suggested for developing supportive DEEs in emerging countries.
AbubakreMFaikIMkansiM (2021) Digital entrepreneurship and indigenous value systems: An Ubuntu perspective. Information Systems Journal31(6): 838–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12343
3.
AhmadNHSeetP-S (2009) Understanding business success through the lens of SME founder-owners in Australia and Malaysia. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing1(1): 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2009.023821
4.
AlegreJChivaR (2013) Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management51(4): 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12005
5.
AlwakidWNDahriNA (2025) Harnessing AI capabilities and green entrepreneurial orientation for sustainable SME performance using SEM analysis approach. Technology in Society83: 103007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103007.
Arias-PérezJVélez-JaramilloJ (2022) Ignoring the three-way interaction of digital orientation, not-invented-here syndrome and employee’s artificial intelligence awareness in digital innovation performance: A recipe for failure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change174: 121305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121305
8.
ArrudaCNogueiraVSCostaV (2013) The Brazilian entrepreneurial ecosystem of start-ups: An analysis of entrepreneurship determinants in Brazil as seen from the OECD pillars. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management2(3): 17–57.
9.
AsokanDRHuqFASmithCM, et al. (2022) Socially responsible operations in the Industry 4.0 era: Post-COVID-19 technology adoption and perspectives on future research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management42(13): 185–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2022-0069
10.
Attah-BoakyeRAdamsKYuH (2024) Growing old, but paying back: Understanding how age influences corporate social innovation depth and breadth of multinationals in weak institutional contexts. Management International Review64: 419–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-024-00543-7
11.
AudretschDBBelitskiM (2017) Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. Journal of Technology Transfer42: 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8
12.
AudretschDBBelitskiM (2021) Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem typology for regional economic development: The role of creative class and entrepreneurship. Regional Studies55(4): 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854711
AudretschDBBelitskiMEichlerGM, et al. (2025) City-level institutions and perceived entrepreneurial ecosystem’s growth orientation. Regional Studies59(1): 2478066. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2025.2478066
15.
AudretschDBFiedlerAFathB, et al. (2024) The dawn of geographically unbounded entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Venturing Insights22: e00487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00487
16.
AutioENambisanSThomasLDW, et al. (2018) Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal12: 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
17.
AutioEChiyachantanaCCastillejos-PetalcorinC, et al. (2024). Adoption of digital technologies, business model innovation, and financial and sustainability performance in start-up firms. ADB Economics Working Paper Series, 734. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/WPS240356-2
18.
BejjaniMGöckeLMenterM (2023) Digital entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change189: 122372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122372
BroccardoLTruantEDanaL-P (2023) The interlink between digitalization, sustainability, and performance: An Italian context. Journal of Business Research158: 113621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113621
21.
Castro-LopezAEntrialgoMLiaoCT, et al. (2025) Towards circular economy through innovation: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and human resource management. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal21:36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-01032-x
22.
CaoZShiX (2021) A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystems in advanced and emerging economies. Small Business Economics57: 75–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00326-y
23.
CennamoCDagninoGBDi MininA, et al. (2020) Managing digital transformation: scope of transformation and modalities of value co-generation and delivery. California Management Review62(4): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256209421
24.
ChaudharySGuptaVKSinglaC (2024) Moderating effect of chief executive officer servant leadership on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. International Small Business Journal42(9): 1130-1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426241268328
25.
CherbibJ (2024) Exploring the interplay between entrepreneurial orientation, causation and effectuation under unexpected COVID-19 uncertainty: Insights from large French banks. Technological Forecasting and Social Change200: 123090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123090
26.
CobbenDOomsWRoijakkersN, et al. (2022) Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research142: 138–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046
27.
ColombelliAPaolucciERaguseoE, et al. (2024) The creation of digital innovative start-ups: the role of digital knowledge spillovers and digital skill endowment. Small Business Economic 62(3): 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00789-9
28.
CompagnucciLSpigarelliFIacobucciD, et al. (2025) Does the hub and spoke model matter for university-industry engagement in innovation ecosystems?The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10234-6
29.
CorvelloVFelicettiAMAmmiratoS, et al. (2024) The rules of courtship: What drives a start-up to collaborate with a large company?Technological Forecasting and Social Change200: 123092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123092
CovinJGWalesWJ (2019) Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice43(1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718773181
32.
CrespoNFCrespoCFSilvaGM, et al. (2023) Innovation in times of crisis: The relevance of digitalization and early internationalization strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change188: 122283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122283
33.
DanaL-PSalamzadehAHadizadehM, et al. (2022) Urban entrepreneurship and sustainable businesses in smart cities: Exploring the role of digital technologies. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship1(2): 100016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100016
34.
DillmanDASmythJDCristianLM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method, 4th ed.Wiley, New York.
35.
DuWPanSLZhouN, et al. (2018) From a marketplace of electronics to a digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE): The emergence of a meta-organization in Zhongguancun, China. Information Systems Journal28: 1158–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12176
36.
DubeyRGunasekaranAChildeSJ, et al. (2019) Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability?Technological Forecasting and Social Change144: 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.020
37.
DuttaDKKhuranaI (2024) Productive entrepreneurship within the entrepreneurial ecosystem: Insights from social exchange theory. Applied Psychology73(4): 1487–1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12509
38.
El BazJRuelS (2024) Achieving social performance through digitalization and supply chain resilience in the COVID-19 disruption era: An empirical examination based on a stakeholder dynamic capabilities view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change201: 123209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123209
39.
EliaGMargheritaAPassianteG (2020) Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change150: 119791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791
FernandesAJCFerreiraJJFarinhaL (2024) How do digital entrepreneurial ecosystems impact on achieving the SDGs? A country-level analysis. In Digital Entrepreneurship in Science, Technology and Innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035311422.00017
42.
FerrazJCKupferDTorraccaJ, et al. (2019) Snapshots of a state of flux: how Brazilian industrial firms differ in the adoption of digital technologies and policy implications. Journal of Economic Policy Reform23(4): 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1578651
43.
FerreiraJJGrigoroudisECarayannisEG, et al. (2023) The role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in technological and social challenges. R&D Management53(4): 563–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12634
44.
FilippelliSTroiseCBigliardiB, et al. (2025) Examining the influence of entrepreneurial ecosystem pressure on the economic, social, and environmental orientation of startups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change210: 123900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123900
45.
FreisingerEHeidenreichSLandauC, et al. (2021) Business model innovation through the lens of time: An empirical study of performance implications across venture life cycles. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research73(3): 339–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-021-00116-6
46.
Garcia MartinPCSjödinDNairS, et al. (2023) Managing start-up – incumbent digital solution co-creation: a four-phase process for intermediation in innovative contexts. Industry and Innovation3(5): 579–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2023.2189091
47.
GorelovaIDmitrievaDDedovaM, et al. (2021) Antecedents and consequences of digital entrepreneurial ecosystems in the interaction process with smart city development. Administrative Sciences11: 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030094
48.
GrybauskasAStefaniniAGhobakhlooM (2022) Social sustainability in the age of digitalization: A systematic literature Review on the social implications of industry 4.0. Technology in Society70: 101997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101997
49.
HairJFJrSarstedtMRingleCM, et al. (2017) Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
50.
HajliNBaydarovaINisarT (2025) Digital entrepreneurial ecosystem: the role of the sharing economy in driving innovation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development37(5–6): 785–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2444908
51.
HamadiI (2026) Toward a meta-framework for digital ecosystem concepts: A comparative review on the state of research, concept relationships, and future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change223: 124413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124413
52.
HanoumSPalalicRDurmanTY, et al. (2025). Enhancing SME performance through e-business: the interplay of ambidexterity and entrepreneurial orientation in technology parks. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship14: 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00556-y
53.
HoMSooCTianA, et al. (2024) Influence of strategic HRM and entrepreneurial orientation on dynamic capabilities and innovation in small- and medium-sized enterprises. International Small Business Journal42(5): 611–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426231201761
54.
HooiHCAhmadNHAmranA, et al. (2016) The functional role of entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial bricolage in ensuring sustainable entrepreneurship. Management Research Review39(12): 1616–1638. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2015-0144
55.
HuangY. (2024) Digital transformation of enterprises: Job creation or job destruction?Technological Forecasting and Social Change208: 123733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123733
56.
HuangYZhangJXuY, et al. (2025) Digital entrepreneurial ecosystem and female entrepreneurial activity. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications12: 162. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04345-y
KallmuenzerAMikhaylovAChelaruM, et al. (2025). Adoption and performance outcome of digitalization in small and medium-sized enterprises. Review of Managerial Science19: 2011–2038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00744-2
60.
KanshebaJMWaldAE (2022) Entrepreneurial ecosystems quality and productive entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial attitude as a mediator in early-stage and high-growth activities. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development29(2): 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2021-0209
61.
KleinAZBraidoGM (2024). Institutional factors related to digital entrepreneurship by start-ups and SMEs in the Latin American context: Two cases in Brazil. Information Systems Journal34(4): 970–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12466
62.
KrausNKrausK (2021) Digitalization of business processes of enterprises of the ecosystem of Industry 4.0: Virtual-real aspect of economic growth reserves. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics18: 569–580. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2021.18.57
63.
KrausSVonmetzKBullini OrlandiL, et al. (2023) Digital entrepreneurship: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and digitalization for disruptive innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change193: 122638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122638.
64.
LadeiraMJMFerreiraFAFFerreiraJJM, et al. (2019) Exploring the determinants of digital entrepreneurship using fuzzy cognitive maps. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal15: 1077–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00574-9
65.
LanivichSEAdomakoSVardamanJM, et al. (2025) Founder regulatory focus: Effects on entrepreneurial orientation and venture performance. Strategic Management Journal19(3): 481–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1535
66.
LeãoPSantosGGFORochaTN, et al. (2023) The digitalization phenomenon and digital strategies in emerging countries: A semi-systematic review. Revista de Administração Mackenzie24(3): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMR230059.en
67.
LiWBadrYBiennierF (2012) Digital ecosystems: Challenges and prospects. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems MEDES, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2457276.2457297
68.
LonialSCCarterRE (2015) The impact of organizational orientations on medium and small firm performance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Small Business Management53(1): 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12054
69.
LiangXFrösénJ (2020) Examining the link between marketing controls and firm performance: The mediating effect of market-focused learning capability. Journal of Business Research109: 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.021
70.
LumpkinGTDessGG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review21: 135–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
71.
LunkesRJRosaFSMonteiroJJ, et al. (2020) Interactions among environmental training, environmental strategic planning and personnel controls in radical environmental innovation. Sustainability12(20): 8748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208748
72.
MatsunoKMentzerJTÖzsomerA (2002) The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. Journal of Marketing66(3): 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.3.18.18507
MooreJ (1993) Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review71(3): 75–86.
76.
Moreno-MenéndezAMArzubiagaUDíaz-MorianaV, et al. (2022) The impact of a crisis on entrepreneurial orientation of family firms: The role of organisational decline and generational change. International Small Business Journal40(4): 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426211036694
77.
MunniaACorrenteSCunninghamJ, et al. (2024) Digital entrepreneurial ecosystems: An empirical contribution using SMAA. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management42: 95–119. https://doi.org/10.7433/s123.2024.05
78.
NaldiLLarssonJPWestlundH (2020) Policy entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial orientation in vulnerable Swedish municipalities. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development32(7–8): 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2020.1798557
79.
NambisanSZahraSALuoY (2019) Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories. Journal of International Business Studies50(9): 1464–1486. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00262-4
80.
NambisanS (2017) Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice41(6): 1029-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
81.
NicotraMRomanoMDel GiudiceM, et al. (2018) The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: A measurement framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer43: 640–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9628-2
82.
OECD (2022) Measuring the social performance of firms through the lens of the OECD Well-being Framework. OECD Policy Insights on Well-being, Inclusion and Equal Opportunity3: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1787/41f3823b-en
83.
PaulJAlhassanIBinsaifN, et al. (2023) Digital entrepreneurship research: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research156(C): 113507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113507
84.
PencoLProfumoGSerravalleF, et al. (2023) Has COVID-19 pushed digitalisation in SMEs? The role of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development30(2): 311–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2021-0423
PettiCCompagnucciLTangY (2024) Institutions, innovation and performance in Guangdong firms: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental turbulence. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal20: 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00878-x
87.
PigolaAFischerBde MoraesGHSM (2024) Impacts of digital entrepreneurial ecosystems on sustainable development: Insights from Latin America. Sustainability16(18): 7928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187928
88.
PizziSLeopizziRCaputoA (2022). The enablers in the relationship between entrepreneurial ecosystems and the circular economy: The case of circularity. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal33(1): 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2021-0011
89.
QuinonesGHeeksRNicholsonB (2021) Embeddedness of digital start-ups in development contexts: Field experience from Latin America. Information Technology for Development27(2): 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1779638
90.
RehmanSU (2025) SMEs internationalization! Market intelligence and entrepreneurial orientation influence on international performance: A moderation model. Business Process Management Journal31(1): 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-04-2024-0299
91.
Ribeiro-NavarreteSBotella-CarrubiDPalacios-MarquésD, et al. (2021) The effect of digitalization on business performance: An applied study of KIBS. Journal of Business Research126: 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.065
92.
Ribeiro-NavarreteBMartínJMMGuaita-MartínezJM, et al. (2023) Analysing a cooperative’s digital maturity using a synthetic indicator. International Journal of Information Management72: 102678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102678.
93.
RitalaPBaiyereAHughesM, et al. (2021) Digital strategy implementation: The role of individual entrepreneurial orientation and relational capital. Technological Forecasting and Social Change171: 120961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120961
94.
RochaRGEd-DafaliSSharmaN (2025) Entrepreneurial orientation, agility and responsibility: A triad for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development32(2): 470–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2024-0224
RossiMCheungCMSarkerS, et al. (2024) Ethical issues and unintended consequences of digitalization and platformization. Journal of Information Technology39(3): 390–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962241282515
SoininenJPuumalainenKSjögrenH, et al. (2012) The impact of global economic crisis on SMEs: Does entrepreneurial orientation matter?Management Research Review35(10): 927-944. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211272660
TurkerD (2009) Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics85(4): 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9780-6
104.
TippinsMJSohiRS (2003) IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link?Strategic Management Journal24(8): 745-761. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.337
105.
VenâncioAPicotoWPintoI (2023) Time-to-unicorn and digital entrepreneurial ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change190: 122425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122425
106.
VerhoefPCBroekhuizenTBartY, et al. (2021) Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research122: 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
107.
WalesWJ (2016) Entrepreneurial orientation: A review and synthesis of promising research directions. International Small Business Journal34(1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615613840
108.
VickerySKJayaramJDrogeC, et al. (2003) The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management21(5): 523-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.002
109.
WalesWJKrausSFilserM, et al. (2021) The status quo of research on entrepreneurial orientation: Conversational landmarks and theoretical scaffolding. Journal of Business Research128: 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.046
110.
WibisonoE (2023) The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem in the European Union: Evidence from the digital platform economy index. European Planning Studies31(6): 1270–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2202683
ZhengFSunHRenR, et al. (2024) Impact of the digital entrepreneurial ecosystem on startup performance: An empirical study from China. International Review of Economics & Finance96(Part B): 103611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103611
114.
ZhouJCenW (2024) Digital Entrepreneurial ecosystem embeddedness, knowledge dynamic capabilities, and user entrepreneurial opportunity development in China: The moderating role of entrepreneurial learning. Sustainability16(11): 4343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114343
