Do Good,Have Good: Mandatory CSR Policy and Foreign Subsidiary Performance in India

Abstract

In 2013, the Companies Act in India mandated that foreign subsidiaries with specified profitability and size spend at least 2% of their net income on corporate social responsibility (CSR). The study uses this natural experiment to isolate the impact of CSR spending on multinational enterprise (MNE) subsidiary performance. Using a triple difference estimation method on 175 foreign subsidiaries from 2005 to 2020, this study finds a positive impact of the compulsory CSR regulation on the CSR spender subsidiaries. We also find that higher institutional distance and greater subsidiary age benefit affected subsidiaries, positively impacting their performance because of mandatory CSR spending. The findings offer suitable recommendations for managers and policymakers in emerging markets as navigating regulatory CSR policies in the host country requires considering both resource-based and institutional environment factors.

Keywords

Multination enterprise corporate social responsibility emerging markets triple difference subsidiary performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aswani

, Chidambaran

N. K.

, & Hasan

(2021). Who benefits from mandatory CSR? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. Emerging Markets Review , 46(February 2020), 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100753

Baik

, & Park

Y. R.

(2019). Managing legitimacy through corporate community involvement: The effects of subsidiary ownership and host country experience in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management , 36(4), 971–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09670-4

Balon

, Kottala

S. Y.

, & Reddy

K. S.

(2022). Mandatory corporate social responsibility and firm performance in emerging economies: An institution-based view. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship , 1(3), 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100023

Beloskar

V. D.

, & Rao

S. V. D. N.

(2022). Corporate social responsibility: Is too much bad?—Evidence from India. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets , 29(2), 221–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-021-09347-3

Campbell

J. T.

, Eden

, & Miller

S. R.

(2012). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter. Journal of International Business Studies , 43(1), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.45

Chari

, Chen

, & Dominguez

K. M. E.

(2012). Foreign ownership and firm performance: Emerging market acquisitions in the United States. IMF Economic Review , 60(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2012.1

Chen

Y. C.

, Hung

, & Wang

(2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics , 65(1), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.009

Cheng

, Ioannou

, & Serafeim

(2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Mangement Journal , 920(October), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj

Dahms

(2020). Power, CSR strategy, and performance in foreign-owned subsidiaries. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences , 37(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1539

10.

Delios

, & Beamish

P. W.

(2001). Survival and profitability: The roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. The Academy of Management Journal , 44(5), 1028–1038.

11.

Eden

, & Miller

S. R.

(2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Advances in International Management , 16, 187–221.

12.

Edmans

(2012). The link between job satisfaction and firm value, with implications for corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives , 26(4), 1–19.

13.

Elango

, & Dhandapani

(2020). Does institutional industry context matter to performance? An extension of the institution-based view. Journal of Business Research , 115(April), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.037

14.

Flammer

, & Bansal

(2017). Does a long-term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management Journal , 38(9), 1827–1847.

15.

Flammer

, & Luo

(2017). Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Strategic Management Journal , 38(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2492

16.

Gardberg

N. A.

, & Fombrun

C. J.

(2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review , 31(2), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.20208684

17.

Gaur

A. S.

, Delios

, & Singh

(2007). Institutional environments, staffing strategies, and subsidiary performance. Journal of Management , 33(4), 611–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302551

18.

Guha

(2020). Why comply with an unenforced policy? The case of mandated corporate social responsibility in India. Policy Design and Practice , 3(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1726592

19.

Jamali

(2010). The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: Global, local, substantive or diluted? Journal of Business Ethics , 93(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0560-8

20.

Kaufmann

, Kraay

, & Mastruzzi

(2010). The worldwide governance indicators: A summary of methodology, data and analytical issues. The World Bank , 5430(September), 1–29.

21.

Kim

, Kim

, Marshall

, & Afzali

(2018). Stakeholder influence, institutional duality, and CSR involvement of MNC subsidiaries. Journal of Business Research , 91(June), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.044

22.

Kostova

, Beugelsdijk

, Scott

W. R.

, Kunst

V. E.

, Chua

C. H.

, & van Essen

(2020). The construct of institutional distance through the lens of different institutional perspectives: Review, analysis, and recommendations. Journal of International Business Studies , 5(4), 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00294-w

23.

Kostova

, & Zaheer

(1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. The Academy of Management Review , 24(1), 64–81.

24.

Lee

M. D. P.

(2011). Configuration of external influences: The combined effects of institutions and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility strategies. Journal of Business Ethics , 102(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0814-0

25.

Lee

J. Y.

, Choi

, Xiao

, Lew

Y. K.

, & Park

II. (2021). How do the institutions matter for MNE subsidiaries’ CSR in host countries? Evidence from Chinese overseas subsidiaries. BRQ Business Research Quarterly , 27(3), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211044732

26.

Luo

(1997). Guanxi and performance of foreign-invested enterprises in China: An empirical inquiry. Management International Review , 37(July), 1–23.

27.

Manchiraju

, & Rajgopal

(2017). Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) create shareholder value? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. Journal of Accounting Research , 55(5), 1257–1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12174

28.

Marano

, & Kostova

(2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies , 53(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12124

29.

Marcus

, & Sant’anna

P. H. C.

(2021). The role of parallel trends in event study settings: An application to environmental economics. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists , 8(2), 235–275. https://doi.org/10.1086/711509

30.

Marshall

, Rao

, Roy

P. P.

, & Thapa

(2022). Mandatory corporate social responsibility and foreign institutional investor preferences. Journal of Corporate Finance , 76(July), 102261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102261

31.

Mohanty

S. S.

, & Rath

(2023). Does CSR make business? Insights from structural equation model analysis of Indian companies. Global Business Review. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09721509231173112

32.

Mukherjee

, & Chanda

(2017). Differential effects of trade openness on Indian manufacturing firms. Economic Modelling , 61(September 2016), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.10.001

33.

Muralidharan

, & Prakash

(2017). Cycling to school: Increasing secondary school enrollment for girls in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics , 9(3), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160004

34.

Oki

, & Kawai

(2022). Local sourcing and MNC subsidiary performance: A legitimacy perspective. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management , 29(4), 729–760. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-07-2021-0139

35.

Olden

, & Møen

(2022). The triple difference estimator. Econometrics Journal , 25(3), 531–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utac010

36.

Rathert

(2016). Strategies of legitimation: MNEs and the adoption of CSR in response to host-country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies , 47(6), 723–747. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.25

37.

Reimann

, Rauer

, & Kaufmann

(2015). MNE subsidiaries’ strategic commitment to CSR in emerging economies: The role of administrative distance, subsidiary size, and experience in the host country. Journal of Business Ethics , 132(4), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2334-1

38.

Rhee

, & Haunschild

P. R.

(2006). The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organization Science , 17(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0175

39.

Rottig

(2016). Institutions and emerging markets: Effects and implications for multinational corporations. International Journal of Emerging Markets , 11(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-12-2015-0248

40.

Roy

P. P.

, Rao

, & Zhu

(2022). Mandatory CSR expenditure and stock market liquidity. Journal of Corporate Finance , 72(January), 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102158

41.

Servaes

, & Tamayo

(2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science , 59(5), 1045–1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630

42.

Shirodkar

, & Konara

(2017). Institutional distance and foreign subsidiary performance in emerging markets: Moderating effects of ownership strategy and host-country experience. Management International Review , 57(2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0301-z

43.

Stevens

C. E.

, Xie

, & Peng

M. W.

(2016). Toward a legitimacy-based view of political risk: The case of Google and Yahoo in China. Strategic Management Journal , 37(5), 945–963. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2369

44.

Tamanna

, & Nurul

(2022). Meta-analysis of the impact of financial constraints on firm performance. Accounting & Finance , 63(2), 1671–1707. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12923

45.

Tian

(2022). The art of rhetoric: Host country political hostility and the rhetorical strategies of foreign subsidiaries in developing economies. Journal of World Business , 57(5), 101360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101360

46.

Tokas

, & Yadav

(2023). Foreign ownership and corporate social responsibility: The case of an emerging market. Global Business Review , 24(6), 1302–1325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920920444

47.

Tsionas

M. G.

, & Tzeremes

N. G.

(2022). The degree of internationalization and firm productivity: Empirical evidence from large multinationals. British Journal of Management , 33(4), 1969–1990. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12560

48.

Uzma

S. H.

(2016). Embedding corporate governance and corporate social responsibility in emerging countries. International Journal of Law and Management , 58(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-04-2015-0015

49.

World Bank. (2020). Global economic prospects, June 2020 . The World Bank.

50.

, & Shenkar

(2002). Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. The Academy of Management Review , 27(4), 608–618.

51.

Zhang

, Xue

, & Liu

. (2022). Going out by doing good: The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on outward FDI of Chinese firms. The World Economy. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/twec.13629

52.

Zhou

, & Wang

(2020). Foreign subsidiary CSR as a buffer against parent firm reputation risk. Journal of International Business Studies , 51(8), 1256–1282. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00345-7