This study aimed to determine the drivers of mobile payment FinTech adoption. The study was conducted with 306 generation Y (Gen Y) and generation Z (Gen Z) FinTech users, and data were analyzed using structural equation modelling (SEM) through partial least squares and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The present study investigates some interesting and novel associations among variables that contribute to the literature, such as the mediating effect of effort expectancy, facilitating condition, performance expectancy and social influence between the association of financial literacy and behavioural intention, and investigates the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) constructs (effort expectancy, facilitating condition, performance expectancy and social influence), technology acceptance model 3 (TAM 3) constructs (perceived enjoyment and self-efficacy), financial literacy and demographic features as drivers of FinTech adoption. The results indicate that effort expectancy, performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, financial literacy and self-efficacy are strong drivers of FinTech adoption. Perceived enjoyment and social influence do not influence users’ behavioural intention to adopt mobile payment services.
AbayomiO. J., OlabodeA. C., ReyadM. H., TeyeE. T., HaqM., &TakyiE.M. (2019). Effects of demographic factors on customers’ mobile banking services adoption in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 10(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v10n1p1
2.
AhmadS., UrusS. T., & NazriS. N. (2021). Technology acceptance of financial technology (FinTech) for payment services among employed fresh graduates. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 16(2), 27–58.
3.
AlkhwaldiA. F., AlharasisE. E., ShehadehM., Abu-AlSondosI., OudatM. S., & AttaA. A. (2022). Towards an understanding of FinTech users’ adoption: Intention and e-loyalty post-COVID-19 from a developing country perspective. Sustainability, 14, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912616
4.
Al-OkailyM., NatourA. R., ShishanF., Al-DmourA., AlghazzawiR., & AlsharairiM. (2021). Sustainable FinTech innovation orientation: A moderated model. Sustainability, 13, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413591
5.
AlomariA. S., & AbdullahN. L. (2023). Factors influencing the behavioral intention to use cryptocurrency among Saudi Arabian public university students: Moderating role of financial literacy. Cogent Business & Management, 10, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2178092
6.
Al-SaediK., Al-EmranM., RamayahT., & AbushamE. (2020). Developing a general extended UTAUT model for M-payment adoption. Technology in Society, 62, 101293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101293
7.
AltwaireshR., & AloudM. (2021). Mobile payments from merchants’ perspective: An empirical study using the TAM model in Saudi Arabia. In ternational Journal of Computer Science & Network Security, 21(8), 317–326.
8.
Antwi-BoampongA., BoisonD. K., DoumbiaM. O., BoakyeA. N., Osei-FosuaL., & SarbengK. O. (2022). Factors affecting port users’ behavioral intentions to adopt financial technology (FinTech) in ports in Sub-Saharan Africa: A case of ports in Ghana. FinTech, 1, 362–375. https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech1040027
9.
AriffinN. H. M., AhmadF., & HaneefU. M. (2020). Acceptance of mobile payments by retailers using UTAUT model. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 19(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v19.i1.pp149-155
10.
AsengA. C. (2020). Factors influencing generation Z intention in using FinTech digital payment services. Cogito Smart Journal, 6(2), 155–166.
11.
BaileyA. A., PentinaI., MishraA. S., & MimounM. S. B. (2017). Mobile payments adoption by US consumers: An extended TAM. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(6), 626–640. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-08-2016-0144
12.
BajunaiedK., HussinN., & KamarudinS. (2023). Behavioral intention to adopt FinTech services: An extension of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100010
13.
BashirI., & MadhavaiahC. (2015). Consumer attitude and behavioural intention towards internet banking adoption in India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 7(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-02-2014-0013
14.
BeckerJ. M., CheahJ. H., GholamzadeR., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2023). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0474
15.
BhuvanaM., & VasanthaS. (2019). Ascertaining the mediating effect of financial literacy for accessing mobile banking services to achieve financial inclusion. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 7(6), 1182–1190.
16.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
17.
ChanR., TroshaniI., HillS. R., & HoffmannA. (2022). Towards an understanding of consumers’ FinTech adoption: The case of open banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(4), 886–917. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2021-0397
18.
ClaessensS., FrostJ., TurnerG., & ZhuF. (2018). FinTech credit markets around the world: Size, drivers and policy issues. BIS Quarterly Review. https://ddd.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1809e.htm
19.
CrabbeM., StandingC., StandingS., & KarjaluotoH. (2009). An adoption model for mobile banking in Ghana. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 7(5), 515–541.
20.
DanuartaG. L., & DarmaG. S. (2019). Determinants of using Go-Pay and its impact on net benefits. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 4(11), 173–182.
21.
DaragmehA., LentnerC., & SágiJ. (2021). FinTech payments in the era of COVID-19: Factors influencing behavioral intentions of ‘‘Generation X’’ in Hungary to use mobile payment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 32, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100574
22.
DasA., & DasD. (2022). Adoption of FinTech services amidst COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical evidence from Assam. Managerial Finance, 49(6), 1075–1093. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-08-2022-0379
23.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://www.jstor.org/stable/249008
24.
DhingraS., & GuptaS. (2020). Behavioural intention to use mobile banking: An extension of UTAUT2 model. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 12(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMHCI.2020070101
25.
DimockM. (2019). Defining generations: Where millennials end and generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://pewrsr.ch/2szqtJz
26.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
27.
GuptaK., & AroraN. (2020). Investigating consumer intention to accept mobile payment systems through unified theory of acceptance model. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 9(1), 88–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-03-2019-0037
28.
HaddadC., & HornufL. (2018). The emergence of the global FinTech market: Economic and technological determinants. Small Business Economics, 53(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9991-x
29.
HairJ. F., AndersonR. E., BabinB. J., & BlackW. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson Education.
30.
HairJ. F., HowardM. C., & NitzlC. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109(C), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
31.
HairJ. F., HultG. T., RingleC. M., SarstedtM., DanksN. P., & RayS. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) using R(1st ed.). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
32.
HajaziM. U., ChanS. S., Ya’kobS. A., SialiF., & LatipH. A. (2021). Usage intention of QR mobile payment system among millennials in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(1), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i1/8494
33.
HammouriQ., AloqoolA., SalehB. A., AldossaryH., FreijatS. Y., HalimM., AlmajaliD., Al-GasawnehJ., & DarawshehS. R. (2023). An empirical investigation on acceptance of e-wallets in the FinTech era in Jordan: Extending UTAUT2 model with perceived trust. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7, 1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.4.013
34.
HasanR., AshfaqM., & ShaoL. (2021). Evaluating drivers of FinTech adoption in the Netherlands. Global Business Review, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211027402
35.
HassanM. S., IslamM., SobhaniF. A., NasirH., MahmudI., & ZahraF. T. (2022). Drivers influencing the adoption intention towards mobile FinTech services: A study on the emerging Bangladesh market. Information, 13, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13070349
36.
HenselerJ., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
37.
HwangY., ParkS., & ShinN. (2021). Sustainable development of a mobile payment security environment using FinTech solutions. Sustainability, 13, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158375
38.
KakinumaY. (2022). Financial literacy and quality of life: A moderated mediation approach of FinTech adoption and leisure. International Journal of Social Economics, 49(12), 1713–1726. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2021-0633
39.
KhalilzadehJ., OzturkA. B., & BilgihanA. (2017). Security-related factors in extended UTAUT model for NFC based mobile payment in the restaurant industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.001
40.
KhatunN., & TamannaM. (2020). Factors affecting the adoption of FinTech: A study based on the financial institutions in Bangladesh. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 9(4), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2020.021
41.
KimS. H., & YooB. K. (2020). Factors influencing the reuse of mobile payment services in retail. Journal of Distribution Science, 18(3), 53–65.
42.
KlapperL., SingerD., & AnsarS. (2021). The Global Findex Database 2021. World Bank Group.
43.
Koenig-LewisN., MarquetM., PalmerA., & ZhaoA. L. (2015). Enjoyment and social influence: Predicting mobile payment adoption. The Service Industries Journal, 35(10), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2015.1043278
44.
Koenig-LewisN., PalmerA., & MollA. (2010). Predicting young consumers’ take up of mobile banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 410–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321011064917
45.
KumarR., SinghR., KumarK., KhanS., & CorvelloV. (2023). How does perceived risk and trust affect mobile banking adoption? Empirical evidence from India. Sustainability, 15, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054053
46.
KurniasariF., UrusS. B., UtomoP., HamidN. B., JimmyS. Y., & OthmanI. W. (2022). Determinant factors of adoption of FinTech payment services in Indonesia using the UTAUT approach. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 17(1), 97–125.
47.
KurniasariF., UtomoP., & JimmyS. Y. (2023). Determinant factors of FinTech adoption in organization using UTAUT theory approach. Journal of Business and Management Review, 4(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.47153/jbmr42.6032023
48.
KurniawanD., & PutraC. I. (2023). The effect of financial literacy, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and money saving to use decision financial technology in the millennial generation in North Bekasi. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.0.218.119/eajmr.v2i1.2170
49.
LaksamanaP., SuharyantoS., & CahayaY. F. (2022). Determining factors of continuance intention in mobile payment: FinTech industry perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(7), 1699–1718. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-11-2021-0851
50.
LeeY. K. (2021). Impacts of digital technostress and digital technology self-efficacy on FinTech usage intention of Chinese Gen Z consumers. Sustainability, 13, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095077
51.
LianJ. W., & LiJ. (2021). The dimensions of trust: An investigation of mobile payment services in Taiwan. Technology in Society, 67, 101753.
52.
LiC., KhaliqN., ChinoveL., KhaliqU., PoppJ., & OláhJ. (2023). Cryptocurrency acceptance model to analyze consumers’ usage intention: Evidence from Pakistan. SAGE Open, 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231156360
53.
Liébana-CabanillasF. J., Sánchez-FernándezJ., & Muñoz-LeivaF. (2014). Role of gender on acceptance of mobile payment. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(2), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2013-0137
54.
LimS. H., KimD. J., HurY., & ParkK. (2018). An empirical study of the impacts of perceived security and knowledge on continuous intention to use mobile FinTech payment services. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(10), 886–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1507132
55.
De Luna I.R., Liébana-CabanillasF., Sánchez-FernándezJ., & Muñoz-LeivaF. (2019). Mobile payment is not all the same: The adoption of mobile payment systems depending on the technology applied. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 931–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.018
56.
MakanyezaC. (2017). Determinants of consumers’ intention to adopt mobile banking services in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(6), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-07-2016-0099
57.
MalaquiasR. F., & SilvaA. F. (2020). Understanding the use of mobile banking in rural areas of Brazil. Technology in Society, 62, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101260
58.
MansyurA., & AliE. M. (2022). The adoption of Sharia FinTech among millenial in Indonesia: Moderating effect of Islamic financial literacy on UTAUT 2. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(4), 1329–1343. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i4/13035
59.
MascarenhasA. B. (2020). The influence of perceptions of risks and benefits on the continuity of use of FinTech services. Brazilian Business Review, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2021.18.1.1
60.
MerhiM., HoneK., TarhiniA., & AmeenN. (2021). An empirical examination of the moderating role of age and gender in consumer mobile banking use: A cross-national, quantitative study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(4), 1144–1168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2020-0092
61.
MohapatraM. R., MoirangthemN. S., & VishwakarmaP. (2020). Mobile banking adoption among rural consumers: Evidence from India. American Business Review, 23(2), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.23.2.300-315
62.
MohtaA., & ShunmugasundaramV. (2022). Financial literacy among millennials. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 12(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.12801
63.
MohtaA., & ShunmugasundaramV. (2023). Moderating role of millennials’ financial literacy on the relationship between risk tolerance and risky investment behavior: Evidence from India. International Journal of Social Economics, 51(3), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-12-2022-0812
64.
MulyanaA., DismanD., WibowoL., & HurriyatiR. (2018). Application of customer behavior in using FinTech as business media based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. 3rd Global Conference on Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2018). 117, pp. 69–75. Atlantis Press.
65.
NanD., KimY., ParkM. H., & KimJ. H. (2020). What motivates users to keep using social mobile payments? Sustainability, 12, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176878
66.
NatakusumahK., MaulinaE., MuftiadiA., & PurnomoM. (2023). Integrating religiosity into a technology acceptance model for the adoption of mobile payment technology. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.10.003
67.
NatarajanT., BalasubramanianS. A., & KasilingamD. L. (2018). The moderating role of device type and age of users on the intention to use mobile shopping applications. Technology in Society, 53, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.01.003
68.
NugrahaD. P., SetiawanB., NathanR. J., & Fekete-FarkasM. (2022). FinTech adoption drivers for innovation for SMEs in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040208
69.
NurT., & PanggabeanR. R. (2021). Factors influencing the adoption of mobile payment method among generation Z: The extended UTAUT approach. Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics, 4(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v4i1.19644
70.
OliveiraT., ThomasM., BaptistaG., & CamposF. (2016). Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.030
71.
OsmanZ., RazliI. A., & IngP. (2021). Does security concern, perceived enjoyment and government support affect FinTech adoption? Focused on bank users. Journal of Marketing Advances and Practices, 3(1), 61–78.
72.
PhH. (2023). Mobile payment service adoption: Understanding customers for an application of emerging financial technology. Information & Computer Security, 31(2), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-04-2022-0058
73.
PatilP., TamilmaniK., RanaN. P., & RaghavanV. (2020). Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144
74.
PatnaikA., KudalP., DawarS., InamdarV., & DawarP. (2023). Exploring user acceptance of digital payments in India: An empirical study using an extended technology acceptance model in the FinTech landscape. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(8), 2587–2597. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180831
75.
PhuongN. T., ThuyN. D., GiangT. L., HanB. T., HieuT. H., & LongN. T. (2022). Determinants of intention to use FinTech payment services: Evidence from Vietnem’ generation Z. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 26(1), 354–366.
76.
PWC. (2023). The Indian payments handbook–2014;2022–2027. PWC. https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/the-indian-payments-handbook-2022-2027.pdf
77.
Rabaa’iA. A. (2021). An investigation into the acceptance of mobile wallets in the FinTech era: An empirical study from Kuwait. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2021.10038422
78.
RahiS., MansourM. M., AlghizzawiM., & AlnaserF. M. (2019). Integration of UTAUT model in internet banking adoption context. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0032
79.
RahimN. F., BakriM. H., FiantoB. A., ZainalN., & ShamiS. A. (2023). Measurement and structural modelling on factors of Islamic FinTech adoption among millennials in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(6), 1463–1487. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2020-0279
80.
RamanP., & AashishK. (2021). To continue or not to continue: A structural analysis of antecedents of mobile payment systems in India. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(2), 242–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2020-0167
81.
Reserve Bank of India. (2017). Report of the working group on FinTech and digital banking. Reserve Bank of India.
82.
RohT., ParkB., & XiaoS. (2023). Adoption of AI-enabled robo-advisors in FinTech: Simultaneous employment of UTAUT and the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 24(1), 29–47.
83.
RoutrayS., KhuranaR., PayalR., & GuptaR. (2019). A move towards cashless economy: A case of continuous usage of mobile wallets in India. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9, 1152–1166. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2019.94074
84.
RubaiaiI. R., & PriaS. (2022). Customer usage behavior of FinTech products in Sultanate of Oman. International Journal of Research in Entrepreneurship & Business Studies, 3(3), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.47259/ijrebs.3321
85.
SarmahR., DhimanN., & KanojiaH. (2021). Understanding intentions and actual use of mobile wallets by millennial: An extended TAM model perspective. Journal of Indian Business Research, 13(3), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-06-2020-0214
86.
SenyoP., & OsabuteyE. L. (2020). Unearthing antecedents to financial inclusion through FinTech innovations. Technovation, 98, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102155
87.
SetiawanB., NugrahaD. P., IrawanA., NathanR. J., & ZoltanZ. (2021). User innovativeness and FinTech adoption in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7, 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030188
88.
ShaikhI. M., & AminH. (2023). Consumers’ innovativeness and acceptance towards use of financial technology in Pakistan: Extension of the UTAUT model. Information Discovery and Delivery, 52(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-08-2022-0080
89.
ShaikhI. M., QureshiM. A., NoordinK., ShaikhJ. M., KhanA., & ShahbazM. S. (2020). Acceptance of Islamic financial technology (FinTech) banking services by Malaysian users: An extension of technology acceptance model. Foresight, 22(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-12-2019-0105
90.
SinghA. K., & SharmaP. (2022). A study of Indian Gen X and millennials consumers’ intention to use FinTech payment services during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Modelling in Management, 18(4), 1177–1203. https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-02-2022-0059
91.
SinghS., SahniM. M., & KovidR. K. (2020). What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model. Management Decision, 58(8), 1675–1697. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019-1318
92.
SladeE. L., DwivediY. K., PiercyN. C., & WilliamsM. D. (2015). Modeling consumers’ adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the United Kingdom: Extending UTAUT with innovativeness, risk, and trust. Psychology & Marketing, 32(8), 860–873.
93.
SobtiN. (2019). Impact of demonetization on diffusion of mobile payment service in India. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 16(4), 472–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-09-2018-0086
94.
SulaimanA., JaafarN. I., & MohezarS. (2007). An overview of mobile banking adoption among the urban community. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 5(2), 157–168.
95.
SultanM. F., ShaikhS. K., TunioM. N., & AsimM. (2021). Impact of financial literacy of house hold females on the use of FinTech: Testing the relation with unified theory of acceptance & use of technology (UTAUT) model. GISRAS Journal of Management & Islamic Finance, 1(4), 50–65.
96.
TangK. L., AikN. C., & ChoongW. L.(2021). A modified UTAUT in the context of M-payment usage intention in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 5(1), 40–59.
97.
The Economics Times. (2023). India tops digital payments rankings globally, shows MyGovIndia data. ETPrime. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/banking/finance/banking/india-tops-digital-payments-rankings-globally-shows-mygovindia-data/articleshow/100892312.cms?from=mdr
98.
TürkerC., AltayB. C., & OkumuşA. (2022). Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 121968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121968
99.
VenkateshV., MorrisM. G., DavisG. B., & DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540
100.
VenkateshV., & BalaH. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
101.
VenkateshV., & DavisF. D. (2000). A Theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
102.
VenkateshV., ThongJ. Y., & XuX. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41410412
103.
VijayakumarS. (2023). Digital payments in India: Cresting new waves consistently. ET BFSI. https://bfsi.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/fintech/digital-payments-in-india-cresting-new-waves-consistently/99849087#:s:text=story%20has%20transformed.-,So%20far%20in%202023%2C%20over%2091%20billion%20digital%20payment%20transactions,UK%2C%20Germany%
104.
WangZ., GuanZ., HouF., LiB., & ZhouW. (2019). What determines customers’ continuance intention of FinTech? Evidence from YuEbao. Industrial Management & Data System, 119(8), 1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2019-0011
105.
WidyantoH. A., KusumawardaniK. A., & YohanesH. (2021). Safety first: Extending UTAUT to better predict mobile payment adoption by incorporating perceived security, perceived risk and trust. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management, 13(4), 952–973. https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-03-2020-0058
106.
XieJ., YeL., HuangW., & YeM. (2021). Understanding FinTech platform adoption: Impacts of perceived value and perceived risk. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 1893–1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050106
107.
YadavU. S., TripathiR., & TripathiM. A. (2022). Effect of digital and financial awareness of household womens on the use of Fin-Tech in India: Observing the relation with (UTAUT) model. Journal of Sustainable Business and Economics, 5(3), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.30564/jsbe.v5i3.14
108.
YahayaM. H., & AhmadK. (2019). Factors affecting the acceptance of financial technology among Asnaf for the distribution of zakat in Selangor—A study using UTAUT. Journal of Islamic Finance (Special Issue), 8, 35–46.
109.
YanC., SiddikA. B., AkterN., & DongQ. (2023). Factors infuencing the adoption intention of using mobile fnancial service during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of FinTech. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 61271–61289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17437-y
110.
YangX., YangJ., HouY., LiS., & SunS. (2023). Gamification of mobile wallet as an unconventional innovation for promoting FinTech: An fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 155, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113406
111.
YoonC., & LimD. (2020). An empirical study on factors affecting customers’ acceptance of internet-only banks in Korea. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1792259
