Family firms are often recognized as wealthy in resources, especially in operant resources. These resources are hidden and play a phenomenal role in sustainable development. Fewer studies are available to spotlight the role of operant resources. This study aims to surface the magnificent hidden role of agile operant resources that facilitate the diverse needs of stakeholders in family firms. Data for this study were collected using in-depth interviews with complementary observations. Almost 29 interviews were considered with the owners of family firms from Pakistan. Interviews were translated and transcribed. Gioia Methodology is used to develop broader themes for discussion in terms of first-order concepts, themes and aggregate dimension that explained the mystical hidden role of agile operant resources in family firms. Research findings portrayed that Collaborative Capability, Reputational Resources, Religious Resources and Relationship Proneness are the agile operant resources which strengthen stakeholder’s partnership in family businesses. The authors proposed a conceptual model for highlighting the pertinent role of agile operant resources that facilitate stakeholder partnership in family-owned businesses (FOBs). Recent study provides the conceptual framework to academia for future research in the literature of family firms. FOBs may adopt all these agile operant resources to cater firm diverse stakeholder partnerships in today’s business world. It will open new avenues of growth and innovation for FOBs. This research can apply to all FOBs.
AbdullahF., ShahA., GoharR., & IqbalA. M. (2011). The effect of group and family ownership on firm performance: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Review of Business Research Papers, 7(4), 191–208.
2.
AdlerP. S., & KwonS. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
3.
AhmadS., OmarR., & QuoquabF. (2020). Family firms’ sustainable longevity: The role of family involvement in business and innovation capability. Journal of Family Business Management, 11, 86–106.
4.
AhmadZ., & YaseenM. R. (2018). Moderating role of education on succession process in small family businesses in Pakistan. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(3), 293–305.
5.
AndersonR. C., & ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.
6.
AnisimovaT. A. (2007). The effects of corporate brand attributes on attitudinal and behavioural consumer loyalty. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24, 395–405.
7.
AskenazyP., CaroliE., & MarcusV. (2002). New organizational practices and working conditions: Evidence from France in the 1990’s. Recherches Économiques de Louvain/Louvain Economic Review, 68(1–2), 91–110.
8.
AstrachanC. B., BoteroI., AstrachanJ. H., & PrüglR. (2018). Branding the family firm: A review, integrative framework proposal, and research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(1), 3–15.
9.
BalodiK. C., & BasuS. (2015). Configurations of resources, strategy, structure and environment in young high-technology firms: Evidence from qualitative comparative analysis. Global Business Review, 16(6), 1012–1024.
10.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.
11.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
12.
BarneyJ. B., & HansenM. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 175–190.
13.
BaùM., BlockJ., Discua CruzA., & NaldiL. (2021). Bridging locality and internationalization—A research agenda on the sustainable development of family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 33(7–8), 477–492.
14.
BerroneP., GelabertL., & FosfuriA. (2009). The impact of symbolic and substantive actions on environmental legitimacy.
15.
BinghamJ. B., Gibb DyerW., SmithI., & AdamsG. L. (2011). A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 565–585.
16.
BinzC., HairJ.F.Jr., PieperT. M., & BaldaufA. (2013). Exploring the effect of distinct family firm reputation on consumers’ preferences. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(1), 3–11.
17.
BititciU., TurnerT., MackayD., KearneyD., ParungJ., & WaltersD. (2007). Managing synergy in collaborative enterprises. Production Planning and Control, 18(6), 454–465.
18.
BlombäckA. (2011). Realizing the value of family business identity as corporate brand element–A research model. (JIBS Working Papers 2011-17). Jönköping International Business School.
19.
BlombäckA., & BoteroI. C. (2013). Reputational capital in family firms: Understanding uniqueness from the stakeholder point of view. In Handbook of Research on Family Business (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing.
20.
BrownG. E., RiveA. C., FerrariM. C., & ChiversD. P. (2006). The dynamic nature of antipredator behavior: Prey fish integrate threat-sensitive antipredator responses within background levels of predation risk. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 9–16.
21.
BundyJ. N., LangeD. A., & ParkE. (2018, July). The social nature of stakeholder utility perceptions. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2018, No. 1, p. 14741). Academy of Management.
22.
ButtM. W., KausarA. R., & RashidY. (2021). Exploring the role of agile operant resources in the facilitation of strategic orientation: The case of family-owned businesses in Pakistan. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211053499.
23.
CameronK. S., DuttonJ. E., & QuinnR. E. (2003). An introduction to positive organizational scholarship. Positive Organizational Scholarship, 3(13), 2–21.
24.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family–controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–265.
25.
CastroI., & RoldánJ. L. (2013). A mediation model between dimensions of social capital. International Business Review, 22(6), 1034–1050.
26.
CennamoC., BerroneP., & Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2009). Does stakeholder management have a dark side?Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 491–507.
27.
ChrismanJ. J., ChuaJ. H., KellermannsF. W., MatherneC. F.III, & DebickiB. J. (2008). Management journals as venues for publication of family business research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 927–934.
28.
CollisD. J. (1994). Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities?Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 143–152.
29.
CorleyK. G., & GioiaD. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208.
30.
CuradoC., & MotaA. (2021). A systematic literature review on sustainability in family firms. Sustainability, 13(7), 3824.
31.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
32.
DjupeP. A., & GwiasdaG. W. (2010). Evangelizing the environment: Decision process effects in political persuasion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(1), 73–86.
33.
DonaldsonT., & PrestonL. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
34.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
35.
FangH., KotlarJ., MemiliE., ChrismanJ. J., & De MassisA. (2018). The pursuit of international opportunities in family firms: Generational differences and the role of knowledge-based resources. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 136–157.
36.
FirfirayS., CruzC., NeacsuI., & Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2018). Is nepotism so bad for family firms? A socioemotional wealth approach. Human Resource Management Review, 28(1), 83–97.
37.
FombrunC. J., GardbergN. A., & BarnettM. L. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1).
38.
FreemanR. E., WicksA. C., & ParmarB. (2004). Stakeholder theory and ‘the corporate objective revisited’. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.
39.
FriedmanA. L., & MilesS. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. OUP.
40.
GioiaD. A., CorleyK. G., & HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
41.
GodfreyP. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.
42.
Gomez-MejiaL. R., CruzC., BerroneP., & De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.
43.
HabbershonT. G., WilliamsM., & MacMillanI. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451–465.
44.
HandlerW. C. (1989). Managing the family firm succession process: The next-generation family member’s experience [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Boston University.
45.
HarrisonJ. S., BosseD. A., & PhillipsR. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74.
46.
HerreraJ., & de las Heras-RosasC. (2020). Economic, non-economic and critical factors for the sustainability of family firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 119.
47.
HittM. A., IrelandR. D., CampS. M., & SextonD. L. (2002). Strategic entrepreneurship: Integrating entrepreneurial and strategic management perspectives. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset, 1, 16.
48.
HulbergJ. (2006). Integrating corporate branding and sociological paradigms: A literature study. Journal of Brand Management, 14(1), 60–73.
49.
HuntS. D., & LambeC. J. (2000). Marketing’s contribution to business strategy: Market orientation, relationship marketing and resource-advantage theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(1), 17–43.
50.
HuntS. D., & MorganR. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 1–15.
51.
HuxhamC., & VangenS. (1996). Working together: Key themes in the management of relationships between public and non-profit organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9, 5–17.
52.
IntiharA., & PollackJ.M. (2012). Exploring small family-owned firms’ competitive ability. Journal of Family Business Management, 2(1), 76–86.
53.
JainS., & NairS. K. (2017). Work support and family support as predictors of work-to-family enrichment and family-to-work enrichment. Global Business Review, 18(5), 1307–1324.
54.
JinS., Guerrero-JuarezC. F., ZhangL., ChangI., RamosR., KuanC. H., MyungP., PlikusM. V., & NieQ. (2021). Inference and analysis of cell–cell communication using CellChat. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1088.
55.
KellerJ. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175–185.
56.
KimberlyH. H., ShahS., MarillK., & NobleV. (2008). Correlation of optic nerve sheath diameter with direct measurement of intracranial pressure. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(2), 201–204.
57.
KolbA. Y., & KolbD. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.
58.
LaplumeA. O., SonparK., & LitzR. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.
59.
LievensF., & SlaughterJ. E. (2016). Employer image and employer branding: What we know and what we need to know. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 407–440.
60.
LineschD., & CarnayJ. (2005). Supporting cultural competency in art therapy training. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 32(5), 382–394.
61.
MacDonaldA., ClarkeA., & HuangL. (2019). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainability: Designing decision-making processes for partnership capacity. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), 409–426.
62.
MantereS., & KetokiviM. (2013). Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 70–89.
63.
McCarthyT. M., & GolicicS. L. (2002). Implementing collaborative forecasting to improve supply chain performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25, 625–646.
64.
MitchellL. (2011). Enquiring teachers and democratic politics: Transformations in New Zealand’s early childhood education landscape. Early Years, 31(3), 217–228.
65.
MorrisC., JanssensA., ShillingV., AllardA., FellowesA., TomlinsonR., & LoganS. (2015). Meaningful health outcomes for paediatric neurodisability: Stakeholder prioritisation and appropriateness of patient reported outcome measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 1–9.
66.
MorrisD. B. (2020). Illness and culture in the postmodern age. In Illness and Culture in the Postmodern Age. University of California Press.
67.
MuzellecL., & LambkinM. (2008). Corporate rebranding and the implications for brand architecture management: The case of Guinness (Diageo) Ireland. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 16(4), 283–299.
68.
NedelkoZ., & PotocanV. (2019). Perception of corporate social responsibility by the employees: Evidence from Slovenia. In Socio-economic development: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1442–1465). IGI global.
69.
NicovichS. G., DibrellC. C., & DavisP. S. (2007). Integration of value chain position and Porter’s (1980) competitive strategies into the market orientation conversation: An examination of upstream and downstream activities. Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 13(2).
70.
OsnesG., UribeA., HokL., Yanli HouO., & HaugM. (2017). Autonomy and paradoxes in family ownership: Case studies across cultures and sectors. Journal of Family Business Management, 7(1), 93–110.
71.
PandaS. S., & SangleS. (2020). Stakeholder engagement as a dynamic capability. Business Strategy & Development, 3(2), 204–212.
72.
ParkerC. (2000). Performance measurement. Work Study, 49, 63–66.
73.
ParmarB. L., Edward FreemanR., HarrisonJ. S., WicksA. C., PurnellL., & De ColleS. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445.
74.
PenroseR. (1959, January). The apparent shape of a relativistically moving sphere. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 137–139). Cambridge University Press.
75.
Perez-RiverolY., CsordasA., BaiJ., Bernal-LlinaresM., HewapathiranaS., KunduD. J., InugantiA., GrissJ., MayerG., EisenacherM., PérezE., UszkoreitJ., PfeufferJ., SachsenbergT., YilmazS., TiwaryS., CoxJ., AudainE., WalzerM., JarnuczakA. F., TernentT., BrazmaA., & VizcaínoJ. A. (2019). The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: Improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(D1), D442–D450.
76.
PeterafM. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.
77.
PettigrewA. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292.
78.
PindadoJ., RequejoI., & de la TorreC. (2012). Do family firms use dividend policy as a governance mechanism? Evidence from the Euro zone. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 413–431.
79.
PorterM. E. (1981). The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 609–620.
80.
QinR., & NembhardD. A. (2015). Workforce agility in operations management. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 20(2), 55–69.
81.
QurashiA., HussainI., MushtaqF., & UllahA. (2013). The dilemma of success and failure in family business: Overcoming failure and attaining success. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2(4), 161.
82.
RamadaniV., & HoyF. (2015). Context and uniqueness of family businesses. In Family businesses in transition economies. Springer.
83.
RashidS., & RattenV. (2020). A dynamic capabilities approach for the survival of Pakistani family-owned business in the digital world. Journal of Family Business Management, 10(4), 373–387.
84.
RuppD. E. (2011). An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(1), 72–94.
85.
SagederM., DullerC., & MitterC. (2015). Reputation of family firms from a customer perspective. International Journal of Business Research, 15(2), 13–24.
86.
SagederM., MitterC., & Feldbauer-DurstmüllerB. (2018). Image and reputation of family firms: A systematic literature review of the state of research. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 335–377.
87.
SaiiaD. H., CarrollA. B., & BuchholtzA. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity “begins at home”. Business & Society, 42(2), 169–201.
88.
SchefferM., WestleyF., BrockW. A., & HolmgrenM. (2002). Linking theories from ecology, economy, and sociology. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, 195–239.
89.
SchoemakerP. J., HeatonS., & TeeceD. (2018). Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California Management Review, 61(1), 15–42.
90.
ShankerM. C., & AstrachanJ. H. (1996). Myths and realities: Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy—A framework for assessing family business statistics. Family Business Review, 9(2), 107–123.
91.
SharmaS. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681–697.
92.
SheehanN. T., & FossN. J. (2007). Enhancing the prescriptiveness of the resource-based view through Porterian activity analysis. Management Decision, 45, 450–461.
93.
SirmonD. G., & HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.
94.
SrivastavaA., & BhatiaS. (2022). Influence of family ownership and governance on performance: Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 23(5), 1135–1153.
95.
StavrouE. T., & SwierczP. M. (1998). Securing the future of the family enterprise: A model of offspring intentions to join the business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(2), 19–40.
96.
SteierL. P., ChrismanJ. J., & ChuaJ. H. (2015). Governance challenges in family businesses and business families. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(6), 1265–1280.
97.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
98.
SuneA., & GibbJ. (2015). Dynamic capabilities as patterns of organizational change: An empirical study on transforming a firm’s resource base. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), 213–231.
99.
SvenssonL. E. (2018). Monetary policy and macroprudential policy: Different and separate?Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 51(3), 802–827.
100.
Tasman-JonesJ. (2015). Brand camp: How to market a family business. Campden FB.
101.
TeeceD. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49.
102.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
103.
TreguaM., BrozovicD., & D’AuriaA. (2021). 15 years of service-dominant logic: Analyzing citation practices of Vargo and Lusch (2004). Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 31, 563–606.
104.
UrdeM., & GreyserS. A. (2016). The corporate brand identity and reputation matrix–The case of the nobel prize. Journal of Brand management, 23(1), 89–117.
105.
Van de VenA. H. (1992). Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 169–188.
106.
VargoS. L., & LuschR. F. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of service-dominant logic. Sage Publications.
VarkiS., & RustR. T. (1998). Technology and optimal segment size. Marketing Letters, 9(2), 147–167.
109.
WachE. (2012). Measuring the ‘inclusivity’of inclusive business. IDS Practice Papers, 2012(9), 01–30.
110.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
111.
WilliamsonO. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
112.
Wojewnik-FilipkowskaA., & WęgrzynJ. (2019). Understanding of public–private partnership stakeholders as a condition of sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(4), 1194.
113.
WoodfieldP., & RasmussenE. (2021). Family businesses and employment relations: Review and suggestions for future research. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 46(1), 68–87.
114.
YamazakiY., & KayesD. C. (2004). An experiential approach to cross-cultural learning: A review and integration of competencies for successful expatriate adaptation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(4), 362–379.
115.
YenG. F., YangY. H., & LeeA. K. (2013). A strategic group analysis of financial holding industry in Taiwan-structural relationship and dynamic development. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 16(2–3), 177–200.
116.
ZellwegerT. M., EddlestonK. A., & KellermannsF. W. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 54–63.
