This study aims to determine to what extent social capital and social approval mediate the relationship between power distance and purchase intention of luxury brands when these brands are congruent with one’s self. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling, linear regression to access mediating effects and latent class analysis to profile the sample. Results suggest that social capital and social approval together have a dual mediating effect on consumers’ intention to purchase luxury brands with a feeling of power distance. Three distinct perceived power distance profiles were revealed through respondent heterogeneity, impacting the other constructs. This is the first study to propose a model in the luxury market that includes low-status, underprivileged consumers as distant from power in society through the dual mechanisms of social approval and social capital. The study provides evidence that there is an opportunity to better understand including underprivileged individuals in the market and society.
BagozziR. P., & LeeK.-H. (2002). Multiple routes for social influence: The role of compliance, internalization, and social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(3), 226–247.
2.
BalabanisG. & DiamantopoulosA. (2016). Consumer xenocentrism as determinant of foreign product preference: A system justification perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 24(3), 58–77.
3.
BeatsonA., RiedelA., Chamorro-KocM., MarstonG., & StaffordL. (2020). Increasing the independence of vulnerable consumers through social support. Journal of Services Marketing, 34, 223–237.
4.
BecheurI., BayarassouO., & GhribH. (2017). Beyond brand personality: Building consumer–brand emotional relationship. Global Business Review, 18(3_suppl), S128–S144.
5.
BhamraM., & KishoreK. (2022). Strategies for cluster branding in MSMEs clusters: A grounded theory approach. Global Business Review, 09721509221124166. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221124166
6.
BourdieuP. (1980). Le capital social: Notes provisoires. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 31(1), 2–3.
7.
BourdieuP. (1983). Forms of capital. In RichardsJ. C. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press.
8.
BourdieuP. (1989). La noblesse d´Etat: Grandes écoles et esprit de corps. Editions de Minuit.
9.
CharlesK. K., HurstE., & RoussanovN. (2009). Conspicuous consumption and race. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 425–455.
10.
ChurchillG. A.Jr (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.
11.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
12.
CuiH.-j, FamK. S., ZhaoT.-y., XuW., & HanC. (2020). How to save the wounded self: Power distance belief’s moderation of self-identity threat and status-related consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(1), 3–12.
13.
Deloitte. (2020). Global powers of luxury goods. https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/consumer-business/articles/gx-cb-global-powers-of-luxury-goods.html
14.
DionD., & BorrazS. (2017). Managing status: How luxury brands shape class subjectivities in the service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 81(5), 67–85.
15.
DoddsW. B., MonroeK. B., & GrewalD. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319.
16.
EastmanJ. K., IyerR., ShepherdC. D., HeugelA., & FaulkD. (2018). Do they shop to stand out or fit in? The luxury fashion purchase intentions of young adults. Psychology & Marketing, 35(3), 220–236.
17.
EckhardtG. M., BelkR. W., & WilsonJ. A. J. (2014). The rise of inconspicuous consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(7), 807–826.
18.
EisendM., HartmannP., & ApaolazaV. (2017). Who buys counterfeit luxury brands? A meta-analytic synthesis of consumers in developing and developed markets. Journal of International Marketing, 25(4), 89–111.
19.
EscalasJ. E., & BettmanJ. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339–348.
20.
GoffmanE. (1981). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press.
21.
GrewalR., MehtaR., & KardesF. R. (2004). The timing of repeat purchases of consumer durable goods: The role of functional bases of consumer attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 101–115.
22.
GrixJ. (2002). Introducing students to the generic terminology of social research. Politics, 22(3), 175–186.
23.
HairJ. F., HultG. T. M., RingleC., & SarstedtM. A. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
24.
HardestyD. M., & BeardenW. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 98–107.
25.
HarriganP., EversU., MilesM. P., & DalyT. (2018). Customer engagement and the relationship between involvement, engagement, self-brand connection and brand usage intent. Journal of Business Research, 88(C), 388–396.
26.
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
27.
HennigsN., WiedmannK. P., KlarmannC., StrehlauS., GodeyB., PederzoliD., & OhH. (2012). What is the value of luxury? A cross-cultural consumer perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 29(12), 1018–1034.
28.
HillR. P. (2019). “You Can Always Get What You Want?!?” The case of rent-to-own. In SAGE business cases. SAGE Publications: SAGE Business Cases Originals.
29.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. SAGE Publication.
30.
JöreskogK. G., & SörbomD. (2018). LISREL 10 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Inc.
31.
KimC., YanX., & ParkS. (2022). Do consumer boycotts really matter with global companies? The moderating effect of gender differences, International Journal of Emerging Markets, in press.
32.
KimY. (2018). Power moderates the impact of desire for exclusivity on luxury experiential consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 35(4), 283–293.
33.
KimY., & ZhangY. (2014). The impact of power-distance belief on consumers’ preference for status brands. Journal of Global Marketing, 27(1), 13–29.
34.
KoE., CostelloJ. P., & TaylorC. R. (2017). What is a luxury brand? A new definition and review of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 99, 405–413.
35.
LandisB., & GladstoneJ. J. (2017). Personality, income, and compensatory consumption: Low-income extraverts spend more on status. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1518–1520.
36.
LinzerD. A., & LewisJ. B. (2011). poLCA: An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 42, 1–29.
37.
MendeM., & ScottM. L. (2021). May the force be with you: Expanding the scope for marketing research as a force for good in a sustainable world. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 40(2), 116–125.
38.
MostafaM. M. (2010). A structural equation analysis of the animosity model of foreign product purchase in Egypt. Global Business Review, 11(3), 347–363.
39.
OrdabayevaN., & ChandonP. (2011). Getting ahead of the Joneses: When equality increases conspicuous consumption among bottom tier consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 27–41.
40.
PinoG., AmatulliC., PelusoA. M., NataraajanR., & GuidoG. (2019). Brand prominence and social status in luxury consumption: A comparison of emerging and mature markets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 46, 163–172.
41.
PortesA. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1–12.
42.
PucciT., CaspriniE., GuerciniS., & ZanniL. (2017). One country, multiple country-related effects: An international comparative analysis among emerging countries on Italian fashion products. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 8(2), 98–112.
43.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community (p. 541). Simon and Schuster.
44.
RingleC. M., Da SilvaD., & de Souza BidoD. (2014). Modelagem de equações estruturais com utilização do Smart-PLS. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 56–73.
45.
RustR. T. (2020). The future of marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(1), 15–26.
46.
SharmaA., SoniM., BorahS. B., & SabooA. R. (2020). Identifying the drivers of luxury brand sales in emerging markets: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 111, 25–40.
47.
SiisiäinenM. (2000). Social capital, power and the third sector. In: SiisiäinenM., KinnunenP., & HietanenE. (Eds.), The third sector in Finland (pp. 3–25). STKL.
48.
StoecklV. E., & LuedickeM. K. (2015). Doing well while doing good? An integrative review of marketing criticism and response. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2452–2463.
49.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. AustinW. G. & WorchelsS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole.
50.
TanT. M., SaloJ., JuntunenJ., & KumarA. (2018). A comparative study of creation of self-brand connection amongst well-liked, new, and unfavorable brands. Journal of Business Research, 71(C), 71–80.
51.
VerdugoG. B., & PonceH. R. (2020). Gender differences in millennial consumers of Latin America associated with conspicuous consumption of new luxury goods. Global Business Review, 0972150920909002
52.
WellerB. E., BowenN. K., & FaubertS. J. (2020). Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287–311.
53.
WilkinsonR. (1996). Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. Routledge.
54.
WuZ., LuoJ., SchroederJ. E., & BorgersonJ. L. (2017). Forms of inconspicuous consumption. Marketing Theory, 17(4), 491–516.
55.
YimM. Y. C., SauerP. L., WilliamsJ., LeeS. J., & MacruryI. (2014). Drivers of attitudes toward luxury brands: A cross-national investigation into the roles of interpersonal influence and brand consciousness. International Marketing Review, 31(4), 363–389.
56.
YooB., DonthuN., & LenartowiczT. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3–4), 193–210.
