Masstige marketing represents a downward extension of luxury brands to middle-class consumers. The growing middle class, with its higher spending power, provides a greater scope for both the marketing industry and academia. A bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database from 2008 to 2022 was employed to reveal masstige marketing details. Publications were identified through performance analysis and science mapping analysis of selected articles to analyse masstige marketing’s growing relevance. The results identified masstige marketing’s major theories, key variables, antecedents, consequences, mediators and moderators. Emergent themes included hedonism, brand happiness and social comparison. The study also conducted citation analysis, co-citation analysis and bibliographic coupling on selected articles. The study findings provide theoretical and managerial implications and directions for future masstige marketing research using the TCM framework.
AhmiA. (2022). Bibliometric analysis using r for non-coders: A practical handbook in conducting bibliometric analysis studies using Biblioshiny for Bibliometrix R package. https://www.aidi-ahmi.com/download/TOC_bibliometric_analysis_using_R.pdf
AkhavanP., EbrahimN. A., FetratiM. A., & PezeshkanA. (2016). Major trends in knowledge management research: A bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1249–1264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1938-x
4.
AleemA., LoureiroS. M. C., & BilroR. G. (2024). Luxury fashion consumption: A review, synthesis and research agenda. Spanish Journal of Marketing—ESIC, 28(2), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-06-2021-0105
5.
AriaM., & CuccurulloC. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
6.
BaberR., UpadhyayY., KauravR. P. S., & BaberP. (2020). Application of ‘masstige’ theory and approaches for the marketing of smartphone brands in India. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 12(3), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114591
7.
BakerH. K., KumarS., & PandeyN. (2021). Forty years of the journal of futures markets: A bibliometric overview. Journal of Futures Markets, 41(7), 1027–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22211
8.
Bahri-AmmariN., CoulibalyD., & Ben MimounM. S. (2020). The bandwagon luxury consumption in Tunisian case: The roles of independent and interdependent self concept. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101903
9.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
10.
BilroR. G., LoureiroS. M. C., & dos SantosJ. F. (2021). Masstige strategies on social media: The influence on sentiments and attitude toward the brand. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(4), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12747
11.
BoisvertJ., & AshillN. J. (2018). The spillover effect of downward line extensions on U.S. consumers’ evaluation of a French luxury parent brand: The role of branding strategies, authenticity, and fit. Psychology and Marketing, 35(10), 740–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21131
12.
BruhnM., & SchnebelenS. (2017). Brand happiness: The searching and finding of the ‘holy grail’ of marketing. Unternehmung: Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, 71(4), 464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102318
13.
ChristodoulidesG., AthwalN., BoukisA., & SemaanR. W. (2021). New forms of luxury consumption in the sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 137, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.022
14.
DasM., HabibM., SahaV., & JebarajakirthyC. (2021). Bandwagon vs snob luxuries: Targeting consumers based on uniqueness dominance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102582
15.
DonthuN., KumarS., MukherjeeD., PandeyN., & LimW. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
16.
EastR., HammondK., & LomaxW. (2008). Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.04.001
17.
FalagasM. E., PitsouniE. I., MalietzisG. A., & PappasG. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
18.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
19.
García-LilloF., Úbeda-GarcíaM., & Marco-LajaraB. (2017). The intellectual structure of human resource management research: A bibliometric study of the international journal of human resource management, 2000–2012. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(13), 1786–1815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.10.007
20.
GoethalsG. R. (1986). Social comparison theory: Psychology from the lost and found. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167286123001
21.
GoorD., OrdabayevaN., KeinanA., & CrenerS. (2020). The impostor syndrome from luxury consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(6), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz044
22.
GurzkiH., & WoisetschlägerD. M. (2017). Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 77, 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.009
23.
HairJ. F., & SarstedtM. (2021). Data, measurement, and causal inferences in machine learning: Opportunities and challenges for marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 29, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1860683
24.
HanL., NunesJ. C., & DrezeX. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.4.015
25.
Hennig-ThurauT., GwinnerK. P., WalshG., & GremlerD. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
26.
HuangJ. H., DuanX. Y., HeF. F., WangG. J., & HuX. Y. (2021). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of research on weak measurement research over the past decades based on Biblioshiny. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.11375
27.
HuangM. H., & RustR. T. (2008). Two paths to luxury. Marketing Management, 17(6), 31–35.
28.
HusainR., SamadT. A., & QamarY. (2022). Past, present, and future of luxury brands: A review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 26(4), 582–602.
29.
KapfererJ. N., & BastienV. (2009). The specificity of luxury management: Turning marketing upside down. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5–6), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.51
30.
KapnerS. (2024, September26). The addiction to discounting at Michael Kors is exposed in court. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/business/retail/the-addiction-to-discounting-at-michael-kors-is-exposed-in-court-cecc1b7c
31.
KastanakisM. N., & BalabanisG. (2012). Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the ‘bandwagon’ luxury consumption behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1399–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.005
32.
KellerK. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. The Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700101
33.
KhanM. A., PattnaikD., AshrafR., AliI., KumarS., & DonthuN. (2021). Value of special issues in the journal of business research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 125, 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.015
34.
KimJ.-E., LloydS., AdebeshinK., & KangJ.-Y. M. (2019). Decoding fashion advertising symbolism in masstige and luxury brands. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 23(2), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-04-2018-0047
35.
KoE., CostelloJ. P., & TaylorC. R. (2019). What is a luxury brand? A new definition and review of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 99, 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.023
36.
KumarA., & PaulJ. (2018). Mass prestige value and competition between American versus Asian laptop brands in an emerging market—Theory and evidence. International Business Review, 27(5), 969–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.007
37.
KumarA., PaulJ., & StarcevicS. (2021). Do brands make consumers happy? A masstige theory perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102318
38.
KumarA., PaulJ., & UnnithanA. B. (2020). ‘Masstige’ marketing: A review, synthesis and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.030
39.
LiE. Y., LiaoC. H., & YenH. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42(9), 1515–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012
40.
LoA., & YeungM. A. (2020). Brand prestige and affordable luxury: The role of hotel guest experiences. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 26(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766719880251
41.
LoureiroS. M. C., BilroR. G., & de Aires AngelinoF. J. (2021). Virtual reality and gamification in marketing higher education: A review and research agenda. Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, 25(2), 179–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-01-2020-0013
42.
MainolfiG. (2020). Exploring materialistic bandwagon behaviour in online fashion consumption: A survey of Chinese luxury consumers. Journal of Business Research, 120, 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.038
43.
MartinM. C., & KennedyP. F. (1994). Social comparison and the beauty of advertising models: The role of motives for comparison. Advances in Consumer Research, 21(1), 365–371.
44.
MundelJ., HuddlestonP., & VodermeierM. (2017). An exploratory study of consumers’ perceptions: What are affordable luxuries?Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.004
45.
Munoz-LeivaF., Viedma-del-JesúsM. I., Sanchez-FernandezJ., & Lopez-HerreraA. G. (2012). An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1077–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9565-3
46.
MussweilerT., RüterK., & EpstudeK. (2004). The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 832–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.832
47.
NicolaisenJ. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 609–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120
48.
ParksL., & GuayR. P. (2009). Personality, values, and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(7), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.002
49.
PaulJ. (2019). Masstige model and measure for brand management. European Management Journal, 37(3), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.10.002
50.
RathiR., GargR., KatariaA., & ChhikaraR. (2022). Evolution of luxury marketing landscape: A bibliometric analysis and future directions. Journal of Brand Management, 29(3), 241.
51.
SharmaA., SoniM., BorahS. B., & HaqueT. (2022). From silos to synergies: A systematic review of luxury in marketing research. Journal of Business Research, 139, 893–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.007
52.
SilversteinM., & FiskeN. (2003). Luxury for the masses. Harvard Business Review, 81(4), 48–57. https://hbr.org/2003/04/luxury-for-the-masses
53.
SilversteinM. J., FiskeN., & ButmanJ. (2008). Trading up: Why consumers want new luxury goods—And how companies create them. Penguin.
54.
SnyderC. R., & FromkinH. L. (2012). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. Springer Science & Business Media.
55.
SrivastavaA., MukherjeeS., & JebarajakirthyC. (2020). Aspirational consumption at the bottom of pyramid: A review of literature and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 110, 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.045
56.
SrivastavaM. (2021). Mapping the influence of influencer marketing: A bibliometric analysis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(7), 979–1003. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-03-2021-0085
57.
TruongY., McCollR., & KitchenP. J. (2009). New luxury brand positioning and the emergence of masstige brands. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5–6), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2009.1
58.
TsaiW. S., YangQ., & LiuY. (2013). Young Chinese consumers’ snob and bandwagon luxury consumption preferences. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2013.827081
59.
TverskyA., & KahnemanD. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
60.
VachaniS., & SmithN. C. (2008). Socially responsible distribution: Distribution strategies for reaching the bottom of the pyramid. California Management Review, 50(2), 52–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166435
61.
van EckN. J., & WaltmanL. (2014). CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.006
62.
VigneronF., & JohnsonL. W. (2004). Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management, 11(6), 484–506. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540194
63.
WangH., ChengZ., & SmythR. (2019). Consumption and happiness. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(1), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1371294
64.
WangX. D., LiuJ. J., & ShengF. S. (2014). Analysis of hotspots in the field of domestic knowledge discovery based on co-word analysis method. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 14(5), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2014-0051
65.
WeijersD. (2011). Hedonism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/hedonism/
66.
WhiteH. D., & GriffithB. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
67.
XuZ., GeZ., WangX., & SkareM. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of technology adoption literature published from 1997 to 2020. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120896
