The drivers of individual-level innovation remain an underresearched area. Based on JD-R theory, we argue that (a) high-performance work systems (HPWS) enhance employees’ innovative work behaviours (IWB) through an increase in employees’ work engagement, and (b) that the positive relationship between HPWS and work engagement will be magnified at high levels of work overload. We collected data from 313 supervisor-subordinate dyads in an engineering R&D organization in India. Structural equation modelling results supported all the hypotheses except the moderation hypotheses. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed, and we also suggest a few avenues for future research.
AfsarB., & UmraniW. A. (2019). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of motivation to learn, task complexity and innovation climate. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(3), 402–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0257
2.
AgarwalT., AryaS., & BhasinK. (2022). Evaluating the impact of Coronavirus Disease-2019 pandemic on employer branding, employee engagement and employee performance: A moderation study of Indian information technology firms. Global Business Review, 09721509221119014. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221119014
3.
AkramT., LeiS., HaiderM. J., & HussainS. T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.10.001
4.
AlEssaH. S., & DurugboC. M. (2021). Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00224-x
5.
AwanS. H., HabibN., Shoaib AkhtarC., & NaveedS. (2020). Effectiveness of performance management system for employee performance through engagement. SAGE Open, 10(4), 2158244020969383. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020969383
6.
AzeemM., AhmedM., HaiderS., & SajjadM. (2021). Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation. Technology in Society, 66, 101635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101635
7.
BakkerA. B., & AlbrechtS. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207
8.
BakkerA. B., & DemeroutiE. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
9.
BakkerA. B., & DemeroutiE. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
10.
BakkerA. B., & XanthopoulouD. (2013). Creativity and charisma among female leaders: The role of resources and work engagement. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(14), 2760–2779. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.751438
11.
BakkerA. B., DemeroutiE., & Sanz-VergelA. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
12.
BakkerA. B., HakanenJ. J., DemeroutiE., & XanthopoulouD. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274
13.
BakkerA. B., PetrouP., Op den KampE. M., & TimsM. (2020). Proactive vitality management, work engagement, and creativity: The role of goal orientation. Applied Psychology, 69(2), 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12173
14.
BakkerA. B., SchaufeliW. B., LeiterM. P., & TarisT. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393649
15.
BakkerA. B., van VeldhovenM., & XanthopoulouD. (2010). Beyond the demand-control model. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000006
16.
BaoP., XiaoZ., BaoG., & NoorderhavenN. (2021). Inclusive leadership and employee work engagement: A moderated mediation model. Baltic Journal of Management, 17(1), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-06-2021-0219
17.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
18.
BhattiM. A., MatN., & JuhariA. S. (2018). Effects of job resources factors on nurses job performance (mediating role of work engagement). International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 31(8), 1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2017-0129
19.
BlaiqueL., IsmailH. N., & AldabbasH. (2022). Organizational learning, resilience and psychological empowerment as antecedents of work engagement during COVID-19. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2021-0197
20.
Bos-NehlesA., RenkemaM., & JanssenM. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228–1253. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0257
21.
BowenF. E., RostamiM., & SteelP. (2010). Timing is everything: A meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1179–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.014
22.
BoxallP., HuoM.-L., MackyK., & WintertonJ. (2019). High-involvement work processes and systems: A review of theory, distribution, outcomes, and tensions. In BuckleyM. Ronald, WheelerA. R., BaurJ. E., & HalbeslebenJ. R. B. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 37, pp. 1–52). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-730120190000037002
23.
ChenC.-Y. (2019). Does work engagement mediate the influence of job resourcefulness on job crafting? An examination of frontline hotel employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1684–1701. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2018-0365
24.
CheungG. W., & LauR. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343
25.
ChiangY.-H., HsuC.-C., & ShihH.-A. (2015). Experienced high performance work system, extroversion personality, and creativity performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(2), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9403-y
26.
ChooL. S. (2016). A study of the role of work engagement in promoting service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in the Malaysian hotel sector. Global Business & Organizational Excellence, 35(4), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21682
27.
CookeF. L., CooperB., BartramT., WangJ., & MeiH. (2019). Mapping the relationships between high-performance work systems, employee resilience and engagement: A study of the banking industry in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1239–1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1137618
28.
DastmalchianA., BaconN., McNeilN., SteinkeC., BlytonP., Satish KumarM., BayraktarS., Auer-RizziW., BodlaA. A., CottonR., CraigT., ErtenuB., HabibiM., HuangH. J., İmerH. P., IsaC. R., IsmailA., JiangY., KabasakalH., … VarnaliR. (2020). High-performance work systems and organizational performance across societal cultures. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(3), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00295-9
29.
De DreuC. K. W., BaasM., & NijstadB. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739
30.
de JongeJ., & DormannC. (2006). Stressors, resources, and strain at work: A longitudinal test of the triple-match principle. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1359–1374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1359
31.
de ReuverR., Van de VoordeK., & KilroyS. (2021). When do bundles of high performance work systems reduce employee absenteeism? The moderating role of workload. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(13), 2889–2909. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1616594
32.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
33.
DemeroutiE., BakkerA. B., & GeversJ. M. P. (2015). Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of work engagement and flourishing. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001
34.
DemeroutiE., BakkerA. B., NachreinerF., & SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
35.
DlouhyK., & CasperA. (2021). Downsizing and surviving employees’ engagement and strain: The role of job resources and job demands. Human Resource Management, 60(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22032
36.
Du PlessisE. (2018). Exploring the relationship between self-managed work teams and work engagement in a gold processing plant(Thesis, North-West University). https://repository.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/30963
37.
DubbeltL., DemeroutiE., & RispensS. (2019). The value of job crafting for work engagement, task performance, and career satisfaction: Longitudinal and quasi-experimental evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1576632
38.
El-KassarA.-N., DagherG. K., LythreatisS., & AzakirM. (2022). Antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding: The roles of HR practices, organizational support for creativity, creativity, innovative work behavior, and task performance. Journal of Business Research, 140, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.079
39.
FletcherL. (2016). Training perceptions, engagement, and performance: Comparing work engagement and personal role engagement. Human Resource Development International, 19(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2015.1067855
40.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
41.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
42.
FuN., FloodP. C., BosakJ., MorrisT., & O’ReganP. (2015). How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms?Employee Relations, 37(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2013-0155
43.
GahanP., TheilackerM., AdamovicM., ChoiD., HarleyB., HealyJ., & OlsenJ. E. (2021). Between fit and flexibility? The benefits of high-performance work practices and leadership capability for innovation outcomes. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(2), 414–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12316
44.
García-ChasR., Neira-FontelaE., & Castro-CasalC. (2014). High-performance work system and intention to leave: A mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(3), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.789441
45.
García-MoralesV. J., Jiménez-BarrionuevoM. M., & Gutiérrez-GutiérrezL. (2012). Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 1040–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.005
46.
GarmendiaA., ElorzaU., AritzetaA., & Madinabeitia-OlabarriaD. (2021). High-involvement HRM, job satisfaction and productivity: A two wave longitudinal study of a Spanish retail company. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12307
47.
GreenP. I., FinkelE. J., FitzsimonsG. M., & GinoF. (2017). The energizing nature of work engagement: Toward a new need-based theory of work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.007
48.
GrumanJ. A., & SaksA. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.004
49.
HairJ. F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., & AndersonR. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
50.
HakanenJ. J., BakkerA. B., & DemeroutiE. (2005). How dentists cope with their job demands and stay engaged: The moderating role of job resources. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 113(6), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00250.x
51.
HakanenJ. J., PerhoniemiR., & Toppinen-TannerS. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.003
52.
HammondM. M., NeffN. L., FarrJ. L., SchwallA. R., & ZhaoX. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556
53.
HarrisM. M., & BladenA. (1994). Wording effects in the measurement of role conflict and role ambiguity: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Management, 20(4), 887–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(94)90034-5
54.
HauffS., FelfeJ., & KlugK. (2022). High-performance work practices, employee well-being, and supportive leadership: Spillover mechanisms and boundary conditions between HRM and leadership behavior. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(10), 2109–2137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1841819
55.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, second edition: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
56.
HenselP. G., & KacprzakA. (2020). Job overload, organizational commitment, and motivation as antecedents of cyberloafing: Evidence from employee monitoring software. European Management Review, 17(4), 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12407
57.
HongX., LiuQ., & ZhangM. (2021). Dual stressors and female pre-school teachers’ job satisfaction during the COVID-19: The mediation of work-family conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 691498. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691498
58.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
59.
HuangK.-E., WuJ.-H., LuS.-Y., & LinY.-C. (2016). Innovation and technology creation effects on organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2187–2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.028
60.
IsmailA., MajidA. H. A., RahmanM. A., JamaluddinN. A., SusantiyA. I., & SetiawatiC. I. (2018). Aligning Malaysian SMEs with the megatrends: The roles of HPWPs and employee creativity in enhancing Malaysian SME performance. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918811236
61.
JanssenO. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
62.
JasonV., & GeethaS. N. (2021). Regulatory focus and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement. Current Psychology, 40(6), 2791–2803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00220-1
63.
JiangH., & MenR. L. (2017). Creating an engaged workforce: The Impact of authentic leadership, transparent organizational communication, and work-life enrichment. Communication Research, 44(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613137
64.
JiangK., LepakD. P., HuJ., & BaerJ. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088
65.
JyotiJ., & RaniA. (2017). High performance work system and organisational performance: Role of knowledge management. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1770–1795. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2015-0262
66.
JyotiJ., & RaniA. (2019). Role of burnout and mentoring between high performance work system and intention to leave: Moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Research, 98, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.068
67.
KallmuenzerA. (2018). Exploring drivers of innovation in hospitality family firms. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3), 1978–1995. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2017-0242
68.
KaratepeO. M. (2013). The effects of work overload and work-family conflict on job embeddedness and job performance: The mediation of emotional exhaustion. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(4), 614–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111311322952
69.
KaushikD., & MukherjeeU. (2021). High-performance work system: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2020-2282
70.
KhanM. M., MubarikM. S., IslamT., RehmanA., AhmedS. S., KhanE., & SohailF. (2021). How servant leadership triggers innovative work behavior: Exploring the sequential mediating role of psychological empowerment and job crafting. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 1037–1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2020-0367
71.
KimK., OkC., KangS.-C., BaeJ., & KwonK. (2021). High-performance work systems with internal and external contingencies: The moderating roles of organizational slack and industry instability. Human Resource Management, 60(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22030
72.
KloutsiniotisP. V., & MihailD. M. (2020). Is it worth it? Linking perceived high-performance work systems and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of job demands and job resources. European Management Journal, 38(4), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.012
73.
KnightC., PattersonM., & DawsonJ. (2017a). Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 792–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2167
74.
KnightC., PattersonM., DawsonJ., & BrownJ. (2017b). Building and sustaining work engagement—A participatory action intervention to increase work engagement in nursing staff. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5), 634–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1336999
75.
KooijD. T. A. M., & BoonC. (2018). Perceptions of HR practices, person–organisation fit, and affective commitment: The moderating role of career stage. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12164
76.
KulikowskiK. (2018). The model of relationships between pay for individual performance and work engagement. Career Development International, 23(4), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-10-2017-0181
77.
KumarD., UpadhyayY., YadavR., & GoyalA. K. (2022). Psychological capital and innovative work behaviour: The role of mastery orientation and creative self-efficacy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103157
78.
LeeH.-W. (2019). Moderators of the motivational effects of performance management: A comprehensive exploration based on expectancy theory. Public Personnel Management, 48(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018783003
79.
LeeY. L. A., MalikA., RosenbergerP. J., & SharmaP. (2020). Demystifying the differences in the impact of training and incentives on employee performance: Mediating roles of trust and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1987–2006. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0309
80.
LittleT. D., CunninghamW. A., ShaharG., & WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
81.
LittleT. D., RhemtullaM., GibsonK., & SchoemannA. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
82.
LiuN.-C., & LiuM.-S. (2011). Human resource practices and individual knowledge-sharing behavior—An empirical study for Taiwanese R&D professionals. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(4), 981–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.555138
83.
LuC., WangH., LuJ., DuD., & BakkerA. B. (2014). Does work engagement increase person–job fit? The role of job crafting and job insecurity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.12.004
84.
MacKinnonD. P., LockwoodC. M., HoffmanJ. M., WestS. G., & SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
85.
MadenC. (2015). Linking high involvement human resource practices to employee proactivity: The role of work engagement and learning goal orientation. Personnel Review, 44(5), 720–738. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2014-0030
86.
MadridH. P., PattersonM. G., BirdiK. S., LeivaP. I., & KauselE. E. (2014). The role of weekly high-activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1867
87.
MazzettiG., RobledoE., VignoliM., TopaG., GuglielmiD., & SchaufeliW. B. (2021). Work engagement: A meta-analysis using the job demands-resources model. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988
88.
MemonM. A., SallehR., MirzaM. Z., CheahJ.-H., TingH., AhmadM. S., & TariqA. (2020). Satisfaction matters: The relationships between HRM practices, work engagement and turnover intention. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2018-0127
89.
MiaoR., BozionelosN., ZhouW., & NewmanA. (2021). High-performance work systems and key employee attitudes: The roles of psychological capital and an interactional justice climate. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(2), 443–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1710722
90.
MontaniF., TorresC., FerreiraM. C., MendonçaH., SilvaA. J., CourcyF., & Dagenais-DesmaraisV. (2021). Self-image goals, compassionate goals and innovative work behavior: The role of organizational support for innovation across countries. Journal of Business Research, 137, 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.072
91.
MontaniF., VandenbergheC., KhedhaouriaA., & CourcyF. (2020). Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness. Human Relations, 73(1), 59–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718819055
92.
NeuberL., EnglitzC., SchulteN., ForthmannB., & HollingH. (2022). How work engagement relates to performance and absenteeism: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 292–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1953989
93.
NielsenK., AntinoM., Rodríguez-MuñozA., & Sanz-VergelA. (2021). Is it me or us? The impact of individual and collective participation on work engagement and burnout in a cluster-randomized organisational intervention. Work & Stress, 35(4), 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2021.1889072
94.
PahosN., & GalanakiE. (2018). Staffing practices and employee performance: The role of age. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 7(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-01-2018-0007
95.
PattnaikS. C., & SahooR. (2021). High-performance work practices, affective commitment of employees and organizational performance: A multi-level modelling using 2-1-2 mediation analysis. Global Business Review, 22(6), 1594–1609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919859106
96.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., & PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
97.
RhemtullaM. (2016). Population performance of SEM parceling strategies under measurement and structural model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 348–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000072
98.
RichB. L., LepineJ. A., & CrawfordE. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
99.
RudolphC. W., KatzI. M., LavigneK. N., & ZacherH. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008
100.
SaksA. M. (2021). Caring human resources management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32, 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835
101.
SalanovaM., SchaufeliW. B., XanthopoulouD., & BakkerA. B. (2010). The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife. In Work engagement—A handbook of essential theory and research (1st ed., pp. 118–131). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203853047
102.
SaleemS., RasheedM. I., MalikM., & OkumusF. (2021). Employee-fit and turnover intentions: The role of job engagement and psychological contract violation in the hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 49, 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.10.009
103.
SchaufeliW. B., & BakkerA. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
104.
SchaufeliW. B., BakkerA. B., & SalanovaM. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
105.
SchaufeliW. B., SalanovaM., González-romáV., & BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
106.
ShantzA., AlfesK., TrussC., & SoaneE. (2013). The role of employee engagement in the relationship between job design and task performance, citizenship and deviant behaviours. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(13), 2608–2627. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.744334
107.
SiddiqueM., ProcterS., & GittellJ. H. (2019). The role of relational coordination in the relationship between high-performance work systems (HPWS) and organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(4), 246–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-04-2018-0029
108.
SonnentagS. (2011). Research on work engagement is well and alive. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.510639
109.
SousaT., & NevesP. (2021). Two tales of rumination and burnout: Examining the effects of boredom and overload. Applied Psychology, 70(3), 1018–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12257
110.
SpectorP. E., & JexS. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356
111.
TakeuchiR., LepakD. P., WangH., & TakeuchiK. (2007). An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1069–1083. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1069
112.
TakeuchiR., WayS. A., & TianA. W. (2018). Cross-level effects of support climate: Main and moderating roles. Human Resource Management, 57(5), 1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21891
113.
TimsM., BakkerA. B., & DerksD. (2014). Job crafting and job performance: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 1–15. https://www.tandfonline.com.xlrij.remotexs.in/doi/abs/10.1080/1359432X.2014.969245
114.
TregaskisO., DanielsK., GloverL., ButlerP., & MeyerM. (2013). High performance work practices and firm performance: A longitudinal case study. British Journal of Management, 24(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00800.x
115.
Úbeda-GarcíaM., Claver-CortésE., Marco-LajaraB., Zaragoza-SáezP., & García-LilloF. (2018). High performance work system and performance: Opening the black box through the organizational ambidexterity and human resource flexibility. Journal of Business Research, 88, 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.045
116.
van de BrakeH. J., WalterF., RinkF. A., EssensP. J. M. D., & van der VegtG. S. (2020). Multiple team membership and job performance: The role of employees’ information-sharing networks. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(4), 967–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12326
117.
Vargas RubilarN., & OrosL. B. (2021). Stress and burnout in teachers during times of pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 756007. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756007
118.
VîrgăD., MaricuţoiuL. P., & IancuA. (2021). The efficacy of work engagement interventions: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Current Psychology, 40(12), 5863–5880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00438-z
119.
VogelR. M., & FeldmanD. C. (2009). Integrating the levels of person-environment fit: The roles of vocational fit and group fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.03.007
120.
WattooM. A., ZhaoS., & XiM. (2020). High-performance work systems and work–family interface: Job autonomy and self-efficacy as mediators. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(1), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12231
121.
WeijtersB., & BaumgartnerH. (2022). On the use of balanced item parceling to counter acquiescence bias in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428121991909
122.
WeissH. M., & CropanzanoR. (1996). Affective events theory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 1–74.
123.
WoodS. (2021). Developments in the HRM–performance research stream: The mediation studies:German Journal of Human Resource Management, 35, 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002220986943
124.
WuW., & YuL. (2022). How does personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology promote knowledge workers’ innovative work behavior?Information & Management, 59(6), 103688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103688
125.
YangJ., KimY., & KimP. B. (2021). Pushing forward high-performance work systems in the hotel industry: A procedural-justice climate to promote higher unit-level outcomes. Tourism Management, 87, 104385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104385
126.
ZacharatosA., BarlingJ., & IversonR. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.77
127.
ZhangB., & MorrisJ. L. (2014). High-performance work systems and organizational performance: Testing the mediation role of employee outcomes using evidence from PR China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.781524
128.
ZhangC., & LiuL. (2021). The effect of job crafting to job performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1762517
129.
ZhangL., & FarndaleE. (2021). Workforce age profile effects on job resources, work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Review, 51(1), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2020-0095
