The Moderating Effects of Board Independence and the Separation of Chairman–Chief Executive Officer Duality Roles on a Firm’s Value: Evidence from the Thai Listed Firms

Abstract

Since the 1997 financial crisis, good corporate governance is one of the most contentious problems for Thai listed companies’ long-term viability. Unlike earlier research in Thailand, this article uses a three-level hierarchical regression model to examine the moderating effects of board independence and the separation of chairman–chief executive officer (CEO) duality roles on the firm’s value of the Thai listed firms between 2010 and 2019. This study confirms a negative relationship between family ownership and a firm’s value in Thailand. Nevertheless, it reveals that the association between family ownership and firm’s value becomes positive if the Thai listed firms have a high proportion of independent directors. Further evidence confirms that the separation of chairman–CEO duality roles can increase a firm’s value, but it cannot solely enhance the value in those firms with high family ownership. Finally, this study discusses empirically-based practical implications and recommendations.

Keywords

Corporate governance family ownership board independence chairman–CEO duality firm’s performance moderating effects

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al Farooque

, Buachoom

, & Hoang

(2019a). Interactive effects of executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance: Evidence from an Asian market. Asia Pacific Journal of Management , 36, 1111–1164.

Al Farooque

, Buachoom

, & Sun

(2019b). Board, audit committee, ownership and financial performance–emerging trends from Thailand. Pacific Accounting Review , 32(1), 54–81.

Allouche

, Amann

, Jaussaud

, & Kurashina

(2008). The impact of family control on the performance and financial characteristics of family versus nonfamily businesses in Japan: A matched-pair investigation. Family Business Review , 21, 315–330.

Ammann

, Oesch

, & Schmid

M. M.

(2011). Corporate governance and firm value: International evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance , 18, 36–55.

Anderson

R. C.

, & Reeb

D. M.

(2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance , 58, 1301–1328.

Anderson

R. C.

, & Reeb

D. M.

(2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly , 49, 209–237.

Bhagat

, & Bolton

(2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance , 14, 257–273.

Black

B. S.

(2001). The core fiduciary duties of outside directors. Asia Business Law Review , 71(7), 3–16.

Buachoom

(2017). Simultaneous relationship between performance and executive compensation of Thai non-financial firms. Asian Review of Accounting , 25, 404–423.

10.

Buachoom

(2018). How do board structures of Thai firms influence on different quantile levels of firm performance? In Lee

C.-F.

& Yu

M.-T.

(Eds.), Advances in Pacific Basin business, economics and finance (pp. 157–189). Emerald Publishing.

11.

Buachoom

(2022). Effect of fair value accounting and corporate governance on stock prices: Evidence of information efficiency in Thailand. In Lee

C.-F.

& Yu

M.-T.

(Eds.), Advances in Pacific Basin business, economics and finance (pp. 209–228). Emerald Publishing.

12.

CFA Institute. (2020). Independent directors in Asia Pacific: Regulations and practice in selected markets . https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/advocacy/policy-positions/independent-directors-in-asia-pacific

13.

Chu

(2011). Family ownership and firm performance: Influence of family management, family control, and firm size. Asia Pacific Journal of Management , 28, 833–851.

14.

Davis

J. H.

, Schoorman

F. D.

, & Donaldson

(1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review , 22, 20–47.

15.

de Jong

P. F.

(1999). Hierarchical regression analysis in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , 6, 198–211.

16.

Dhnadirek

, & Tang

(2003). Corporate governance problems in Thailand: Is ownership concentration the cause? Asia Pacific Business Review , 10, 121–138.

17.

Erah

D. O.

, Samuel

, & Izedonmi

(2012). Chief executive officer duality and financial performance of firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Social Research , 2, 125–134.

18.

Fama

E. F.

, & Jensen

M. C.

(1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics , 26, 301–325.

19.

Giovannini

(2010). Corporate governance, family ownership and performance. Journal of Management & Governance , 14, 145–166.

20.

Grossman

S. J.

, & Hart

O. D.

(1982). Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives. In McCall

(Ed.), The economics of information and uncertainty (pp. 107–140). UMI.

21.

Herbert

W. E.

, & Agwor

T. C.

(2021). Board composition and corporate performance: X-raying the nexus in Nigerian Banks. Global Business Review . https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211049593

22.

Hermalin

B. E.

, & Weisbach

M. S.

(1988). The determinants of board composition. The RAND Journal of Economics , 19, 589–606.

23.

Hillman

A. J.

, Withers

M. C.

, & Collins

B. J.

(2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management , 35, 1404–1427.

24.

Hsu

, Lin

S.-W.

, Chen

W.-P.

, & Huang

J.-W.

(2021). CEO duality, information costs, and firm performance. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance , 55, 101011.

25.

Jensen

M. C.

(1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance , 48, 831–880.

26.

Jensen

M. C.

, & Meckling

W. H.

(1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics , 3, 305–360.

27.

Kim

K. A.

, Kitsabunnarat

, & Nofsinger

J. R.

(2004). Ownership and operating performance in an emerging market: Evidence from Thai IPO firms. Journal of Corporate Finance , 10, 355–381.

28.

King

M. R.

, & Santor

(2008). Family values: Ownership structure, performance and capital structure of Canadian firms. Journal of Banking & Finance , 32, 2423–2432.

29.

Koji

, Adhikary

B. K.

, & Tram

(2020). Corporate governance and firm performance: A comparative analysis between listed family and non-family firms in Japan. Journal of Risk and Financial Management , 13(9), 215.

30.

Krenn

(2016). Convergence and divergence in corporate governance. Management Research Review , 39, 1447–1471.

31.

Lei

A. C.

, & Song

F. M.

(2012). Board structure, corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from Hong Kong. Applied Financial Economics , 22, 1289–1303.

32.

, & Ryan

H. E.

(2022). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the evolution of family ownership and firm policies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting , 58(3), 1301–1328.

33.

Majumdar

S. K.

(1997). The impact of size and age on firm-level performance: Some evidence from India. Review of Industrial Organization , 12, 231–241.

34.

Mak

Y. T.

, & Kusnadi

(2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal , 13, 301–318.

35.

Martínez

J. I.

, Stöhr

B. S.

, & Quiroga

B. F.

(2007). Family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from public companies in Chile. Family Business Review , 20, 83–94.

36.

Masud

M. A. K.

, Nurunnabi

, & Bae

S. M.

(2018). The effects of corporate governance on environmental sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence from South Asian countries. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility , 3(1), 1–26.

37.

Maury

(2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance , 12, 321–341.

38.

Mostafa

M. M.

(2006). Antecedents of Egyptian consumers’ green purchase intentions. Journal of International Consumer Marketing , 19, 97–126.

39.

Muntahanah

, Kusuma

, Harjito

D. A.

, & Arifin

(2021). The effect of family ownership and corporate governance on firm performance: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business , 8, 697–706.

40.

Naciti

, Cesaroni

, & Pulejo

(2021). Corporate governance and sustainability: A review of the existing literature. Journal of Management and Governance , 26, 55–74.

41.

Nasrallah

, & El Khoury

(2021). Is corporate governance a good predictor of SMEs financial performance? Evidence from developing countries (the case of Lebanon). Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment , 12, 13–43.

42.

Nikomborirak

(2004). Problems of corporate governance reform in Thailand. In Gul

F. A.

& Tsu

J. S. L.

(Eds.), The governance of East Asian Corporations: Post Asian financial crisis (pp. 216–235). Palgrave Macmillan.

43.

O’Connell

, & Cramer

(2010). The relationship between firm performance and board characteristics in Ireland. European Management Journal , 28, 387–399.

44.

OECD. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance . OECD Publishing.

45.

Rouf

M. A.

(2011). The relationship between corporate governance and value of the firm in developing countries: Evidence from Bangladesh. The International Journal of Applied Economics and Finance , 5, 237–244.

46.

Rubino

, & Napoli

(2020). What impact does corporate governance have on corporate environmental performances? An empirical study of Italian listed firms. Sustainability , 12(14), 5742.

47.

Sami

, Wang

, & Zhou

(2011). Corporate governance and operating performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation , 20, 106–114.

48.

Securities and Exchange Commission. (2017). Corporate governance code for listed companies 2017 . Securities and Exchange Commission.

49.

Securities and Exchange Commission. (2021). CG and sustainable business development . https://www.sec.or.th/cgthailand/en/pages/overview/cgandsustainablebusinessdevelopment.aspx

50.

Souther

M. E.

(2021). Does board independence increase firm value? Evidence from closed-end funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , 56, 313–336.

51.

Srivastava

, & Bhatia

(2020). Influence of family ownership and governance on performance: Evidence from India. Global Business Review . https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919880711

52.

Thai Institute of Directors Association. (2010). Corporate governance report of Thai listed companies 2010 . http://www.thai-iod.com/imgUpload/CGR%20Report%202010.pdf

53.

Thai Institute of Directors Association. (2019). Corporate governance report of Thai listed companies 2019 . https://www.thai-iod.com/imgUpload/CGR2020%20Report(1).pdf

54.

Le Tiep

, Nguyen

V. K.

, & Elshandidy

(2022). The impact of corporate governance on firms’ value in an emerging country: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility and organisational identification. Cogent Business & Management , 9(1), 2018907.

55.

Ullah

M. S.

, Muttakin

M. B.

, & Khan

(2019). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures in insurance companies. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management , 27, 284–300.

56.

Uppal

(2020). CEO narcissism, CEO duality, TMT agreeableness and firm performance. European Business Review , 32, 573–590.

57.

Villalonga

, & Amit

(2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics , 80, 385–417.

58.

Yang

, & Zhao

(2014). CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment. Journal of Banking & Finance , 49, 534–552.