National identity has been found to be a basis for othering and resistance in host country managers at multinational enterprises overseas’ affiliates. An original model of employee’s resistance using national identity has developed a nuanced understanding of how resistance manifests. This research tests this original model in a multinational enterprise’s office in the emerging market and power distance accepting India. A case study design was adopted. Interpretive analysis of the data indicates that the newly developed model could apply to Indian situations, and collateral inductive reasoning proposes a further refinement to this model. Thus, besides verbal othering, it is found that the use of space and rituals can also be used in the acts of resistance and further it is proposed that such acts are not necessarily continuous, but can manifest intermittently. Hence, the practising international human resources manager now has a broader lens to assess resistance manifestation, facilitating sooner remedial countermeasures.
The cross-cultural study is among the pioneers in studying national identity as a means of resistance in a power distance accepting context in general, and the under-researched advanced economy, emerging market Japan–India international business dyad specifically. It contributes to cross-cultural management (CCM) literature by surfacing the darker side of globalization—the power retained by the parent company and concomitant subordination of the host country manager that results in resistance. This study adds to the under-researched India–Japan global business scholarship.
AguinisH., & SolarinoA. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1291–1315.
2.
Ailon-SoudayG., & KundaG. (2003). The local selves of global workers: The social construction of national identity in the face of organizational globalization. Organization Studies, 24(7), 1073–1096.
3.
AlbertS., AshforthB. E., & DuttonJ. E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 13–17.
4.
AmbosT. C., FuchsS. H., & ZimmermannA. (2020). Managing interrelated tensions in headquarters–subsidiary relationships: The case of a multinational hybrid organization. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 906–932.
5.
AndoN. (2016). Similarity to successful peers and the implications for subsidiary performance. Asian Business and Management, 15(2), 110–136.
6.
AshtaA. (2021). Postulation of India–Japan Vedic-Buddhist cross-cultural management cluster: Conceptualizing a spiritual philosophy-based explanation for emerging theory. Management Research Review, 44(7), 1029–1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2020-0345
7.
AshtaA., StokesP., & HughesP. (2018). Change management in Indo–Japanese cross-cultural collaborative contexts: Parallels between traditional Indian philosophy and contemporary Japanese management. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(1), 154–172.
8.
AshtaA., StokesP., & HughesP. (2019) Logic or smiles? International talent management across advanced and emerging economic contexts—Japanese expatriates’ cross-cultural communication friction in India. In LiuY. (Ed.), Research handbook of international talent management (pp. 213–246). Edward Elgar.
9.
BaikovichA., & WassermanV. (2020). Mobilizing national identity and othering practices as means of resistance. Organization Science, 31(5), 1220–1247. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1345
10.
BalogunJ., JarzabkowskiP., & VaaraE. (2011). Selling, resistance and reconciliation: Acritical discursive approach to subsidiary role evolution in MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(6),765–786.
11.
BansalP., & CorleyK. (2011). The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 233–237.
12.
BarzelayM. (1993). The single case study as intellectually ambitious inquiry. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3),305–318.
13.
BasuR., & SondhiN. (2015). An empirical analysis of purchase behaviour for football ancillaries: An emerging market perspective. Global Business Review, 16(5), 879–890.
14.
BoddyJ., NeumannT., JenningsS., MorrowV., AldersonP., ReesR., & GibsonW. (2010). The research ethics guidebook: A resource for social scientists. https://www.ethicsguidebook.ac.uk
15.
BoussebaaM., SinhaS., & GabrielY. (2014). Englishization in offshore call centers: A postcolonial perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(9), 1152–1169.
16.
BoussebaaM., & BrownA. D. (2017). Englishization, identity regulation and imperialism. Organization Studies, 38(1), 7–29.
17.
BrownA. D. (2015). Identities and identity work in organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(1), 20–40.
18.
CaligiuriP., De CieriH., MinbaevaD., VerbekeA., & ZimmermannA. (2020). International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice. Journal of International Business Studies,51, 697–713.
19.
DroriI., & EllisS. (2011). Conflict and power games in a multinational corporation: Sense giving as a strategy of preservation. European Management Review, 8(1),1–16.
20.
DyerW. G., & WilkinsA. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613–619.
21.
Economist (2020, July 25). Starting over again. https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/07/25/the-covid-19-pandemic-is-forcing-a-rethink-in-macroeconomics
22.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
23.
FriedmanP. A., DykeL. S., & MurphyS. A. (2009). Expatriate adjustment from the inside out: An autoethnographic account. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(2),252–268.
24.
GabrielY. (1999). Beyond happy families: A critical reevaluation of the control-resistance-identity triangle. Human Relations, 52(2),179–203.
25.
GabrielY. (2018). Interpretation, reflexivity and imagination in qualitative research. In CiesielskaM., & JemielniakD. (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies in organization studies (Vol.1,pp.137–157). Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
GaoH., & RenM. (2020). Over reliance on China and dynamic balancing in the shift of global value chains in response to global pandemic COVID-19: An Australian and New Zealand perspective. Asian Business and Management, 19(3), 306–310.
27.
HambrickD. C. (2007). The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?Academy of Management Journal, 50(6),1346–1352.
28.
HartleyJ. (2004). Case study research. In SymonG., & CassellC. (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research (pp.323–333).SAGE Publications.
29.
HassardJ., & KelemenM. (2010). Paradigm plurality in case study research. In MillsA. J., DureposG., & WiebeE. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (Vol. 2, pp. 647–652). SAGE Publications.
30.
HofstedeG. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–89.
31.
HollinsheadG. (2017). The tortuous ascent of global value chains—The case of pharmaceutical R&D in China. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 13(3), 244–262.
32.
JackG., & LorbieckiA. (2007). National identity, globalization and the discursive construction of organizational identity. British Journal of Management, 18, S79–S94.
33.
JohnsonP. (2015). Evaluating qualitative research: Past, present and future. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 10(4), 320–324.
34.
Kassis-HendersonJ., & CohenL. (2020). The paradoxical consequences of ‘the perfectaccent’! A critical approach to cross-cultural interactions. In MahadevanJ., PrimeczH., & RomaniL. (Eds.), Cases in critical cross-cultural management: An intersectional approach to culture (Vol. 1, pp. 12–21). Routledge.
35.
KawashimaS. (2020, May 14). Is Japan pulling its companies out of China? The Japan Times. p. 7. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2020/05/13/commentary/japan-commentary/japan-pulling-companies-china/
36.
KirkmanB. L., & ShapiroD. L. (2001). The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 557–569.
37.
KnightsD., & WillmottH. (1999). Management lives: Power and identity in work organizations. SAGE Publications.
38.
LiuY., VrontisD., VisserM., StokesP., SmithS., MooreN., ThrassouA., & AshtaA. (2021). Talent management and the HR function in cross-cultural mergers and acquisitions: The role and impact of bi-cultural identity. Human Resource Management Review, 31(3).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100744
39.
MahadevanJ. (2012). Utilizing identity-based resistance for diversity change: A narrative approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25, 819–834.
40.
MariottoF. L., ZanniP. P., & MoraesG. H. S. (2014). What is the use of a single-case study in management research?Revista de Administraçãode Empresas, 54(4),358–369.
41.
MayerC. H., & LouwL. (2011). Managerial challenges in South Africa. European Business Review, 23(6), 572–591.
42.
MeyerK. E., LiC., & SchotterA. P. (2020). Managing the MNE subsidiary: Advancing a multi-level and dynamic research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 538–576.
43.
MinbaevaD., RabbiosiL., & StahlG. K. (2018). Not walking the talk? How host country cultural orientations may buffer the damage of corporate values’ misalignment in multinational corporations. Journal of World Business, 53(6),880–895.
44.
MooreF. (2011). Holistic ethnography: Studying the impact of multiple national identities on post-acquisition organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 654–671.
45.
NathV. (2011). Aesthetic and emotional labour through stigma: National identity management and racial abuse in offshored Indian call centres. Work, Employment and Society, 25(4), 709–725.
46.
PatelT. (2017). Multiparadigmatic studies of culture: Needs, challenges, and recommendations for management scholars. European Management Review, 14(1), 83–100.
47.
PatelT. (2018). Innovative trends in culture in international business literature: Toward multiparadigmatic and nonlinear studies of culture. International Studies of Management and Organization, 48(4), 435–456.
48.
PatelT., & SalihA. (2018). Cultural intelligence: A dynamic and interactional framework. International Studies of Management and Organization, 48(4), 358–385.
49.
PassS. (2020). Benefits of boredom: An ‘interlopers’ experience of conducting participant observation on the production line. European Management Review, 17(1), 285–295.
50.
PiekkariR., WelchC., & PaavilainenE. (2009). The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 567–589.
51.
PrattM. G. (2009). For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5).https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44632557
52.
RomaniL., BarmeyerC., PrimeczH., & PilhoferK. (2018). Cross-cultural management studies: State of the field in the four research paradigms. International Studies of Management and Organization, 48(3),247–263.
53.
RottigD., & ReusT. H. (2018). Research on culture and international acquisition performance: A critical evaluation and new directions. International Studies of Management and Organization, 48(1), 3–42.
54.
RuddinL. P. (2006). You can generalize stupid! Social scientists, Bent Flyvbjerg, and case study methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(4), 797–812.
55.
SalkJ. (1996). Partners and other strangers: Cultural boundaries and cross-cultural encounters in international joint venture teams. International Studies of Management and Organization, 26(4), 48–72.
56.
SchwartzS. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47.
57.
SharpeD. R. (2006). Shop floor practices under changing forms of managerial control: Acomparative ethnographic study of micro-politics, control and resistance within a Japanese multinational. Journal of International Management, 12(3), 318–339.
58.
SimonB., & OakesP. (2006). Beyond dependence: An identity approach to social power and domination. Human Relations, 59(1), 105–139.
59.
SokroE., & PillayS. (2020). Host country nationals’ attitudes, social support and willingness to work with expatriates. Global Business Review, 21(5), 1184–1199.
60.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
61.
StokesP. (2011). Critical concepts in management and organization studies: Key terms and concepts. Macmillan International Higher Education.
62.
SymonG., CassellC., & JohnsonP. (2018). Evaluative practices in qualitative management research: A critical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 134–154.
63.
ThomasG. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6),511–521.
64.
ThomasG. (2021). How to do your case study. SAGE Publications.
65.
TohS. M., & DeNisiA. S. (2007). Host country nationals as socializing agents: A social identity approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(3), 281–301.
66.
Van LaerK., & JanssensM. (2017). Agency of ethnic minority employees: Struggles around identity, career and social change. Organization, 24(2), 198–217.
67.
Van ZantenJ. A., & Van TulderR. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the sustainable development goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3–4), 208–233.
68.
VissakT. (2010). Recommendations for using the case study method in international business research. Qualitative Report, 15(2), 370–388.
69.
WelchC., PiekkariR., PlakoyiannakiE., & Paavilainen-MäntymäkiE. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740–762.
70.
WhettenD. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.
