The aim of this research is to apply the tool of social network analysis to situations in capital sourcing, including early stage financing. The study is conducted within the social network of Medical Alley Association of Minnesota (MAA). We investigate the correlation between the main centrality measures: closeness, degree and betweenness, and the amount of funding received by the 163 MAA members during 2009–2012. Companies benefit from their social network to get access to better financing. The empirical results also provide a road map to encourage the sponsored or spontaneous growth of other social networks in related fields. Despite the financial crisis, the empirical results show how competition works when firms have established relations with others. Where an intersection occurs is merely an empirical curiosity and the causation resides in the intersection of relations. The relation that intersects on an organization determines the player’s competitive advantage.
AbrahamsonE.RosenkopfL. (1997). Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science, 8(3), 289–309.
2.
AhujaG. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.
3.
AldrichH. E.ZimmerC. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In SextonD.SmilarR. (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). New York, NY: Ballinger.
4.
AndrieuG.StaglianòR. (2016). The entrepreneur’s choice of a venture capital firm: Empirical evidence from two VC fund portfolios. Finance Research Letters, 17, 141–145.
5.
BarsingP.DaultaniY.VaidyaO. S.KumarS. (2018). Cross-docking centre location in a supply chain network: A social network analysis approach. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl), S218–S234.
6.
BonacichP. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29(4), 555–564.
7.
BorgattiS. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 56–71.
8.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G. (2006). A graph: Theoretic perspective on centrality. Social networks, 28(4), 466–484.
9.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
ButtsC. T. (2008). Social network analysis: A methodological introduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(1), 13–41.
11.
ChuluunT.PrevostA.UpadhyayA. (2017). Firm network structure and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 193–214.
12.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
13.
De CarolisD. M.SapatitoP. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 41–56.
14.
De CarolisD. MLitzkyB. E.EddlestonK. A. (2009). Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: The influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 527–545.
15.
DiMaggioP. (1992). [Review of] Political networks: The structural perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 172–174.
16.
FreemanL. C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification in Hawaii Nets Conferences. Social Networks. An International Journal of Structural Analysis Lausanne, 1(3), 215–239.
17.
HiteJ. M. (2005). Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 113–144.
18.
HoangH.AntoncicB. (2003). Network-bases research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.
19.
JohannissonB. (1990b, August). Building an Entrepreneurial Career in a mixed economy: Need for social and business ties in personal networks. Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Fransico.
20.
KnokeD. (2009). Playing well together: Creating corporate social capital in strategic alliance networks. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(12), 1690–1708.
21.
KohF. C. C.KohW. T. H.FeichinT. T. (2005). An analytical framework for science parks and technology districts with an application to Singapore. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 217–239.
22.
LazegaE.JourdaM. T.MounierL.StoferR. (2008). Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design. Social Networks, 30(2), 159–176.
23.
LiaoJ.WelschH. (2003). Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: A comparison of technology and non-technology-based nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 149–170.
24.
MaurerI.EbersM. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(2), 262–292.
25.
NewmanM. E. (2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social networks, 27(1), 39–54.
26.
OtteE.RousseauR. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453.
27.
PodolnyJ. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60.
28.
SchillingM. A.PhelpsC. C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113–1126.
29.
ShaneS.CableD. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.
30.
SteierL.GreenwoodR. (2000). Entrepreneurship and the evolution of angel financing networks. Organization Studies, 21(1), 163–192.
31.
TalaveraO.XiongL.XiongX. (2012). Social capital and access to bank financing: The case of Chinese entrepreneurs. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 48(1), 55–69.
32.
UzziB. (1999). Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review, 64(4), 481–505.
33.
UzziB.SpiroJ. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504.
34.
WittP. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(5), 391–412.
35.
XueC.JiangP.DangX. (2018). The dynamics of network communities and venture capital performance: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters.
36.
XueC.JiangP.DangX. (2019). The dynamics of network communities and venture capital performance: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 28, 6–10.
37.
YuF. L. T.HuM. W. (2015). Strategic entrepreneurship in Taiwan’s food and catering industries: The case of 85 C café shop. Global Business Review, 16(5), 891–902.
38.
ZaheerA.BellG. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825.
39.
ZhangJ.SouitarisV.SohP.-H.WongP.-K. (2008). A contingent model of network utilization in early financing of technology ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practise, 32(4), 593–613.
