This study investigates the association between globalization and carbon emissions for Next-11 (N-11) countries. In doing so, we apply bounds testing approach to examine cointegration between globalization and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The results confirm the U-shaped association between globalization and carbon emissions for Bangladesh, Iran and South Korea. Contrarily, traditional approach validates an inverted U relationship between globalization and carbon emissions for Pakistan and South Korea, but U-shaped relationship exists for the Philippines and Vietnam. The presence or absence of an inverted U relationship between globalization and carbon emissions has important policy implications using globalization as an economic tool for sustainable economic development.
AgenorP. R. (2003). Does globalization hurt the poor?(World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2922). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
2.
AhmedK.ShahbazM.KyophilavongP. (2016). Revisiting the emissions-energy-trade nexus: Evidence from the newly industrializing. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(8), 7676–7691.
3.
AicheleR.FelbermayrG. (2013). The effect of the Kyoto protocol on carbon emissions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(4), 731–757.
4.
AntweilerW.CopelandB. R.TaylorM. S. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment? The American Economic Review, 91(4), 877–908.
5.
BaekJ.ChoY.KooW. W. (2009). The environmental consequences of globalization: A country-specific time-series analysis. Ecological Economics, 68(8), 2255–2264.
6.
BrownS. P. A.McDonoughI. K. (2016). Using the environmental Kuznets curve to evaluate energy policy: Some practical considerations. Energy Policy, 98, 453–458.
7.
ChangN. (2012). The empirical relationship between openness and environmental pollution in China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(6), 783–796.
8.
ChaudhuriS.PfaffA. (2002). Economic growth and the environment: What can we learn from household data?(Working Paper). New York, NY: Columbia University.
9.
ChintrakarnP.MillimetD. (2006). The environmental consequences of trade: Evidence from sub-national trade flows. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52(1), 430–453.
10.
ChristmannP.TaylorG. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 439–458.
11.
ColeM. A.ElliottR. J. R.ZhangJ. (2011). Growth, FDI and the environment: Evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Regional Science, 51(1), 121–138.
12.
CopelandB. R. (2005). Policy endogeneity and the effects of trade on the environment. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 34(1), 1–15.
13.
CopelandB. R.TaylorM. S. (1994). North–South trade and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 755–787.
14.
CopelandB.TaylorM. (1995). Trade and environment: A partial synthesis. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 77(3), 765–771.
15.
CopelandB. R.TaylorM. S. (2003). Trade, growth and the environment(NBER Working Paper No. 9823). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
16.
CopelandB. R.TaylorM. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7–71.
17.
CopelandB. R.TaylorM. S. (2005). Free trade and global warming: A trade theory view of the Kyoto protocol. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49(2), 205–234.
18.
DeanJ. (2002). Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(4), 819–842.
19.
DindaS. (2006). Globalization and environment: Can pollution heaven hypothesis alone explain the impact of globalization on environment?Kolkata, India: Economic Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute.
20.
DreherA. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110.
21.
EngleR. F.GrangerC. W. J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction representation: Estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
22.
FrankelJ.RoseA. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 85–91.
23.
FriedmanT. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
24.
GrossmanG. M.KruegerA. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement(NBER Working Paper No. 3914). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
25.
GrossmanG.KruegerA. (1995). Economic environment and the economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.
26.
HawkenP.LovinsA.LovinsH. (2008). Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. Boston, MA: Back Bay Books.
27.
HeckscherE. (1919). The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift, 497–512.
28.
HelpmanE. (1998). Explaining the structure of foreign trade: Where do we stand. Review of World Economics, 134(4), 573–589.
29.
IbrahimM. H. (2005). Sectoral effects of monetary policy: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Economic Journal, 19(1), 83–102.
30.
ItkonenJ. V. A. (2012). Problem estimating the carbon Kuznets curve. Energy, 39, 274–280.
31.
JayadevappaR.ChhatreS. (2000). International trade and environmental quality: A survey. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 175–194.
32.
JenaP. R.GroteU. (2008). Growth-trade-environment nexus in India. Economics Bulletin, 17(11), 1–17.
33.
JohansenS.JuseliusK. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
34.
KanzilalK.GhoshS. (2013). Environmental Kuznets curve for India: Evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structural breaks. Energy Policy, 56, 509–515.
35.
KimD.PerronP. (2009). Unit root tests allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time under both the null and alternative hypotheses. Journal of Econometrics, 148(1), 1–13.
36.
KraftJ.KraftA. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy Development, 3(2), 401–403.
37.
KuznetsS. (1995). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45, 1–28.
38.
LeamerE. (1988). Measures of Openness, NBER Chapters. In Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis (pp. 145–204). New York City, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
39.
LeeK. H.MinB. (2014). Globalization and carbon constrained global economy: A fad or a trend? Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 15(2), 105–121.
40.
LingC. H.AhmedK.MuhamadR. B.ShahbazM. (2015). Decomposing the trade-environment nexus for Malaysia: What do the technique, scale, composition, and comparative advantage effect indicate? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(24), 20131–20142.
41.
LöschelA.RexhäuserS.SchymuraM. (2013). Trade and the environment: An application of the WIOD database. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 11(1), 51–61.
42.
LucasR. E. B.WheelerD.HettigeH. (1992). Economic development, environmental regulation, and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution : 1960-88. Policy, Research working papers no. WPS 1062. Washington, DC: World Bank: World Development Report.
43.
MachadoG. V. (2000, August 21–25). Energy use CO2emissions and foreign trade: An IO approach applied to the Brazilian case. Paper presented Inat the Thirteenth International Conference on Input–Output Techniques, Macerata, Italy–.
44.
ManagiS. (2004). Trade liberalization and the environment: Carbon dioxide for 1960–1999. Economics Bulletin, 17(1), 1–5.
45.
ManagiS.HibikiA.TetsuyaT. (2008). Does trade liberalization reduce pollution emissions?(Discussion Paper No. 08013). Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), Japan.
46.
ManagiS.JenaP. R. (2008). Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 432–440.
47.
McCarneyG. R.AdamowiczW. L. (2006). The effects of trade liberalization of the environment: An empirical study. In 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12–18, 2006, Queensland, Australia (No. 25297). International Association of Agricultural Economists.
48.
NarayanP. K. (2005). The saving–investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990.
49.
NarayanP. K.NarayanS. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 661–666.
50.
NarayanP.PoppS. (2010). Size and power properties of structural break unit root tests. Applied Economics, 45, 721–728.
51.
NarayanP.PoppS. (2013). A new unit root test with two structural breaks in level and slope at unknown time. Journal of Applied Statistics, 37(9), 1425–1438.
52.
NaughtonB. (2014). China’s economy: Complacency, crisis & the challenge of reform. Daedalus, 143(2), 14–25.
53.
OhlinB. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Harvard, MA: Cambridge University Press.
54.
PanayotouT. (1997). Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: Turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 383–399.
55.
ParamatiS. R.ApergisN.UmmallaM. (2017). Financing clean energy projects through domestic and foreign capital: The role of political cooperation among the EU, the G20 and OECD countries. Energy Economics, 61, 62–71.
56.
PermanR.SternD. I. (2003). Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(3), 325–347.
57.
PesaranM. H.ShinY. (1999). An autoregressive distributed-led modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In StromS. (Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century(The Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium) (Chap. 11, pp. 1–33). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
PesaranM. H.ShinY.SmithR. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
59.
PhillipsP. C. B.HansenB. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57, 99–125.
60.
RungeC. F. (1994). Freer trade, protected environment. New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
61.
SabooriB.SulaimanJ.MohdS. (2012). Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: A cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 51, 184–191.
62.
SchmalenseeR.StokerT. M.JudsonR. A. (1998). World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950–2050. Review of Economic and Statistics, 80(1), 15–27.
63.
ShahbazM.BhattacharyaM.AhmedA. (2017). CO2 emissions in Australia: Economic and non-economic drivers in the long-run. Applied Economics, 49(13), 1273–1286.
64.
ShahbazM.IslamF.ButtM. S. (2016). Finance-growth-energy nexus and the role of agriculture and modern sectors: Evidence from ARDL bounds test approach to cointegration in Pakistan. Global Business Review, 17(5), 1037–1059.
65.
ShahbazM.KhanS.Ali.A.BhattacharyaM. (2017). The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. Singapore Economic Review, 62, 1–29.
66.
ShahbazM.LeanH. H.ShabbierM. M. (2012). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2947–2953.
67.
ShahbazM.MallickH.MahalikM. K.LoganathanN. (2015). Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecological Indicators, 52, 379–393.
68.
ShahbazM.MallickH.MahalikM. K.SadorskyP. (2016). The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: Implications for sustainable development. Energy Economics, 55, 52–68.
69.
ShahbazM.NasreenN.AhmedK.HammoudehS. (2017). Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics, 61, 221–232.
70.
ShahbazM.OzturkI.AfzaT.AliA. (2013). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 494–502.
71.
ShinS. (2004). Economic globalization and the environment in China: A comparative case study of Shenyang and Dalian. The Journal of Environment Development, 13(3), 263–294.
72.
SolarinS. A. (2014). Tourist arrivals and macroeconomic determinants of CO2 emissions in Malaysia. Anatolia, 25(2), 228–241.
73.
SternD. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439.
74.
StockJ. H.WatsonM. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61(4), 783–820.
75.
TiwariA. K.ShahbazM.HyeQ. M. A. (2013). The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: Cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 519–527.
76.
WijenF.Van TulderR. (2011). Integrating environmental and international strategies in a world of regulatory turbulence. California Management Review, 53(4), 23–46.
77.
YildirimE.SukruogluD.AslanA. (2014). Energy consumption and economic growth in the Next 11countries: The bootstrapped autoregressive metric causality approach. Energy Economics, 44, 14–21.
