Adopting a differentiated network view of multinational corporations (MNCs), this study investigates how recently formed subsidiaries access diversified technological knowledge that allows them to differently contribute to the MNCs’ competence building. By employing a firm-specific measure of different technological knowledge categories, we study the competence building of foreign subsidiaries in China in electric and office equipment industry between 1996 and 2005. We find that foreign subsidiaries in China extensively access background technological knowledge to adjust to and benefit from technical changes in supply chain activities. Meanwhile, these subsidiaries actively access marginal technological knowledge to explore potential opportunities. Our results offer the supporting evidence of a differentiated network view of MNCs and contribute to subsidiary evolution literature.
AdenfeltM., & LagerstromK. (2008). The development and sharing of knowledge by centres of excellence and transnational teams: A conceptual framework. Management International Review, 48(3), 319–338.
2.
AlmeidaP. (1996). Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 155–165.
3.
AlmeidaP., & PheneA. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 847–864.
4.
AnderssonU., & ForsgrenM. (2000). In search of centre of excellence: Network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 40, 329–350.
5.
AnderssonU., BjorkmanI., & ForsgrenM. (2005). Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness. International Business Review, 14(5), 521–538.
6.
AnderssonU., ForsgrenM., & HolmU. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 155–165.
7.
AnderssonU., ForsgrenM., & HolmU. (2007). Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 802–818.
8.
AnderssonU., ForsgrenM., & PedersenT. (1999). The MNC as a differentiated network: Subsidiary technology embeddedness and performance (Working Papers). Copenhagen Business School, Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen, Denmark.
9.
AsmussenC. G., PedersenT., & DhanarajC. (2009). Host-country environment and subsidiary competence: Extending the diamond network model. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 42–57.
10.
BartlettC. A., & GhosbalS. (1987). Managing across borders: New strategic requirements. Sloan Management Review, 28(4), 7–18.
11.
BartlettC. A., & GhoshalS. (1986). Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Review, 64(6), 87–94.
12.
BirkinshawJ., & HoodN. (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability evolution and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773–795.
13.
BirkinshawJ., & LingbladM. (2005). Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multibusiness firm. Organization Science, 16(6), 674–686.
14.
BoeheD. M. (2007). Product development in MNC subsidiaries: Local linkages and global interdependencies. Journal of International Management, 13(4), 488–512.
15.
BouquetC., & BirkinshawJ. (2008). Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 577–601.
16.
BowmanE. H., & HurryD. (1993). Strategy through the option lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. The Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 760–782.
17.
BrucheG. (2009). A new geography of innovation—China and India rising. Columbia FDI Perspectives, 1(4), 24–27.
18.
CantwellJ. A. (2006). Introduction. In CantwellJ. (Ed.), The economics of patents (p. 9). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
19.
CantwellJ. A., & JanneO. (1999). Technological globalization and innovative centers: The role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy. Research Policy, 28(2–3), 119–144.
CantwellJ. A., & PiscitelloL. (2002). The location of technological activities of MNCs in European regions: The role of spillovers and local competencies. Journal of International Management, 8(1), 69–96.
22.
CantwellJ. A., & PiscitelloL. (2007). Attraction and deterrence in the location of foreign-owned R&D activities: The role of positive and negative spillovers. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1(1), 83–111.
23.
CantwellJ. A., & VertovaG. (2004). Historical evolution of technological diversification. Research Policy, 33(3), 511–529.
24.
CantwellJ. A., & ZhangF. (2013). Do foreign-owned subsidiaries in China follow a distinctive pattern of technological knowledge sourcing?Management & Organization Review, 9(3), 489–512.
25.
CantwellJ. A., NoonanC., & ZhangF. (2008). Technological complexity and the restructuring of subsidiary knowledge sourcing in intra-multinational and inter-firm networks. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Academy of International Business, Milan, Italy.
26.
CantwellJ., & ZhangF. (2011). Technological complexity and the evolving structure of MNC subsidiary knowledge accumulation. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 38, 5–33.
27.
CantwellJ., & ZhangF. (2012). Knowledge accession strategies and the spatial organization of R&D. In AnderssonM. & JohanssonB. (Eds.), Firms, Innovation and Growth (vol. 1, pp. 88–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
ChenY.-C. (2007). The upgrading of multinational regional innovation networks in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 13(3), 373–403.
29.
ChenY.-C. (2008). Why do multinational corporations locate their advanced R&D centres in Beijing?Journal of Development Studies, 44(5), 622–644.
30.
CohenW., & LevinthalD. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
31.
DasguptaM., GuptaR. K., & SahayA. (2011). Linking technological innovation, technology strategy and organizational factors: A review. Global Business Review, 12(2), 257–277.
32.
DozY. L., & PrahaladC. K. (1991). Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 145–164.
33.
DozY. L., & PrahaladC. K. (1984). Patterns of strategic control within multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2), 55–72.
34.
DunningJ. H. (1994). Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy, 23(1), 67–89.
35.
DunningJ. H., & LundanS. M. (1998). The geographical sources of competitiveness of multinational enterprises: An econometric analysis. International Business Review, 7(2), 115–133.
ErnstD. (2007). Beyond the ‘global factory’ model: Innovative capabilities for upgrading China’s IT industry. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 3(4), 437–459.
38.
FangC., LeeJ., & SchillingM. A. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science, 21(3), 625–642.
39.
FangY., WadeM., DeliosA., & BeamishP. W. (2013). An exploration of multinational enterprise knowledge resources and foreign subsidiary performance. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 30–38.
40.
FigueiredoP. N. (2011). The role of dual embeddedness in the innovative performance of MNE subsidiaries: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 417–440.
41.
FrostT. S., BirkinshawJ. M., & EnsignP. C. (2002). Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 997–1018.
42.
GalunicD. C., & EisenhardtK. M. (1996). The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations. Organization Science, 7(3), 255–282.
43.
Garcia-PontC., CanalesJ. I., & NoboaF. (2009). Subsidiary strategy: The embeddedness component. Journal of Management Studies, 46(2), 182–214.
44.
GarrigaH., von KroghG., & SpaethS. (2013). How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(9), 1134–1144.
45.
GassmannO., & HanZ. (2004). Motivations and barriers of foreign R&D activities in China. R&D Management, 34(4), 423–437.
46.
GhoshalS., & BartlettC. A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 603–625.
47.
GhoshalS., & NohriaN. (Eds.). (1997). The differentiated network: Organizing multinational corporations for value creation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
GranstrandO., PatelP., & PavittK. (1997). Multi-technology corporations: Why they have distributed rather than distinctive core competencies. California Management Review, 39(4), 8–25.
49.
HandyC. (1992). Balancing corporate power: A new federalist paper. Harvard Business Review, 70, 59–72.
50.
HeX., & MuQ. (2012). How Chinese firms learn technology from transnational corporations: A comparison of the telecommunication and automobile industries. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(3), 270–287.
51.
HedlundG. (1986). The hypermodern MNC—a heterarchy?Human Resource Management, 25(1), 9–35.
52.
HittM. A., LiH., & WorthingtonW. J. (2005). Emerging markets as learning laboratories: Learning behaviors of local firms and foreign entrants in different institutional contexts. Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 353–380.
53.
HoskissonR. E., EdenL., LauC. M., & WrightM. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.
54.
JaffeA. B., TrajtenbergM., & HendersonR. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.
55.
KatilaR. (2002). New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime?Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 995–1010.
56.
KatilaR., & AhujaG. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194.
57.
KogutB., & ZanderU. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.
58.
KumaraswamyA., MudambiR., SarangaH., & TripathyA. (2012). Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 368–395.
59.
LiJ. J., PoppoL., & ZhouK. Z. (2010). Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31(4), 349–370.
60.
LiJ., ChenD., & ShapiroD. M. (2010). Product innovations in emerging economies: The role of foreign knowledge access channels and internal efforts in Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(2), 243–266.
61.
LiaoT.-J., & YuC.-M. J. (2012). Knowledge transfer, regulatory support, legitimacy, and financial performance: The case of foreign firms investing in China. Journal of World Business, 47(1), 114–122.
62.
LiuJ., ChenL., & KittilaksanawongW. (2013). External knowledge search strategies in China’s technology ventures: The role of managerial interpretations and ties. Management & Organization Review, 9(3), 437–463.
63.
LuoY. (2003). Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent subsidiary links shape overseas success. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3), 290–309.
64.
LuoY. (2005). Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: A perspective from foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 40(1), 71–90.
65.
MarchJ. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
66.
MonteiroL. F., ArvidssonN., & BirkinshawJ. (2008). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19(1), 90–107.
67.
MotohashiK. (2006). R&D of multinationals in China: Structure, motivations and regional difference (RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-E-005). Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
68.
MudambiR., & NavarraP. (2004). Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 385–406.
69.
MudambiR., PiscitelloL., & RabbiosiL. (2014). Reverse knowledge transfer in MNEs: Subsidiary innovativeness and entry modes. Long Range Planning, 47(1–2), 49–63.
70.
NerkarA. (2003). Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, 49(2), 211–229.
71.
NguyenN. T. D., & AoyamaA. (2014). Impact of corporate culture on the relationship between efficient technology transfer and business performance. Global Business Review, 15(4), 637–661.
72.
NiosiJ., & ReidS. E. (2007). Biotechnology and nanotechnology: Science-based enabling technologies as windows of opportunity for LDCs?World Development, 35(3), 426–438.
73.
PearceR. (Eds.). (1989). The Internationalisation of research and development by multinational enterprises. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
74.
PheneA., & AlmeidaP. (2003). How do firms evolve? The patterns of technological evolution of semiconductor subsidiaries. International Business Review, 12(3), 349–367.
75.
PheneA., Fladmoe-LindquistK., & MarshL. (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 369–388.
76.
PowellB., & AkhtarO. (2012). Can Apple win over China?Fortune International (Asia), 166, 40–46.
77.
PradhanJ. P. (2010). Strategic asset-seeking activities of emerging multinationals: Perspectives on foreign acquisitions by Indian pharmaceutical MNEs. Organizations & Markets in Emerging Economies, 1(2), 9–31.
78.
PreschitschekN., & BresserD. (2010). Nanotechnology patenting in China and Germany—a comparison of patent landscapes by bibliographic analyses. Journal of Business Chemistry, 7(1), 3–13.
79.
RosenkopfL., & AlmeidaP. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6), 751–766.
80.
RosenkopfL., & NerkarA. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306.
81.
RothaermelF. T. (2001). Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 687.
82.
RugmanA. M., & VerbekeA. (2001). Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 237–250.
83.
SadoiY. (2008). Technology transfer in automotive parts firms in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(1), 147–163.
84.
SharpD. J. (1991). Uncovering the hidden value in high-risk investments. Sloan Management Review, 32(4), 69–74.
85.
SongJ. (2014). Subsidiary absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer within multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 73–84.
86.
SørensenJ. B., & StuartT. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112.
87.
SorensonO., RivkinJ. W., & FlemingL. (2006). Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7), 994–1107.
88.
StuartT. E., & PodolnyJ. M. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 21–38.
89.
ThompsonP. (2006). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: Evidence from inventor- and examiner-added citations. Review of Economics & Statistics, 88(2), 383–388.
90.
TiwanaA., & KeilM. (2007). Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 623–634.
91.
TsaiW. (2002). Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190.
92.
VossG. B., & VossZ. G. (2013). Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains. Organization Science, 24(5), 1459–1477.
93.
WeiY., & LiuX. (2006). Productivity spillovers from R&D, exports and FDI in China’s manufacturing sector. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(4), 544–557.
94.
WuC.-Y., & MathewsJ. A. (2012). Knowledge flows in the solar photovoltaic industry: Insights from patenting by Taiwan, Korea, and China. Research Policy, 41(3), 524–540.
95.
XieX., & O’NeillH. M. (2014). Learning and product entry: How diversification patterns differ over firm age and knowledge domains in US generic drug industry. Strategic Management Journal, 35(3), 440–449.
96.
YipG., & McKernB. (2014). Innovation in emerging markets: The case of China. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 9(1), 2–10.
97.
ZhangF., & CantwellJ. A. (2013). Regional and global technological knowledge search strategies and the innovative performance of large multinational corporations. Industry & Innovation, 20(7), 637–660.
98.
ZhangF., CantwellJ. A., & JiangG. (2014). The competence creation of recently-formed subsidiaries in networked multinational corporations: Comparing subsidiaries in China and subsidiaries in industrialized countries. Asian Business & Management, 13(1), 5–41.
99.
ZhangS., & PearceR. (2011). Multinaitonals, China and the global economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
100.
ZhouK. Z., & LiC. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090–1102.
