The article analysed the relationship between saving and investment for the East Asian countries, namely, China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Macao and Mongolia, during the period of 1982 to 2015. The autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) bound testing approach was applied to determine long-run coefficients, and short-run dynamics are captured from an error correction model (ECM). The Phillips–Perron (PP) tests and augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) tests indicate that order of integration of both the series for selected countries is either 1(1), 1(0) or mutually cointegrated. The critical value of bound test indicates mixed evidence of cointegration for selected countries. The ARDL was applied to confirm the long-run and short-run relationship for those countries where cointegration exists. The results support the Feldstein–Horioka hypothesis that high cointegration between saving and investment postulates low capital mobility internationally.
AhadM., & DarA. A. (2018). A dynamic relationship between financial development and import demand for Bangladesh: An evidence from combine co-integration and granger causality approach. Global Business Review, 19(3), 1–13.
2.
ArtisM. J., & BayoumiT. (1992). Global capital market integration and the current account. In TaylorM. P. (Ed.), Money and financial markets (pp. 297−307). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
3.
BanerjeeA., & ZanghieriP. (2003). A new look at the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle using an integrated panel (CEPII Working Paper No. 2003-22). CEPII, France. Retrieved from http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/publications/wp/abstract.asp?NoDoc=183
4.
BaxterM., & CruciniM. J. (1993). Explaining saving-investment correlations. American Economic Review, 83(3), 416–436.
5.
BayoumiT. (1989). Saving-investment correlations: Immobile capital, government policy or endogenous behavior? (IMF Working Paper, 89–66). Washington D.C: IMF.
6.
CaprioG., & HowardD. H. (1984). Domestic saving, current accounts, and international capital mobility (International Finance Discussion Papers, 244). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
7.
CoakleyJ., SmithP. R., HasanF., & SmithR. P. (1996). Saving, Investment, and Capital Mobility in LDCs. Review of International Economics, 7(4), 632–640.
8.
CoakleyJ., & KulasiF. (1997). Cointegration of long run saving and investment. Economics Letters, 54(1), 1–6.
9.
CoakleyJ., HasanF., & SmithR. (1999). Saving, investment, and capital mobility in LDCs. Review of International Economics, 7(4), 632–640.
10.
CorbinA. (2001). Country specific effects in the Feldstein-Horioka paradox: A panel data analysis. Economics Letters, 72(3), 297–302.
11.
DooleyM., FrankelJ., & MathiesonD. J. (1987). International capital mobility: What do saving-investment correlations tell us?International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 34(3), 503–530.
12.
FeldsteinM. (1983). Domestic saving and international capital movements in the long run and the short run. European Economic Review, 21(1), 157–159.
13.
FeldsteinM., & BacchettaP. (1991). National saving and international investment. In BernheimB. D. & ShovenJ. B. (Eds.), National saving and economic performance (pp. 201–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
FeldsteinM., & HoriokaC. (1980). Domestic saving and international capital flows. Economic Journal, 90(358), 314–329.
15.
FielekeN. S. (1982). National saving and international investment. Saving and government policy: Proceedings of a Conference Held at Melvin village, New Hampshire, Conference Series No. 25. Boston, MA: Reserve Bank of Boston. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6c7f/b180fb69bf1b617e2dc22d0744a4b3840f5b.pdf
16.
FrankelJ. A. (1985). International capital mobility and crowding-out in the US economy: Imperfect integration of financial markets or of goods markets? (NBER Working Paper No. 1773). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
17.
GeorgopoulosG. J., & HejaziW. (2005). Feldstein-Horioka meets a time trend. Economic Letters, 86(3), 353–357.
18.
HarbergerA. C. (1980). Vignettes on the world capital market. American Economic Review, 70(2), 331–337.
19.
HoT. W. (2002). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle revisited. Journal of International Money and Finance, 21(4), 555–564.
20.
JansenW. (1996). Estimating saving-investment correlations: Evidence for OECD countries based on an error correction model. Journal of International Money and Finance, 15(5), 749–781.
21.
JansenW. (2000). International capital mobility: Evidence from panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 19(4), 507–511.
22.
KaoC., & ChiangM. H. (2001). On the estimation and inference of a co integrated regression in panel data. In BaltagiB. H., FombyT. B. & HillR. C. (Eds.), Non-stationary panels, panel co-integration, and dynamic panels (Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15, pp. 179–222). Amsterdam: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
23.
KetenciN. (2016). The Feldstein–Horioka puzzle and structural breaks: Evidence from the largest countries of Asia. The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 10(3), 337–354.
24.
KhundrakpamJ. K., & RanjanR. (2010). Saving-investment nexus and international capital mobility in India: Revisiting Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis. Indian Economic Review, 45(1), 49–66.
25.
KimS. H. (2001). The saving–investment correlation puzzle is still a puzzle. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(7), 1017–1034.
26.
KolliasC., MylonidisN., & PaleologouS. M. (2008). The Feldstein–Horioka puzzle across EU members: Evidence from the ARDL bounds approach and panel data. International Review of Economics & Finance, 17(3), 380–387.
27.
KrolR. (1996). International capital mobility: Evidence from panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 15(3), 467–474.
28.
LevineR., & ReneltD. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 942–963.
29.
MillerS. M. (1988). Are saving and investment co-integrated?Economics Letters, 27(1), 31–34.
30.
MurphyG. R. (1984). Capital mobility and the relationship between saving and investment in OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 3(3), 327–342.
31.
NarayanP. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990.
32.
ObstfeldM. (1986). Capital mobility in the world economy: Theory and measurement. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 2, 55–104.
33.
ObstfeldM. (1995). International capital mobility in the ‘90s. In KenenP. B. (Ed.), Understanding interdependence: The macroeconomics of the open economy (pp. 201–261). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
PayneJ. E., & KumazawaR. (2006). Capital Mobility and The Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle: Re-Examination of Less Developed Countries. The Manchester School, 74(5), 610−616. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00512.x
35.
PenatiA., & DooleyM. (1984). Current account imbalances and capital formation in industrial countries 1949–1981. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 31(1), 1–24.
36.
PesaranH., ShinY., & SmithR. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
37.
RaheemI. (2017). More finance or better finance in Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: Evidence from SSA countries. Global Business Review, 18(1), 1–12. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net
38.
SachsJ. (1981). The current account and macroeconomic adjustment in the 1970s. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 201–268.
39.
SinhaD., & SinhaT. (1998). An exploration of the long-run relationship between saving and investment in the developing economies: A tale of Latin American countries. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 20(3), 435–443.
40.
SinhaT., & SinhaD. (2004). The mother of all puzzles would not go away. Economics Letters, 82(2), 259–267.
41.
SinnS. (1992). Saving-investment correlations and capital mobility: On the evidence from annual data. Economic Journal, 102(414), 1162–1170.
42.
TesarL. L. (1991). Savings, investment and international capital flows. Journal of International Economics, 31(1–2), 55–78.
43.
TobinJ. (1983). Domestic savings and international capital movements in the long-run and short-run. European Economic Review, 21(1–2), 153–156.
