There is general agreement that organizational innovativeness is a multidimensional construct. The scale for organizational innovativeness developed and validated by Wang and Ahmed (2004) takes this multidimensionality into account. In this study, the authors investigate whether this scale is robust enough to be invariant across different cultures. Starting with the innovativeness construct of Wang and Ahmed, the article discusses its rescaling using data from Indian organizations. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the data from 481 respondents from 14 diverse Indian organizations to obtain the underlying factor structure of the innovativeness construct. Four factors with strong internal consistency and clear loadings were extracted—behavioural, process, strategic and product–market innovativeness. Their close correspondence to the five factors of Wang and Ahmed demonstrates the robustness of the organizational innovativeness construct. The 22-item scale demonstrates high reliability and convergent validity.
AhmedP.K. (1998). Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 30–43.
2.
AvlonitisG.J.KouremenosA. & TzokasN. (1994). Assessing the innovativeness of organizations and its antecedents: Project innovstrat. European Journal of Marketing, 28(11), 5–28.
3.
BucklerS.A. (1997). The spiritual nature of innovation. Research Technology Management, 40(2), 43–47.
4.
CaponN.FarleyJ.U.LehmannD.R. & HulbertJ.M. (1992). Profiles of product innovators among large US manufacturers. Management Science, 38(2), 157–169.
5.
DaftR.L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193–210.
6.
DamanpourF. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996–1010.
7.
DewarR.D. & DuttonJ.E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.
8.
DobniC.B. (2008). Measuring innovation culture in organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539–559.
9.
GhoshS. & SrivastavaB.K. (2014). Construction of a reliable and valid scale for measuring organizational culture. Global Business Review, 15(3), 583–596.
10.
GronhaugK. & KaufmannG. (1988). Innovation: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
11.
HaytonJ.C.AllenD.G. & ScarpelloV. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205.
12.
HullF.M.HageJ. & AzumiK. (1985). R&D management strategies: America versus Japan. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 32(2), 78–83.
13.
HurleyR.F. & HultT.M. (1998, July). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54.
14.
KaiserH.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
15.
KimberlyJ.R. & EvaniskoM. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689–713.
16.
KyrgidouL.P. & SpyropoulouS. (2013). Drivers and performance outcomes of innovativeness: An empirical study. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 281–298.
17.
LumpkinG.T. & DessG.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
18.
MatsunagaM. (2010). How to factor-analyse your data right: Do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110.
19.
MengucB. & AuhS. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 63–73.
20.
MidgleyD.F. & DowlingG.R. (1978, March). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 229–242.
21.
MillerD. (1987). Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 7–32.
22.
MillerD. (1988). Relating Porter’s business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 280–308.
NunnallyJ.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26.
PrahaladC.K. & HamelG. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.
27.
RogersE.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). NY: The Free Press.
28.
SiguawJ.A.SimpsonP.M. & EnzC.A. (2006). Conceptualizing innovation orientation: A framework for study and integration of innovation research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(6), 556–574.
29.
SubramanianA. & NilakantaS. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 631–647.
30.
TellisG.J.PrabhuJ.C. & ChandyR.K. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3–23.
31.
TiddJ. (2001). Innovation management in context: Environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 169–183.
32.
WangC.L. & AhmedP.K. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303–313.
33.
WoodmanR.W.SawyerJ.E. & GriffinR.W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.
34.
WolfeR.A. (1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405–431.
35.
ZienK.A. & BucklerS.A. (1997). From experience dreams to market: crafting a culture of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(4), 274–287.
