In this study, we attempt to identify the channels through which economic reforms enhanced the productivity growth in total manufacturing sector in India. Because one possible channel is better utilization of plant capacity, we estimate the capacity utilization rate in Indian manufacturing. Empirical estimates show that the annual average capacity utilization rate in Indian manufacturing was lower over the post-reform years. However, after the reforms, the capacity utilization rate grew faster at the all-India level as well as for most of the major industrial states. Subsequent regression analysis confirms that there was evidence of a favourable impact of economic reforms on productivity growth in total manufacturing, beyond the positive impact of improved capacity utilization.
AghionP.BurgessR.ReddingS.ZilibottiF. (2003). The unequal effects of liberalization: Theory and evidence from India. Unpublished, London School of Economics, London.
2.
AzeezA. E. (2005). Economic reforms and industrial performance: An analysis of capacity utilization in Indian manufacturing. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 4(2), 305–223 (An earlier version is available as Working paper 334, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, June, 2002, and Proceedings of the ERC/METU VI International Conference in Economics, Ankara, Turkey, September 2002).
3.
BankerR. D.CharnesA.CooperW. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
4.
BerndtE. R.FussM. A. (1982). Productivity measurement using capital asset valuation to adjust for variations in utilization. NBER Working Paper No. 895, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
5.
BerndtE. R.FussM. A. (1986). Productivity measurement with adjustments for variations in capacity utilization and other forms of temporary equilibrium. Journal of Econometrics, 33(1–2), 7–29.
6.
BerndtE.RMorrisonC. J. (1981). Capacity utilization measures: Underlying economic theory and an alternative approach. American Economic Review, 71(2), 48–52.
7.
CasselsJ. M. (1937). Excess capacity and monopolistic competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(3), 426–443.
8.
CavesD. W.ChristensenL. R.DiewertW. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of inputs, outputs and productivity,Econometrica, 50(6), 1393–1414.
9.
CharnesA.CooperW. W.RhodesE. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
10.
CorradoC.MatteyJ. (1997). Capacity utilization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 151–167.
11.
DasD. K. (2004). Manufacturing productivity under varying trade regimes, 1980–2000. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(5), 423–433.
12.
DasD. K.KalitaG. (2009). Aggregate productivity growth in Indian manufacturing: An application of Domar aggregation. Working Paper 239, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
13.
DebA. K.RayS. C. (2013). Economic reforms and total factor productivity growth of Indian manufacturing: An inter-state analysis. Working Paper No. 2013–04, Department of Economics, University of Connecticut, USA.
14.
DenisonE. F. (1974). Accounting for United States economic growth, 1929–1969. Washington, DC: The Brooking Institution.
15.
FäreR.GrosskopfS.KokkelenbergE. C. (1989). Measuring plant capacity, utilization and technical change: A nonparametric approach. International Economic Review, 30(3), 655–666.
16.
FarrellM. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.
17.
GajananS.MalhotraD. (2007). Measures of capacity utilization and its determinants: A study of Indian manufacturing. Applied Economics, 39(6), 765–776.
18.
GoldarB.RenganathanV. S. (2008). Import penetration and capacity utilization in Indian industries. Working Paper No. 293, Institute of Economic Growth, New Delhi, India.
19.
GoldarB. N. (2004). Productivity trends in Indian manufacturing in the pre and post reform periods. Working Paper No. 137, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi.
20.
GoldarB. N.KumariA. (2003). Import liberalization and productivity growth in Indian manufacturing industries in the 1990s. The Developing Economies, 41(4), 436–460.
21.
HultenC. R. (1986). Productivity change, capacity utilization, and the sources of efficiency growth. Journal of Econometrics, 33(1–2), 31–50.
22.
JohansenL. (1968). Production functions and the concept of capacity. Collected Works of Leif Johansen (pp. 359–382). North Holland.
23.
JorgensonD. W.GrilichesZ. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. Review of Economic Studies, 34(3), 249–283.
24.
KleinL. R. (1960). Some theoretical issues in the measurement of capacity. Econometrica, 28(2), 272–286.
25.
MilnerC.VencappaD.WrightP. (2007). Trade policy and productivity growth in Indian manufacturing. The World Economy, 30(2), 249–266.
26.
MorrisonC. J. (1986). Productivity measurement with non-static expectations and varying capacity utilization: An integrated approach. Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, 33(1–2), 51–74.
27.
MulegaG.WeissJ. (1996). Trade reform and manufacturing performance in Malawi 1970–1991. World Development, 24(7), 1267–1278.
28.
PastorJ. T.AsmildM.LovellC. A. K. (2011). The biennial Malmquist productivity change index. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45(1), 10–15.
29.
RayS. C. (2002). Did India’s economic reforms improve efficiency and productivity? A non-parametric analysis of the initial evidence from manufacturing. Indian Economic Review, 37(1), 23–57.
30.
RayS. C.DesliE. (1997). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: Comment. The American Economic Review, 87(5), 1033–1039.
31.
RayS. C.MukherjeeK.WuY. (2006). Direct and indirect measures of capacity utilization: A non-parametric analysis of US manufacturing. The Manchester School, University of Manchester, 74(4), 526–548.
32.
SahaB.PanI. (1994). Industrial disputes in India: An empirical analysis. Economic and Political Weekly, 29(18), 1081–1087.
33.
SegersonK.SquiresD. (1990). On the measurement of economic capacity utilization for multi-product industries. Journal of Econometrics, 44(3), 347–361.
34.
ShapiroM. D. (1989). Assessing the Federal Reserve’s measures of capacity and utilization. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1989(1), 181–225.
35.
Shyam SundarK. R. (2004). Lockouts in India, 1961–2001. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(39), 4377–4385.
36.
SrinivasanP. V. (1992). Excess capacities in Indian industries: Supply or demand determined?Economic and Political Weekly, 27(45), 2437–2441.
37.
TopalovaP. (2004). Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. IMF Working Paper No. WP/04/28, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
38.
TrivediP. (2004). An inter-state perspective on manufacturing productivity in India: 1980–81 to 2000–01. Indian Economic Review, 39(1), 203–337.
39.
TrivediP.LakshmananL.JainR.GuptaY. K. (2011). Productivity, efficiency and competitiveness of the Indian manufacturing sector. Development Research Group Study. Mumbai: Department of Economic Analysis and Policy, Reserve Bank of India.
40.
TrivediP.PrakashA.SinateD. (2000). Productivity in major manufacturing industries in India: 1973–74 to 1997–98. Development Research Group Study No. 2.Mumbai: Department of Economic Analysis and Policy, Reserve Bank of India.
41.
UchikawaS. (2001). Investment boom and underutilization of capacity in the 1990s. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(34), 3247–3254.
42.
UnelB. (2003). Productivity trends in India’s manufacturing sectors in the last two decades. IMF Working Paper No. WP/03/22, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
