Performance of Indian microfinance institutions (MFIs) is crucial to ensure access to financial services by the poor who lack access to finance from banks. Improvement in technology of Indian MFIs over a period of time is vital to ensure higher access and expansion of microfinance services to a large number of poor individuals or households in the economy. Better performance of Indian MFIs is also important, as MFIs are social entrepreneurial in nature, expecting fair returns on their investment. This article analyzes the changing trends of technological change in Indian MFIs by using the technological index, decomposed from the Malmquist total factor productivity index (TFP), employing data envelopment analysis (DEA) for a panel of 34 Indian MFIs during the period 2005–2006 to 2010–2011. We further use a static panel data model, such as random effect model (REM), to examine various macro- economic determinants of technological change in Indian MFIs during the period 2006–2007 to 2010–2011. Our result indicates that the technological change in Indian MFIs is positively driven by macroeconomic factors, namely, GDP growth rate and size of the economy, whereas it is negatively influenced by the rate of inflation.
BassemB.S. (2008). Efficiency of microfinance institutions in the Mediterranean: An application of DEA. Transition Studies Review, 15(2), 343–354.
2.
BaumC.F. (2006). An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. Texas, USA: Stata Corp.
3.
BergS.A., ForsundF.R., HjalmarssonL., & SouminenM. (1993). Banking efficiency in the Nordic countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17(2–3), 371–388.
4.
BergerA.N., & HumphreyD.B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175–212.
5.
CaudillS., GropperD., & HartarskaV. (2009). Which microfinance institutions: Are becoming more cost-effective with time? Evidence from a mixture model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(4), 651–672.
6.
CaudillS., GropperD., & HartarskaV. (2012). Microfinance institution costs: Effects of gender, subsidies and technology. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 4(4), 292–319.
7.
CavesD.W., ChristensenL.R., & DiewertW.E. (1982a). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50(6), 1393–1414.
8.
CavesD.W., ChristensenL.R., & DiewertW.E. (1982b). Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers. The Economic Journal, 92(365), 73–86.
9.
CoelliT.J. (1996). A guide to DEAP version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (computer) program (DEAP). (CEPA working paper 96/08). Australia: Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England.
10.
CoelliT.J., RaoD.P., O’DonnellC.J., & BatteseG.E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
11.
DesrochersM., & LamberteM. (2003). Efficiency and expense preference behaviour in Philippines’ cooperative rural banks(Cahier de researche/Working paper 03-21). Centre interuniversiairesur les risqué, les politiques economiques et l’emploi (CIRPEE).
12.
DoughertyC. (2007). Introduction to econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
FäreR., GrosskopfS., NorrisM., & ZhangZ. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83.
14.
FerrierG., & LovellC.A.K. (1990). Measuring cost efficiency in banking: Econometric and linear programming evidence. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1), 229–245.
15.
Guitierrez-NietoB., Serrano-CincaC., & MolineroC.M. (2007). Microfinance institutions and efficiency. OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 35(2), 131–142.
16.
HaqM., SkullyM., & PathanS. (2010). Efficiency of microfinance institutions: A data envelopment analysis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 17(1), 63–97.
17.
HartarskaV., & MerslandR. (2012). Which governance mechanisms promote efficiency in reaching poor clients? Evidence from rated microfinance institutions. European Financial Management, 18(2), 218–239.
18.
HartarskaV., NadolnyakD., & ShenX. (2012a). Efficiency in microfinance cooperatives. Iberoamerical Journal of Development Studies, 1(2), 53–74.
19.
HartarskaV., NadolnyakD., & ShenX. (2012b). Social performance and cost minimizing MFI size. Journal of Cost Management, 26(5), 20–28.
20.
HartarskaV., ParmeterC.F., & NadolnyakD. (2011). Economies of scope of lending and mobilizing deposits in rural MFIs: A semiparametric analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(2), 389–398.
21.
HartarskaV., ParmeterC., NadolnyakD., & ZhouD.B. (2010). Economies of scope for microfinance: Differences across output measures. Pacific Economic Review, 15(4), 464–481.
22.
HartarskaV., ShenX., & MerslandR. (2013). Scale economies and elasticities of substituion in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(1), 118–131.
23.
HassanM.K., & TufteD. R. (2001). The X- efficiency of a group based lending institution: The case of Grameen Bank. World Development, 29(6), 1071–1082.
24.
HermesN., LensinkR., & MeestersA. (2009). Financial development and the efficiency of microfinance institutions (Unpublished working paper). doi:SSRN 1396202.
25.
HermesN., & MeestersA. (2011). The performance of microfinance institutions: Do macro conditions matter? In ArmendarizB. and MarcL. (Eds), The handbook of microfinance (pp. 173–201). Chennai: World Scientific Publishers.
26.
HudonM., & TracaD. (2011). On the efficiency effects of subsidies in microfinance: An empirical inquiry. World Development, 39(6), 966–973.
27.
KuussaariH., & VesalaJ. (1995). The efficiency of Finnish banks in producing payment and account transactions(Working paper 95, 6). Helsinki: Bank of Finland. Financial Market Department.
28.
LeonJ.V. (2009). An empirical analysis of Peruvian municipal banks using cost-efficiency frontier approaches. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 29(1–2), 161–182.
29.
MasoodT., & AhmadM.I. (2010). Technical efficiency of microfinance institutions in India—A stochastic frontier approach. Prajnan, 39(2), 159–176. Pune: NIBM.
30.
Mix Market. (2014). Data accessed from microfinance information exchange for microfinance industry. Retrieved 13August2014, from www.mixmarket.org/mfi/country/india
31.
Muneer BabuM. (2013). An empirical study of regulation and performance of microfinance institutions in India. (PhD thesis). Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
32.
Muneer BabuM., & KulshreshthaP. (2013). Efficiency of Indian microfinance institutions: a data envelopment analysis. Indian Economic Journal, 60(4), 81–101, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
33.
Muneer BabuM., & KulshreshthaP. (2014). Productivity change and technical efficiency in Indian microfinance institutions. Studies in Microeconomics, 2(2). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
34.
NadiyaM., & RamananR. (2011). Probing on the efficiency and sustainability status of Indian microfinance institutions: A data envelopment analysis application (Unpublished paper). National Institute of Technology, Calicut, India.
35.
NawazA. (2009). Efficiency and productivity of microfinance: Incorporating the role of subsidies(Working Paper No. 10). Brussels: School of Economics and Management, Centre Emile Bernheim.
36.
PastorJ.M. (1999). Efficiency and risk management in Spanish banking: A method to decompose risk. Applied Financial Economics, 9(4), 371–384.
37.
PaxtonJ. (2007). Technical efficiency in a semi-formal financial sector: The case of Mexico. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 57–74.
38.
QayyumA., & AhmadM. (2006). Efficiency and sustainability of microfinance institutions in South Asia. Pakistan: Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
39.
RogersonP.A. (2001). Statistical methods for geography. London: SAGE Publications.
40.
SarkarA.N., & SinghJ. (2006). Savings-led microfinance to Bank the unbankables: Sharing of global experience. Global Business Review, 2(7), 271–295. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
41.
ShermanH.D., & GoldF. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency—evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(2), 297–315.
42.
Tortosa-AusinaE. (2002). Exploring efficiency differences over time in the Spanish banking industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(3), 643–664.
43.
WorthingtonA.C. (1998). The determinants of non-bank financial institution efficiency: A stochastic cost frontier approach. Applied Financial Economics, 8(3), 279–287.
