This article explores the relevance of different entry modes for Danish exporting small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Internal and external resources that influence the choice of entry modes into the Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) markets are investigated from both a resource-based view (RBV) and a market-based view (MBV). The survey conducted by the University of Southern Denmark in 2012 is based on a sample of 177 Danish SMEs. Our results of this study show that Danish companies entering the BRIC markets mainly prefer low commitment modes. The more traditional internal factors (control, flexibility and risk) were evaluated less important than personnel and financial resources for the BRIC markets. The most important external factor was market potential whereas the trade barriers, cultural distance as well as the political and economical risk are viewed as main obstacles when internationalizing into distant markets. Managers can compensate the loss of control when choosing the lower commitment modes into distant markets by forming business networks and thereby gaining local knowledge.
AakerD.MascarenhasB. (1984). The need for strategic flexibility. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(2), 74–82.
2.
Abdul-TalibA.NSallehM. F.ShamsuddinF. M.AshariH. (2011). The effects of firm size and international business experience on export attitudes. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 19(1/2), 4–14.
3.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
4.
AgarwalS.RamaswamiS. N. (1992). Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1–27.
5.
AlouiR.Ben AissaM. S.NguyenD. K. (2011). Global financial crisis, extreme interdependences, and contagion effects: The role of economic structure?Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(1), 130–141.
6.
AndersonE.GatignonH. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1–26.
7.
BaenaV. (2009). Modeling global franchising in emerging markets: An entry mode analysis. Journal of East-West Business, 15(3–4), 164–188.
8.
BrouthersK. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203–221.
CanabalA.WhiteG. O. (2008). Entry mode research: Past and future. International Business Review, 17(3), 267–284.
11.
CarazoP. C. M.LumisteR. (2010). Foreign entry modes of Colombian small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Business and Economics Perspectives, 5(1), 16–41.
12.
DanaL.BajramovicM. B.WrightR. W. (2005). The new paradigm of multipolar competition and its implications for entrepreneurship research in Europe. In FayolleA.KyroP.UlijnJ. (Eds), Entrepreneurship research in Eeurope: Outcomes and perspectives (pp. 102–121). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
13.
Danmarks Statistik. (2012). Danmarks Udenrigsøkonomi 2011, København.
14.
DowD.LarimoJ. (2009). Challenging the conceptualization and measurement of distance and international experience in entry mode choice research. Journal of International Marketing, 17(2), 74–98.
15.
DunningJ. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(Spring), 1–31.
16.
Dyhr UlrichA. M.BoydB.HollensenS. (2012). Financial performance of entry mode decisions: Effects of control in an internationalization context. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), 12–28.
17.
ErramilliM. K. (1992). Influence of some external and internal environmental factors on foreign market entry mode choice in service firms. Journal of Business Research, 25(4), 263–276.
18.
ErramilliM. K.RaoC. P. (1993). Service firms’ international entry-mode choice: A modified transaction-cost analysis approach. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 19–38.
19.
EstrinS.PrevezerM. (2010). A survey on institutions and new firm entry: How and why do entry rates differ in emerging markets?Elsevier B.V, Economic Systems, 34(3), 289–304.
20.
European Comission. (2012). Small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/sme-definition/index_en.htm (accessed on 05 February 2012).
21.
GatignonH.AndersonE. (1988). The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4(2), 305–336.
22.
GertsenC. M.SøderbergA. M.ZølnerM. (2012). Global collaboration: intercultural experiences and learning. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
HanM. (2006). Developing social capital to achieve superior internationalization: A conceptual model. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 4(2–3), 99–112.
24.
HillW. L.HwangP.KimW. C. (1990). An electic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117–128.
HollensenS.BoydB.Dyhr UlrichA. M. (2011). The choice of foreign entry modes in a control perspective. The IUP Journal of Business Strategy, 8(4), 7–31.
27.
HollingsworthJ. R. (2000). Doing institutional analysis: Implications for the study of innovations. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 595–644.
28.
HoltbrüggeD.BaronA. (2013). Market entry strategies in emerging markets: An institutional study in the BRIC countries. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(3), 237–252.
29.
JohansonJ.VahlneJ. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.
30.
KochA. J. (2001). Factors influencing market and entry mode selection: Developing the MENS model. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(5), 351–361.
31.
KogutB.SinghH. (1988). The effect on national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.
32.
KouznetsovA.JonesA. (2009). Conditions in Russia and their effects on entry mode decisions of multinational manufacturing enterprises: A qualitative study identifying issues for further research in the area of country conditions and their impact on entry mode. Marketing Management Journal, 19(1), 84–95.
33.
KumarV.StamA.JoachimsthalerE. (1994). An international multicriteria approach to identifying potential foreign markets. Journal of International Marketing, 2(1), 29–52.
34.
LeeG. K.LiebermannM. B. (2010). The international performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 140–158.
35.
LinW.-T. (2012). Family ownership and internationalization processes: Internationalization pace, internationalization scope, and internationalization rhythm. European Management Journal, 30(1), 47–56.
36.
LiuY.PearsonC. (2011). The determining factors of Western Australia’s (WA) foreign investment in China. Global Business Review, 12(1), 1–20.
37.
MadhokA. (1996). Know-how-, experience- and competition-related considerations in foreign market entry: An exploratory investigation. International Business Review, 5(4), 339–366.
38.
MakhijaM. (2003). Comparing the resource-based and market-based views of the firm: Empirical evidence from Czech privatization. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 433–451.
39.
McDougallP. P.ShaneS.OviattB. M. (2003). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6), 469–487.
40.
MorschettD.Schramm-KleinH.SwobodaB. (2010). Decades of research on market entry modes: What do we really know about external antecedents of entry mode choice?Journal of International Management, 16(1), 60–77.
41.
NisarS.BoatengA.WuJ.LeungM. (2012). Understanding the motives for SMEs entry choice of international entry mode. Market Intelligence & Planning, 30(7), 717–739.
42.
O’NeillJ. (2001). Building Better Global Economic BRICs, Global Economics Paper, No. 66, Goldman Sachs, New York.
43.
PapadopoulosN. (1988). Inventory, taxonomy and assessment of methods for international market selection. International Marketing Review, (Autumn), 5(3) 38–51.
44.
PeterafM. A.BergenM. E. (2003). Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: A market-based and resource-based framework. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1027–1041.
45.
RattenV.DanaL.-P.HanM.WelpeI. (2007). Internationalisation of SMEs: European comparative studies. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 4(3), 361–379.
46.
RipollésM.BlesaA.MonferrerD. (2012). Factors enhancing the choice of higher resource commitment entry modes in international new ventures. International Business Review, 21(4), 648–666.
47.
RootF. R. (1994). Entry strategies for international markets. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Sanchez-PeinadoE.Pla-BarberL.HébertL. (2007). Strategic variables that influence entry mode choice in service firms. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), 67–91.
50.
SearleJ. R., (2005). What is an institution. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 1–22.
51.
SharmaV. M.ErramilliM. K. (2004). Resource-based explanation of entry mode choice. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 12(1), 1–18.
52.
ShimizuK.HittM. A. (2004). Strategic flexibility: Organizational preparedness to reverse ineffective strategic decisions. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 18(4), 44–59.
53.
ShraderR. C. (2001). Collaboration and performance in foreign markets: The case of young high-technology manufacturing firms. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 44–60.
54.
The World Bank. (2012). World development indicators 2012, The World Bank—Development Data Group, Washington. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ (accessed 05 January 2013).
55.
TihanyiL.GrifithD. A.RussellC. J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 70–283.
56.
WheatleyA. (2012). Economy offers little to give thanks for, International Herald Tribune. The Global Edition of The New York Times, November19, 19.
57.
WilsonD. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050, Global Economics Paper, No. 99, Goldman Sachs, New York.
58.
WronaT.TrapczynskiP. (2012). Re-explaining international entry modes—Interaction and moderating effects on entry modes of pharmaceutical companies in to transition economies. European Management Journal, 30(4), 295–315.
