The Indian education industry is the third largest in the world. The higher system shows that even after the proliferation of higher educational institutions, particularly in the last two decades. The researcher tried to examine of multiple stakeholders in quality of education need to explore. The purpose and significance of the study are to analyse the concept of multiple stakeholders’ involvement (MSI) in the higher academic sector, including healthcare institutions. At the same time, they intend to develop their roles in higher academics, including healthcare institutions.
To understand MSI in the sustainability of higher academics and to investigate the role of faculty members, grounded theory was most suitable here. We also did focus group discussion (FGD) to secure a collective decision. Results were in accordance with research objectives.
AkaoY. (1990). Quality function deployment, integrating customer requirements into product design. Productivity Press.
2.
AlvarezM., & RodríguezS. (1997). La calidad total en la universidad: Podemos hablar de clientes?Boletín de Estudios Económicos, LII(161), 333–352.
3.
AnttilaJ., & JussilaK. (2017). ISO 9001:2015—A questionable reform. What should the implementing organisations understand and do?Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9-10), 1090–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1309119
4.
AsiyaiR. I. (2015). Improving quality higher education in Nigeria: The roles of stakeholders. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 61–70.
5.
AtkinsonP., & CoffeyA. (2011). Analyzing documentary realities. In SilvermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 77–92). Sage Publications.
6.
BalamE. M., & ShannonD. M. (2010). Student ratings of college teaching: A comparison of faculty and their students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 209–221.
7.
BebbingtonJ., RussellS., & ThomsonI. (2017). Accounting and sustainable development: Reflections and propositions. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 48, 21–34.
8.
BeerkensM., & UdamM. (2017). Stakeholders in higher education quality assurance: Richness in diversity?Higher Education Policy, 30(3), 1–19.
9.
BerchinI. I., SimaM., de LimaM. A., BieselS., dos SantosL. P., FerreiraR. V., & CeciF. (2018). The importance of international conferences on sustainable development as higher education institutions’ strategies to promote sustainability: A case study in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 756–772.
10.
BiggsJ. B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.
11.
BogueG., & HallK. (2012). Corporate, academic, and political perspectives on higher education accountability policy. College & University Journal, 87(3), 14–23.
BowdenJ., & MartonF. (1998). The university of learning. Kogan Page Ltd.
14.
BrintS., & ClotfelterC. T. (2016). U.S. higher education effectiveness. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(1), 2–37.
15.
BurrowsJ. (1999). Going beyond labels: A framework for profiling institutional stakeholders. Contemporary Education, 70(4), 5–10.
16.
CandyP. C. (2000). Reaffirming a proud tradition. The Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(2), 101–125.
17.
CardosoS., RosaM. J., & StensakerB. (2016). Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 950–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052775
18.
ChengY. C., & TamW. M. (1997). Multi-models of quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 5(1), 22–31.
19.
DevlinM., & SamarawickremaG. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(2), 111–124.
20.
FenwickT. (2016). Social media, professionalism and higher education: A sociomaterial consideration. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 664–677.
21.
FlintD. J., & WoodruffR. B. (2001). The initiators of changes in customers’ desired value: Results from a theory building study. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(4), 321–337.
22.
GibbsG. (2010). Using assessment to support student learning. Leeds Met Press.
23.
GlaserB. (1999). Keynote address for the fourth annual qualitative health research conference. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 836–845.
24.
GlaserB., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.
25.
GreenD. (1994). What is quality in international higher education? In GreenD. (Ed.), Society for research into international higher education. Open University Press.
26.
GruberT., ReppelA., & VossR. (2010). Understanding the characteristics of effective professors: The student’s perspective. Journal of Marketing for International Higher Education, 20(2), 175–190.
27.
HatamiH., RangrazE., & JahromiM. (2016). Survey the relationship between inter personal conflict and organizational communications in personnel of physical education offices of Alborz province. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2208–2215. http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/article/view/2370/2185
28.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge, G.B.
29.
HwarngH. B., & TeoC. (2001). Translating customers’ voices into operations requirements – A QFD application in higher education. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(2), 195–226.
30.
JohnsonL., BeckerS., EstradaV., & FreemanA. (2014). Horizon report: 2014. Higher education. Publications Office of the European Union: The New Media Consortium. http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2014-nmchorizon-report-he-EN.pdf
31.
KanjiG. K., MalekA., & TambiB. A. (1999). Total quality management in UK higher education institutions. Total Quality Management, 10(1), 129–153.
KavanaghM., & DrennanL. (2008). What skills and attributes does an accounting graduate need? Evidence from student perceptions and employer expectations. Accounting and Finance, 48, 279–300.
34.
KuitJ. A., ReayG., & FreemanR. (2001). Experiences of reflective teaching. Active Learning in Higher Education, 2(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787401002002004
35.
LaryeaS. (2013). Feedback provision and use in teaching and learning: A case study. Education and Training, 55(7), 665–680.
36.
LuxfordK., SafranD. G., & DelbancoT. (2011). Promoting patient-centered care: A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 23(5), 510–515.
37.
MazurG. (2003). Voice of the customer (define): QFD to define value. ASQs Annual Quality Congress Proceedings (p. 57). Kansas City, MI, 19–21May.
38.
MohsinM., & KamalM. A. (2012). Managing quality higher education in Bangladesh: Lessons from the Singaporean and Malaysian strategies and reforms. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(20), 59–70.
39.
MorganD. L. (1997). Qualitative research methods series (Vol. 16). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
40.
NewellG. (2013). Assessing property student satisfaction with their property education experience in an Australian university. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 19(2), 133–149.
41.
NgP. T. (2015). What is quality education? How can it be achieved? The perspectives of school middle leaders in Singapore. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27(4), 307–322.
42.
OliverM., & TrigwellK. (2005). Can blended learning be redeemed. E-learning, 2(1), 17–26.
43.
PizamA., ShapovalV., & EllisT. (2016). Customer satisfaction and its measurement in hospitality enterprises: A revisit and update. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(1), 2–35.
44.
PoonJ. (2012). Use of blended learning to enhance the student learning experience and engagement in property education. Property Management, 300(2), 129–156.
45.
PoonJ. (2016). A study of real estate student satisfaction in Australia. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 21(3), 215–233.
46.
ProsserM., & TrigwellK. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. SRHE and Open University Press.
47.
Radinger-PeerV., & PflitschG. (2017). The role of higher education institutions in regional transition paths towards sustainability. Review of Regional Research, 37(2), 161–187.
48.
Rosak-SzyrockaJ., & BlaškováM. (2016). Engineering production education in e-learning example in Poland. Production Engineering Archives, 12, 259–268.
49.
SarricoC. S., & AlvesA. A. (2016). Academic staff quality in higher education: An empirical analysis of Portuguese public administration education. Higher Education, 71(2), 143–162.
50.
ScordoulisM., SparanghsP., StampolisO., MougkoliaI., PapageorgiouA., & ChondreliC. (2015). A framework for quality in education: Applying quality function deployment a higher educational institute. International Scientific Conference e-RA-10.
51.
SnyderK. D. (2003). Ropes, poles and space: Active learning in business education. The Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 4(2), 159–167.
52.
Stasiak-BetlejewskaR. (2012). Value engineering as the way of quality problems solving in the steel construction management. Manufacturing Technology, 12(13), 242–247.
53.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
54.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Sage Publications.
55.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
56.
SunderM. V. (2016). Lean Six Sigma in higher education institutions. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 8(2), 159–178.
57.
TaggJ. (2007). Double-loop learning in higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(4), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.39.4.36-41
58.
UlewiczR. (2014). Application of SERVQUAL method for evaluation of quality of educational services at the university of higher education. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 9, 254–264.
59.
UlewiczR. (2017). Developing a quality culture in the Czestochowa University of technology proceedings. 18th International Symposium on Quality (pp. 267–278).
60.
VenkatramanS. (2007). A framework for implementing TQM in higher education programs. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(1), 92–112.
61.
WatsonD. (2012). Who runs our universities? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 16(2), 41–45.
62.
WiśniewskaM., Szymańska-BrałkowskaM., & ZielińskiG. (2014). Determinanty jakości usług edukacyjnych (Determinants of education services quality) (pp. 271–280). Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics.
63.
YeoR. K., & MarquardtM. J. (2011). Through a different lens: Bridging the expectation–perception (quality) divide in higher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31(4), 379–405.
64.
ZielińskiG., & LewandowskiK. (2012). Determinanty percepcji jakości usług edukacyjnych w perspektywie grup interesariuszy (Determinants of perception of quality of educational services in the perspective of stakeholder groups). Zarządzanie i Finanse, 10(3), 42–54.
65.
ZushoA., PintrichP. R., & CoppolaB. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1081–1094.
