The present article focuses on the perception of elderly regarding younger generation in rural Odisha. Data for this study were collected from the rural areas of Bargarh district using semi-structured interview schedule. For this study, 310 males and females were interviewed by using systematic sampling technique. Various issues like condition of the aged in context of respect and care have been taken into consideration. Other factors like their level of satisfaction from the care provided by their children and how they perceive today’s youth has been analysed. ANOVA was conducted to see which socio-demographic variables have the most significant effect on the perception of elderly later, factor analysis is used and the results show that the elderly have a negative perception regarding the younger generation. Results show that the elderly feels that today’s youth is selfish and least bothered about their needs and demands.
AminS. (1996). Family structure and change in rural Bangladesh (Working Paper No. 87). New York: The Population Council.
2.
AsharafA. (2000). Elderly in Kerala: Productive units with challenges ahead. Unpublished PhD thesis, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai.
3.
BarrettA. E.CartwellL. E. (2007). Drawings on sterotypes: Using undergraduates sketeches of elders as a teaching tool. Educational Gerontology, 33(4), 327–348.
4.
BikkerA. P.ThompsonA. G. H. (2006). Predicting and comparing patient satisfaction in four different modes of health care across a nation. Social Science and Medicine, 63(6), 1671–1683.
5.
ButlerR. N. (1969). Ageism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontology, 9, 243–246.
6.
ButlerR. N. (1995). Ageism. In MaddoxG. L. (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of ageing (2nd ed., pp. 38–39). New York: Springer.
7.
ChaoS.RothP. (2000). The experience of Taiwanese women caring for parents in law. Journal of Advance Nursing, 31(3), 631–638.
8.
CottleN. R.GloverR. J. (2007). Combating ageism: Change in student knowledge and attitude regarding aging. Educational Gerontology, 33(6), 501–512.
9.
CuddyA. J. C.NortonM. I.FiskeS. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistency of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 267–285.
10.
FemiaE. E.ZaritS. M.BlairC.JarrottS. E.BrunoK. (2008). Intergenerational pre-school experiences and the young child: Potential benefits to development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(2), 272–287.
11.
GaurR.KaurA. (2004). Health status and general attitudes of institutionalized and non-institutionalized aged persons living in and around Chandigarh. Man in India, 84(3–4), 153–166.
12.
GellisZ. D.ShermanS.LawranceF. (2003). First year graduate social work students’ knowledge of and attitude toward older adults. Educational Gerontology, 29(1), 1–16.
13.
HairJ. F.BlackC. W.BabinJ. B.AndersonR. E.TathamL. R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
14.
JohnsonR. A.WichernD. W. (2002). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs and New York, NY: Prentice-Hall Inc.
15.
KabirM.SalamA. M. (2001). The effects of various interventions on the welfare of the elderly: Evidence from micro-study (Working Paper No. 17). CPD-UNFPA Program on Population and Sustainable Development, Centre for Policy Dialogue, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
16.
KaiserH. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
17.
KamP. K. (1996). Empowering elderly people: A community work approach. Community Development Journal, 31(3), 230–240.
18.
KiteM. E.StuckdaleG. D.WhitelyB. E.JohnsonB. T. (2005). Attitudes towards younger and older adults: An updated meta-analytic survey. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 241–266.
19.
LeeE. M.(2004). Subsidies for acute health care services (Ministry of Health Information Paper). Singapore. Retrieved 1July2006, from www.moh.gov.sg
20.
McConthaJ. T.HaytoV.Rieser-DannerL.McConthaD.PolatT. S. (2004). Turkish and U.S. attitude towards aging. Educational Gerontology, 30(3), 169–183.
21.
NarayanC. (2008). Is there a double standard of aging? Older men and women and ageism. Educational Gerontology, 34(9), 782–787.
22.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
OthmanA.OwenL. (2001a). Adapting and measuring consumer service quality (SQ)in Islamic banks: A case study in Kuwait finance house. International Journal of Islamic Service, 3(1), 1–26.
24.
OthmanA.OwenL. (2001b). The multidimensionality of CARTER model to measure customer service quality (SQ)in Islamic banking industry: A study in Kuwait financial house. International Journal of Islamic Financial Service, 3(4), 1–12.
25.
PalmoreE. B. (1999). Ageism: Negative and positive. New York: Springer.
26.
PettM. A.LackeyN. R.SullivanJ. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
27.
RajuS. S. (2011). Studies on ageing in India: A review (BKPAI Working Paper No. 2). New Delhi: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
28.
RamanP.HarwoodJ.WeisD.AndersonJ. L.MillerG. (2008). Portrayals of older adults in U.S. and Indian magazine advertisements: A cross-cultural comparison. Howard Journal of Communication, 19(3), 221–240.
29.
TanP. P.ZhangN. H.FanZ. (2004). Students’ attitude towards the elderly in the People’s Republic of China. Educational Gerontology, 30(4), 305–314.
30.
TolvanenE. (1998). I and others: Alcohol use among older people as a social and cultural phenomenon. Aging and Society, 18(5), 538–563.
31.
UzomaO. O.DanO. S. (2005). Stereotypes and perceptions of the elderly by the youth in Nigeria: Implications for social policy. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 24(5), 439–452.
32.
WardR. A. (1984). Aging experiences. New York: Harper & Row.
33.
WHO. (2010). Global health and aging (NIH Publication No. 11-7737). National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/systems/sage/en
YenC. H.LiaoW. C.ChenY. R.KaoM. C.LeeM. C.WaangC. C. (2009). A Chinese version of Kogan’s attitude towards older people scale: Reliability and validity assessment. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(1), 38–44.
