According to the analysis of this series of papers, in the old civilized world for thousands of years, theocracies, tyrancracies and timocracies, along with the later deify-overlord’s sovereignty, party-tyrant’s sovereignty and plutocrat’s sovereignty are the major powers which dominate all things. This series of papers put forth the hierarchical analysis sequence of ontology: arche – paradigm – pattern – structure – factors, and thus the analytic framework of the ontology and its axiomatism for the power ecosphere of the world is set. For the new civilized world to be created, the recombination of interests, the reconstruction of human rights and the reengineering of sovereignty should be the basic content of the rebuilt of dynamic foundation. We should rebuild the sovereignty, with citizen’s sovereignties as the core. Thus this paper establishes the design basis of the ontological dynamics for the synthetic study of inter-discipline on the citizen-autonomous commonwealth.
AligicaP. (2014). Institutional diversity and political economy: The Ostroms and beyond. Madison Avenue, New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BlairA. (1999). The Problemata as a natural philosophical genre. In GraftonA.SiraisiN. (Eds.), Natural Particulars: Nature and the Disciplines (p. 173). Renaissance Europe.
3.
BodinJ. (1568 [1965]). Response to the Paradoxes of Malestroit (Trans. TudorH.). In TudorH.DysonR. W. (Eds.), European economic history: Documents and reading (p. 22). Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum.
4.
BrownR. E. (2013). The power and the peculiarity: The paradoxes of early Mormonism. Reviews in American History, 41, 451–457.
5.
CrawfordS. E. SOstromE. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082975
6.
DeanL. F. (1942, April). Bodin’s ‘methodus’ in England before 1625. Studies in Philology, 39, 160–166.
7.
EinspahrJ. (2010). The beginning that never was: Mediation and freedom in Rousseau’s political thought. Review of Politics, 72(3), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670510000318
8.
HerzbergR. Q. (2015). Governing their commons: Elinor and Vincent Ostrom and the Bloomington school. Public Choice, 163(1-2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0243-1
9.
LamW. F. (1998). Governing irrigation systems in Nepal: Institutions, infrastructure, and collective action. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
10.
LopezD. S. (1998). Prisoners of Shangri-La: Tibetan Buddhism and the west (p. 9). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
MasonP. Q. (2011). God and the people: Theodemocracy in nineteenth-century Mormonism. Journal of Church and State, 53, 349–353.
12.
NadeauR. L. (2012). The Wiley-Blackwell companion to Chinese religions (p. 54 ff). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
13.
NeuhausR. J. (1986). The naked public square: Religion and democracy in America (p. 188). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
14.
NorthD. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
OakersonR. J. (1992). Analyzing the commons: A framework. In BromleyD. W.FeenyD.McKeanM.PetersP.GillesJ.OakersonR.Ford RungeC.ThomsonJ. (Eds.), Making the commons work: Theory, practice, and policy (pp. 41–59). San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
16.
OstromE. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems, American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.
17.
OstromV.OstromE. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 31(March-April), 203–216.
18.
QuinnM. D. (2002). National culture, personality, and theocracy in the early Mormon culture of violence. The John Whitmer Historical Association Journal, 22, 159–186.
19.
RosenblattH. (1997). Rousseau and Geneva: From the first discourse to the social contract, 1749–1762 (pp. 264–265). Cambridge University Press.
20.
PalmquistS. (1993). Biblical theocracy: A vision of the biblical foundations for a Christian political philosophy. Hong Kong: Philopsychy Press.
21.
United Nations, Dept. of Public Information (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Adopted and proclaimed by general assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948. New York: Author.
22.
WilliamsJ. D. (1967). The separation of church and state in Mormon theory and practice. Journal of Church and State, 9(2), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/9.2.238
23.
ZongchengL. (1995a). Data sampling frequency and interval in evolution processes, data acquisition and processing,
24.
ZongchengL. (1995b). Hypothesis of bifurcate-chaos quantum for atom in heat non-equilibrium conditions. Journal of Atomic and Molecular Physics (Chinese Journal of physics).
25.
ZongchengL. (1996). General theory of economic science in the new century (Vol. 1). China: China Industry and Commerce Joint Press.
26.
ZongchengL. (2003a). Extendable spatiotemporal relation of general relativity in irreversible process of dissipative systems. Acta Physica Sinica (Chinese Journal of physics).
27.
ZongchengL. (2003b). Extendable gravitational relation of general relativity in irreversible process of dissipative systems. Acta Physica Sinica (Chinese Journal of physics).
28.
ZongchengL. (2008a). Boundary energy flux density, quantum basic equilibrium and quantum dissipative equilibrium (I). Journal of Atomic and Molecular Physics (Chinese Journal of physics), 2008, 3.
29.
ZongchengL. (2008b). Boundary exchange relations, quantum system consumption and quantum organizing equilibrium (II). Journal of Atomic and Molecular Physics (Chinese Journal of physics), 2008, 4.
30.
ZongchengL. (2008c). Dominant analysis foundation of complete factor synergetics of complex systems. Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2008, 1.
