This article explores the implications of online social networks for gender relations in Africa. It questions whether these networks are impacting the stereotypes and biases that drive offline interaction. To answer this question, the article relies on targeted surveys in Nigeria and Ghana. These surveys not only generate data for the central enquiry, but also highlight the role of class in shaping the nature of interactions with and within the new spaces emerging with new media. This raises questions about the gender dimensions of the much touted democratic utility of new media, and how other important social interactions, such as, economic and cultural, can frame it. It also questions the overall inclusiveness of new media. The article concludes by drawing attention to the possibilities of new media in creating gender-blind societies but also highlights the crucial, and often neglected, role of other social categories in framing access to these possibilities and in configuring how they interact with the political space.
BairdZ. (2002). Governing the Internet: Engaging government, business and nonprofits. Foreign Affairs, 81(6), 14–20.
3.
BimberB. (2000). Measuring the gender gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 1–11.
4.
BoydD.HeerJ. (2006). Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster. Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
5.
ChoucriN. (2000). Introduction: CyberPolitics in international relations. International Political Science Review, 21(3), 243–263.
6.
CNNIC (China Internet Network Information Centre). (2002). 11th Survey Report. Retrieved October 3, 2011, from http://www.cnnic.net.cn
7.
CompaigneB. (Ed.). (2001). The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth?Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
DreznerD. (2004). The global governance of the Internet: Bringing the state back. Political Science Quarterly, 119(3), 477–498.
9.
DreznerD. (2007). All politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
DuttonW. (1999). Society on the line: Information politics in the digital age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
EdwardsA. (1995). Women in a Restructuring Australia: Work and Welfare. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
12.
EllisonN.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(3), 1143–1168.
13.
ErikssonJ.GiacomelloG. (2006). The information revolution, security and international relations: (IR)relevant theory?International Political Science Review, 27(3), 221–244.
14.
FeldmanD. (2000). Public confidence in cyber systems: Issues and implications for sustainability. International Political Science Review, 21(1), 23–42.
15.
FinkC.KennyC. (2003). W(h)ither the digital divide?Info—The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, 5(6), 15–24.
16.
FrandaM. (2001). Governing the Internet: The emergence of an international regime. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
17.
GordenkerL.WeissG. (1995). Pluralising global governance: Analytical approaches and dimensions. Third World Quarterly, 16(3), 357–387.
18.
GoslingS.VazireS.SrivastavaS.JohnO. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104.
19.
GrossR.AcquistiA. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (The Facebook Case). Proceedings of ACM workshop on privacy in the electronic society (pp. 71–80). Alexandria, VA: Association for Computing Machinery.
20.
HargittaiE. (2008). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297.
21.
HodgeM. (2006). The fourth amendment and privacy issues on the “new” Internet: Facebook.com and MySpace.com. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 31(Fall), 95–123.
22.
LentzB.StaubhaarJ.LaPastinaA.MainS.TaylorJ. (2000). Structuring access: The role of public access centers in the “digital divide”. Austin, TX: University of Texas Telecommunications and Information Policy Institute.
23.
LiffS.ShepherdA. (2004). An evolving gender digital divide?Internet Issue Brief, No. 2. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
24.
MehraB.MerkelC.BishopA.P. (2004). The Internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New Media and Society, 6(6), 781–802.
25.
NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration)
. 2002. A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce. Retrieved August 12, 2011, from, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/ accessed on
26.
OnoH.ZavodnyM. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 111–121.
27.
ShashaaniL. (1997). Gender differences in computer attitudes and use among college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 37–51.
28.
SteinerPeter (1993July). The New Yorker, 69(20), 61.
29.
WellmanB.SalaffJ.DimitrovaD.GartonL.GuliaM.HaythornthwaiteC. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 213–238.
30.
WilsonK.WallinJ.ReiserC. (2003). Social stratification and the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 133–143.
