The article addresses the potential of transnational advocacy networks for the diffusion of norms such as “equality in the family” on a national as well as international basis. Taking the network Musawah for Equality in the Family as a case in point, it shows how transnational networking with a focus on one particular issue can take place, and how significant the national and local context is for the formulation of strategies and on-the-ground struggle for reform. It traces the importance that family laws based on Islamic sources have gained for a “national Islamic identity” during the course of history, which in turn explains why this issue is such a contested arena in politics and society. The article concludes with an appreciation of transnational advocacy work, while simultaneously stressing the significance of the national and local context.
Alpízar Durán, Lydia, Payne, Noël D., & Russo, Anahi. (Eds). (2007) Building feminist movements and organizations. Global perspectives. London/New York: Zed Books.
2.
An-Na’im, Abdullahi. (Ed.). (2002). Islamic family law in a changing world. A global resource book. London/New York: Zed Books.
3.
Basarudin, Azza. (2009). Musawah Movement: Seeking equality and justice in Muslim family law. UCLA International Institute. Retrieved April 24, 2010, from http://www.international.ucla.edu/print.asp?parentid=105896
4.
Chappell, Louise. (2006). Contesting women’s rights. Charting the emergence of a transnational conservative counter-network. Global Society, 20(4), 491–520.
5.
Dawn Ontario. (2003, September 25). Court overturns stoning sentence of woman in Nigeria. Retrieved March 3, 2010, from, http://dawn.thot.net/amina_lawal.html
6.
Derichs, Claudia. (in press). Islamische familiengesetze. Vom Zankapfel zum reformobjekt [Islamic Family Laws. From bone of contention to reform object]. In Fritz Schulze & Holger Warnck (Eds), Islam in Gesetzgebung und Verfassung Südostasiens [Islam in Legislative and Constitution in Southeast Asia]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
7.
Harcourt, Wendy. (2006). The global women’s rights movement: Power politics around the United Nations and the World Social Forum, UNRISD Civil Society and Social Movements Program Paper 25. Retrieved July 12, 2007, from http://www.unrisd.org/unrisd/website/document.nsf/(httpPublications)/59E3AF8FB95F929FC1257230002F43C1?OpenDocument
8.
IFL. (n.d.). Islamic family law: Possibilities of reform through internal initiatives. Retrieved January 17, 2010, from http://www.law.emory.edu/ifl/index2.html
9.
Keck, Margaret, & Sikkink, Kathryn. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James, V., & Sikkink, Kathryn. (Eds). (2002). Restructuring world politics. Transnational social movements, networks, and norms. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
Marx-Ferree, Myra, & Tripp, Aili Mari. (Eds). (2006). Global feminism. Transnational women’s activism, organizing, and human rights. New York: New York University Press.
13.
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., & Zald, Mayer N. (Eds). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. Political opportunity structures, mobilizing structures and cultural frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Moghadam, Valentine M. (2005). Globalizing women. Transnational feminist networks. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
Moghadam, Valentine M. (2009). Globalization and social movements. Islamism, feminism, and the global justice movement. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Plymouth, UK: Rowman and Littlefield.
16.
Musawah. (n.d.). Family Laws. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from http://www.musawah.org/family_laws.asp
17.
Ng, Cecilia, Maznah, Mohamad, & tan, beng hui. (2007). Feminism and the women’s movement in Malaysia. An unsung (R)evolution. London: Routledge.
18.
Price, Richard. (2003). Transnational civil society and advocacy in world politics [Review Article]. World Politics, 55(4), 579–606.
19.
Rucht, Dieter. (1999). The transnationalization of social movements: Trends, causes, problems. In Donatella della Porta, Hanspeter Kriese, & Dieter Rucht (Eds), Social movements in a globalizing world (pp. 206–222). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
20.
Ruppert, Uta. (2005). Die bessere Hälfte transnationaler Zivilgesellschaft? Frauen-NGOs und die Politik der FrauenMenschenrechte’ [The better half of transnational civil society? Women’s NGOs and the politics of Women Human Rights]. In Achim Brunnengräber, Ansgar Klein, & Heike Walk (Eds), NGOs als Akteure der internationalen Zivilgesellschaft—Hoffnungsträger einer demokratischen Globalisierung [NGOs as actors of international civil society—hopefuls of a democratic globalization] (pp. 214–242). Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
21.
Sadiqi, Fatima. (2008). The central role of the family law in the Moroccan feminist movement. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 35(3), 325–337.
Tarrow, Sidney. (2001). Transnational politics: Contention and institutions in international politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 1–20.
24.
Teune, Simon. (2008). Gibt es so etwas überhaupt noch? Forschung zu protest und sozialen bewegungen’ [Does this still exist? Research on protest and social movements]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift [Political Science Quarterly], 49(3), 528–547.
25.
Tucker, Judith. (2008). Women, family, and gender in Islamic law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Wichterich, Christa. (2007, March). Transnationale frauenbewegung und global governance [Transnational women’s movement and global governance], gender…politik…online. Retrieved May 14, 2008, from http://web.fu-berlin.de/gpo/christa_wichterich.htm
27.
Women Living Under Muslim Law (WLUML). (n.d.). Retrieved May 3, 2009, from http://www.wluml.org/english/index.shtml
28.
Women Living Under Muslim Law. (Ed.). (2006). Knowing our rights: Women, family, laws and customs in the Muslim world (3rd ed.). London: WLUML.
