More than half of Chinese high-technology firms are led by top executives (chairman and CEO) with R&D background. This study investigates whether and how top executives’ R&D background affects corporate innovation outcomes using a sample of listed firms in the high-technology industries in China. We find that the R&D background of top executives is positively related to innovation outcomes. We also find evidence on the mediating effect of R&D expenditure and moderating effect of corporate risk-taking on the above relationship. Our baseline results are robust to tests that address concerns caused by potential unobservable characteristics, reverse causality and other issues. Findings of our study have important implications for firms that aim to enhance their innovation outcomes and countries regarding their research policymaking and R&D management.
AhujaG., & LampertC. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543.
2.
AmaraN., LandryR., BecheikhN., & OuimetM. (2008). Learning and novelty of innovation in established manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 28(7), 450–463.
3.
AmyxS. (2019, November19). How your CEO can make or break your innovation culture. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2019/11/19/how-your-ceo-can-make-or-break-your-innovation-culture/?sh=2f6c83a761a6
4.
AntonakisJ., BendahanS., JacquartP., & LaliveR. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120.
5.
BaldwinJ. R., & HanelP. (2003). Innovation and knowledge creation in an open economy: Canadian industry and international implications. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BarkerV. L., & MuellerG. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801.
7.
BecheikhN., LandryR., & AmaraN. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003. Technovation, 26(5–6), 644–664.
8.
BenmelechE., & FrydmanC. (2015). Military CEOs. Journal of financial Economics, 117(1), 43–59.
9.
BoubakriN., CossetJ. C., & SaffarW. (2013). The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 641–658.
10.
CaloghirouY., KastelliI., & TsakanikasA. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance?Technovation, 24(1), 29–39.
11.
ChagantiR., & SambharyaR. (1987). Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 393–401.
12.
ChesbroughH. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
13.
ChesbroughH., & CrowtherA. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.
14.
DaellenbachU. S., McCarthyA. M., & SchoeneckerT. S. (1999). Commitment to innovation: The impact of top management team characteristics. R&D Management, 29(3), 199–208.
15.
DalzielT., GentryR. J., & BowermanM. (2011). An integrated agency-resource dependence view of the influence of directors’ human and relational capital on firms’ R&D spending. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1217–1242.
16.
DamanpourF. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693–716.
17.
DattaD. K., & GuthrieJ. P. (1994). Executive succession: Organizational antecedents of CEO characteristics. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 569–577.
18.
DosiG., MarengoL., & PasqualiC. (2006). How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation. Research Policy, 35(8), 1110–1121.
19.
FabryB., ErnstH., LangholzJ., & KösterM. (2006). Patent portfolio analysis as a useful tool for identifying R&D and business opportunities—An empirical application in the nutrition and health industry. World Patent Information, 28(3), 215–225.
20.
FaccioM., MarchicaM. T., & MuraR. (2011). Large shareholder diversification and corporate risk-taking. Review of Financial Studies, 24(11), 3601–3641.
21.
FelixB., & BistrovaJ. (2015, September4). Many CEOs aren’t breakthrough innovators (and that’s OK). Harvard Business Review.
22.
FinkelsteinS. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538.
23.
GalassoA., & SimcoeT. S. (2011). CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science, 57(8), 1469–1484.
24.
HallB. H., & LernerJ. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In HallB. H. and RosenbergN. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 609)–639). North-Holland.
25.
HaoX. C., LiangQ., & LiZ. (2018). Margin trading, short selling, and firm innovation: The perspectives of quantity and quality. Economic Research Journal, 53(6), 127–141. (in Chinese)
26.
HaytonJ. C. (2005). Competing in the new economy: The effect of intellectual capital on corporate entrepreneurship in high-technology new ventures. R&D Management, 35(2), 137–155.
27.
HwangB. Y., SuhJ. H., & KimD. C. (2017). An empirical study on the improvement of R&D competition policy for the national R&D programme. Science, Technology and Society, 22(3), 506–523.
LernerJ., & WulfJ. (2007). Innovation and incentives: Evidence from corporate R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 634–644.
30.
OmarA. A., MohanA. V., & ZhaoX. (2017). Can government policies drive open innovation type platforms? Ideas from the MSC Malaysia flagship applications. Science, Technology and Society, 22(3), 490–505.
31.
RomijnH., & AlbaladejoM. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31(7), 1053–1067.
32.
SunderJ., SunderS. V., & ZhangJ. (2017). Pilot CEOs and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(1), 209–224.
33.
TalkeK., SalomoS., & RostK. (2010). How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39(7), 907–918.
34.
TanJ. (2001). Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: A comparative study of Chinese managers and entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 359–376.
35.
TanY., TianX., ZhangX. C., & ZhaoH. (2014). Privatization and innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Kelley School of Business Research Paper, 33(3), 21–49.
36.
TianX., & WangT. Y. (2014). Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 211–255.
37.
ThomasA. S., LitschertR. J., & RamaswamyK. (1991). The performance impact of strategy-manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 509–522.
38.
UseemM. (1979). The social organization of the American business elite and participation corporation directors in the governance of American institutes. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 553–572.
39.
Van den SteenE. (2005). Organizational beliefs and managerial vision. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 21(1), 256–283.
40.
van de WalN., BooneC., GilsingV., & WalraveB. (2020). CEO research orientation, organizational context, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. R&D Management, 50(2), 239–254.
41.
WangF., ChenJ., WangY., LutaoN., & VanhaverbekeW. (2014). The effect of R&D novelty and openness decision on firms’ catch-up performance: Empirical evidence from China. Technovation, 34(1), 21–30.
42.
WenZ. L., ChangL., & HauK. T. (2006). Mediated moderator and moderated mediator. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38(3), 448–452.
43.
WenZ. L., & YeB. J. (2014). Different methods for testing moderated mediation models: Competitors or backups?Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(5), 714–726.
44.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2020). Guide to the International Patent Classification. WIPO.
YunJ. J. (2016). Open innovation: Technology, market and complexity in South Korea. Science, Technology and Society, 21(3), 319–323.
47.
YunJ. J., YangJ., & ParkK. (2016). Open innovation to business model: New perspective to connect between technology and market. Science, Technology and Society, 21(3), 324–348.
