Informed by Foucault’s governmentality, this article examines the making of the smart home in China. Operating within the nexus of security and risk, smart homes foster a discourse of the ‘the good life’ that accelerates AI’s integration into the population’s daily life. Taking Xiaomi (a renowned smart home technology company) as a case study, I trace how commercial practices formulate issues of security and risk in three smart home products: smart door lock, home surveillance camera and virtual home assistant. Drawing on visual and discourse analyses of Xiaomi’s promotional materials, this analysis is structured around three levels of relationships: (a) trust and ontological security; (b) the practices of government and the practices of self (c) and the technologisation of Chinese society. This analysis demonstrates that Xiaomi further advances the state-driven technologisation of Chinese society, in which subjects are guided to embrace the positive dimensions of technology for self-actualisation and self-management. However, the technology that makes domestic life and the physical home more reliable, less prone to risks and more secure has at the same time further eroded social relations and trust.
AndrejevicM. (2005). The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance and Society, 2(4), 479–497. 10.24908/ss.v2i4.3359
2.
ApthorpeN., ReismanD., & FeamsterN. (2017, May18). A smart home is no castle: Privacy vulnerabilities of encrypted IoT traffic. Cryptography and Security, 1–6. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.06805
3.
AradauC., & MunsterV. (2007). Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions, (un)knowing the future. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 89–115.
4.
BigoD. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives, 27, 63–92.
5.
ChongG. P. L. (2019). Cashless China: Securitization of everyday life through Alipay’s social credit system—Sesame Credit. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 290–307. 10.1080/17544750.2019.1583261
6.
ChongG. P. L. (2020). Dwelling, aspirations, and the good life: Inter-referencing young people in Beijing and Hong Kong. In de KloetJ., ChowY., & ChongG. P. L. (Eds.), Trans-Asia as method: Theory and practices (pp. 177–210). Rowman and Littlefield International.
7.
ChowY. F. (2019). Caring in times of precarity: A study of single women doing creative work in Shanghai. Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
CoumauJ.-B., FuruhashiH., & SarrazinH. (2017, January). A smart home is where the bot is. McKinsey Quarterly, 80–87. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/a-smart-home-is-where-the-bot-is
9.
DaiS. (2018, September17). China urges AI elites to unite in ‘global village’: Despite background of US–China trade war. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/business/companies/article/2164476/china-official-calls-world-address-complex-ethical-legal
10.
DaiS. (2019, August30). China adds Huawei, Hikvision to expanded ‘national team’ spearheading country’s AI efforts. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/business/companies/article/2164476/china-official-calls-world-address-complex-ethical-legal
11.
Daxue Consulting. (2019, March15). Towards a smart home future: China’s smart systems and smart devices. https://daxueconsulting.com/smart-home-future-in-china/
12.
de GoedeM. (2004). Repoliticizing financial risk. Economy and Society, 33(2), 197–217. 10.1080/03085140410001677120
13.
de GoedeM. (2008). Beyond risk: Premediation and the post-9/11 security imagination. Security Dialogue, 39(2–3), 155–176. 10.1177/0967010608088773
14.
DeanM. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. SAGE Publications.
15.
EricsonR., & DoyleA. (2010). Catastrophe risk, insurance and terrorism. Economy and Society, 33(2), 135–173. 10.1080/03085140410001677102
16.
FeatherstoneM. (2007). Consumer culture and post modernism (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
FoucaultM. (1989). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Routledge.
19.
FoucaultM. (1991). Governmentality. In BurchellG., GordonC., & MillerP. (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–103). The University of Chicago Press.
20.
GordonC. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In GrahamB., ColinG., & MillerP. (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–51). The University of Chicago Press.
21.
HayJ. (2006). Designing homes to be the first line of defense: Safe households, mobilization, and the new mobile privatization. Cultural Studies, 20(4–5), 349–377. 10.1080/09502380600724728
22.
JeffreysE., & SigleyG. (2009). Governmentality, governance and China. In JeffreysE. (Ed.), China’s governmentalities: Governing change, changing government (pp. 1–23). Routledge.
23.
MaalsenS., & SadowskiJ. (2019). The smart home on FIRE: Amplifying and accelerating domestic surveillance. Surveillance and Society, 17(1–2), 118–124. 10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12925
24.
MäkinenK. (2016). Valuable selves: Potentiality and temporality in work-related coaching. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(1), 69–84. 10.1177/1367549415585547
25.
NichollsL., StrengersY., & TiradoS. (2017). Smart home control: Exploring the potential for enabling technologies in households. Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
PatilK. S., KokateA. R., & WaghS. R. (2017). A survey on IoT based smart home. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 6(3), 176–178. 10.5281/zenodo.376550
27.
SchmittC. (1985). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. MIT Press.
28.
ShirkyC. (2015). Little rice: Smartphones, Xiaomi, and the Chinese dream. Columbia Global Reports.
29.
statista. (2020). Smart homes in China. https://www.statista.com/topics/7207/smart-homes-in-china/
30.
StevensH. (2019). The quotidian labour of high tech: Innovation and ordinary work in Shenzhen. Science, Technology and Society, 24(2), 218–236. 10.1177/0971721819841997
31.
StrengersY., & NichollsL. (2017). Convenience and energy consumption in the smart home of the future: Industry visions from Australia and Beyond. Energy Research and Social Science, 32, 86–93.
32.
The State Council of The People’s Republic of China [¹úÎñÔº]. (2017). Next generational artifical intelligence development plan issued by the state council [¹úÎñÔº¹ØÓÚÓ¡•¢ÐÂÒ»´úÈ˹¤ÖÇÄÜ•¢Õ¹¹æ»®µÄ֪ͨ]. Retrieved June20, 2019, from http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017–07/20/content_5211996.htm
33.
ZhangJ. (2019). Driving toward modernity: Cars and the lives of the middle class in contempoary China. Cornell University Press.
