Governance and Accountable Citizenship Through Identification Infrastructures: Database Politics of Copernicus (France) and National Register of Citizens (India)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2020
Governance and Accountable Citizenship Through Identification Infrastructures: Database Politics of Copernicus (France) and National Register of Citizens (India)
Several governments around the world have developed new ways of registering citizens when it comes to their relations with the state administration. Contemporary practices of identification through databases open up new ways of institutional and governmental practices across various sectors. In France, the tax administration had become the flagship of the whole French e-government project. The first case study focuses on the Copernicus project, which rapidly raised concerns about the implications of identification practices for taxpayers/citizens/households/individuals through unique identifiers. The Indian case study focuses on the National Register of Citizens as a citizen identification infrastructure, the processes of trying to categorise a diverse demography into citizens and non-citizens, and the subsequent issues that arise around different claims to citizenship. Taking these two case studies, this article discusses two national databases in France (tax administration) and India (citizenship), respectively, as examples of contemporary state practices around digital identification infrastructures as a form of database politics to enforce accountable forms of citizen practices through which different forms of data driven institutional and sociotechnical processes are marking new changes in the state–citizen relationship, both in France and in India.
AbrahamI., & RajadhyakshaA. (2015). State power and technological citizenship in India: From the postcolonial to the digital age. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 9(1): 65–85.
2.
AboutI., & DenisV. (2010). Histoire de l’identification des personnes [History of personal identification]. Coll. « Repères ». La Découverte.
3.
AdasM. (2006). Dominance by design: Technological imperatives and America’s civilizing mission. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
4.
AgarJ. (2003). The government machine. MIT Press.
5.
AlauzenM. (2019). L’État plateforme et l’identification numérique des usagers. Le processus de conception de FranceConnect [The platform state and digital identification of users. The FranceConnect design process]. Réseaux, n°213, 211–239.
6.
BaruahS. (1999). India against itself: Assam and the politics of Northeast India. Oxford University Press.
7.
BenigerJ. (1986). The control revolution. Technological and economic origins of the information society. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
8.
BowkerG. C., & StarS. L. (1999). Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences. The MIT Press.
9.
BreckenridgeK. (2014). Biometric state: The global politics of identification and surveillance in South Africa, 1850 to the present. Cambridge University Press.
10.
BreckenridgeK., & SzreterS. (2012). Registration and recognition: Documenting the person in world history. Oxford University Press.
11.
ClanchyM. T. (1979). From memory to written record: England 1066–1307. Edward Arnold.
12.
CorbridgeS., WilliamsG., SrivastavaM., & VeronR. (2005). Seeing the state: Governance and governmentality in India. Cambridge University Press.
13.
CordellaA., & TempiniN. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286.
14.
CrettiezX., & PiazzaP. (Eds.). (2006). Du papier à la biométrie: Identifier les individus [From paper to biometrics: Identifying individuals]. Presses de Sciences Po.
15.
DagiralÉ. (2007). La construction socio-technique de l’administration électronique. Les usagers et les usages de l’administration fiscale [Unpublished PhD dissertation] (The socio-technical construction of e-government. The users and uses of the tax administration). ParisTech & Université Paris Est - Marne-la-Vallée.
16.
DagiralÉ., & PeerbayeA. (2016). Making knowledge in boundary infrastructures: Inside and beyond a database for rare diseases. Science & Technology Studies, 29(2), 44–61.
17.
DenisJ., & GoëtaS. (2017). Rawification and the careful generation of open government data. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), 604–629.
18.
DesrosièresA. (1998). The politics of large numbers. A history of statistical reasoning. Harvard University Press.
19.
DesrosièresA. (2014). Prouver et gouverner. Une analyse politique des statistiques publiques [Proving and governing. A political analysis of public statistics]. La Découverte.
20.
EliasN. (1991). The society of individuals. Blackwell.
21.
FergusonJ., & GuptaA. (2002). Spatializing states: Towards an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist, 29(4), 981–1002.
22.
FountainJ. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.
23.
GardeyD. (2008). Écrire, calculer, classer. Comment une révolution de papier a transformé les sociétés contemporaines (1800–1940) [Writing, calculating, classifying. How a paper revolution has transformed contemporary societies (1800–1940)]. La Découverte.
24.
GitelmanL. (2014). Paper knowledge. Toward a media history of documents. Duke University Press.
25.
GoodyJ. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge University Press.
26.
HazarikaS. (1994). Strangers in the mist. Viking.
27.
HenmanP. (2010). Governing electronically. E-government and the reconfiguration of public administration, policy and power. Palgrave MacMillan.
28.
HiggsE. (2011). Identifying the English: A history of personal identification, 1500 to the present. Continuum.
29.
JaegerP. T. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 323–331.
30.
KurianR., RayI., & ToyamaK. (2009). Information and communication technologies for development: The bottom of the pyramid model in practice. The Information Society: An International Journal, 24(2), 93–104.
31.
MariotN., & ZalcC. (2007). Identifier, s’identifier: recensement, auto-déclarations et persécution des Juifs de Lens (1940–1945) [Identification, self-identification: census, self-declarations and persecutions of the Jewish population of lens (1940–1945)]. Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 54(3), 91–117.
32.
MarzoukiM., & SimonP. (2010). Sous contrôle. Gouverner par les fichiers [Special issue] [Under surveillance, Governed by Files]. Mouvements, 62.
33.
MusianiF. (2015). Practice, plurality, performativity, and plumbing: Internet governance research meets science and technology studies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(2), 272–286.
34.
NoirielG. (1998). Surveiller les déplacements ou identifier les personnes? Contribution à l’histoire du passeport en France de la Ie à la IIIe République [Overseeing movement or identifying people? Contribution to the history of the passport in France from the second to the third Republic]. Genèses, 30, 77–100.
35.
NoirielG. (Ed.). (2007). L’identification. Genèse d’un travail d’État [Identification. Genesis of a state work]. Belin.
36.
PelizzaA., & HoppeR. (2018). Birth of a failure: Consequences of framing ICT projects for the centralization of inter-departmental relations. Administration and Society, 50(1), 101–130.
37.
PelizzaA. (2016). Developing the vectorial glance: Infrastructural inversion for the new agenda on government information systems. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(2), 298–321.
38.
PiazzaP. (2004). Histoire nationale de la carte d’identité (A national history of the identity card). Odile Jacob.
39.
PoznanskiR. (1997). Le fichage des juifs de France pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale et l’affaire du fichier des juifs [Registering Jews in France during the Second World War and the case of the Jewish file]. La Gazette des archives, 177–178, 250-270.
40.
RamanathanU. (2010). A unique identity bill. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(30): 10–14.
41.
RosentalP.-A. (2012). Civil status and identification in 19th century France: A matter of State control? In BreckenridgeK. & SzreterS. (Eds), Registration and recognition. Documenting the person in world history (pp. 137–165). Oxford University Press for the Proceedings of the British Academy series.
42.
RoyA. (2010). Mapping citizenship in India. Oxford University Press.
43.
RuppertE. (2012). The governmental topologies of database devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4/5), 116–136.
44.
RusnockA. A. (2002). Vital accounts. Quantifying health and population in eighteenth-century England and France. Cambridge University Press.
45.
ScottJ. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
46.
ScottJ. (2017). Against the grain: A deep history of the earliest states. Yale University Press.
47.
SenA. (1995). The political economy of targeting. In van de WalleD. & NeadK. (Eds.), Public Spending and the Poor. World Bank.
48.
WhitleyE. A. (1997). In cyberspace all they see is your words: A review of the relationship between body, behaviour and identity drawn from the sociology of knowledge. Information Technology and People, 10(2), 147–163.
49.
ZalcC. (1998). L’analyse d’une institution: Le Registre du commerce et les étrangers dans l’entre-deux-guerres [The trade register and foreigners between the wars. History of a source]. Genèses, 31, 99–118.
