This article explores the role of Members of Parliament (MPs) in poverty alleviation in Bangladesh. Under the existing party-dominated parliamentary system, MPs do not have really much to do at the national level; their role is to play second fiddle to their party leaders. What most MPs now do is to try to get involved in different kinds of activities at the local level. The government often remains receptive to demands of the MPs for greater local level involvement for two reasons: first, it can be seen as a strategy to compensate the MPs for their lack of genuine involvement in national policymaking; second, it is used as a strategy to exert centralised political control over the locality, especially to discourage the emergence of any ‘autonomous’ local power. Using MPs for centralised control has negative implications for the development of local level representative institutions and democracy deepening in the country.
AhmedN. (2006). Parliament and public spending in Bangladesh. Dhaka: UPL.
2.
AhmedN. (2013). The Bangladesh parliament: A data handbook. Dhaka: BIGD.
3.
AhmedN. (2019, Forthcoming). Parliament and PRSP: The Bangladesh experience. In AhmedN. (Ed.), Parliament, public policy, local government and public service delivery in Bangladesh. Dhaka: UPL.
4.
AhmedS. S. (2007). Social safety nets in Bangladesh. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
5.
AhmedZ (2019, Forthcoming). Do constituency relations matter? An anthropology of MP–constituent relations in Bangladesh. In AhmedN. (Ed.), Parliament, public policy, local government and public service delivery in Bangladesh.
6.
AhmedN.NevilleA. (2013). Constituency relations in Bangladesh (mimeo). Dhaka: UNDP.
7.
Bangladesh Parliament. (2006). Report of the standing committee on the ministry of food and disaster management of the eighth parliament. Dhaka: Parliament Secretariat.
8.
Bangladesh Parliament. (2012). First report of the standing committee on the ministry of social welfare of the ninth parliament. Dhaka: Parliament Secretariat.
9.
Bangladesh Parliament. (2013). Second report of the standing committee on the ministry of social welfare of the ninth parliament. Dhaka: Parliament Secretariat.
10.
Bangladesh Parliament. (2016). First report of the standing committee on the ministry of social welfare of the tenth parliament. Dhaka: Parliament Secretariat.
11.
BaroiH.PandayP. K. (2015). NGOs in local governance in Bangladesh: A new wave in development disclosure. South Asian Survey, 22(2), 156–170.
CraigD.PorterD. (2003). Poverty reduction strategy papers: A new convergence. World Development, 31(1), 53–69.
14.
DebA.PatwariS. I.AlamM.UddinM. I. (2018). Do social safety net policies reduce poverty in Bangladesh: Understanding the perception of state philosophy in swimming across the tide. Global Journal of Political Science and Administration, 6(1), 30–41.
15.
DrezeJ.SenA. (2013). An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
FaalanadJ.ParkinsonJ. (1976). Bangladesh: The test case for development. London, UK: C. Hurst.
17.
GauriV.GalefJ. (2005). NGOs in Bangladesh: Activities, resources, and governance. World Development, 33(12), 2045–2065.
18.
Government of Bangladesh (GoB). (2004). Unlocking the potential. Dhaka: Ministry of Planning.
19.
Government of Bangladesh (GoB). (2015). Poverty and inequality in Bangladesh: Journey towards progress (2014–2015). Dhaka: Ministry of Finance.
20.
HelalM.HossainM. (2013). Four decades of economic development of Bangladesh: An assessment. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 58(2), 335–362.
21.
HossainM.SenB. (1992). Rural poverty in Bangladesh: Trends and determinants. Asian Development Review, 10(1), 1–34.
22.
HubliK. S.MandavilleA. P. (2004). Parliaments and the PRSP process. Washington, DC: WBI.
23.
IslamM. (2009). The poverty discourse and participatory action research in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Research Initiatives of Bangladesh (RIB).
24.
JahanR.AmundsenI. (2012). The parliament of Bangladesh: Representation and accountability (CPD-CMI Working Paper). Dhaka and Bergen: Center for Policy Dialogue (CPD) and Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI).
25.
KhanA. R. (1990). Poverty in Bangladesh: A consequence of and a constraint on growth. Bangladesh Development Studies, 17(3), 19–35.
26.
KhanM. S.ArefinT. M. S. (2013). Safety net, social protection, and sustainable poverty reduction: A review of the evidences and arguments for developing countries. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 15(2), 23–29.
27.
KroonC.StapenhurstR. (2008). Parliament’s role in poverty reduction strategies. Washington, DC: The World Bank Institute.
28.
NarayanD. (1999). The definitions of poverty. Can anyone hear us: Voices of the poor. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
29.
NarayanD. (2000). Poverty is powerlessness and voicelessness. Finance and Development, 37(4), 18–21.
30.
PandayP. K.RabbaniM. G. (2011). Good governance at the grass-roots: Evidence from union parishads in Bangladesh. South Asian Survey, 18(2), 293–315.
31.
PironL.NortonA. (2004). Politics and the PRSP approach: Uganda case study. London: Overseas Development Institute.
32.
PradhanM. A. H.MohdS.SulaimanJ. (2012). Social safety net programmes in Bangladesh: Preparing for adaption to demographic change, disaster, and poverty reduction. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(10), 174–182.
33.
PRODIP. (2012). A synthesis of the findings of three surveys of members of parliament, citizens and Civil Society Organizations. Dhaka: The Asia Foundation.
34.
RahmanM. A. (1985). NGO work in organizing the rural poor: The perspective. IFDA Dossier, 5, 15–20.
35.
RahmanH. Z.ChoudhuryL. A.AliK. S. (2011). Social safety nets in Bangladesh. Dhaka: PPRC-UNDP.
36.
SaalfeldT.MullerW. (1997). Roles in legislative studies: A theoretical introduction. In MullerW.SaalfeldT. (Eds.), Members of parliament in Western Europe: Roles and behavior (pp. 1–16). London, UK: Frank Cass.
37.
ScheffingT. N. (2017). Non-governmental organizations’ involvement in poverty alleviation in Bangladesh. Pursuit, 8(1), 150–156.
38.
SearingD. C. (1994). Westminster’s world: Understanding political roles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
SelbervikH.WangV. (2006). In pursuit of poverty reduction: What have parliaments got to do with it? Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute.
40.
SharkeyK.DregerT.BhatiaS. (2006). The role of legislatures in poverty reduction: Experience and future directions. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
41.
SobhanR. (1998). How bad governance impedes poverty alleviation in Bangladesh (Working Paper No. 143). Paris: OECD Development Centre.
42.
The World Bank. (2000). World development report. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
The World Bank. (2016). Household income and expenditure survey 2016. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
44.
UNDP/IPU. (2012). Global parliamentary report: The changing nature of parliamentary representation. Geneva: IPU.
45.
Wilton Park Conference Report. (2006). Reducing poverty: The roles of parliaments, government and non-state actors. London: CPA & WBI.
