This study explores the experiences of women as voters and political representatives at the local level. It includes women’s stories which capture the challenges they faced, their resistance and aspiration for change. The study also looks at men’s perception of women’s political participation. The study uses a feminist perspective with qualitative methods. Tools such as in-depth interview, focus group discussions and observations were used to gather data and information.
AeijazT. (2001). Mahilaon ke liye Aarakshan. In MenonN., LoknitaJ., & AaryaS. (Eds.), Nariwadi Rajniti: Sangharsh evam Mudde (pp. 340–355). Hindi Madhayam Karyanavya Nideshalaya.
2.
BaxiU. (2016, December15). Supreme error: The court has misread the constitutional right to adult suffrage, which includes right to contest and to vote. Indian Express Online.
3.
BrooksA. (2007). Feminist standpoint epistemology: Building knowledge and empowerment through women’s lived experience. In Hesse-BiberandS. N., & LeavyP. L. (Eds.), Feminist research practice: A primer (pp. 53–83). SAGE Publications.
4.
BuchN. (2005). Law of two-child norm in panchayats: Implications, consequences and experiences. Economic & Political Weekly, 40(24), 2421–2429.
5.
BuchN. (2009). Reservation for women in panchayats: A sop in disguise?Economic & Political Weekly, 44(40), 8–10.
6.
BuchN. (2010). From oppression to assertion: Women and panchayats in India (pp. 71–94). Routledge.
7.
ChowdhryP. (1993). Persistence of a custom: Cultural centrality of ghunghat. Social Scientist, 21(9/11), 91–112.
8.
ChowdhryP. (1994). The veiled women: Shifting gender equation in rural Haryana 1880–1990. Oxford University Press.
9.
DeviL., & KaurM. (2019). Purdah or ghunghat, a powerful means to control women: A study of rural Muslim and non-Muslim women in Western Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 336–349.
10.
Election Commission of India. (2019). Government of India.
11.
Government of Haryana. (2019). State Election Commission. Panchkula, Haryana.
12.
Government of India. (2011). Census of India. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India.
13.
Jayal GopalN. (2006). Engendering local democracy: The impact of quotas for women in India’s Panchayats. Democratisation, 13(1), 15–35.
14.
Kirti. (2016, February1). An election less democratic: Haryana panchayat poll outcome does not reflect the state’s social composition. Indian Express Online.
15.
KumarS., & GuptaP. (2014). Changing patterns of women’s turnout in Indian elections. Studies in Indian Politics, 3(1), 7–18.
16.
RaiP. (2011). Electoral participation of women in India: Key determinants and barriers. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(3), 47–55.
17.
RaoM. (2003). Two-child norms and panchayats: Many steps back. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(33), 3452–3454.
18.
SekhonJ. (2006). Engendering grassroots democracy: Research, training, and networking for women in local self-governance in India. NWSA Journal, 18(2), 101–122.
19.
VijayakumariR., & Rao GangadharaK. (2014). Women’s political participation in India. Social Science, 3(8), 1–5.
