This article looks at the performance of the Women Component Plan (WCP) introduced at the local level in Kerala to encourage participatory planning by studying the experience of five village panchayats over a 10 year reference period. There has been a marked difference among projects carried out under the WCP and general sector projects and projects meant for Scheduled Castes in expenditure efficiency. The article also looks at the nature of projects implemented, the extent of participation of women members in their design and execution, and the opinion of elected representatives on the usefulness of the WCP.
ArnsteinS. (1971). A ladder of citizen’s participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(7), 216–224.
2.
BandyopadhyayD. (1997). People’s participation in planning—Kerala experiment. Economic and Political Weekly, 32(39), 2450–2454.
3.
BeneriaL. (2003). Gender, development, and globalization. London: Routledge.
4.
ChathukulamJosJohnM. S. (2002). Five years of participatory planning in Kerala: Rhetoric and reality. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(49), 4917–4926.
5.
ChaudhuriS.HellerP. (2003). The plasticity of participation: Evidence from a participatory governance experiment. Working Paper, Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac:129202
6.
ChaudhuriS.HarilalK. N.HellerP. (2004). Does decentralization make a difference? A study of the people’s campaign for decentralized planning in the Indian state of Kerala. Thiruvananthapuram: Centre for Development Studies.
7.
ChettiparambAngelique (2007). Dealing with complexity: An autopoietic view of the People’s Planning Campaign, Kerala. Planning Theory & Practice, 8(4), 489–508.
8.
CornwallAndrea (2004). Spaces for transformation? Reflections on power and difference in participation in development. In HickeySamuelMohanGiles (Eds), Participation: From tyranny to transformation (pp. 75–91). London: St. Martin’s Press.
9.
CornwallAndrea (2008). Unpacking ‘participation: Models, meanings and practices’. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283.
10.
DevikaJ.ThampyBintha V. (2007). Between “Empowerment” and “Liberation”: The Kudumbashree initiative in Kerala. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 14(1), 33–59.
11.
DevikaJ.ThampyBintha V. (2011). Mobility towards work and politics for women in Kerala state, India: A view from the histories of gender and space. Modern Asian Studies, 45(5), 1147–1175.
12.
DevikaJ.SukumarMini (2006). Making space for feminist social critique in contemporary Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly [REVIEW OF WOMEN’S STUDIES], 41(42), 4469–4475.
13.
DevikaJ. (2012). The beauty of unintended consequences. Seminar, No. 637, September. pp. 83–87.
14.
EapenMridul (2004). Report on gender analysis of select gram (village) panchayat plan-budgets in Trivandrum district, Kerala. Paper presented at the Consultation on Impact of Macroeconomic Policies on Women, 25November, 2004, New Delhi, Human Resources Development Centre, UNDP. Retrieved from http://wcd.nic.in/gbsummary/Mridul.pdf, viewed on 10December2010.
15.
EapenMridul (2007). Gender budgeting and decentralised governance. In OommenM. A. (Ed.), A decade of decentralisation in Kerala: Experience and lessons (pp. 209–244). New Delhi: Har Anand.
16.
GaventaJohn (2004). Towards participatory governance: Assessing the transformative possibilities. In HickeySamuelMohanGiles (Eds), Participation: From tyranny to transformation (pp. 25–41). London: St. Martin’s Press.
17.
GeorgeMiriam (2011). In the midst of a storm: Distress of Kerala women. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 26(3), 304–313.
18.
GoetzAnne Marie (2007). Political cleaners: Women as the new anti-corruption force. Development and Change, 38(1), 87–105.
19.
Government of India (1974). Towards equality: Report of the committee on the status of women in India. New Delhi: Department of Social Welfare, Ministry of Education and Social Welfare.
20.
Government of India (2001a). Report of the committee on empowerment of women and development of children for the Tenth Five Year Plan. New Delhi: Planning Commission. Retrieved from http://planningcommission.gov.in/aboutus/committee/strgrp/stgp_woman.pdf, Accessed on 10 October 2013.
21.
Government of India (2001b). The national policy for the empowerment of women. Department of women and child development. Retrieved from http://wcd.nic.in/empwomen.html
22.
Government of India (2008). Kerala development report. New Delhi: National Planning Commission & Academic Foundation.
23.
Government of Kerala (2006). Panchayat level statistics. Kottayam District, Thiruvanthapuram: Department of Economics & Statistics.
24.
Government of Kerala (2009). Report of the committee for evaluation of decentralized planning and development. Thiruvanthapuram: Department of Local Self Government.
25.
HellerP.ChaudhuriS.HarilalK. N. (2007). Building local democracy: Evaluating the impact of decentralization in Kerala, India. World Development, 35(4), 626–648.
26.
IsaacThomas, T. M.HarilalK. N. (1997). Planning for empowerment: People’s campaign for Decentralized planning in Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly, 32(1), 53–58.
27.
IsaacThomas T.M. (2001). Campaign for democratic decentralisation in Kerala. Social Scientist, 29(9–10), 8–47.
28.
IsaacThomas T.M.FrankeRichard (2000). Local democracy and development: People’s campaign for decentralized planning in Kerala. New Delhi: Left Word.
29.
JohnM. S.ChathukulamJ. (October2001). Gender issues and participatory planning: Case study of a Gram Panchayat in Kerala. Paper presented in the workshop on Decentralisation in Kerala, 23–24. Thiruvanathapuram: Kerala Research Programme on Local Level Development, Centre for Development Studies.
30.
JohnM. S.ChathukulamJ. (2002). Building social capital through state initiative: Participatory planning in Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(20), 1939–1948.
31.
KabeerNaila (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London: Verso.
32.
KabeerNaila (1995). Targeting women or transforming institutions? Policy lessons from NGO Anti-Poverty. Development in Practice, 5(2), 108–116.
33.
KadiyalaS. (2004). Scaling Up Kudumbasree—Collective Action for Poverty Alleviation and Women’s Empowerment. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division, FCND Discussion Paper No.180. Washington DC.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
34.
KannanK. P. (2000). People’s planning, Kerala’s dilemma. Seminar, 485, pp. 92–97.
35.
KhanBava Pareethu, P. M.LeelaKumari, P.OommenJohn (2000). Study of women component plan in Kerala. Trivandrum: SIRD.
36.
MannathukkarenN. (2010). The ‘poverty’ of political society: Partha Chatterjee and the people’s plan campaign in Kerala, India. Third World Quarterly, 31(2), 295–314.
37.
MayouxL. (1995). Beyond naivety: Women, gender inequality and participatory development. Development and Change, 26(2), 235–258.
38.
MolyneuxMaxine (1985). Mobilization without emancipation? Women’s interests, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua. Feminist Studies, 11(2), 227–54.
39.
MolyneuxMaxine (2007). The chimera of success: Gender ennui and the changed international policy environment. In CornwallAndreaHarrisonElizabethWhiteheadAnn (Eds), Feminisms in development: Contradictions, contestations and challenges (pp. 227–240). New Delhi: Zubaan.
40.
MoolakkattuJohn S.ChathukulamJos (2007). Between euphoria and skepticism: Ten years of panchayati raj in Kerala. In OommenM. A. (Ed.), A decade of decentralisation in Kerala: Experience and lessons (pp. 54–87). New Delhi: Har-Anand.
41.
MoolakkattuJohn S.KunhambuV. V. (2005). People’s participation in Grama Sabha: Evidence from three village panchayats in Malabar (Kerala). Man and Development, 27(2), 77–90.
42.
MoserC. O. N. (1993). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice and training. London: Routledge.
43.
MuraleedharanSarada (2007). Negotiating frameworks for local development: An analysis of the role of district planning committees. In OommenM. A. (Ed.), A decade of decentralisation in Kerala: Experience and lessons (pp. 141–174). New Delhi: Har Anand.
44.
NairNisha V. (2011). Participatory planning and gender mainstreaming: Case study of a village panchayat in Kerala. Gandhi Marg, 33(2), 187–215.
45.
ParameswaranM. P. (2001). From voters to actors: People’s planning campaign and participatory democracy in Kerala. Trichur: Kerala Sastra Sahitya Parishad.
46.
PrabhashJ. (2012). Politics of presence: Socio-economic background of members of Kerala Legislature Assembly: 1957–2006. Gandhi Marg, 34(2&3), 235–257.
47.
PrettyJ. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263.
48.
SeemaT. N.MukherjeeV. (2000). Gender governance and citizenship in decentralised planning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Democratic Decentralisation. Thiruvananthapuram, 23–27.
VeronR. (2001). The “new” Kerala model: Lessons for sustainable development. World Development, 29(4), 601–617.
51.
VijayalakshmiV. (2008). Rent-seeking and gender in local governance. Journal of Development Studies, 44(9), 1262–1288.
52.
VijayanAleyammaSandhyaJ. (2004). Gender and decentralised planning in Kerala. Trivandrum: Caxton Press.
53.
VijayanAleyamma (2007). A decade of gender mainstreaming in local governance in Kerala. In OommenM. A. (Ed.), A decade of decentralisation in Kerala: Experience and lessons (pp. 141–147). New Delhi: Har-Anand.
