The article reflects on the experience of researchers at the Institute of Social Studies Trust (ISST) with evaluation of gender-sensitive/women-oriented development projects. It argues that participatory methods allow for constructive evaluation, based on adequate contextualisation and tracing of unintended consequences, and enhances use of findings. It also assesses the role of the evaluator in such a process.
BambergerMichaelPodemsDonna R. (2002). Feminist evaluation in the international development context. New Directions for Evaluation, 96(Winter), 83–96.
2.
BatliwalaS.PittmanA. (2010). Capturing change in women’s realities: A critical overview of current monitoring and evaluation frameworks and approaches. Toronto: Association for Women’s Rights in Development.
3.
CookJudith A.FonowMary Margaret (1986). Knowledge and women’s interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry, 56(1), 2–29.
HayK. (2010). Evaluation field building in South Asia: Reflections, anecdotes, and questions. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 222–231.
6.
JacksonR.PearsonR. (Eds) (1998). Feminist visions of development. London: Routledge.
7.
KabeerNaila (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London: Verso.
8.
LusthausCharlesAdrienMarie-HélènePerstingerMark (1999). Capacity development: Definitions, issues and implications for planning, monitoring and evaluation. Occasional Paper No. 35. Montreal: Universalia.
9.
MiesMaria (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research. In BowlesG.KleinR. (Eds), Theories of women’s studies (pp. 140–162). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
10.
ShethD.L.SethiH. (1997). Representation and reality: The NGO sector. In PanandikarV.A. Pai (Ed.), A survey of research in public administration 1980–1990 (pp. 259–288). Delhi: Konark Publishers.
