This article reviews literature on gender, development and evaluation to map the emerging theoretical terrain of measuring change in gender relations in South Asia. It traces the separate but related trajectories of thinking on gender and development, of ‘evaluation culture’, and of conducting social science research to explore the points where these conflict and converge. It also presents an overview of the most commonly used frameworks employed in gender evaluations, and critically examines whether and how these are appropriate in the context of South Asia, drawing especially on examples from India.
BambergerM.PodemsD.R. (2002). Feminist evaluation in the international development context. New Directions for Evaluation, 96 (Winter), 83–96.
3.
BatliwalaS.PittmanA. (2010). Capturing change in women’s realities: A critical overview of current monitoring and evaluation frameworks. Toronto: Association for Women in Development.
DaleR. (2004). Evaluating development programmes and projects. New Delhi: SAGE.
7.
DesaiN.KrishnarajM. (1987). Women and society in India. Bombay: Ajanta Publications.
8.
EstrellaM.GaventaJ. (1998). Who counts reality? Participatory monitoring and evaluation: A literature review. IDS Working Paper 70, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
9.
GoetzA.M.GuptaR.S. (1996). Who takes the credit? Gender, power and control over loan use in rural credit programs in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(1), 45–64.
10.
GovindaR. (2009). In the name of ‘poor and marginalised’? Politics of NGO activism with Dalit women in rural North India. Journal of South Asian Development, 4(1), 45–64.
11.
GreadyP. (2009). Reasons to be cautious about evidence and evaluation: Rights-based approaches to development and the emerging culture of evaluation. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 1(23), 380–401.
12.
HayK. (2010). Evaluation field building in South Asia: Reflections, anecdotes and questions. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 222–231.
13.
HuntJ.KasynathanN. (2001). Pathways to empowerment? Reflections on microfinance and transformation in gender relations in South Asia. Gender and Development, 9(1), 42–52.
14.
JohnM. (2001). Gender, development and the women’s movement: Problems for a history of the present. In RajanR. Sunder (Ed.), Signposts: Gender issues in post-independence India (pp. 100–124). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
15.
KabeerN.MurthyR.K. (1996). Poverty as institutional exclusion: Lessons from Indian government and non-government credit interventions. IDS Discussion Paper 356, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
16.
KabeerN.SubrahmanianR. (1999). From concepts to practice: Gender-aware planning through the institutional framework. In KabeerN.SubrahmanianR. (Eds), Institutions, relations and outcomes (pp. 197–230). New Delhi: Kali for Women.
17.
KhanK. (2008). Evaluation challenges in Pakistan and the establishment of Pakistan Evaluation Network (PEN). In WilliamsB.SankarM. (Eds), Evaluation South Asia (pp. 69–78). Kathmandu: UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia.
18.
LingamL. (2002). Women’s movement and the state. In ShahG. (Ed.), Social movements and the state (pp. 310–334). New Delhi: SAGE.
MarchC.SmythI.A.MukhopadhyayM. (1999). A guide to gender analysis frameworks. London: Oxfam GB.
21.
MertensD. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), 1–15.
22.
MikkelsenB. (1995). Methods for development work and research: A guide for practitioners. New Delhi: SAGE.
23.
MoserC. (1989). Gender planning in the Third World: Meeting practical and strategic gender needs. World Development, 17(11), 1799–1825.
24.
National Institute for Advanced Studies (NIAS) (1997). Unpacking the status of women: A model for studying gender equality. Paper prepared for UNDP/GIDP Gender and Development Monograph Series, Women’s Policy Research and Advocacy Unit, NIAS, Bangalore.
25.
PearsonR.JacksonC. (1998). Introduction: Interrogating development: feminism, gender and policy. In JacksonC.PearsonR. (Eds), Feminist visions of development: Gender analysis and policy (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.
26.
RamachandranV.SaihjeeA. (2000). Flying with the crane: Recapturing KMVS’s ten-year journey. Evaluation report. Bhuj, Gujarat: KMVS (Kutch Mahila Vikas Sanghatan).
RayR. (2000). Fields of protest: Women’s movements in India. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
29.
RossiP.H.FreemanH.E. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
30.
SankarM.WilliamsB. (2008). Editorial—Evaluation matters. In WilliamsB.SankarM. (Eds), Evaluation South Asia (pp. 1–4). Kathmandu: UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia.
31.
SenG.GrownC.for DAWN (Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era) (1988). Development crises and alternative visions: Third World women’s perspectives. London: Earthscan Publications.
32.
Sielbeck-BowenK.BrisolaraS.SeigartD.TischlerC.WhitmoreE. (2002). Exploring feminist evaluation: The ground from which we rise. New Directions for Evaluation, 96(Winter), 3–8.
33.
TudaweP.I.SamranayakeM.R. (2008). Civil society partnership in pro-moting an evaluation culture in the development process—Experience of the Sri Lanka Evaluation Association (SLEvA). In WilliamsB.SankarM. (Eds), Evaluation South Asia (pp. 61–68). Kathmandu: UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia.
