Drawing on neo-liberal economic norms, India and the US are increasingly marking
and constituting women in poverty as new economic agents. Though based in vastly
different socio-economic polities, poor women in both countries are subject to state-
led agendas that seek to alter their economic conditions and their subjectivities.
Discourse in the US seeks to shift women from welfare to that of workfare and thereby
integrate them into the normative structures of dual-parent families. In India the
state draws cn the rhetoric of enabling economic empowerment and yet fails to provide
the required structural support. Details from the various programmes in the two
countries and their impact indicate the extent to which there is a 'serial collectivity'
between women in the two countries who share similar shifts in their identities, cul
tures and life conditions despite being located in vastly different structural conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaronson, Stephanie, and Heidi Hartmann.1996. 'Reform, not Rhetoric: A Critique of Welfare Policy and Charting of New Directions', American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66(4): 583-98.
2.
Acharya, Sarthi.1996. 'Women in the Labour Force', in Susan Horton (ed.), Women and Industrialisation in Asia, pp. 43-79. London : Routledge.
3.
Agarwal, Bina.1995. A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in Asia . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
4.
Babb, Sandra, and Lydia Faulkner.1997. 'The States and Social Responsibility: The South Carolina Experience', in USIS, Social Responsibility in the United States (electronic bulletin), pp. 27-31. New Delhi: USIS.
5.
Bennholdt-Thomsen, Veronika.1988. 'Investment in the Poor: An Analysis of World Bank Policy' in Maria Mies, Clandia von Werkhof and Veronika Bennholdt-Thomsen (eds.), Women: The Last Colony, pp. 51-63. London : Zed Books.
6.
Blau, Joel.1999. Illusions of Prosperity: America's Working Families in an Age of Economic Insecurity. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Buch, Nirmala.1998. 'State Welfare Policy and Women, 1950-1975', Economic and Political Weekly, 33(17): WS18-20.
8.
Chandoke, Neera.1990. 'Bringing People Back In: Political and Intellectual Agendas', Economic and Political Weekly , 25(31): 1721-27.
9.
Dalla Costa, Mariarosa and Giovano Dalla Costa .1993. Paying the Price: Women and the Politics of Internal Economic Strategy. London: Zed Books.
10.
Franzway, S., D. Court and R.W. Connell.1989. Staking a Claim: Feminism, Bureaucracy and the State. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
11.
Fraser, Nancy.1989, 'Women, Welfare, and the Politics of Need Interpretation' , in Nancy Fraser (ed.), Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory, pp. 144-59. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
12.
Government of India.1974. Towards Equality. New Delhi: Committee on the Special Status of Women, Ministry of Social Welfare.
13.
—. 1996b. Report of the Working Group on Women's Development . New Delhi: Department of Women and Child Development, Ministry of Human Resource Development.
14.
—. 1997. Approach Paper to the Ninth Five Year Plan (1997-2002) . New Delhi: Planning Commission .
15.
—. 2001. National Policy for the Empowerment of Women . New Delhi: National Commission for Women.
16.
Haney, Lynne.1996. 'Homeboys, Babies, Men in Suits: The State and the Reproduction of Male Dominance', American Sociological Review , 61(5): 759-78.
17.
Jayal, Neeraja.1994. 'The Gentle Leviathan: Welfare and the Indian State' , Social Scientist, 22(9-12): 18-26.
18.
John, Mary.1996. 'Gender and Development in India, 1970s-1990s: Some Reflections on the Constitutive Role of Contexts', Economic and Political Weekly, 31(47): 3071-77.
19.
Kabeer, Naila.1994. Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
20.
Kingfisher, Catherine.1999. 'Rhetorics of (Female) Savagery: Welfare Reform in the US and Aotearoa/New Zealand', National Women's Studies Journal, 11(1): 1-20.
21.
Lowenhak, Shiela.1992. The Revaluation of Women's Work. London : Earthscan.
22.
McNay, L.1992. Foucault, Feminism and Power: Gender and the Self . Boston: North East University Press .
23.
Mead, Lawrence.1992. The New Politics of Poverty: The Non-working Poor in America . New York: Basic Books .
24.
Mittleman, James.1995. 'Rethinking the International Division of Labour in the Context of Globalisation', Third World Quarterly, 16(2): 243-94.
25.
Moser, C.1993. Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice, Training . London: Routledge .
26.
National Commission on Self-Employed Women and Women in the Informal Sector.1988. Shramshakti . New Delhi.
27.
Orloff, Ann, and R. Manson.1996. 'Gender in the Welfare State', Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 55-78.
28.
Patnaik, Prabhat.1994. 'International Capital and National Economic Policy: A Critique of India's Economic Reforms', Economic and Political Weekly, 29(12): 683-89.
29.
Petras, James.1997. 'Volunteerism: The Great Deception', Economic and Political Weekly, 32(27): 1587-89.
30.
Piven, Frances, and Richard Cloward .1971. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Random House.
31.
Rai, Shirin.1992. 'Watering Another Man's Garden: Gender, Employment, and Educational Reforms in China', in Shirin Rai, Hilary Pilkington and Anne Phizacklea (eds.), Women in the Face of Change: The Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, and China, pp. 20-40. London : Routledge.
32.
Rao, Brinda.1996. Dry Wells and Deserted Women: Gender, Ecology and State in Rural Western India. New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.
33.
Rowbotham, Shiela, and Swasti Mitter.1994. Dignity and Daily Bread: New Forms of Economic Organising among Poor Women in the Third World and the First . London: Routledge.
34.
Roy, Sumit.1995. 'New Institutional Economics, State and Development' , Economic and Political Weekly, 30(30): PE65-72.
35.
Samuelson, Robert.1997. The Good Life and its Discontents: The American Dream in the Age of Entitlement, 1945-1995. New York : Vintage Books.
36.
Sangari, Kumkum.1993. 'Consent, Agency and Rhetorics of Incitement', Economic and Political Weekly, 28(18): 867-82.
37.
Sassoon, Anne S.1987. 'Women's New Social Role: Contradictions of the Welfare State', in Anne Sassoon (ed.), Women and the State: The Shifting Boundaries of Private and Public, pp. 158-88. London : Hutchinson.
38.
Sawhill, Isabel, and Daniel McMurrer .1997. 'American Dreams and Discontents: Beyond the Level Playing Field', in USIS, Social Responsibility in the United States (electronic bulletin) pp. 16-18. New Delhi : USIS.
39.
Sen, Gita, and Caren Grown.1987. Development Crises and Alternate Visions: Third World Women's Perspectives. New York: Monthly Review Press.
40.
Shalala, Donna E.1997. 'Investing in America's Children', in USIS, Social Responsibility in the United States (electronic responsibility). New Delhi : USIS.
41.
Smith, Ruth.1990. 'Order and Disorder: The Naturalisation of Poverty' , Cultural Critique, 14: 209-29.
42.
Swaminathan, Padmini.1991. 'Gender in Indian Planning: A Critique', in Sebasti L. Raj (ed.), Quest for Gender Justice , pp. 53-68. Madras : T.R. Publications.
43.
Uberoi, Patricia.1996. 'The Family in Official Discourse', India International Centre Quarterly, 25(4): 134-55.
44.
US Bureau of Census.2001. Poverty in the United States. Availableat:http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/povertyou/povoosrc.pdf
45.
United States Information Services (USIS).1997. Social Responsibility in the United States (electronic bulletin). New Delhi: USIS.
46.
Varma, Rameswari.1993. 'Assessing Rural Development Programmes in India from a Gender Perspective', in Janet Momsen and Vivian Kinnaird (eds.), Different Places, Different Voices: Gender and Development in Africa, Asia and Latin America, pp. 120-30. London : Routledge.
47.
Vielle, Paul.1988. 'The State of the Periphery and its Heritage', Economy and Society, 17(1): 52-89.
48.
Viswanath, Vanita.1993. NGOs and Women's Development in Rural South India (A Comparative Anaylsis). New Delhi: Vistaar.
49.
Wolfson, Adam.1997. 'Welfare Fixer', in USIS, Social Responsibility in the United States (electronic bulletin), pp. 25-28. New Delhi: USIS.
50.
World Bank.1992. Women, Poverty and Productivity (EDI seminar # 43). Washington, DC: World Bank.
51.
Yateman, Anna.1990. Bureaucrats, Technocrats and Femocrats . London: Allen and Unwin.
52.
Young, Iris Marion.1997. 'Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective', in Iris Marion Young, Intersecting Voice, Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy and Policy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
