This study examines the personality traits of Schumpeterian entrepreneurs by comparing them with those of non-Schumpeterian entrepreneurs, using a sample of Forbes billionaires and analysing posts from X. The RoBERTa language model, fine-tuned with the Pennebaker and King 1999 Essay I dataset, was employed for natural language processing of X’s posts to evaluate personality traits. Two quasi-experiments with propensity score matching were performed for the treatment and control groups. The two quasi-experiments highlighted Schumpeterians’ second-order stochastic dominance in openness to experience and non-Schumpeterians’ second-order stochastic dominance in neuroticism and extraversion. These findings offer insights into the promotion of entrepreneurship by considering personality differences. However, the generalizability of the findings is restricted by the constrained sample size. Due to data availability restrictions, only 113 entrepreneurs from the Forbes billionaires list, who have an active, verified X account, were included in the sample. Further research with larger and more diverse samples is required to confirm and expand these findings.
AraarA. (2006). Poverty, inequality and stochastic dominance, theory and practice: Illustration with Burkina Faso surveys [CIRPEE Working Paper No. 06-34]. Interuniversity Centre on Risk, Economic Policy and Employment. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.938555
2.
ArlotS., & CelisseA. (2010). A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys, 4, 40–79. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0907.4728
3.
BengioY., SimardP., & FrasconiP. (1994). Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.279181
4.
BommasaniR., HudsonD. A., AdeliE., AltmanR., AroraS., von ArxS., BernsteinM. S., BohgJ., BosselutA., BrunskillE., BrynjolfssonE., BuchS., CardD., CastellonR., ChatterjiN., ChenA., CreelK., DavisJ. Q., DemszkyD., DonahueC., … LiangP. (2022). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. (arXiv:2108.07258). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258
5.
Braga-NetoU., & DoughertyE. (2004). Is cross-validation valid for small-sample microarray classification?Bioinformatics, 20(3), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg419
6.
BrandstätterH. (2011). Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.007
7.
CantnerU., GoethnerM., & SilbereisenR. (2017). Schumpeter’s entrepreneur A rare case. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27, 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0467-3
8.
CattellR. (1946). Description and measurement of personality. World Book Company.
9.
CattellR. (1950). Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/10773-000
10.
CBInsights. (n.d.). The complete list of unicorn companies. https://www.cbinsights.com/research-unicorn-companies
11.
CostaP., & McCraeR. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
12.
DevlinJ., ChangM., LeeK., & ToutanovaK. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Arxiv Cornell University, 1(2), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805
13.
El-DemerdashK., El-KhoribiR., ShomanM., & AbdouS. (2021). Psychological human traits detection based on universal language modeling. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 22(3), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.eij.2020.09.001
14.
El-DemerdashK., El-KhoribiR., ShomanM., & AbdouS. (2022). Deep learning based fusion strategies for personality prediction. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 23(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2021.05.004
FushikiT. (2011). Estimation of prediction error by using K-fold cross-validation. Statistics and Computing, 21(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-009-9153-8
17.
GolbeckJ., RoblesC., EdmondsonM., & TurnerK. (2011). Predicting personality from Twitter. IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.33
18.
GoldbergL. (1990). An alternative ‘description of personality’: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
19.
GoldbergL. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
20.
HenreksonM., & SanandajiT. (2014). Small business activity does not measure entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(5), 1760–1765. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307204111
21.
HenreksonM., & SanandajiT. (2020). Measuring entrepreneurship: Do established metrics capture Schumpeterian entrepreneurship?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(4), 733–760. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1042258719844500
HowardJ., & RuderS. (2018). Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. Arxiv Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.06146
24.
HuE., ShenY., WallisP., Allen-ZhuZ., LiY., WangS., WangL., & ChenW. (2021). LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. Arxiv Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.09685
25.
JohnO., & SrivastavaS. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A. & JohnO. P. (Eds), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
26.
JumperJ., EvansR., PritzelA., GreenT., FigurnovM., RonnebergerO., TunyasuvunakoolK., BatesR., ŽídekA., PotapenkoA., BridglandA., MeyerC., KohlS. A. A., BallardA. J., CowieA., Romera-ParedesB., NikolovS., JainR., AdlerJ., BackT., … HassabisD. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature, 596(7873), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
KhanS., NaseerM., HayatM., ZamirS., KhanF., FahadS., & ShahM. (2022). Transformers in vision: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(10s), 1–41. http://doi.org/10.1145/3505244
29.
KuratkoD., HoltH., & NeubertE. (2020). Blitzscaling: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Business Horizons, 63(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.10.002
30.
LarsonL., RottinghausP., & BorgenF. (2002). Meta-analyses of big six interests and big five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1854
31.
LeiteE., AudretschD., & LeiteA. (2024). Redefining entrepreneurship: Philosophical insights in a post-individualist era. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 33(2), 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557241255399
McCraeR., & CostaP. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In PervinL. A. & JohnO. P. (Eds), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). Guilford Press.
34.
MeijerR., & GoemanJ. (2013). Efficient approximate k‐fold and leave‐one‐out cross‐validation for ridge regression. Biometrical Journal, 55(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201200088
35.
Mohades DeilamiF., SadrH., & TarkhanM. (2022). Contextualized multidimensional personality recognition using combination of deep neural network and ensemble learning. Neural Processing Letters, 54(5), 3811–3828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10787-9
36.
ObschonkaM., & FischC. (2018). Entrepreneurial personalities in political leadership. Small Business Economics, 50, 851–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9901-7
37.
ObschonkaM., Schmitt-RodermundE., SilbereisenR., GoslingS., & PotterJ. (2013). The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone personality profile in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A socioecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032275
38.
OgryczakW., & RuszczynskiA. (1999). From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semideviations as risk measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00167-2
39.
ParkG., SchwartzH., EichstaedtJ., KernM., KosinskiM., StillwellD., UngarL., & SeligmanM. (2015). Automatic personality assessment through social media language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 934–952. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000020
40.
PascanuR., MikolovT., & BengioY. (2013). On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. Arxiv Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1211.5063
41.
PennebakerJ., & KingL. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296
42.
RosenbaumP., & RubinD. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942
43.
SanandajiT. (2014). The international mobility of billionaires. Small Business Economics, 42, 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9481-0
Schmitt-RodermundE. (2004). Pathways to successful entrepreneurship: Parenting, personality, early entrepreneurial competence, and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(3), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.007
46.
SchumpeterJ. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Transaction Publishers.
ShorrocksA. (1983). Ranking income distributions. Economica, 50(197), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2554117
50.
SjogrenH., & YusufF. (2021). Profiles of entrepreneurial success during two centuries. The case of Sweden, with comparisons to Italy. Business History, 65(8), 1366–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2021.1979515
51.
ToninelliP., & VastaM. (2014). Opening the black box of entrepreneurship: The Italian case in a historical perspective. Business History, 56(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2012.745068
52.
VaswaniA., ShazeerN., ParmarN., UszkoreitJ., JonesL., GomezA., KaiserL., & PolosukhinI. (2017). Attention is all you need. Arxiv Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
53.
WangX., SuiY., ZhengK., ShiY., & CaoS. (2021). Personality classification of social users based on feature fusion. Sensors, 21(20), 6758. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21206758
54.
WelchB. (1947). Generalization of ‘student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34(1–2), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28
55.
WongT., & YehP. (2020). Reliable accuracy estimates from k-fold cross validation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 32(8), 1586–1594. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2019.2912815
56.
YangZ., YangD., DyerC., HeX., SmolaA., & HovyE. (2016). Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1480–1489. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1174
57.
ZhangX., ZhaoJ., & LeCunY. (2016). Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. Arxiv Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1509.01626
58.
ZhaoH., & SeibertS. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259
59.
ZhaoH., SeibertS., & LumpkinG. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492 06309335187
60.
ZhouP., QiZ., ZhengS., XuJ., BaoH., & XuB. (2016). Text classification improved by integrating bidirectional LSTM with two-dimensional max pooling. Arxiv Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.06639
