We compile four hand-collected measures of high-impact Schumpeterian entrepreneurship (venture capital-funded IPOs, self-made billionaire entrepreneurs, unicorn start-ups, and young top global firms founded by individual entrepreneurs) and six measures dominated by small business activity as well as institutional and economic variables for 64 countries. Factor analysis reveals that a great deal of the variation is accounted for by two distinct factors: one relating to high-impact Schumpeterian entrepreneurship and the other relating to small business activity. Except for the World Bank measure of firm registration of limited liability companies, quantity-based measures tend to be inappropriate proxies for high-impact Schumpeterian entrepreneurship.
AcsZ. J.DesaiS.KlapperL. F. (2008). What does “entrepreneurship” data really show?Small Business Economics, 31(3), 265–281.doi:10.1007/s11187-008-9137-7
2.
AcsZ. J.AutioE.SzerbL. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016
3.
AldrichH. E.RuefM. (2018). Unicorns, gazelles, and other distractions on the way to understanding real entrepreneurship in the United States. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(4), 458–472.doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0123
4.
AlstadsæterA.JacobM. (2012). 3:12-reglerna har blivit för generösa och används för skatteplanering [The 3:12 rules have become too generous and are used for tax planning]. Ekonomisk Debatt, 40(8), 5–12.
5.
ÅstebroT.TågJ. (2017). Gross, net, and new job creation by entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8(November), 64–70.doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.06.001
6.
AutioE. (2016). Entrepreneurship Support in Europe: Trends and Challenges (Technical Report). London: Imperial College.
7.
AutioE.PathakS.WennbergK. (2013). Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(4), 334–362.doi:10.1057/jibs.2013.15
8.
BankW. (2011). Entrepreneurship Snapshots 2010: Measuring the Impact of the Financial Crisis on New Business Registration. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
9.
BaumolW. J. (2002). The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
10.
BaumolW. J. (2010). The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
11.
BlockJ. H.FischC. O.van PraagM. (2017). The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: A review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 61–95.doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1216397
12.
BosmaN.KelleyD. (2018). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2018/2019 Global Report. London: The Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA).
13.
CernyB. A.KaiserH. F. (1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12(1), 43–47.doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3
14.
ChinW. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. InMarcoulidesG. A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp.295–358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
ChristensenC. M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
16.
CoadA.DaunfeldtS. -O.HölzlW.JohanssonD.NightingaleP. (2014). High-growth firms: Introduction to the special section. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 91–112.doi:10.1093/icc/dtt052
17.
ColomboM. G.PivaE. (2012). Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: A comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 41(1), 79–92.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.010
18.
CoolidgeJ.HornbergerK.LuttikhuizenR. (2008). Understanding and improving data on entrepreneurship and active companies. FIAS, the Multi-Donor Investment Climate Advisory Services of the World Bank Group.
19.
DeckerR. A.HaltiwangerJ.JarminR. S.MirandaJ. (2016). Where has all the skewness gone? the decline in high-growth (young) firms in the U.S. European Economic Review, 86(July), 4–23.doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.12.013
20.
DvouletýO. (2017). Determinants of Nordic entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(1), 12–33.doi:10.1108/JSBED-07-2016-0104
21.
DvouletýO. (2018). How to analyse determinants of entrepreneurship and self-employment at the country level? A methodological contribution. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 9, 92–99.doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.03.002
22.
ElertN.HenreksonM. (2019). The collaborative innovation bloc: A new mission for Austrian economics. Review of Austrian Economics, forthcoming.
23.
FazioC.GuzmanJ.MurrayF. E.SternS. (2016). A New View of the Skew: Quantitative Assessment of the Quality of American Entrepreneurship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Innovation Initiative.
24.
GartnerW. B. (1988). “Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11–32.doi:10.1177/104225878801200401
25.
GuzmanJ.SternS. (2016). The State of American Entrepreneurship: New Estimates of the Quantity and Quality of Entrepreneurship for 15 US States, 1988–2014 (NBER Working Paper No. 22095). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
26.
HébertR. F.LinkA. N. (2006). The entrepreneur as innovator. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 589–597.doi:10.1007/s10961-006-9060-5
27.
HenreksonM.JohanssonD. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 227–244.doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9172-z
28.
HenreksonM.SanandajiT. (2014). Small business activity does not measure entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(5), 1760–1765.doi:10.1073/pnas.1307204111
29.
HenreksonM.SanandajiT. (2018). Schumpeterian entrepreneurship in Europe compared to other industrialized regions. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 157–182.
30.
HurstE.PugsleyE. (2011). What do small businesses do?Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 42(2), 73–118.
31.
KaiserH. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.doi:10.1007/BF02291575
32.
KaplanS. N.LernerJ. (2010). It ain't broke: The past, present, and future of venture capital. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 22(2), 36–47.doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.2010.00272.x
33.
KihlstromR. E.LaffontJ.-J. (1979). A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87(4), 719–748.doi:10.1086/260790
34.
KirznerI. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
KlapperL.AmitR.GuillénM. F.QuesadaJ. M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and Firm Formation Across Countries (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4313). Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
36.
KlotzA. C.HmieleskiK. M.BradleyB. H.BusenitzL. W. (2014). New venture teams: A review of the literature and roadmap for future research. Journal of Management, 40(1), 226–255.
37.
KnightF. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
38.
KoromP.LutterM.BeckertJ. (2017). The enduring importance of family wealth: Evidence from the Forbes 400, 1982 to 2013. Social Science Research, 65(July), 75–95.doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.03.002
39.
LiY.ZahraS. A.LanS. (2017). Heterogeneity in new venture formationrates across nations: The Schumpeterian and institutional economics views. InDaiN. (Ed.), World Scientific Reference on Entrepreneurship, Vol. 2: Entrepreneurial Finance: Managerial and Policy Implications (pp.1–35). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
40.
MarcotteC. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurship at the country level: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(3–4), 174–194.doi:10.1080/08985626.2012.710264
41.
McCrawT. K. (2007). Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
42.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. 2nd. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
OsborneJ. W.CostelloA. B.KellowJ. T. (2008). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. InOsborneJ. W. (Ed.), Best Practices in Quantitative Methods (pp.86–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
44.
PuriM.ZarutskieR. (2012). On the life cycle dynamics of venture-capital- and non-venture-capital-financed firms. The Journal of Finance, 67(6), 2247–2293.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01786.x
45.
SanandajiT. (2011). Essays in Entrepreneurship Policy. (Doctoral Dissertation in Public Policy). Chicago, IL: Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago.
46.
SanandajiT. (2014). The international mobility of billionaires. Small Business Economics, 42(2), 329–338.doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9481-0
47.
SanandajiT.LeesonP. T. (2013). Billionaires. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 313–337.doi:10.1093/icc/dts052
48.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. New Brunswick, NJ, and London, UK: Transaction Publishers (Original work published 1911).
49.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
50.
ShaneS. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149.doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5
51.
SnedecorG. W.CochranW. G. (1989). Statistical Methods. 8th edition. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
52.
SzerbL.AidisR.AcsZ. J. (2013). The comparison of the global entrepreneurship monitor and the global entrepreneurship and development index methodologies. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 1–142.doi:10.1561/0300000046
53.
WennekersS.ThurikR. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56.doi:10.1023/A:1008063200484
