Distributive justice has been examined in the context of reward or resource allocation and the research findings indicate that there are individual and cultural variations in what people consider fair or just. Issues related to the determinants of individual and cultural difference in the perception of justice are discussed. Earlier studies are discussed which have shown that allocation rule preferences are determined by personal, situational and resource char acteristics that reflect cultural influences. However, socialisation as a deter minant has not been theoretically or empirically studied. The socialisation antecedents for justice rule preferences are discussed with reference to the at titudes and values of both traditional and contemporary Indian society and with reference to child rearing practices. Indian studies of allocation rule pref erences are presented which indicate that the effect of pervasive cultural norms are moderated by situational and resource characteristics. It has been pointed out that socialisation and child rearing practices are not highlighted in tra ditional texts. Five cultural dimensions, namely, collectivism, power distance, traditionalism, agricultural economy and scarcity are discussed and the link ages between cultural dimensions, socialisation and allocation rule preference are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2.
Aruna, A., Jain, S., Choudhary, A.K., Ranjan, R., & Krishnan, L. (1994). Justice rule preference in India: Cultural or situational effect?Psychological Studies, 19 (1), 8-17.
3.
Barry, H., Child, I., & Bacon, M. (1959). Relation of child training to subsistence economy . American Anthropologist, 61, 51-63.
4.
Berman, J., Murphy-Berman, V., & Singh, P. (1985). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in perception of fairness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 16, 55-67.
5.
Berry, J.W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York : Sage/Halsted.
6.
Berry, J.W., Poorttnga, Y.H., Segall, M.H., & Dasen, P.R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bhatt, A. (1989). Development and social justice: Micro action by weaker sections. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
8.
Bierhoff, H.W., Cohen, R.L. , & Greenserg, J. (Eds). (1986). Justice in social relations. New York: Plenum Press.
9.
Braham, R.L. (Ed.). (1981). Social justice. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing.
10.
Chatterjee, L. (1984). Power differences, Machiavellianism and coalition dynamics: A social psychological perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur.
11.
Chousalkar, A.S. (1986). Social and political implications of concepts of justice and dharma. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
12.
Cohen, R.L. (Ed.). (1986). Justice: Views from the social sciences. New York: Plenum Press.
13.
Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85-113.
14.
Damon, W. (1981). The development of justice and self-interest during childhood. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 57-72). New York & London: Plenum Press.
15.
De Carufel, A. (1981). The allocation and acquisition of resources in times of scarcity. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 317-341). New York & London: Plenum Press.
16.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
17.
—. (1985). The social psychology of justice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18.
Dutt, M.N. (1979). The Dharma-shastras: Hindu religious codes (Vols I & IV)New Delhi: Cosmo Publications .
19.
Emler, N. (1991). What do children care about justice? The influence of culture and cognitive development. In R. Vermunt & H. Steensma (Eds), Social justice in human relations (Vol.1, pp. 123-150). New York & London: Plenum Press.
Foa, U.G., & Foa, E.B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas.
22.
Foster, G.M. (1965). Peasant society and the image of limited good . American Anthropologist, 67, 293-315.
23.
Gibbs, J.C., & Schnell, S.V. (1985). Moral development "versus" socialization. American Psychologist, 40 (10), 1071-1080.
24.
Greenberg, J. (1981). The justice of distributing scarce and abundant resources. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 289-316). New York & London: Plenum Press.
25.
Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R.L. (1982). Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press.
26.
Haughton, G.P. (Ed.). (1982). Manav Dharma Shastra, or the institutes of Manu: Codes of Hindu laws (Vols I & III). New Delhi: Cosmo Publications.
27.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
28.
Homans, G.C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
29.
Hook, J.G., & Cook, T.D. (1979). Equity theory and the cognitive ability of children . Psychological Bulletin,86, 429-445.
30.
Inkeles, A., & Smith, D.H. (1974). Becoming modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Jain, U. (1991). The subjective construction of morality: The Indian experience. The Indian Journal of Social Work, LII (3), 388-397.
32.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
33.
Krishnan, L. (1987). Equality and equity in reward distribution in an Indian setting. Psychological Studies, 32, 97-103.
34.
—. (1992). Justice research: The Indian perspective. Psychology and Developing Societies, 4 (1), 39-71.
35.
—. (1994). What is "socially justice" in contemporary Indian society? Unpublished manuscript.
36.
—. (in press). Child rearing: The Indian perspective. In A. K. Srivastava (Ed.), Child development: The Indian perspective. New Delhi: NCERT.
37.
Lerner, M.J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.
38.
Leventhal, G.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds), Social exchange theory (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
39.
Mellers, B.A., & Baron, J. (1993). Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Mikula, G. (1980). Justice and social interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.
41.
Misra, G. (1991). Sociocultural influences on moral behaviour. The Indian Journal of Social Work, LII (2), 179-194.
42.
Murphy-Berman, V., Berman, J.J., Singh, P., Pachauri, A., & Kumar, P. (1984). Factors affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 46, 1267-1272.
43.
Pandey, J., & Singh, P. (1989). Reward allocation as a function of resource availability, recipients' needs, and performance. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 115 (4), 467-481.
44.
—. (1994). Distributive decisions as a function of recipients'need-performance variations and caste of allocator. In Fons van de Vijver (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger .
45.
Pandey, S.R. (1991). Community action for social justice: Grassroots organizations in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
46.
Pepitone, E. (1980). Considerations of scarcity conditions: Second graders' reactions to scarce resources. In E. Pepitone, Children in cooperation and competition (pp. 293-319). New York: D. C. Heath and Company.
47.
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child (M. Gabain, Trans.). New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1932)
48.
Sampson, E.E. (1975). On justice as equality. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 45-64.
49.
Saraswathi, T.S., & Sundaresan, J. (1980). Perceived maternal disciplinary practices and their relation to development of moral judgment. International Journal of Behaviour Development, 3, 91-104.
50.
The Shreemad-Bhagavad-Geeta. Gorakhpur: Geeta Press.
51.
Snarey, J. (1985). The cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlbergian research. Psychological Bulletin,97, 202-232.
52.
Ter Laak, J., & Aleva, L. (1991). Distributive justice in children: Social psychological and developmental perspectives. In R. Vermunt & H. Steensma (Eds), Social justice in human relations (Vol. 1, pp. 151-166). New York & London: Plenum Press.
53.
Vermunt, R., & Steensma, H. (1991). Social justice in human relations (Vol. 1). New York & London: Plenum Press.
54.
Williams, L.K. (1973). Some developmental correlates of scarcity. Human Relations, 26, 51-65.
