Byrne’s (1971) attraction paradigm was a novel perspective on how to conduct programmatic research in social psychology. Once a base relation between a stimulus (S) and the response (R) is established: R = f(S), research can be directed at (a) refining the base relation (analytic research), (b) replacing the original S by a new one (stimulus generality), (c) replacing the original R by new ones (response generality) and (d) theory building (i.e., explaining the S–R relations and generating new predictions). In this article, the author presents (1) an overview of the attraction paradigm and (2) the recent literature on mediators of the attitude similarity–attraction relation to show that what originally seemed to be a ‘simple causal relation’ is hardly so. There are five mediators (i.e., Validation → Positive affect → Respect → Inferred attraction → Trust) of the attitude similarity–attraction relation.
AllportG. W. (1935). Attitudes. InMurchisonC.(Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Clark University Press.
2.
AndersonN. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. Academic Press.
3.
AronsonE., & WorchelP. (1966). Similarity versus liking as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 5, 157–158. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328329
4.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
5.
BhawukD. P. S. (2011). Spirituality and Indian psychology: Lessons from the Bhagavad-Gita. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8110-3
6.
ByrneD. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 713–715. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044721
7.
ByrneD. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.
8.
ByrneD., & CloreG. L. (1967). Effectance arousal and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(4, Pt. 2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024829
9.
ByrneD., & CloreG. L. (1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality: An International Journal, 1, 103–128.
10.
ByrneD., CloreG. L., & SmeatonG. (1986). The attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes predict anything?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1167–1170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1167
11.
ByrneD., & NelsonD. (1965). Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 659–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022073
12.
ByrneD., NelsonD., & ReevesK. (1966). Effects of consensual validation and invalidation on attraction as a function of verifiability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(66)90009-6
13.
ByrneD., & RhameyR. (1965). Magnitude of positive and negative reinforcements as a determinant of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 884–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022656
14.
ClarkeI. (2016, October27). How old is too old? No matter the age, the science matters. https://blog.sciencedirect.com/posts/how-old-is-too-old-no-matter-the-age-the-science-matters
15.
CloreG. L., & ByrneD. (1974). A reinforcement-affect model of attraction. InHustonT. L.(Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 143–170). Academic Press.
16.
CondonJ. W., & CranoW. D. (1988). Inferred evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 789–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.789
17.
CottrellC. A., NeubergS. L., & LiN. P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.208
18.
DuckS., & BarnesM. K. (1992). Disagreeing about agreement: Reconciling differences about similarity. Communications Monographs, 59, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376262
19.
EaglyA. H., & ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Hartcourt.
20.
GouldnerA. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
21.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
22.
HeisenbergW. (1901–1976). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/64760-what-we-observe-is-not-nature-itself-but-nature-exposed
23.
JiaL., & SinghR. (2009). Asymmetrical attention allocation to dissimilar and similar attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1259–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.012
24.
KaplanM. F., & AndersonN. H. (1973). Information integration theory and reinforcement theory as approaches to interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035112
25.
MansteadA. S. R. (1996). Attitude theory and research. InMansteadA. S. R. & HewstoneM.(Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 47–52). Blackwell Publisher.
26.
MichinovE., & MonteilJ. M. (2002). The similarity–attraction relationship revisited: Divergence between the affective and behavioural facets of attraction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.104
27.
MontoyaR. M., & HortonR. S. (2004). On the importance of cognitive evaluation as a determinant of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 696–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.696
28.
MontoyaR. M., & HortonR. S. (2013). A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 64–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512452989
29.
MontoyaR. M., & HortonR. S. (2014). A two-dimensional model for the study of interpersonal attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501887
30.
MontoyaR. M., & InskoC. A. (2008). Toward a more complete understanding of the reciprocity of liking effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.431
31.
MorryM. M. (2007). The attraction-similarity hypothesis among cross-sex friends: Relationship satisfaction, perceived similarities, and self-serving perceptions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507072615
32.
NosekB. A., HardwickeT. E., MoshontzH., AllardA., CorkerK. S., AlmenbergA. D., FidlerF., HilgardJ., StruhlM. K., NuijtenM. B., RohrerJ. M., RomeroF., ScheelA. M., SchererL., SchönbrodtF., & VazireS. (2022). Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 719–748. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ksfvq
PremchandM. (1933/2019). Qaidi[Hindi: कैदी]. In M. Premchand, 51 popular stories [Hindi: ५१ प्रिय कहानियाँ] (pp. 58–70). Maple Press Private Ltd.
36.
PremchandM. (1916/2021). Punch Parmeshwar[Hindi: पंच परमेश्वर]. In M. Premchand, 31 great stories [Hindi: ३१ सर्वश्रेष्ठ कहानियाँ] (pp. 38–50). Maple Press Private Ltd.
37.
RaoK. R., ParanjapeA. C., & DalalA. K. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Indian psychology. Cambridge University Press/Foundation Books.
38.
ReisH. T., & ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. InDuckS., HayD. F., HobfollS. E., IckesW. & MontgomeryB. M.(Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367–389). John Wiley & Sons.
39.
RosenbaumM. E. (1986). The repulsion hypothesis: On the nondevelopment of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1156–1166. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1156
40.
RuckerD. D., PreacherK. J., TormalaZ. L., & PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
41.
SawickiV., & WegenerD. T. (2018). Metacognitive reflection as a moderator of attitude strength versus attitude bolstering: Implications for attitude similarity and attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217744196
42.
SaxeJ. G. (1863/1873). The blind men and the elephant. InSaxeJ. G.(Ed.), The poems of John Godfrey Saxe (pp. 77–78). James R. Osgood and Company.
43.
SinghR. (1974). Reinforcement and attraction: Specifying the effects of affective states. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(74)90040-3
44.
SinghR. (2011). Information integration as a basic cognitive process. InMishraG.(Ed.), Handbook of psychology in India (pp.73–98). Oxford University Press.
45.
SinghR. (2024). Validating cognitive and emotional urges in understanding of one’s surroundings: The case of attraction from attitudes. Psychology and Developing Societies, 36, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713336241229897
46.
SinghR., ChenF., & WegenerD. T. (2014). The similarity–attraction link: Sequential versus parallel multiple-mediator models involving inferred attraction, respect, and positive affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2014.912583
47.
SinghR., & HoS. Y. (2000). Attitudes and attraction: A new test of the attraction, repulsion, and similarity–dissimilarity asymmetry hypotheses. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164426
48.
SinghR., HoL. J., TanH. L., & BellP. A. (2007). Attitudes, personal evaluations, cognitive evaluation, and interpersonal attraction: On the direct, indirect, and reverse-causal effects. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X104417
49.
SinghR., LinP. K. F, TanH. L., & HoL. J. (2008). Evaluations, attitudes, and interpersonal attraction: Testing the hypothesis of weighting interference across responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802375052
50.
SinghR., NgR., OngE. L., & LinP. K.-F. (2008). Different mediators of the age, sex, and attitude similarity effects in interpersonal attraction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701665165
51.
SinghR., & RaiH. (2021). Desiring to punish leaders: A new test of the model of people as intuitive prosecutors. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5, 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.105
52.
SinghR., SimonsJ. J. P., YoungD. P. C. Y., SimB. S. X., ChaiX. T., SinghS., & ChiouS. Y. (2009). Trust and respect as mediators of the effects of other- and self-profitable trait on interpersonal attraction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1021–1038. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.605
53.
SinghR., & TanL. S. C. (1992). Attitudes and attraction: A test of the similarity–attraction and dissimilarity–repulsion hypotheses. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1992.tb00967.x
54.
SinghR., TayY. Y., & SankaranK. (2016). Causal role of trust in interpersonal attraction from attitude similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 717–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540751665682
55.
SinghR., TengJ. S. Q., BhullarN., & SankaranK. (2018). Positive affect as a moderator of liking effects on trust and attraction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12192
56.
SinghR., WegenerD. T., SankaranK., BhullarN., AngK. Q. P., ChiaP. J. L., CheongX., & ChenF. (2017). Attitude similarity and attraction: Validation, positive affect, and trust as sequential mediators. Personal Relationships, 24, 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12178
57.
SinghR., WegenerD. T., SinghS., SankaranK., LinP. K. F., SeowM. X., TengJ. S. Q., & ShuliS. (2015). On the importance of trust in interpersonal attraction from attitude similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 829–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515576993
58.
SinghR., YeoS. E., LinP. K. F., & TanL. (2007). Multiple mediators of the attitude similarity–attraction relationship: Dominance of inferred attraction and subtlety of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701331007
59.
SpencerS. J., ZannaM. P., & FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
60.
TanD. T. Y., & SinghR. (1995). Attitudes and attraction: A developmental study of the similarity–attraction and dissimilarity-repulsion hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295219011
61.
Toribio-FlórezD., van HarreveldF., & SchneiderI. K. (2020). Ambivalence and interpersonal liking: The expression of ambivalence as social validation of attitudinal conflict. Frontiers of Psychology, 11, 525301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.525301
WilsonT. D., LindseyS., & SchoolerT. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101
