Economic Development,Sociocultural Change and Quality of Life in Korea: Analysis of Three Generations Growing up in Colonial,Industrial and Digital Age

Abstract

The article reviews key questions that are central to developing countries and provide a case study of South Korea (abbreviated as Korea): How could one of the poorest country in the world transform to become the 10th largest economy in the world? What are the psychological, relational, social and cultural impact of rapid economic development in Korea? How do these factors influence the subjective well-being, quality of life and happiness among three generations of Koreans? The first part of this article reviews the cultural history of Korea. The second part of this article reviews the rapid economic development that lifted Korea out of poverty into prosperity. The third part of this articles reviews the social and cultural changes that impacted the family, incentive structure and lifestyle of three generation of Koreans. The fourth part of this article reviews the impact of digital revolution on the psychological, economic and cultural life of Millennials and Gen Z (abbreviated as the MZ generation), and examine how they are different from their parent and grandparent generation. The fifth part of the articles reviews quality of life and social problems in Korea. In contrast to the economic prosperity that Koreans enjoy, the country is facing serious social problems with low marriage and fertility rate, high unemployment, divorce and suicide rate, and a bleak economic future for the MZ generation. The current situation in Korea is an example of Innovator’s Dilemma (Christensen, 2016), where the economic and political model that accelerated economic growth is serving as an obstacle to innovation and change. The fifth part of this article reviews empirical studies conducted in Korea during the past 20 years focusing on subjective well-being, quality of life and happiness. The results indicate that social support received from close relationships and self, relational and social efficacy predict high subjective well-being, quality of life and happiness. In contrast, income and socio-economic status had very little impact on subjective well-being, quality of life and happiness. For the MZ generation, friends have become much more important than their parents in promoting happiness and online social support is emerging as an important factor. The information, knowledge and skills that they obtain from the online community are changing how they view the world, relate to others and live. The MZ generation represents the most educated, globally connected and socially conscious generation. They are starting a quiet revolution, demanding changes to social inequalities, discrimination and climate change that were create by and for the baby boomer generation.

Keywords

Economic development sociocultural change quality of life happiness generational differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amsden

A. H.

(1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization . Oxford University Press.

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control . Freeman.

Bronfenbrenner

(1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design . Harvard University Press

Chetty

, Grusky

, Hell

, Hendren

, Manduca

, & Narang

(2008). The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940s [Working Paper No 22910]. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Choi

J. J.

(1993). Political Cleavages in South Korea. In

Koo

(Ed.), State and society in contemporary Korea . Cornell University Press.

Christensen

(2016). Innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail . Harvard Business Review Press.

Deloitte. (2021). A call for accountability and action: The Deloitte global 2021 millennial and Gen Z survey .

Diener

(2009). The science of well-being: Collected works of Ed Diener . Springer.

Drucker

(2001). Essential Drucker . Harper Collins.

10.

Kahneman

, & Deaton

(2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. PNAS , 107(38), 16489–16493.

11.

Kim

M. U.

, Kim

, & Park

Y. S.

(2000). Social change and intergenerational differences and similarities, I: Comparative analysis of adolescents and adults. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues , 6(1), 181–124.

12.

Kim

(2001a). Ethnography of Korean people and culture. In

Aasen

H. S.

, Kim

& Helgesen

(Eds.), Democracy, human rights, and peace in Korea; Psychological, political, and cultural Perspectives (pp. 245–278). Kyoyook Kwahasa.

13.

Kim

(2001b). Culture, science and indigenous psychologies: An integrated analysis. In

Matsumoto

(Ed.), Handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 51–76). Oxford University Press.

14.

Kim

(1995). Individualism and collectivism: Psychological, cultural and ecological analysis . Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.

15.

Kim

(1998). Understanding Korean corporate culture: Analysis of transformative human resource management. Strategic Human Resource Development Review , 2, 68–101.

16.

Kim

(1999). Contrasting the Confucian model of life-span development with Western models: A cross-cultural analysis . Institute for Asian Cultural Studies, International Christian University.

17.

Kim

, & Choi

S. H.

(1994). Individualism, collectivism and child development: A Korean perspective. In

Greenfield

& Cocking

(Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development (pp. 227–258). Lawrence Erlbaum.

18.

Kim

, Helgesen

, & Ahn

B. M.

(2002). Democracy, trust, and political efficacy: Comparative analysis of Danish and Korean political culture. Applied Psychology: An International Review , 51(2), 317–352.

19.

Kim

, Helgesen

, & Ahn

B. M.

(2006). Democracy, leadership and political culture in Korea: Political efficacy and trust. In

Helgesen

& Thomsen

S. R.

(Eds.), Politics, culture and self: East Asian and North European attitudes (pp. 155–182). NIAS Press.

20.

Kim

, Hong

C. S.

, Lee

J. K.

, & Park

Y. S.

(2005). Factors influencing health and quality of life among allergy and asthma patients: With specific focus on self-efficacy, social support and health management. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues , 11(2), 143–181.

21.

Kim

, & Kim

J. S.

(2022). Effect of sociocultural changes on relationships and quality of life: Comparative analysis of Koreans who grew up in the colonial, industrial and digital era . Keynote presentation to be presented at the 76th Annual Conference of Korean Association of Psychological, Social and Cultural Issues, August, Seoul.

22.

Kim

, & Park

Y. S.

(2000). Confucian and family values: Their impact of educational achievement in Korea. Zeitshrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft (Journal of Educational Science) , 3(2), 229–249.

23.

Kim

, & Park

Y. S.

(2005). Perception of American people, society and government: Psychological, social and cultural analysis of anti-American sentiments in South Korea. In

Steinberg

(Ed), Korean attitudes toward the United States: Changing dynamics (pp. 247–265). M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

24.

Kim

& Park

Y. S.

(2006a). Can money buy happiness? No - psychological, relational and social factors are much more important . Department of Social Psychology, University of Tokyo.

25.

Kim

, & Park

Y. S.

(2006b). Analysis of factors influencing quality of life in Korean society. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues , 12(Special Issue), 1–28.

26.

Kim

, & Park

Y. S.

(2008). Cognitive, relational and social basis of academic achievement in Confucian cultures: Psychological, indigenous and cultural perspectives. In

Sorrentino

and Yamaguchi

(Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures (pp. 491–515). Elsevier.

27.

Kim

, Park

Y. S.

, Kwon

Y. E.

, & Koo

J. S.

(2005). Values of children, parent-child relationship, and social change in Korea: Indigenous, psychological, and cultural analysis. Applied Psychology: International Review , 54, 313–316.

28.

Korea Legislation Research Institute. (2022). The Constitution of the Republic of Korea . https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?hseq=1&lang=KOR

29.

Moon

H. J.

(2020). Korean dream: A vision for a unified Korea . Morgan Jamese Publishing.

30.

Park

Y. S.

, & Kim

(2004). Parent-child relationship in Korea: Indigenous psychological analysis of self-concept and family role (Cultural Psychology Series 5). Kyoyook Kwahasa.

31.

Park

Y. S.

, & Kim

(2013). Conception of achievement among Koreans: Indigenous psychological analysis (Cultural Psychology Series 7). Kyoyook Kwahasa.

32.

Park

Y. S.

, & Kim

(2014). Happiness and quality of life among Koreans: Indigenous psychological analysis (Cultural Psychology Series 8). Kyoyook Kwahasa.

33.

Park

Y. S.

, & Kim

(2016). Stress experience among Koreans: Indigenous psychological analysis (Cultural Psychology Series 10). Kyoyook Kwahasa.

34.

Sakong

(1993). Korea in the world economy . Institute for International Economics.

35.

Schumpeter

J. A.

(1942/1994). Capitalism, socialism and democracy . Routledge.

36.

Statistics Korea (2022). Ministry Economy and Finance, Government of Korea . https://kostat.go.kr/portal/eng/index.action

37.

Wells

(2002). The journey of man: A genetic odyssey . Princeton University Press.

38.

Yamagishi

(2011). Trust: The evolutionary game of mind and society . Springer.