The current research was to investigate what psychological factors predict Muslims’ negative stereotypes of the West, and the underlying mechanism by which the negative stereotypes can translate into Muslims’ aggressive tendencies towards the West. A correlational survey among a sample of Indonesian Muslims (N = 360) demonstrated that the more participants negatively stereotyped the West, the more they thought that Muslims should aggress the latter group. We also found as expected that Muslims’ negative stereotypes of the West were positively predicted by the perceived conflict between Islam and the West, and this perceived intergroup conflict in turn mediated the role of Islamic fundamentalism in predicting the negative stereotypes. These findings in sum highlight the role of contextual and individual factors in predicting Muslims’ negative stereotypes of the West, as well as the impact of these stereotypes on Muslims’ aggressive tendencies towards the West. Theoretical implications and research limitations of these empirical findings are discussed.
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133.
2.
Bar-TalD.Chernyak-HaiL.SchoriN.GundarA. (2009). A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 91(874), 229–258.
3.
BellerJ.KrögerC. (2017). Is religious fundamentalism a dimensional or a categorical phenomenon? A taxometric analysis in two samples of youth from Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(2), 158–164.
4.
BlantonH. (2001). Evaluating the self in the context of another. In MoskowitzG. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology (pp. 75–87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
BurgessM. C. (2017). Race and gender stereotypes and violence and aggression. In SturmeyP. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression (pp. 1–11). Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
6.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304.
7.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789.
8.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648.
9.
CzoppA. M. (2008). When is a compliment not a compliment? Evaluating expressions of positive stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 413–420.
10.
DovidioJ. F.BrighamJ. C.JohnsonB. T.GaertnerS. L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In MacraeC. N.StangorC.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Foundations of stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 276–319). New York, NY: Guilford.
11.
EndersC. K.BandalosD. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457.
12.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54(4), 699–724.
13.
EssesV. M.DovidioJ. F.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389–412.
14.
FinchilescuG. (2005). Meta-stereotypesmayhinder inter-racial contact. South African Journal of Psychology, 35(3), 460–472.
15.
FiskeS. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357–411). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
16.
FiskeS. T. (2009). From dehumanization and objectification to rehumanization. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167(1), 31–34.
17.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.
18.
FuriaP. A.LucasR. E. (2008). Arab Muslim attitudes toward the West: Cultural, social, and political explanations. International Interactions, 34(2), 186–207.
19.
GauntR. (2011). Effects of intergroup conflict and social contact on prejudice: The mediating role of stereotypes and evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1340–1355.
20.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
21.
HunsbergerB. (1995). Religion and prejudice: The role of religious fundamentalism, quest, and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 51(2), 113–129.
22.
HylandP.MurphyJ.ShevlinM.CareyS.VallièresF.MurphyD.ElklitA. (2018). Correlates of a general psychopathology factor in a clinical sample of childhood sexual abuse survivors. Journal of Affective Disorders, 232, 109–115.
23.
KhisbiyahY. (2009). Contested discourses on violence, social justice, and peace building among Indonesian Muslims. In MontielC. J.NoorN. M. (Eds.), Peace psychology in Asia (pp. 123–145). New York, NY: Springer.
24.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
25.
KunstJ. R.ThomsenL.SamD. L. (2014). Late Abrahamic reunion? Religious fundamentalism negatively predicts dual Abrahamic group categorization among Muslims and Christians. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 337–348.
26.
KunstJ. R.TajamalH.SamD. L.UllebergP. (2012). Coping with Islamophobia: The effects of religious stigma on Muslim minorities’ identity formation. InternationalJournal of Intercultural Relations, 36(4), 518–532.
27.
LevineJ. M.HoggM. A. (2010). Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
28.
MacCallumR. C.AustinJ. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 201–226.
29.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616.
30.
MashuriA.AkhraniL. A.ZaduqistiE. (2016). You are the real terrorist and we are just your puppet: Using individual and group factors to explain Indonesian Muslims’ attributions of causes of terrorism. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 68–98.
31.
MashuriA.ZaduqistiE. (2015). The effect of intergroup threat and social identity salience on the belief in conspiracy theories over terrorism in Indonesia: Collective angst as a mediator. International Journal of Psychological Research, 8(1), 24–35.
32.
MashuriA.ZaduqistiE.SakdiahH.SukmawatiF. (2015). When agony begets zealotry. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 37(2), 200–226.
33.
MashuriA.ZaduqistiE.SukmawatiF.SakdiahH.SuhariniN. (2016). The role of identity subversion in structuring the effects of intergroup threats and negative emotions on belief in anti-West conspiracy theories in Indonesia. Psychology and Developing Societies, 28(1), 1–28.
34.
MoghaddamF. M. (2005). The staircase to terrorism: A psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60(2), 161–169.
35.
MoghaddamF. M. (2009). Commentary: Omniculturalism: Policy solutions to fundamentalism in the era of fractured globalization. Culture & Psychology, 15(3), 337–347.
36.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
37.
NertzM. V. (2014). Images of the West in urban Indonesia: Muslims negotiating the Western path to modernity. International Journal of Nusantara Islam, 1(1), 99–105.
PoppeE.LinssenH. (1999). In-group favouritism and the reflection of realistic dimensions of difference between national states in Central and Eastern European nationality stereotypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(1), 85–102.
45.
RabasaA.WaxmanM.LarsonE. V.MarcumC. Y. (2004). The Muslim world after 9/11. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
46.
RikettaM. (2005). Cognitive differentiation between self, ingroup, and outgroup: The roles of identification and perceived intergroup conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 97–106.
47.
RogersM. B.LoewenthalK. M.LewisC. A.AmlôtR.CinnirellaM.AnsariH. (2007). The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis. International Review of Psychiatry, 19(3), 253–262.
48.
RosemanI. J.WiestC.SwartzT. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 206–221.
49.
SchaferJ. L.GrahamJ. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.
50.
SchwartzS. H.StruchN. (1989). Values, stereotypes, and intergroup antagonism. In Bar-TalD.GraumannD. F.KruglanskiA. W.StoebeW. (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice (pp. 151–167). New York, NY: Springer.
51.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiK. (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (pp. 385–407). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
52.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248–279.
53.
SpanovicM.LickelB.DensonT. F.PetrovicN. (2010). Fear and anger as predictors of motivation for intergroup aggression: Evidence from Serbia and Republika Srpska. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(6), 725–739.
54.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.RiosK. (2016). Intergroup threat theory. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed., pp. 255–278). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
55.
StruchN.SchwartzS. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 364–373.
56.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
57.
TamT.HewstoneM.CairnsE.TauschN.MaioG.KenworthyJ. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(1), 119–136.
58.
TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ.CairnsE. (2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(1), 45–59.
59.
TauschN.BeckerJ. C.SpearsR.ChristO.SaabR.SinghP.SiddiquiR. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and non-normative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129–148.
60.
UfkesE. G.OttenS.Van Der ZeeK. I.GiebelsE.DovidioJ. F. (2012). Urban district identity as a common in-group identity: The different role of in-group prototypicality for minority and majority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(6), 706–716.
61.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535.
62.
VociA. (2014). Negative stereotypes. In MichalosA. C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 4707–4710). Dordrecht: Springer.
63.
VorauerJ. D.MainK. J.O’ConnellG. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 917–937.
64.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1992). Affects separable and inseparable: On the hierarchical arrangement of the negative affects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 489–505.
WrightS. C. (2009). The next generation of collective action research. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 859–879.
67.
ZajoncR. B. (1998). Emotions. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 591–632). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
