This study examined the meanings Jamaicans associate with corporal punishment and its perceived effects on children, caregivers’/parents’ relationship with children and in a broader sense, Jamaican culture. A total of 183 readers’ comments on 13 articles that focused on corporal punishment—published in a prominent Jamaican online newspaper—were qualitatively analysed. The results indicated that not all Jamaicans engage in or embrace the use of corporal punishment. There is a clear divide between Jamaican individuals who practise corporal punishment and those who believe it is socially unacceptable. Those in favour of it reported that it was religiously justified and effective as a method of discipline. Opponents of this view highlighted the negative physical and mental effects of corporal punishment on children and provided alternative discipline methods that were less punitive and more responsive to the needs of children and the parent–child relationship. Implications of the results are discussed.
ArnoldE. (1982). The use of corporal punishment in child rearing in the West Indies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 6(2), 141–145. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(82)90006-0.
2.
BaptisteD.A.HardyK.V.LewinL. (1997). Clinical practice with Caribbean immigrant families in the United States. The intersection of emigration, immigration, culture and race. In RoopnarineJ.BrownJ. (Eds), Caribbean families: Diversities among ethnic groups (pp. 275–303). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
3.
BarrowC. (1996). Family in the Caribbean: Themes and perspective. Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle.
4.
BarrowC. (2010). Caribbean childhoods “outside” “adopted” or “left behind”: Good enough parenting and moral families. Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle.
5.
BaumrindD. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monographs, 4(1), 1–103.
6.
BaumrindD. (1996). Parenting: The discipline controversy revisited. Family Relations, 45(4), 405–414. doi: 10.2307/585170.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
9.
BrownJ.JohnsonS. (2008). Childrearing and child participation in Jamaican families. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(1), 31–40. doi: 10.1080/09669760801892110.
10.
ChevannesB. (1999). What we sow we reap: Problems in the cultivation of male identity in Jamaica. Kingston, Jamaica: Grace Kennedy Foundation.
11.
ChevannesB. (2001). Socialisation of the genders. In Learning to be a man: Culture, socialisation and gender identity in five Caribbean communities (pp. 14–34). Mona, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.
12.
ChaoR.K. (1995). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65 (4), 1111–1119.
13.
ChiuL.H. (1987). Childrearing attitudes of Chinese, Chinese-Americans and Anglo-American mothers. International Journal of Psychology, 22(4), 409–419.
14.
ClarkeE. (2000). My mother who fathered me: A study of the families in three selected communities in Jamaica (Revised Edition). Kingston, Jamaica: The University of the West Indies Press.
15.
Crawford-BrownC. (1999). The impact of parenting on conduct disorder in Jamaican male adolescents. Adolescence, 34(134), 417–436.
16.
DalyK. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies and human development. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
17.
DawberT.KuczynskiL. (1999). The question of ownness: Influence of relationship context on parental socialisation strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(4), 475–493. doi:10.117/0265407599164004.
18.
DobsonJ. (1970). Dare to discipline. Wheaton, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers.
19.
EllisonC.G.SherkatD.E. (1993). Conservative Protestantism and support for corporal punishment. American Sociological Review, 58(4), 131–144.
20.
EvansH.DaviesR. (1997). Overview of issues in childhood socialisation in the Caribbean. In RoopnarineJ.BrownJ. (Eds), Caribbean families: Diversity among ethnic groups (pp. 1–24). Greenwich: Ablex.
21.
GershoffE.T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviours and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 539–579. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.539.
GrasmickH.G.BursikR.J.KimpelM. (1991). Protestant fundamentalism and attitudes toward corporal punishment of children. Violence and Victims, 6(4), 283–298.
26.
GrolnickW.S.DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (1997). Internalisation within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In GrusecJ.E.KuczynskiL. (Eds), Parenting and children’s internalisation of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 135–161). New York: Wiley.
27.
GrusecJ.E.GoodnowJ.J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalisation of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4–19. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.4.
28.
HarachL.D.KuczynskiL. (2005). Construction and maintenance of parent-child relationships: Bidirectional contributions from the perspective of parents. Infant and Child Development, 14(4), 327–343. doi:10.1002/icd.393.
29.
HesterM.HeJ.TianL. (2009). Girls’ and boy’s experiences and perception of parental discipline and punishment while growing up in China and England. Child Abuse Review, 18(6), 401–413. doi: 10.1002/car.1095.
30.
HindeR.A. (1979). Towards understanding relationships. London: Academic Press.
31.
HolsteinJ.A.GubriumJ.F. (Eds). (2008). Handbook of constructionist research. New York: Guildford.
KohlbergL. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialisation. In GoslinD.A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialisation theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
35.
KuczynskiL. (2003). Beyond bidirectionality: Bilateral conceptual frameworks for understanding dynamics in parent-child relations. In KuczynskiL. (Ed.), Handbook in parent-child relations (pp. 1–24). Thousand Oaks CA: SAGE Publications.
36.
KuczynskiL.DalyK. (2003). Qualitative methods for inductive (theory generating) research. In KuczynskiL. (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 373–392). London: SAGE Publications.
37.
KuczynskiL.HildebrandtN. (1997). Models of conformity and resistance in socialisation theory. In GrusecJ.E.KuczynskiL. (Eds), Parenting and children’s internalisation of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 227–256). New York: Wiley.
38.
Leo-RhynieE.A. (1997). Class, race, and gender issues in child-rearing in the Caribbean. In RoopnarineJ.BrownJ. (Eds), Caribbean families: Diversity among ethnic groups (pp. 25–56). Greenwich: Ablex.
39.
LincolnY.S.GubaE.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
40.
LollisS. (2003). Conceptualizing the influence of the past and the future in present parent-child relationships. In KuczynskiL. (Ed.), Handbook in parent-child relationships (pp. 67–87). Thousand Oak, CA: SAGE Publications.
41.
MaccobyE.E. (2000). The uniqueness of the parent-child relationships. In CollinsW.A.LaursenB. (Eds), Relationships as development context: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (pp. 157–175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42.
MaccobyE.E.MartinJ.A. (1983). Socialisation in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In MussenP.H. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 1–100). New York: Wiley.
43.
McLoydV.C.HillN.E.DodgeK.A. (2005). Introduction: Ecological and cultural diversity in African American family life. In McLoydV.C.HillsN.E.DodgeK.A. (Eds), African American families: Ecological and diversity (pp. 3–17). NY: Guilford Press.
44.
MorseJ.M.BarrettM.MayanM.OlsonK.SpiersJ. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1–19.
PattersonG.R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia Press.
47.
RickettsH.AndersonP. (2008). The impact of poverty and stress on the interaction of Jamaican caregivers with young children. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/09669760801892276.
48.
RolfeG. (2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigor: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 304–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03727.x.>
49.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2002). Reading qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(1), 74–108.
50.
ShafferH.R. (1991). The mutuality of parental control in early childhood. In LewisM.FeinmanS. (Eds), Social influences and socialisation in infancy (pp. 165–184). New York: Plenum Press.
51.
SmithD.E.MosbyG. (2003). Jamaican child-rearing practices: The role of corporal punishment. Adolescence, 38(150), 369–381.
52.
SmithD.E.SpringerC.M.BarrettS. (2011). Physical discipline and socioemotional adjustment among Jamaican adolescents. Journal of Family Violence, 26(1), 51–61. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9341-5.
SteinbergL.DornbuschS.BrownB.B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescents’ achievements: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47(6), 723–729.
55.
StrausM.A.DonnellyD.A. (2001). Beating the devil out of them: Corporal punishment in American families and its effects on children. New Brunswick: Transaction.
56.
TrommsdorffG.KornadtH. (2003). Parent-child relations in cross-cultural perspective. In KuczynskiL. (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 271–306). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
UNICEF. (2010). Child disciplinary practices at home: Evidence from a range of low- and middle-income countries. New York: UNICEF.
59.
United States Census Bureau. (2011). The foreign born from Latin America and the Caribbean: 2010 American Community Survey Brief. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acsbr10-15.pdf (accessed on 31 May, 2013).
60.
VERBI Software (1989–2012). MAXQDA (Version 10). Berlin, Germany.
61.
WieheV.R. (1990). Religious influence on parental attitudes toward the use of corporal punishment. Journal of Family Violence, 5(2), 173–186.
