The family in India is a vibrant, complex group that functions on the assumption of interdependence and complementarity of roles and relationships. Patriarchal and patrilocal joint families remain the ideal kin group for a large population of the subcontinent, but this can take many different forms related to co-residence, commensality, branches and subdivisions within the larger group. In the northern Indian rural households from which the illustrations in this article are drawn, household boundaries are largely permeable, the care of children is a shared activity. Whereas older adult members are responsible for keeping a close watch on the children of the family, the adults, usually parents go about their daily work, whether in the home, fields, businesses or employment. Children are a subsystem of mixed ages, constituting siblings, cousins, visiting kin and often even selected neighbours. Women work for the household, which usually includes cattle-care and farming but may also be employed in jobs outside the home in some instances. This active social institution is held together by social conventions and moral obligations. In this article, we provide insights into the ways in which the dynamics of conventions and obligations are expressed, experienced and maintained in relationships between adults and children and among children.
AitkenK. J., & TrevarthanC. (1997). Self/other organization in human psychological development. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 653–677.
2.
AllendorfK. (2013). Going nuclear? Family structure and young women’s health in India, 1992–2006. Demography, 50(3), 853–880. doi:https://www.jstor.org/stable/4291990.
3.
BabuN. (2009). Development of theory of mind and mental state language in children. Concept Publishing.
4.
BerryJ. W. (2019). Culture + behaviour + comparison = cross-cultural psychology. IACCP Internet uploads.
5.
BhatiaS. (2000). Can we return to the concept of duty in a culture of rights? Implications for morality and identity. Culture and Psychology, 6(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0063002
6.
BilimoriaP. (2013). Ethics and virtues in classical Indian thinking. In van HooftS., AthanassoulisN., KawallJ., OakleyJ., SaundersN., & Van ZylL. (Eds.), Handbook of virtue ethics (pp. 294–305). Acumen Publishing.
7.
BiswasS. (2020, September 13). Why Indians continue to live in joint families. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-54053091
8.
BretonE. (2019). Modernization and household composition in India, 1983–2009. Population and Development Review, 45(4), 739–766. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12293
9.
BronfenbrennerU. (1977). Towards an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
10.
Census of India. (2011). Households by composition and size. Retrieved January 19, 2021. https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/hh-series/hh04.html.
11.
ChaudharyN. (1999). Language socialization: Patterns of caregiver speech to young children. In SaraswathiT. (Ed.), Culture, socialization and human development: Theory, research and application in India (pp. 145–166). SAGE Publications.
12.
ChaudharyN. (2004). Listening to culture: Constructing reality from everyday talk. SAGE Publications.
13.
ChaudharyN. (2012). Negotiating the autonomy and relatedness: Dialogical process in everyday lives of Indians. In HermansH. J., & GieserT. (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge University Press.
14.
ChaudharyN. (2013). Parent beliefs, socialization practices and children’s development in Indian families: A report. University Grants Commission.
15.
ChaudharyN., & PillaiP. (2017). Socialisation for subjectification: Growing up with others in an Indian family. In CunhaC., & HanM. (Eds.), The subjectified and subjectifying mind (pp. 155–172). Information Age.
16.
ChaudharyN., & ValsinerJ. (2018). Caring through culture. In BollT., FerringD., & ValsinerJ. (Eds.), Cultures of care in aging (pp. 393–405). Information Age.
17.
ChaudharyN., & ShuklaS. (2019). Family, identity and the Indian individual. In MisraG. (Ed.), Psychology Volume 2: Individual and the social: Processes and issues. ICSSR survey, Advances in psychology. (pp. 142–188). Oxford University Press.
18.
DesaiL. P. (1964). Some aspects of family in Mahuva. Asia Publishing House.
19.
DubeL. (2001). Anthropological explorations in gender: Intersecting fields. SAGE Publications.
20.
GaneshK. (1998). Gender and Kinship: Indian material and context. In RisseeuwC., & GaneshK. (Eds.), Negotiation and social space: A gendered analysis of marriage and kinship relations in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia (pp. 113–137). SAGE Publications.
21.
GoodeW. J. (1963). World revoloution and family patterns. The Free Press.
22.
GoreM. (1968). Urbanization and family change. Popular Prakashan.
23.
GulatiN. (2020). Childhood in India: A socio-hisotric trajectory. In RanganathanN. (Ed.), Understanding childhood and adolescence (pp. 90–114). SAGE Publications.
24.
GuptaD. (n.d.). Young children’s prosocial behaviour in multiple caregiver homes (Ongoing Doctoral Dissertation). Department of Human Development and Childhood Studies, Lady Irwin College, University of Delhi.
25.
HarknessS., & SuperC. M. (Eds.). (1996). Parents’ cultural belief systems: Their origins, expressions, and consequences. Guilford.
26.
HermansH. J. (2001). The dialogical self: Towards a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture and Psychology, 7(3), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0173001
27.
KapadiaK. M. (1956). Rural family patterns: A study in urban-rural relations. Sociological Bulletin, 5(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022919560204
28.
KapadiaK. M. (1969). Marriage and family in India. Oxford University Press.
29.
KapoorS., & PatraD. (2015). Extra-familial care: Perspectives from India. Children Australia, 40(4), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2015.55
30.
KaurR. (2019). Family matters in India: A sociological understanding. In MukherjiP., JayaramN., & GhoshB. (Eds.), Understanding social dynamics in South Asia (pp. 147–159). Springer. http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-981-13-0387-6_9
31.
KaurR. (2020). The perspectives on children and childhood. In RanganathanN. (Ed.), Understanding childhood and adolescence (pp. 66–89). SAGE Publications.
32.
KellerH. (2018). Universality claims of attachment theory: Children’s socio-emotional development across cultures. PNAS, 115(45), 414–419. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720325115
33.
KellerH., & ChaudharyN. (2017). Is the the mother essential for attachment? Models of care in different cultures. In KellerH., & BardK. A. (Eds.), The cultural nature of attachment: Contextualizing relationships and development (pp. 109–137). MIT Press. https://www.esforum.de; https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/cultural-nature-attachment
34.
KurtzS. N. (1992). All the mothers are one. Columbia University Press.
35.
LancyD. (2008). The anthropology of childhood: Cherubs, chattel, changelings. Cambridge University Press.
36.
MadanT. N. (1965). Family and kinship: A study of the Pandits of rural Kashmir. Asia Publishing House.
37.
MillerJ. G., & BersoffD. M. (1992). Culture and moral judgement: How are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 541–554.
38.
MoghaddamF. M. (2003). Interobjectivity and culture. Culture and Psychology, 9(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X030093004
39.
MoghaddamF. M. (2010). Intersubjectivity, interobjectivity, and the embryonic fallacy in developmental science. Culture and Psychology, 16(4), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X10380160
40.
MollH., & TomaselloM. (2007). How 14- and 18-month-olds know what others have experienced. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.309
41.
NielsenM., HaunD., KaertnerJ., & LegareC. H. (2017). The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.017
42.
PalriwalaR. (1993). Economics and patriliny: Consumption and authority within the household. Social Scientist, 21(9/11), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3520426
43.
PatelT. (2005). The family in India: Structure and practice. SAGE Publications. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0513/2005015649.html
44.
PattanaikD. (2010, June 19). Business sutra: dharma sankat(M. Doshi, Interviewer). https://devdutt.com/videos/business-sutra-3-dharma-sankat/
45.
ReddyV. (2008). How infants know minds. PHI learning.
46.
RichK. R. (2009). Dreaming in Hindi: Coming awake in another language. Mariner.
47.
Roettger-RosslerB., ScheideckerG., FunkL., & HolodynskiM. (2015). Learning (by) feeling: A cross-cultural comparison of the socialization and development of emotions. Ethos, 43(2), 187–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12080
48.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
49.
SaraswathiT. S. (1994). Women in poverty context: Balancing economic and child care needs. In BorooahR., CloudK., SeshadriS., SaraswathiT. S., PetersonJ. T., & VermaA. (Eds.), Capturing complexity: An interdisciplinary look at women, households and development (pp. 162–178). SAGE Publications.
50.
SaraswathiT. S. (1999). Culture, socialization and human development: Theory, research and applications in india. SAGE Publications.
51.
SeymourS. (1976). Caste/Class and child-rearing in a changing Indian town. American Ethnologist, 3(4), 783–796. https://www.jstor.org/stable/643350
52.
ShahA. M. (1998). The family in India: Critical essays. Orient Longman.
53.
ShwederR. A., MahapatraM., & MillerJ. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In KaganJ., & LambS. (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). University of Chicago Press.
54.
SinhaD., & MishraR. C. (1999). Socialization and cognitive functioning. In SaraswathiT. S. (Ed.), Culuture, socialization and human development: Theory, research and applications in India (pp. 167–187). SAGE Publications.
55.
SonawatR. (2001). Understanding families in India: A reflection of societal changes. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 17(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722001000200010
56.
TomaselloM, CarpenterM., CallJ., behneT., & MollH. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioural and Brain Science, 28, 675–735.
57.
TrawickM. (1990). Notes on love in a Tamil family. University of California Press.
58.
TrawickM. (2003). The person beyond the family. In DasV. (Ed.), The Oxford India companion to sociology and social anthropology (pp. 1158–1178). Oxford University Press.
59.
TrevarthanC. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In BullowaM. (Ed.), Before speech: The begining of interpersonal communication (pp. 321–347). Cambridge University Press.
60.
TuliM., & KapoorS. (2008, July). Adults as parents: Exploring the dynamics of relationships in ubran Indian families. In ChaudharyN. (Ed.), Symposium organiser, ‘Families in culture: The dynamic organisation of a changing world’. International conference of the International Association for Cross-cultural Psychology, Bremen, Germany.
61.
UberoiP. (1993). Family, kinship and marriage in India. Oxford University Press.
62.
UberoiP. (2004). The family in India. In DasV. (Ed.), Handbook of India sociology (pp. 275–307). Oxford University Press.
63.
ValsinerJ. (2007). Culture in mind and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. SAGE Publications.
64.
VarmaS. (2017, July 5). ‘Supplemented nuclear families’ make 16% of Indian households. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supplemented-nuclear-families-make-16-of-indian-households/articleshow/59449874.cms
65.
WeisnerT. S. (2014). The socialization of trust: Plural caregiving and diverse pathways in human development across cultures. In OttoH., & KellerH. (Eds.), Different faces of attachment: Cultural variations on a universal human need (pp. 263–277). Cambridge University Press.
