The paper focuses on the constructions of the phrase—‘an ideal father’—by integrating findings from six different qualitative studies. Out of these six studies, five are from the city of Baroda while one is from Mumbai, both cities in western India. The total sample included 175 fathers, 50 mothers and 120 children. The studies used semi-structured interviews to elicit data from fathers and mothers about ‘who is an ideal father’? The study also sought children’s notions in the form of responses to open-ended statements. The data was analysed using themes from the generative-fathering framework (Dollahite, 2002; Dollahite and Hawkins, 1997). The results revealed that fathers were most influenced by their own parents in their ideals, followed by close relatives and other sources such as the media, mythology, friends and their respective spiritual gurus. The discussion focuses on understanding the results in terms of change and continuity in fatherhood ideals as well as the use of a generative framework for research on fatherhood.
AnandalakshmyS.BajajM. (1981). Childhood in the weavers’ community in Varanasi. Socialization for adult roles. In SinhaD. (Ed.), Socialization of the Indian child (pp. 3–39) New Delhi: Concept.
2.
ArendellT. (2000). Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1192–1207.
3.
BeardshawT. (2003). Involved responsible fatherhood and its potential impact on men, women, children and society. Draft position paper for the International Summit on Fatherhood, Oxford, United Kingdom, March.
4.
BharatS. (2002). Women, work and family in urban India: Towards new families? In BerryJ.W.MishraR.C.TripathiR.C. (Eds), Psychology in human and social development (pp. 155–169). New Delhi: SAGE.
5.
BhogleS. (1999). Gender roles: The construct in the Indian context. In SaraswathiT.S. (Ed.), Culture, socialization and human development: Theory research and applications in India (pp. 278–300). New Delhi: SAGE.
6.
BrothersonS.E.DollahiteD.C. (1997). Generative ingenuity in fatherwork with young children with special needs. In HawkinsA.J.DollahiteD.C. (Eds), Generative fathering (pp. 89–104). New Delhi: SAGE.
BrownJ.BarkerG. (2004). Global diversity and trends in patterns of fatherhood. Supporting Fathers: Contributions from the International Fatherhood Summit, Early Childhood Development: Practices and Reflections, No. 20 17–43 (Bernard van Leer Foundation).
9.
ChaturvediB. (2003). The householder, grihastha in the Mahabharata. In PernauM.AhmadI.ReifeldH. (Eds), Family and gender: Changing values in Germany and India (pp. 113–139). New Delhi: SAGE.
10.
ChristiansenS.L.PalkovitzR. (2001). Why the good provider role still matters. Providing as a form of paternal invovlement. Journal of Family Issues, 22(1), 84–106.
11.
DienhartA. (1998). Reshaping fatherhood: The social construction of shared parenting. New Delhi: SAGE.
12.
DollahiteD.C. (2002). Generative spirituality: A conceptual model of responsible religion and faithful family life. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the International Society for the Study of Behaviour and Development, Ottawa, Canada, August.
13.
DollahiteD.C.HawkinsA.J. (1997). Beyond the role-inadequacy perspective of fathering. In HawkinsA.J.DollahiteD.C. (Eds), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp. 3–16). New Delhi: SAGE.
14.
D’SouzaV. (2003). Societal development and the changing Indian Family. In BhattiR.VargheseM.RaghuramA. (Eds), Changing marital and family systems: Challenges to conventional models of mental health (pp. 46–65) Bangalore: National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences.
15.
GersonK. (1997). An institutional perspective on generative fathering: Creating social supports for parenting equity. In HawkinsA. J.DollahiteD. C. (Eds), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp. 17–34). New Delhi: SAGE.
16.
GoreM.S. (1968). Urbanization and family change in India. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
17.
GoreM.S. (2003). Keynote Address. In BhattiR.VargheseM.RaghuramA. (Eds), Changing marital and family systems: Challenges to conventional models of mental health, (pp. 1–6). Bangalore: National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences.
18.
GumzE.J.GubriumJ.F. (1972). Comparative parental perceptions of a mentally retarded child. American Journal of Mental Defeciency, 77, 175–180.
19.
HadadianA.MerblerJ. (1995). Fathers of young children with disabilities: How do they want to be involved?. Child & Youth Care Forum, 24(5), 327–338.
20.
HarknessS.SuperC.M. (1996). Introduction. In HarknessS.SuperC. M. (Eds), Parents’ cultural belief systems: Their origins, expression and consequences (pp. 1–23). New York: The Guilford Press.
21.
HaysS. (2001). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Connecticut: Yale University Press.
22.
HewlettB.S. (1987). Husband-wife reciprocity and the father-infant relationship among Aka pygmies. In HewlettB.S. (Ed.), Father-child relations: Cultural and biosocial contexts (pp.153–176). New York: de Gruyter.
KakarS. (1979). Setting the stage. The traditional Hindu view and the psychology of Erik H. Erikson. In KakarS. (Ed.), Identity and adulthood (pp. 3–12). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
25.
KakarS. (1981). The Inner world: A psychoanalytic study of childhood and society in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
26.
KaneP.V. (1974). History of Dharmasastra: Ancient and medieval religious and civil law (2nd edn, Vol. 2). Poona: Bhandarkar Institute Press.
27.
KapadiaK.M. (1958). Marriage and family in India. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
28.
KapoorS. (2000). The Hindus: Encyclopedia of Hinduism (Vol 2). New Delhi: Cosmo Publications.
29.
KatzM.M.KonnerM.J. (1981). The role of the father: An anthropological perspective. In LambM.E. (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 155–185). New York: Wiley.
30.
KrishnanL. (1998). Childrearing: The Indian perspective. In ShrivastavaA.K. (Ed.), Child development: The Indian perspective (pp. 25–55). New Delhi: NCERT Press.
31.
KumariA. (2008). Father involvement: As children view it. Unpublished Masters Dissertation, Department of Human Development and Family studies. Baroda: M.S. University of Baroda.
32.
LambM.LewisC. (2004). Fathers: The research perspective supporting fathers: Contributions from the International Fatherhood Summit, 2003. Early Childhood Development: Practices and Reflections, No. 20, 44–27. (Bernard van Leer Foundation).
33.
La RossaR. (1988). Fatherhood and social change. Family Relations, 37, 451–457.
34.
LewisC.O’BrienM. (1987). Reassessing fatherhood: New observations on fathers and the modern family (pp. 1–19). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
35.
MandelbaumD.G. (1972). Family and kinship relations. In MandelbaumD.G. (Ed.), Society in India: Continuity and change. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
MarsiglioW. (1995). Fatherhood: Contemporary theory, research and social policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
MattuS. (2001). Fathers’ beliefs and practices about fathering: A study of Gujarati Hindu nuclear families. Unpublished master’s thesis. Baroda: the Maharaja Sayajirao University.
38.
McNeillM.ChabassolD.J. (1984). Paternal involvement in the programs of hearing-impaired children: An exploratory study. Family Relations, 33(1), 119–125.
39.
MullatiL. (1993). Changing profile of the Indian family. In AtalY. (Ed.), Family in Asia, (pp. 75–157). Bangkok: UNESCO.
40.
NavalkarP.G. (2007). A descriptive study of the father role perceptions and involvement in families having a child with disability. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
41.
NsamenangB.A. (2000). Fathers, families and child well being in Cameroon: A review of literature. Philadelphia: National Centre for Fathers and Families.
42.
PelchatD.LefevbreH.PerreaultM. (2003). Differences and similarities between mother’s and father’s experiences of parenting a child with disability. Journal of Child Health Care, 7(4), 231–247.
43.
PhoenixA.WoolettA.Lloyd (Eds) (1991). Motherhood, meanings, practices and ideologies. London: SAGE.
44.
PruettK.D. (1987). The nurturing father: Journey toward the complete man. New York: Warner Books.
RamuG.N. (1987). Indian husbands: Their role perceptions and performance in single and dual-earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 903–915.
48.
RoopnarineJ.SuppalP. (2003). Kakar’s psychoanalytic interpretation of childhood: The need to emphasize the father and multiple caregivers in the socialization equation. In SharmaD. (Ed.), Childhood, family and socio-cultural change in India: Reinterpreting the inner world (pp. 115–137) New Delhi: Oxford.
49.
RoopnarineJ.L.LuM.W.AhmeduzzamanM. (1989). Parental reports of early patterns of caregiving play and discipline in India and Malaysia. Early Child Devlopment and Care, 50, 109–120.
50.
RoopnarineJ.L.TalukderE.JainD.JoshiP.SrivastavP. (1990). Characteristics of holding, patterns of play and social behaviors between parents and infants in New Delhi, India. Developmental Psychology, 26(4), 667–673.
51.
RossA.D. (1961). The Hindu family in its urban setting. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
52.
RossA.O. (1972). The exceptional child in the family. New York: Grune and Straton.
53.
RossJ.M. (1982). In search of fathering: A review. In CathS.H.GurwittA.R.RossJ.M. (Eds), Father and child development and clinical perspectives (pp. 21–33). Boston: Little Brown and Company.
54.
RussellG. (1987). Fatherhood in Australia. In LambM.E. (Ed.), The father’s role: Cross cultural perspectives (pp. 333–357). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
SandhuK. (2001). Demystifying fatherhood: Variations with ages of children. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Baroda: M.S. University.
56.
SaraffA.SrivastavaH.C. (2008). Envisioning fatherhood: Indian fathers’ perception of an ideal father. Population Review, 47(1), 45–59.
57.
SaraswathiT.S.PaiS. (1997). Socialization in the Indian context. In SinhaD.KaoH.S.R. (Eds), Asian perspectives on psychology. New Delhi: SAGE.
58.
SaraswathiT.S.GanapathyH. (2002). Indian parents’ethnotheories as reflections of the Hindu scheme of child and human development. In KellerH.PoortingaY.H.ScholmerichA. (Eds), Between culture and biology. Perspectives on ontogenetic development (pp. 79–88). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SarinM. (2007). Masculinity, A cultural developmental perspective from contemporary psychoanalysis. The Journal, IX(2), 25–39.
60.
ShrinivasanA.V. (2000). Principles of Hinduism. Lecture delivered after Shivaratri Puja at Smith College, North Hampton (4March). Retrieved from the A.V. Shrinivasan Web site: http://www.avsrinivasan.com/epics/principles.html (accessed on 20 April 2002)
61.
ShuklaA. (1998). Father’s role in child care: Knowledge, beliefs and practices. Unpublished master’s thesis. Baroda: T.M.S. University.
62.
SinhaD. (2003). Some changes in the Indian family in the context of development and the psychological implications. In BhattiR.S.VargheseM.RaguramA. (Eds), Changing family and marital systems challenges to conventional models in mental health (pp. 1–6). Bangalore: NIMHANS Publication.
63.
SinhaR. (1993). Dynamics of change in modern Hindu family. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Co.
64.
SnareyJ. (1993). How fathers care for the next generation: A four decade study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65.
SonparS. (2007). Reframing masculinities: Narrating the supportive practices of men (book review), The Journal, IX(2), 68–69.
66.
SriramR. (2003). Subjective experiences of fatherhood and motherhood: Realities and reflections. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Human Development and Family studies. Baroda: M.S. University.
67.
SriramR.GanapathyH. (1997). The unresolved dilemma. Childcare options in agricultural contexts. Economic and Political Weekly, 32(43), 63–72.
68.
SriramR.KarnikR.AliR. (2002). Social construction of fatherhood and motherhood: A view from within families. [Mimeo]. Baroda: Women’s Studies Research Centre, M.S. University.
69.
SriramR.KrishnaA. (2000). Demystifying fatherhood in Indian context. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behaviour and Development, Beijing, China, July.
70.
WetherellM. (1995). Social structure ideology and family dynamics: The case of parenting. In MuniceJ.WetherellM.DallosR.CochraneA. (Eds), Understanding the family (pp. 214–253). New Delhi: SAGE.
71.
WoodwardK. (1997). Motherhood: Identities, meanings and myths. In WoodwardK. (Ed.), Identity and difference (pp. 239–297). New Delhi: SAGE.
72.
YoungD.M.RoopnarineJ.L. (1994). Fathers’ childcare involvement with children with and without disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 488–502.
