This study examines the associations between organisational culture (OC), corporate entrepreneurship (CE) and business performance, considering organisational agility as a moderating variable. Drawing on the resource-based view and dynamic capabilities theory, we hypothesised that both OC and CE significantly contribute to business performance, and that organisational agility enhances these effects. Data were collected from 310 mid-sized firm managers across technology, manufacturing and service sectors using a structured questionnaire. Structural equation modelling via SmartPLS revealed that both OC and CE showed significant positive relationships with business performance. Moreover, organisational agility positively moderated the CE–business performance link. These findings offer theoretical contributions to the strategic management and entrepreneurship literature and practical implications for firms seeking sustained performance in dynamic markets.
AbdellahA. O., AbdelkarimA., HijaziM. E., & ElktiriL. (2025). The role of organizational culture in driving managerial innovation: Evidence from Moroccan startups. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00551-3
2.
Accenture. (2025). Accenture technology vision 2025: New age of AI to bring unprecedented autonomy to business.
3.
AkkocaY. (2025). The moderating role of organizational agility in the relationship between environmental uncertainty and organizational trust. International Journal of Economics and Innovation, 11(2), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1698307
4.
Al-HusseiniS., & ElbeltagiI. (2018). The role of knowledge sharing in enhancing innovation: A comparative study of public and private higher education institutions in Iraq. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1227862
5.
ArmstrongJ. S., & OvertonT. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400318
6.
BarneyJ. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306261
7.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1) 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
8.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
9.
BeckerT. E., AtincG., BreaughJ. A., CarlsonK. D., EdwardsJ. R., & SpectorP. E. (2016). Statistical control in correlational studies: 10 essential recommendations for organizational researchers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2053
10.
BekosG. S., JaakkolaM., & ChariS. (2025). Organizational agility and firm performance: The role of architectural marketing capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 125, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.01.005
11.
ÇağaM., KitapçıH., GökM. Ş., & CiğerimE. (2024). The mediating effect of entrepreneurial team behavior and transformational leadership in the relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance. Sustainability, 16(13), 5443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135443
12.
CameronK. S., & QuinnR. E. (2006). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework(Revised ed.). Jossey-Bass.
13.
CameronK. S., & QuinnR. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework(3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
14.
ChinW. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In MarcoulidesG. A. (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences(2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
CovinJ. G., & SlevinD. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
17.
CovinJ. G., & SlevinD. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25.
18.
Deloitte. (2024). Global human capital trends: Culture in the workplace. Deloitte Insights.
19.
DenisonD. R., & MishraA. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.204
20.
DenisonD. R., HaalandS., & GoelzerP. (2004). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness: Is Asia different from the rest of the world? Organizational Dynamics, 33(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2003.11.008
21.
DessG. G., & RobinsonR. B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050306
22.
DozY. L., & KosonenM. (2008). The dynamics of strategic agility: Nokia’s rollercoaster experience. California Management Review, 50(3), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166447
23.
DozY. L., & KosonenM. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006
24.
EisenhardtK. M., & MartinJ. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
25.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
26.
Gartner. (2023). The CIO agenda: Master agility, risk and tenacity.
27.
GeisserS. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
28.
GerlichC., KanbachD. T., & KrausS. (2025). Sustainable corporate entrepreneurship as a catalyst for sustainability: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 29(2/3), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503241307138
29.
González-RodríguezM. R., Díaz-FernándezM. C., & PawlakM. (2019). Cultural orientations and organizational performance in Spanish family firms: The mediating role of innovation. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.04.002
30.
González-TejeroC. B., & MolinaC. M. (2022). Training, corporate culture and organizational work models for the development of corporate entrepreneurship in SMEs. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(6), 960–981. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-12-2021-0178
31.
HairJ. F., HultG. T. M., RingleC., & SarstedtM. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)(3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
32.
HamelG., & PrahaladC. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Harvard Business School Press.
33.
HartnellC. A., KinickiA. J., LambertL. S., FugateM., & Doyle CornerP. (2019). Do similarities or differences between CEO leadership and organizational culture have a more positive effect on firm performance? A test of competing predictions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(8), 1063–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000395
34.
HenselerJ., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
35.
IrelandR. D., CovinJ. G., & KuratkoD. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Strategic Direction, 25(4), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00279.x
36.
Iskamto. (2023). Organizational culture and its impact on employee performance. Migration Letters, 16(1), 1–10.
37.
KockN. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2015100101
38.
KotterJ. P., & HeskettJ. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. Free Press.
39.
KuratkoD. F. (2009). Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, and practice(8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
40.
LumpkinG. T., & DessG. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
41.
McKinsey & Company. (2024). Adopting AI at speed and scale: The 4IR push to stay competitive. McKinsey & Company Insights.
42.
MillerD. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
43.
OuzkýS., & MachekO. (2024). Family firm performance: The effects of organizational culture and organizational social capital. Journal of Family Business Management, 14(2), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-06-2023-0089
44.
OverbyE., BharadwajA., & SambamurthyV. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600
45.
PetersT. J., & WatermanR. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. Harper & Row.
46.
PwC. (2023). Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise.
47.
RauchA., WiklundJ., LumpkinG. T., & FreseM. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x
48.
RobertsN., & GroverV. (2012). Investigating firm’s customer agility and firm performance: The importance of aligning sense and respond capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 65(5), 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.009
49.
Rodríguez-PeñaA. (2023). Corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance relationship under the moderating effect of environmental dynamism: Replication and extension analysis. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 21(4), 550–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-023-00338-1
50.
SaddamH. E. J., HamatiM. Y. N., & AlshahraniA. T. H. (2023). Moderating role of organizational culture between transformational leadership and organizational performance in SMEs. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 26(3), 1–13.
51.
ScheinE. H. (2010). Organisational culture and leadership(4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
52.
SherehiyB., & KarwowskiW. (2014). The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(3), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.002
53.
StoneM. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
54.
TallonP. P., QueirozM., ColtmanT., & SharmaR. (2019). Information technology and the search for organizational agility: A systematic review with future research possibilities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.12.002
55.
TeeceD. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
56.
TeeceD. J., PeterafM. A., & LeihS. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2771245
VenkatramanN., & RamanujamV. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283976
59.
WiklundJ., & ShepherdD. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001
60.
World Economic Forum. (2023). Annual report 2022–2023.
61.
ZahraS. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(91)90019-A
62.
ZahraS. A., & CovinJ. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship–performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E
63.
ZahraS. A., & GarvisD. M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00036-1
64.
ZebuaM. A., SiahaanH. S., & SinagaM. (2024). Impact of dimensions of organisational culture on job performance and satisfaction level of employees. IIMB Management Review, 36(3), 230–238.
