This commentary investigates how small- and mid-sized municipalities prioritise smart development themes and evaluate their readiness to implement related projects in response to the European Green Deal and the Just Transition Fund. Drawing on a two-wave survey conducted in 2021 and 2023 in the Ústí Region of the Czech Republic, the analysis examines changes in local priorities and project preparedness using a stakeholder analysis and structured questionnaires. The findings reveal a growing emphasis on renewable energy, digitalisation, and brownfield regeneration, alongside a gradual but limited increase in project readiness. Smaller municipalities, while increasingly aware of the importance of smart development, continue to face substantial barriers, including constrained financial resources and a lack of technical expertise. Although the commentary is regionally focused, its longitudinal approach offers valuable insights into governance adaptations in structurally disadvantaged areas of Europe. The results underline the reliance of small municipalities on tailored funding mechanisms to develop the capacities needed to meet European Union (EU) sustainability goals.
AinaYAbubakarIAlmulhimADanoULMaghsoodi TilakiMJDawoodSRS (2023) Digitalization and smartification of urban services to enhance urban resilience in the post-pandemic era: the case of the Pilgrimage city of Makkah. Smart Cities6(4): 1973–1995.
2.
AntonTTruppAStephensonMChongK (2023) The Technology Adoption Model Canvas (TAMC): a smart framework to guide the advancement of microbusinesses in emerging economies. Smart Cities6(6): 3297–3318.
3.
BakošENěmecDHrůzaFMixT (2020) Emerging topics on inter-municipal cooperation in the Czech Republic: policy networking, regionalization and financial indicators. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government18(3): 579–602.
4.
BaldiGMegaroACarrubboL (2023) Small-town citizens’ technology acceptance of smart and sustainable city development. Sustainability15(1): 325.
5.
BarnsSCosgraveEAcutoMMcNeillD (2017) Digital infrastructures and urban governance. Urban Policy and Research35(1): 20–31.
6.
BellSBenattiFEdwardsNLaneyRMorseDRPiccoloL, et al. (2018) Smart cities and M3: rapid research, meaningful metrics and co-design. Systemic Practice and Action Research31(1): 27–53.
7.
BenedekJSebestyénTTBartókB (2018) Evaluation of renewable energy sources in peripheral areas and renewable energy-based rural development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews90: 516–535.
DomínMHlaváčekP (2020) Evaluation of the benefits of LAG for the formation of reimage of municipalities in coal regions. In: ČernohorskáLKopáčkováH (eds) Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific Conference Public Administration 2020: Three Decades of Challenges, Reforms, and Uncertain Results. Pardubice: University of Pardubice, pp. 31–42.
11.
European Commission (2019) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: the European Green Deal. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:640:FIN (accessed 24 September 2024).
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2021a) Regulation (EU) 2021/1056 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 Establishing the Just Transition Fund. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union, pp. 2311–2320.
FeltUSepehrP (2024) Infrastructuring citizenry in Smart City Vienna: investigating participatory smartification between policy and practice. Journal of Responsible Innovation11(1): 1–22.
18.
GustafssonSMignonI (2020) Municipalities as intermediaries for the design and local implementation of climate visions. European Planning Studies28(6): 1161–1182.
19.
HlaváčekPKopáčekMKopáčkováLHruškaV (2023a) Barriers for and standpoints of key actors in the implementation of smart village projects as a tool for the development of rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies103: 103098.
20.
HlaváčekPMataMZdražilP (2023b) Differentiation of developmental priorities of different-sized municipalities in the period of acceleration of developmental changes – an example of a mining region. Geoscape17(2): 195–205.
21.
HoltmeyerMLWangSAxelbaumRL (2013) Considerations for decision-making on distributed power generation in rural areas. Energy Policy63: 708–715.
22.
HoppeTvan BuerenE (2015) Guest editorial: governing the challenges of climate change and energy transition in cities. Energy, Sustainability and Society5(1): 19.
23.
HornekJJüptnerP (2020) Endangered municipalities? Case study of three small and critically indebted Czech municipalities. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy13(1): 35–59.
LindahTSöderqvistT (2004) Building a catchment-based environmental programme: a stakeholder analysis of wetland creation in Scania, Sweden. Regional Environmental Change4(2): 132–144.
26.
LoewenB (2022) Coal, green growth and crises: exploring three European Union policy responses to regional energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science93: 102849.
27.
McDonnellJ (2020) Municipality size, political efficacy and political participation: a systematic review. Local Government Studies46(3): 331–350.
28.
MashauNLKroezeJHHowardGR (2022) Key factors for assessing small and rural municipalities’ readiness for smart city implementation. Smart Cities5(4): 1742–1751.
29.
NikolaevaA (2024) Smart cities and (smart) cycling: exploring the synergies in Copenhagen and Amsterdam. Journal of Urban Technology31(1): 29–49.
30.
NochtaTWahbyNSchoolingJ (2021) Knowledge politics in the smart city: a case study of strategic urban planning in Cambridge, UK. Data & Policy3: e31.
31.
SchiavoneFAppioFMoraLRisitanoM (2020) The strategic, organizational, and entrepreneurial evolution of smart cities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal16(4): 1155–1165.
32.
SestinoASestinoMIrgangLGuidoG (2023) Sustainable smart mobility and intelligent transport systems as enabling factors of smart city transition oriented digital transition strategies: evidences from Italy. Electronic Journal of Management1: 1–21.
33.
SmékalováLKučeraF (2020) Smart city projects in the small-sized municipalities: contribution of the cohesion policy. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration28(2): 1–8.
34.
SuzukiKHaH (2018) Municipal merger and local democracy: an assessment of the merger of Japanese municipalities. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government16(4): 759–784.
