The role of civil society in enhancing the quality of democracy has become institutionalised within many developed states. However, within states where programmes of regionalisation, federalisation or devolution are being implemented, how does an already institutionalised civil society respond to new arrangements of governance? This paper demonstrates that the historical institutional and organisational civil society context of newly devolving or regionalising areas inhibits the growth of strong civil society in those areas. It detects a limiting effect on the development of effective policy-making and scrutiny functions, and a prolonged period of time taken to develop effective civil society mechanisms at a territorial level. It concludes that civil society development in developed, regionalising contexts is vulnerable to strong, centralised institutions, and that a lack of civil society organisational engagement to the regionalisation of government ultimately fosters a weakness in the resulting regional civil society.
AlcockP (2012) New Policy Spaces: The Impact of Devolution on Third Sector Policy in the UK. Social Policy & Administration46(2): 219–238.
2.
AnheierH (2000) Managing non-profit organisations: towards a new approach. Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics and Political Science.
3.
AnheierHKendallJCarlsonL (2001) Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads: An International Non-profit Analysis. KH. A.AnheierH. (eds). United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, Inc.
4.
AnheierHKSiebelW (2001) The Nonprofit Sector in Germany: Between State, Economy, and Society. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
5.
AratoA (1994) Civil Society and Political Theory. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
6.
ArchambaultE (1990) Public authorities and the nonprofit sector in France. In: AnheierH (ed.) The Third sector: comparative studies of nonprofit organizations. Germany: Walter de Gruyter & Co, pp. 293–302.
7.
ArmstrongK (2006) Inclusive governance? Civil society and the open method of co-ordination. In: SmismansS (ed.) Civil society and legitimate European Governance. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Elgar, Edward Publishing, Inc., pp. 42–67.
8.
BergerPLuckmannT (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Sociological Review32(1). DOI: 10.2307/2091739.
9.
BernhardM (1993) Civil society and democratic transition in East Central Europe. Political Science Quarterly108(2): 307–326.
10.
BristowGEntwistleTHinesFMartinS (2008) New spaces for inclusion? Lessons from the ‘Three-Thirds’ partnerships in Wales. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32(4): 903–921.
11.
ChaneyPFevreR (2001) Inclusive governance and ‘Minority’ groups: The role of the third sector in Wales. Voluntas: International Journal of Third Sector Research12(2): 131–156.
12.
ChaneyPMackayFMcAllisterL (2007) Women, Politics and Constitutional Change: The First Years of the National Assembly for Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
13.
CheshireP (1995) A new phase of urban development in Western Europe? The evidence for the 1980s. Urban Studies32(7): 1045–1063.
14.
ChristodoulidisE (2003) Constitutional irresolution: Law and the framing of civil society. European Law Journal9(4): 401–432.
15.
CohenJLAratoA (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16.
ColeA (2004) Devolution and decentralization in Wales and Brittany: A framework for evaluation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(2): 354–368.
17.
CoxRW (1999) Civil society at the turn of the millennium: prospects for an alternative world order. Review of International Studies25(1): 3–28.
18.
CurticeJ (2006) A stronger or weaker union? Public reactions to asymmetric devolution in the United Kingdom. Publius: The Journal of Federalism36(1): 95–113.
19.
DagninoE (2011) Civil Society in Latin America. In: MichaelE (ed.) The Oxford handbook of civil society. United States: Oxford University Press Inc, pp. 122–133.
20.
DayG (2006) Chasing the dragon? Devolution and the ambiguities of civil society in Wales. Critical Social Policy26(3): 642–655.
21.
DiMaggioPPowellW (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160.
22.
Du GayP (2000) In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber-Organization-Ethics. London: SAGE.
23.
EikenberryAMKluverJD (2004) The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk?Public Administration Review64(2): 132–140.
24.
EtzioniA (1993) The Spirit of Community: The Reinvention of American Society. New York: Touchstone Books.
25.
FowlerA (2011) ‘Development NGO’s’. In: MichaelE (ed.) The Oxford handbook of civil society. United States: Oxford University Press Inc, pp. 42–54.
26.
FoxJ (2000) Civil Society and Political Accountability: Propositions for Discussion. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame.
27.
FukuyamaF (2001) Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly22(1): 7–20.
GlennJK (2003) Framing Democracy: Civil Society and Civic Movements in Eastern Europe. Stanford California; Stanford University Press.
30.
GramsciA (2009) State and civil society. In: SharmaAGuptaA (eds) The Anthropology of the State: A Reader. Malden Massachussets: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 71–85.
31.
HabermasJ (1996) Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32.
HadeniusAUgglaF (1996) Making civil society work, promoting democratic development: what can states and donors do?World Development24(10): 1621–1639.
33.
HinichMJMungerMC (1993) Political ideology, communication, and community. Political Economy: Institutions, Competition, and Representation. pp. 25–50.
34.
HodgsonL (2004) Manufactured civil society: counting the cost. Critical Social Policy24(2): 139–164.
35.
HowardMM (2003) The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
HughesE (1937) ‘Institutional Office and the Person’. American Journal of Sociology43(3): 404–413.
37.
JonesJBKeatingM (eds) (1995) The European Union and the Regions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
JonesRWScullyR (2006) Devolution and electoral politics in Scotland and Wales. Publius: The Journal of Federalism36(1): 115–134.
39.
KeatingM (2001) Rethinking the region culture, institutions and economic development in Catalonia and Galicia. European Urban and Regional Studies8(3): 217–234.
40.
KendallJKnappMRJ (1996) The voluntary sector in the UK. Manchester: Manchester University Press
41.
KersbergenKVVerbeekB (1994) The politics of subsidiarity in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies32(2): 215–236.
42.
MacCormickN (1997) Democracy, subsidiarity, and citizenship in the ‘European Commonwealth’. Law and Philosophy16(4): 331–356.
43.
MeyerJRowanB (1977) Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–363.
44.
MohanG (2002) The disappointments of civil society: the politics of NGO intervention in northern Ghana. Political Geography21(1): 125–154.
45.
MorganKReesG (2001) Chapter 6. Learning by doing: devolution and the governance of economic development in Wales. In: ChaneyPHallTPithouseA (eds) New Governance: New Democracy?Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp. 126–171.
46.
NorthDC (1981) Structure and Change in Economic History. Politics & Society11(4): 511–512
47.
NorthDC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
OsborneSP (2002) Voluntary Organizations and Innovation in Public Services. London: Routledge.
49.
ParsonsW (1995) Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
50.
PutnamR (1993) Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
52.
RollerESloatA (2002) The impact of Europeanisation on regional governance: A study of Catalonia and Scotland. Public Policy and Administration17(2): 68–86.
53.
RosenblumNLLeschCHT (2011) ‘Civil Society and Government’, in MichaelE. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of civil society. United States: Oxford University Press Inc, pp. 285–297.
54.
RoylesE (2006) Civil society and the new democracy in post-devolution wales—A case study of the EU structural funds. Regional & Federal Studies, 16(2), 137–156.
55.
RumbulR (2012) The scrutiny capacity of civil society in Wales. In: OsmondJUptonS (eds) A Stable, Sustainable Settlement for Wales. Cardiff: UK’s Changing Union Project, pp. 136–144
56.
RumbulR (2013) Structurally excluded? Structural embeddedness and civil society competition for funding. Journal of Civil Society9(4): 341–360.
57.
ScholteJA (2002) Civil society and democracy in global governance. Global Governance8(3): 281.
58.
ScottR (1987) The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly32(4): 493–511.
59.
ScottAPetersonJMillarD (1994) Subsidiarity: a ‘Europe of the Regions’ v. the British Constitution?JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies32(1): 47–67.
60.
SelznickP (1996) ‘Institutionalism “Old” and “New”’. Administrative Science Quarterly41(2): 270–277.
61.
SmismansS (ed.) (2006) Civil Society and Legitimate European Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
62.
SpickerP (1991) The principle of subsidiarity and the social policy of the European Community. Journal of European Social Policy1(1): 3–14.
63.
TaylorMWarburtonD (2003) Legitimacy and the role of UK third sector organizations in the policy process. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations14(3): 321–338.
64.
WhiteG (1994) Civil society, democratization and development (I): Clearing the analytical ground. Democratization1(2): 375–390.
65.
JonesRWScullyR (2011) Wales Says Yes: Devolution and the 2011 Welsh Referendum. United Kingdom: University of Wales Press.
66.
ZuckerLG (1987) Institutional Theories Of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology13(1): 443–464.
